Categorized | The Archive

    Keeping the Books from Being Burned

    Those who would hijack the legal institutions shielding society from Wall Street perfidy must also hijack the political institutions providing them oversight, and hijack the discourse about those legal and political institutions, and hijack the social institutions mediating that discourse. The capture must run deep to be stable. So deep, in fact, that records of the past become untrustworthy.

    The records of the past have in fact become untrustworthy. Stories have disappeared from databases and video clips from websites. It has happened as recently as this week: a clip to which “The Story of Deep Capture” linked as evidence stopped working. And just today has begun a new round of clogging the discourse regarding our claims (the simple difference between legal short-selling and illegal stock counterfeiting being too fine a distinction for almost any journalist to recognize when characterizing my position).

    This chapter is meant to remedy that situation. It will serve as an archive of material to which the rest of DeepCapture may link, with little editorial comment. Those who wish to take issue with DeepCapture’s archiving and deconstruction of their copyrighted articles and videos (and, perhaps, emails) know where to find us.

    This post was written by:

    - who has written 227 posts on Deep Capture.

    I am a concerned citizen who has been focused on systemic instability since 2004.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    • Latest
    • Comments
    • Tags
    • Subscribe

    Related Sites

    Message from

    At the time much of the content on was written, the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 was either on the verge of happening or had just occurred. In those days, emotions among this publication’s contributors were raw and, in an effort to get their warnings noticed and appropriate blame placed, occasionally hyperbolic language and shocking imagery were employed.

    Were we to write these entries today, a different tone would most certainly prevail.

    Yet, being a record of a pivotal time in our global economic history, we’ve decided to leave the rawness unedited, with the proviso that readers take the context of the creation of certain posts into account, and that those easily offended re-consider the decision to read them.