Upon Review, I am raising PBS Grade to a Solid B

If you are following along from home, you know that some months ago PBS and Doug Bock Clark et. al. sought and received my cooperation for that long-sought investigative piece the nation needed to avoid a civil war (or so I was told). Thinking this a worthy goal I turned aside many other journalists’ overtures so as to bring them up to speed carefully, painstakingly, to go where no other journalists had gone before, to learn the intricacies of this questions and that, as they combed through the events of those fateful 65 days from Tuesday, November 3, 2020, until Thursday, January 7, 2021). And after months of cooperation from me, they then delivered …. a superficial rehash of all the reporting that came before them for a year. Really. It was a feat remarkable in some ways, given the volume of evidence that has come out confirming that Election 2020 was a junk election (mountains of which are rehearsed in the two links below), and even since the release of the PBS piece two weeks ago (e.g., see yesterday’s letter from AZ AG Brnovich).

It was a rather blunt but remarkable strategy: a couple weeks before publication Doug Bock Clark let me know that Pro Publica and he had decided to handle this entire mountain of evidence by pretending it did not exist. He did not utter it, but he said it, and so confident was I that I had read him correctly that I decided to publish my review of his work before he even published:

I awarded PBS a somewhat stronger better grade, B-, for several reasons. First, one cannot fault their production quality. Second, they actually made some pretense of feeling an obligation of intellectual honesty (whereas Doug Block Clark simply refused to defend his and Pro Publica’s editorial decision that while judging whether or not we of the Election Integrity movement are correct, one must refuse to consider any evidence that has arisen after a date drawn on December 5, 2021, apparently arbitrarily). PBS got a better grade (B-) than Pro Publica (C-) for those two reasons.

Yet I watched the PBS show again. Again I chuckled at the spooky music playing as their investigation seeks to locate the mystery man behind it all, who turns out to be….. the guy who has been on television since November 5, 2020 saying it, the guy who by January 30, 2020 wrote a book about it, the guy who made a movie about it, the guy who started The America Project about it, the guy who helped launch the national “ReAwaken America” tour and speaks at almost all of them… that is the “mystery” guy behind it all (per the deep investigation of PBS). However, upon second viewing I recognize that PBS did, in their own tiny way, keep three commitments they made to me. And as the adage goes, “Praise publicly, criticize privately”.

So here goes:

  • “Open the ballot boxes in six places” – I pointed out to PBS (as I did to many a journalist before them) that we are not debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin: we are debating something that could be resolved in about a week by “opening the ballot boxes” in six counties. Check the routers and hard drives, Cast Vote Records, etc. It could all be done in a week, as I repeatedly point out to journalists, none of whom have previously been willing to convey that simple and obvious point. However, in the PBS show, they introduced me sitting with General Flynn and Joe Flynn on an Alex Jones show, and the snippet that is playing is, in fact, the snippet where I am making precisely that point to Alex Jones. I assume they did that to get it by the censors, and I commend them on fulfilling that promise.
  • They use my terminology regarding the “pro-freedom movement”. Again, that took courage, and no doubt was the subject of lengthy board-level discussions at PBS.
  • In discussing the events at Lin Wood’s home (“Tomotley”) PBS included my rejection of the claim that there was any “multipart organized plan” cooked up there. Again, such minimal integrity is more than I expect out of most journalists these days, so I must compliment PBS on the point.

So as they say in the NFL, “Upon further review….” I feel obliged to raise PBS’s grade to a solid B.

  1. Patrick,what are your thoughts on having any chance for election integrity for 2022?Is it hopeless?

    At this point,I don’t see how anyone can trust any voting system unless voters receive a receipt for their votes with a unique serial number for each ballot in which every citizen can verify their vote was counted accurately.

    Also,it still seems to me the solution would be a voting system that perhaps had both an electronic,blockchain vote AND a paper vote cast simultaneously in which the electronic ballots and paper ballots were counted separately to expose any discrepancies / fraud, in addition to voting receipts that a company like Voatz provides.

