Political Campaigns and Overstock

We often receive political complaints at Overstock .  I am posting this so that in the future, when customer service agents get harangued by people angry about statements they believe are being made by our decision to advertise certain places or carry certain products or sell certain books, music, or magazines, those agents can just send a link to this post.

During the 2004 election, we created a book page with books by Hillary and Bill Clinton on one side, and two books by Dick Morris criticizing them on the other side. On the left, another book by James Carvel (as I recall). On the right, one by Ann Coulter. All images were of the same size, and there were an equal number of them on each side.

We were inundated with complaints from the Left and the Right about featuring books from the other side. Go figure.

We hear from from Family Values folks about the movies and music we sell (even though we actually are quite conservative, selling, for example, Playboy, but not the steamy stuff).

When we advertised on AirAmerica, we got flack for it.

A few weeks ago we heard from the Ron Paul folks protesting our advertising on Fox, given his exclusion from a debate they covered. I wrote a letter to our customers about it, saying that while I happen to support Paul personally, I was not going to change our TV advertising to punish Fox. Then we heard from people angry that I had mentioned that I personally support Ron Paul.

Last week we heard from the Family Values folks protesting the TV shows on which we advertise.

This week we are hearing about the Hillary Clinton Nutcracker on our site.

I respectfully suggest that people should remember, Different strokes for different folks. It is not up to us to make statements with what products we do or do not carry or where we advertise them.  Playboy is often our fastest selling magazine. The Hillary gadget was briefly one of our fastest selling items.  We have about 1 million products, and I’m not going to police American tastes, beyond not selling hardcore or kiddie porn (like some other etailers), and firearms and ammunition and such.

There was one exception: when Rush made fun of Michael J. Fox, we yanked our advertising.

This is going to be a long and exciting campaign. I don’t recall anything like it since 1980. I hope the citizenry gets through it as friends.

Most respectfully,

Patrick

  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Delicious
  • Reddit
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati Favorites
  • BibSonomy
  • Gmail
  • Bebo
  • Share/Bookmark

This post was written by:

Patrick Byrne - who has written 124 posts on Deep Capture: exposing the crime of naked short selling.

I am a concerned citizen who has spent three years trying to prevent a meltdown of our financial system.

Contact the author

30 Responses to “Political Campaigns and Overstock”

  1. Randy says:

    The fact that you have caven in to the HSUS about fur tells me a lot about your company. The HSUS is no longer a “pet” organization, but a radical animal rights organization that wants to see the end to all animal usage, period. It’s ridiculous, when you sell leather and hunting products, that you expect sportsman to buy from your company. I hope the word gets out, and soon.

  2. H says:

    After hearing about your company’s decision to no longer sell fur I have to say I am quite surprised a big operation such as Overstock would succumb to the pressures of the hypocritical and misinformed people of PETA. They consistently give out misinformation about the fur industry in terms of their policies and procedures. I know because I have done extensive research on this subject. I also happen to be an animal lover but can justify wearing fur as easily as I do for wearing leather or eating meat. So your website will no longer carry any leather or suede products as well then I assume. No you probably will continue to do that because you are just as hypocritical and ridiculous as PETA…who by the way has had executive members’ family treated for various diseases via ANIMAL research…funny huh? Well if it suits their needs I guess its ok….Anyway, I will no longer purchase anything from your website from now on and will hopefully spread the word so I can induce others to do the same.

  3. David R says:

    Like most companies you have your own set of morals and go with what you believe is right.

    But do you realise that sponsoring the apparently wholesome “8th Annual Say No to Drugs Race Holiday Classic” is not helping drug addicts so much as lining the coffers of the church of scientology? As Tom Cruise himself said, you’re either in it or your out of it. I’m out of it and so are many others. Looks like you must be in it. Sorry no fence to sit on with this one.

  4. David says:

    Apparently, you endorse attempting to treat addiction with massive overdoses of niacin.

    I can think of no other reason why you would support an event promoted for the purpose of pushing people towards Narconon treatment, a treatment a former US surgeon general as described as dangerous and not in accord with any sound medical practice.

    Narconon is NOT Narcotics Anonymous, or affiliated with it in any way. This is a common point of confusion. Narconon does not employ any medical professionals, and denies addicts receiving “treatment” from them any access to qualified mental health professionals.

    The “drug free marshals” program is closely associated with this fraud, and will be using the 5k in Los Angeles to distribute Narconon materials and to collect names and phone numbers for later contact.

    Narconon has never proven any success rate at all in any peer reviewed study.

    It’s possible that at the time you agreed to sponsor the “Say No to Drugs” Fun Run in Los Angeles, you didn’t realize that this was what you were supporting, but you have been made aware.

  5. One FORMER customer says:

    Thanks for telling me that you don’t give a damn.

    OVERSTOCK Customer Service:
    “We’d rather not listen to and consider your concerns about human rights abuses, blatant fraud, and suppression of free speech.
    Instead, here is a link to blog for you to read. Have a nice day!”

    This is a just a bad and lazy response to your customers concerns.

    For others reading:
    This is in response to Overstock.com’s sponsorship of a self-serving “charity event” called the “Say No to Drugs Race.”
    This is a Scientology public relations, recruitment, and fundraising effort which most experts will tell you is a scam and will not help anyone except the highest officers of Scientology.

    In my opinion, Overstock.com has been tricked, lied to, and scammed (or perhaps they are a willing collaborator in this fraud.)

    Scientology is a Dangerous Cult.

  6. Heather says:

    Then why not balance it with a positive Hillary toy, like my Hillary-in-the-box, that I just submitted to Overstock for consideration. :-)
    http://www.hillary-in-the-box.com

  7. Dee says:

    Dear Mr. Byrne,
    After reading an article in the Humane Society Legislative Fund. I would like to thank you, thanks for making a difference for speaking up for the animals. people need to be educated and aware of what is going on. breeding animals and the torturing them, and even skinned alive for their fur is just barbaric and sick .thank goodness for peta, HSUS,etc.. who do the undercover work to educate people

  8. Hey Folks,

    I’ll give a few responses.

    1) Animals – I found the HSUS-people quite reasonable, and not at all like PETA-people. I’m not anti-hunting myself. But the commercial fur industry is, in places, just a bit too whacked out for us to want to have any part of it. That’s not an extremist position.

    2) Scientology – No comment, other than, if anyone wants to tell me why this charity event in question was improper, or post a link to a credible criticism of its work, I’ll read it.

    3) Hillary – Yes Heather. I would happily consider any other positive Hillary item. I would also sell “Dick Cheney Brand Shotgun Shells” if someone would get around to inventing them. And if we did not have a policy against selling ammunition.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Patrick,

    I am here to give you links for your perusal on why the “church” of Scientology really is more of a pyramid scheme than a true organized religion.

    Get some popcorn. You’ll be reading for a while.

    Read this first: http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Scientology_cult_Clear_Expansion_Committee_documents

    Then this: http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Scientology_cult:_AOLA_tax_exemption_trick_for_Advanced_Org_members%2C_Nov_2008

    Enjoy your day, Patrick.

  10. Angela says:

    The Ron Paul thing was important because you have more power than we do, Patrick. You had the money – all we had were several million angry letters.

    It’s been almost a year, and I am still disappointed that you didn’t throw us a bone.

    Pulling the ads, if only for a few weeks, would have earned you immediate, albeit possibly short lived, legions of Ron Paul supporer shoppers.

    But it’s water under the bridge now. Good luck during the recession.

  11. anonymous says:

    Patrick there is a guy on the IV board wanting to contact you. Jan 7,2009

  12. Randy says:

    Patrick
    Being a businessman myself, I understand your noncommital answer. But, when we as businessmen decide to sponsor devisive and polarizing issues and speech we open ourselves up for public disagreement. The only form that we as consumers have is to: (1) let our feelings be known in the ballot box (2) let our feelings be known in the market place
    (3) let our feelings be known to the folks that sponsor the divisive and polarizing speech.