    Unfortunately,I doubt that more than 1% of the politicians that are currently elected have any interest in fair,accurate,transparent elections.

    I think any sane person should by now realize that both parties are corrupt to the core and I don’t think a new party would solve anything and would just have the same corruption problems.

    Although I did not vote for Biden or Trump in 2020,I am at least encouraged that most Trump voters support basic freedoms and would support election integrity in contrast to Biden voters who just seem to me like completely brainwashed cult members of the DNC.
    Of course,I am simply basing this view on the Trump and Biden voters among the family and friends I talk to,some of which there is no longer any point talking to at all about most topics until one of us has an epiphany 🙂

    How can anyone with honesty and integrity be elected to any office without accurate,transparent elections in which voters can verify their votes were counted accurately?

    I still think the best way to vote currently is with your wallet and attention by boycotting companies like twitter,google, facebook,apple,netflix,amazon.microsoft,CNN,MSNBC,MSM & others (including not owning their stocks) to counter their censorship and corruption.
    That is simply the best idea I can think of to IMMEDIATELY counter corruption and censorship in a peaceful,productive way.


    1. I will continue voting regardless of the corrupt system because it only takes 10-20 minutes to vote and I think not voting is the ABSOLUTE WRONG IDEA to counter election corruption.
      No sense in making it easier for corrupt politicians and their cronies when voting does not take much time for the vast majority of voters.

      In the meantime,please consider voting with your wallet and attention as I described above.
      Money talks,and it can be used for good in contrast to all the bad things it is also used for.

      If you consider yourself pro-truth & pro-freedom,then what point is there in complaining about censorship and corruption if you are unwilling to take and promote simple,peaceful actions to counter censorship and corruption?
      Considering those who have fought and died for freedom worldwide,I think that is the least one can do.

    2. I hope that anyone reading this would consider the importance of having a specific policy platform for We The People to promote and rally behind ASAP.

      Consider the ridiculous amounts of time and money wasted on failed election campaigns when any time or money you spend supporting and promoting a policy platform can live on past any particular individual campaign and continue to gain support and provide a clear path for people to unite behind principles and become a force for positive change worldwide.In addition,when supporting and promoting a clearly stated policy platform one knows specifically what and why they are supporting it which therefore is likely to fortify the purpose and morale of those who support it.

      TruthFreedomPeace Platform:

      Imagine there was someone running for President and Congress in your state that supported the following policy platform:

      1)Adopting an accurate,fair and transparent voting system, one where any citizen can verify their vote was counted accurately with a receipt.

      2)Replacing the income tax with Fair Tax or National Sales Tax or nothing

      3)Securing the border(Land,Air,Sea)

      4)Ending the phony war on drugs, which currently causes more crime,death,murder,gang violence,incarcerations and enriches criminals while millions of people still use illegal drugs anyway.

      5)Support IMMEDIATE pardons for Julian Assange,Edward Snowden , non-violent Vaccine mandate protesters and election fraud protesters & other

      6)Making generic drugs like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine available over the counter without prescription.

      7)NO vaccine mandates

      8)Sound money $

      9) Request that all people in all states hold a vote regarding the issue of abortion.

      Remind everyone that many people object to abortion because a fetus is a human being and they object to them being killed in the womb for the same reason they object to that same human being being killed after they are delivered from their mother’s womb.
      Ask everyone to please stop killing innocent human beings in the womb.

      10)A new foreign policy where rather than military occupation in foreign lands, We The People worldwide unite behind and promote the principles of truth/freedom/goodwill/integrity/humility/Non-Aggression Principle/Golden Rule and focus on winning hearts and minds.
      A worldwide effort to voluntarily help others in the hope that it will win over more people to these principles.

      Would you vote for such a person?I am not running for any office and I do not ask anyone for money.

      The point is, achieving real change will probably require that people start making demands for the support of a list of policies that ANY POLITICIAN INCLUDING TRUMP need to endorse and publicly advocate for in order to earn the vote of the people.

      Please let any candidate that you are considering supporting know what policies are important to you and demand specifics for them to earn your vote.

      And of course it would also require making sure elected officials back up words with action after stating support for certain policies.

      This is why I believe supporting , promoting and rallying behind a platform of policies is MUCH more important right now than promoting individual politicians and their vague claims of “vote for me and I’ll make things better”.

      I would support an individual politician when they endorse and publicly advocate for a platform similar to the one above.

      Keep in mind that a platform like this could even become popular in countries worldwide because of the internet and I believe that many people throughout the world would support a platform like this.

      The keyboard is mightier than the sword.

      Below is the link to share this platform,if you agree.Thank You.


  2. today is 4/10/22. 1 year ago was the Las Vegas event in the lobby of the Ahern Hotel. You took a photo that I am unable to drag over here. I am holding up the pole wearing blue, behind the pot belly guy. I ran away after I was squinting at the data on your phone. I was going to ask Navarro report? but you scared me & I ran away. Different reason than Tore though. LOL

    1. If all the mule evidence is true, and all this is true, why hasn’t law enforcement done anything with it. Not all counties where this supposed mule ballot fraud occured have corrupt law enforcement. If your proof is true and law enforcement isn’t acting, why aren’t the litigation happy lawyers with the America Project suing those law enforcement entities for failure to investigate with Donald Trump or some other harmed down ballot politician as the Plaintiff? That is an actionable case. It seems thia ia all show otherwise the America Project would be taking real action to get real results like suing for failure to investigate if they are refusing to look at your real evidence and rigged elections are so-called stealing those seats from those candidates. Why is it just all talk and no action? It looks like a bunch of lies and nonsense otherwise.

  3. The only way to save democracy is to CHARGE something like $54.00 to vote. Only after spending at least $540.00 do you get to vote for free.

  4. Ya I’m done voting. Waste of time. I will raise my children to believe they have the right to vote, but I won’t lie to them and tell them it’s every Americans obligation like I was lied to…

  5. my dem ex-friend said of the AZ audit. So after they audit, we have a 3rd audit and so on??

    Republicans are actually pusseys. Very few have gone Moldova outside and Dr B inheirently doesn’t trust our ability to sniff out Antifa. He treats us like kids. I will definitely kill if it comes to it, but not for Byrne, rather Tore.

    1. Tore the fraudster? How many times are you going to be suckered by people using you for their purposes?
      By the way did you donate to the $100,000 for her to get a Tesla? And do you really believe the story that her last car was stolen because it had a Trump sticker?

      1. Oh, wow, and is that Mike Flynn cosying up to Tore the fraudster, on the fundraising page where she thanks her fans for giving her $100,000 for “a new car (and other things)”?

        Oh dear, I sure hope, for his sake, that she used his image without permission, like the time she kept using logos of the Bank of North Dakota or the city of Minot without permission, to dupe people into donating to what she told them was a registered charity!

        BTW, pretty clever of her to figure out that in the modern world, you don’t even have to set up an elaborate con anymore, you just ask idiots for money online, and they give it.

    1. Manchmal muss man im Leben Opfer für das größere Wohl bringen. Das ist die Lehre aus dem Leben Jesu.

    2. Upon a Google search of Patrick Byrne, Patrick’s Title is Chief Executive Officer of Afghanistan of Overstock…. strange….

      Here is what a search for Chief Executive Officer of Afghanistan gets you:

      The Chief Executive of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan was a position within the Government of Afghanistan that served as head of government of Afghanistan. The extra-constitutional post was created in September 2014 following the disputes that arose after the 2014 Afghan presidential election when both Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah claimed victory in that election. As part of a National Unity Agreement, it was agreed that Ashraf Ghani would assume the presidency and a new post of Chief Executive of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan would be created for Abdullah Abdullah.
      After his claim as president, disputed with Ghani, the post is currently not in use.

      “A Company only needs a President, a secretary, and a treasurer. All other positions are essentially made up.” – Elon Musk

      I would love to see how this all ends Patrick 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

Oh, so.... You're Saying We Were Right?

Next Article

The Halderman McGuffin Money-shot

Related Posts