    When you sponsor\support Rush Limbaugh you align your company with such a figure representing a segment of society and culture that speaks only for the elite and out of touch Conservatives that aren’t your consumer base. In today’s political and financial world I would think that supporting a show or public forum that allows us to make positive steps forward would gain the company more market penetration than supporting such a negative show as Limbaugh’s. I suppose that you are saying in your response that you don’t care what Limbaugh says and stands for, you will continue to sponsor him anyway! So, you are also saying that you believed George Bush and Dick Cheney when they said that “if you aren’t for us then you are against us, so you support terrorism”! If that really is your position then you must really have your head in the sand. By not taking any stand, and continuing to stay in the middle you indirectly support the continuing polarization of the nation. So, also by staying in the middle, you must believe that the nation can tolerate the current Republican parties disintegration and with no action to correct the current direction, one could believe that by your lack of action that you support the Democratic successes. Taking no action to correct lies and distortions of the truth by Limbaugh in such a negative public forum has consequences that your company will must agree with.

    Good luck, Patrick

    Karma is a bitch!

  13. tmullins says:

    God bless America, we need to hope our future is better than the past. Our kids deserve better.

  14. George says:

    The facts are pretty simple here. Rush spreads hate, lies and fear. You sponsor his actions. That is a choice that you have made. You could spend your advertising dollars anywhere and you choose to support Rush. I have a choice as to with whom I will conduct business. I can spend my money anywhere. Do I want to spend my money with a company that supports someone who openly hopes Obama fails and that we fall into a major economic depression? No. Hence I choose to no longer do business with Overstock.com so long as you facilitate his actions. The irony is that if he succeeds, your company will likely go out of business. Smart move.

  15. I Was Blind But Now I See says:

    I’m sorry to see you give the HSUS any recognition or support. They are NOT about animal welfare. They are a cult which promotes Animal Rights. Their actual goal is to stop pet ownership/research/anything which has humans interacting with or using animals/animal products in any way. Wayne Pacell is PETA in a suit and tie and veganism is the cult’s dietary rule. Like PETA,they have killed more dogs than they have “rescued.”

  16. sherri says:

    You are choosing to spend your advertising dollars with a person who wants the country that you live and do business in to fail. I thinks your nuts!!! Greed is what caused the economic cluster f*#k. and stupidity will allow it to continue. SHAME ON YOU !!!!!!

  17. Kimberly says:

    George articulated perfectly what I came here to say. Just curious though….how long AFTER Rush made fun of a Parkinson’s patient did you decide to start advertising on his site again? How long did your righteous indignation last?

    I think a perusal of my account will indicate that for the past five years, I’ve done all my Christmas and birthday shopping on Overstock, and have made large purchases of furniture, etc. as well. Will Overstock go broke because they are losing my business? Most likely not. However, as word spreads of your support of the most hypocritical, hatemongering traitor imaginable, I hope you do feel it – right in your wallet.

  18. Jim says:

    your display and sale of items from both side (extremes) of the political spectrum is just fine and to be admired. On the other hand, your advertising with and apparent support of extremely one-sided hate speech on the Rush Limbaugh show is NOT balanced so don’t give us your spiel on that.

    I WILL boycott you in every way I can. I WILL tell others to do the same, until you return to a balanced marketing campaign. Rush Limbaugh is an insult to ‘thinking’ and ‘caring’ Americans. His despicable views are anti-american.

    SHAME ON YOU!

  19. Ron says:

    I have also ended shopping ($$$) with overstock because of their rush limbaugh ads.
    I don’t care about left or right politics as much as I do somebody that wants the president of our nation to fail.I wish I could return all the items I bought over the years and get my dollars back. Just the thought of those dollars going to that disgusting man makes me very angry. good-bye overstock, I thought I knew you well.

  20. Dorri says:

    As disgusting as it is for Rush Limbaugh to make fun Michael J Fox, I believe his racist remarks and undermining of the 1st Af Am president is far worse. He is using his hateful rhetoric to rile up the RW racists. Limbaugh is using abhorrent stereotypes and blatant lies which are not only revolting but dangerous. If you believe his actions do not warrant pulling your ads, then you will lose reasonable customers who do not want to support hateful and dangerous rhetoric.

    BTW, I have been an avid read of Deep Capture and applaud your exposure of the financial miscreants who have brought down so many good people. I don’t see how you can’t understand how types like Limbaugh are equally dangerous to society.

  21. Gigi says:

    It’s nice to know that Overstock is honest in it’s approval and support for the kind of extremist, hateful rhetoric spewed by Rush Limbaugh. It makes my shopping decisions (as in: where not to spend my money) so much easier. I wouldn’t spend another dime here any more than I would send a check to the KKK. Goodbye Overstock.

  22. Jack says:

    It’s good to know that you draw the line with Rush Limbaugh in his mockery of Mr. Fox’s disease. Could you please extend this outrage to his disrespect for those who have served in our military? He seems to think that he can impugn the patriotic character of those who have laid their lives on the line because they disagree with him.

    It is worth noting that Mr. Limbaugh has never served in the military.

    I will be happy to plan our family’s Christmas with your help, but in order to do that, I’m going to need a commitment on your part to our men and women in uniform.

    It’s only a few hours a week. You’ll hardly miss it. Mr. Limbaugh’s programmers, on the other hand, might just remind him that his enterprise is dependent on public relations, something the talk radio guru clearly needs improvement on.

    I will follow this matter with great interest, but if you wish to continue having my patronage, I must insist you stop funding Mr. Limbaugh’s excesses.

  23. Jack says:

    Patrick,

    It is worth adding that with as many people are on here complaining about Rush Limbaugh’s on-air excesses, you might consider just giving us what we want.

    Come on. It’ll make you feel good to cut the gasbag off. Think about it this way: if you and all of the other merchants that advertise on his show pulled your ads for good, the radio stations would have to put something new on–something that would cost you a lot less than you’re currently paying to advertise during his show.

    It’s not a hard decision. 3 million dittoheads will have a lot shorter memory than the tens of millions of us who will drive you out of business if you continue supporting this kind of show.

  24. oliver says:

    Sorry, Patrick.

    Don’t want any part of my dollar enabling fascist propagandists like those on Fox News.
    Shame.
    Loved overstock for xmas shopping
    and interesting products.
    Now we’re just saying, NO.

  25. John C says:

    I received the email form letter and then this link in response to my letter concerning your appearance on Glen Beck. I also strongly believe in the freedom of speech and also the freedom of the market place. You have mixed politics and business with the risk associated. I don’t buy your politics and I am not going to buy your products. Beck is a disgrace thats my free speech and your support by appearing on the show gives me much too insight into the politics of Overstock. Your appearance was overtly and I think disappointingly partisan to the extreme. Beck spouts and rants uncontested crap each night and tonight your support of it lost another customer, not because of your individual views but because of the obvious use of Overstock.com to give you personal credibility and status as an expert.

  26. Joyce N. says:

    I’m going to quit supporting your company because the network that you support has lead to violence and murder (Knoxville, Little Rock, George Tilley, Arizona to name a few) and it continues to incite people with its lies and half truths. I was a frequent buyer.

  27. Barbara G says:

    Sponsoring Rush Limbaugh says to me you agree with his hate. It is understandable that your customers are from all walks of life and you cannot take sides with the Right or the Left, but sponsoring a viscious, treasonous, racist talk show host that brings out the worst in people tells me that you agree with him. I cannot in good conscious purchase products from you. I will be doing business elsewhere.

  28. former customer says:

    Do you really think the Rush Limbaugh fans are your best customers and that it makes sense to thumb your nose at the majority who object to his divisive hatemongering? I did not “harange” Overstock Customer Service. I simply informed that I will not buy from Overstock as long as it’s a sponsor of Rush Limbaugh. What I got for a reply was a link to this blog. Well, okay. You reject my business and I reject yours. I imagine as more and more people realize your association with Rush Limbaugh, more and more will stop shopping at Overstock.

  29. Tom B. says:

    The truth is a powerful commodity. When a media giant like Rupert Murdoch creates false journalism, lurid journalism, fake stories, distortion and disinformation that is researched and found to be be completely bogus, then one has to make a stand.
    You don‘t have to announce anything, just stop giving them your business. It‘s really quite simple.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • Subscribe

Deep Capture on Twitter

Posting tweet...

Archives