<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The short heard &#8217;round the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/</link>
	<description>Investigating naked short selling, economic warfare, and the financial crisis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paying On Time - Credit Cards &#187; Blue Kryptonite and naked short selling</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-170722</link>
		<dc:creator>Paying On Time - Credit Cards &#187; Blue Kryptonite and naked short selling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-170722</guid>
		<description>[...] truth is, since shortly after the onset of the economic crisis naked short sellers themselves helped to spark, naked shorting has become an increasingly difficult crime to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] truth is, since shortly after the onset of the economic crisis naked short sellers themselves helped to spark, naked shorting has become an increasingly difficult crime to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iStandUp</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-169430</link>
		<dc:creator>iStandUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-169430</guid>
		<description>Judd,

I just discovered that &quot;The short heard ’round the world&quot; in deepcapture.com is MISSING MOST of the original Comments - there is suppose to be 116 comments.

I just found all the comments in a Google Cache of this page:

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:LBZPZ-YMzGYJ:test.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/+CHRISTOPHER+L.+CULP+%2B+istandup+%2B+deepcapture&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us

Can  you copy them and add them back into DeepCapture.com?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judd,</p>
<p>I just discovered that &#8220;The short heard ’round the world&#8221; in deepcapture.com is MISSING MOST of the original Comments &#8211; there is suppose to be 116 comments.</p>
<p>I just found all the comments in a Google Cache of this page:</p>
<p><a href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:LBZPZ-YMzGYJ:test.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/+CHRISTOPHER+L.+CULP+%2B+istandup+%2B+deepcapture&#038;cd=1&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;gl=us" rel="nofollow">http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:LBZPZ-YMzGYJ:test.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/+CHRISTOPHER+L.+CULP+%2B+istandup+%2B+deepcapture&#038;cd=1&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;gl=us</a></p>
<p>Can  you copy them and add them back into DeepCapture.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judd Bagley</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-169006</link>
		<dc:creator>Judd Bagley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-169006</guid>
		<description>Rken, yours is a very good question. 

First and foremost, and in the broadest sense, share price greatly affects a company&#039;s ability to raise money to fuel growth. That&#039;s because most public companies use shares as collateral against debt. As share price drops, money becomes much more expensive to borrow, adversely affecting a company&#039;s bottom line. It also becomes harder for companies to raise money via secondary stock offerings. This is particularly damaging to high tech and (especially) biotech companies for which additional rounds of public financing to pay for research and development are so often built right into their business plans.

Additionally, as share price dips below one dollar (into &quot;penny stock&quot; land), companies find that suppliers cease financing inventory or make the terms very difficult to bear. This further constricts cash flow.

Faced with these problems, companies often find themselves forced into a financing &quot;death spiral&quot; which often ends in bankruptcy, though it&#039;s usually a long-ish process (spanning years).

On the other hand, as the examples of Bear and Lehman taught us, when it comes to financial companies a different set of rules apply. That&#039;s because banks are constantly making short term loans to each other, also using their shares as collateral. Because collateral-to-debt ratios must always meet certain levels, when a share price takes a sudden hit, counterparties demand that the loan balance be immediately paid down to keep the ratios in line. Two days of that and suddenly Bear Stearns and Lehman have no more capital cushion, depositors get nervous, a run ensues, and bankruptcy follows.

Having said all this, I should point out that Bear and Lehman very well might have gone bankrupt over time. They were greedy and deserved as much. But it&#039;s still murder to kill someone with a terminal illness, and had the process progressed naturally, the consequence would not have been nearly so dire. Given more time, Lehman might have been acquired or bailed out, and the credit crunch made much less severe.

The point of my video is to remind people that there remain murderers walking around out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rken, yours is a very good question. </p>
<p>First and foremost, and in the broadest sense, share price greatly affects a company&#8217;s ability to raise money to fuel growth. That&#8217;s because most public companies use shares as collateral against debt. As share price drops, money becomes much more expensive to borrow, adversely affecting a company&#8217;s bottom line. It also becomes harder for companies to raise money via secondary stock offerings. This is particularly damaging to high tech and (especially) biotech companies for which additional rounds of public financing to pay for research and development are so often built right into their business plans.</p>
<p>Additionally, as share price dips below one dollar (into &#8220;penny stock&#8221; land), companies find that suppliers cease financing inventory or make the terms very difficult to bear. This further constricts cash flow.</p>
<p>Faced with these problems, companies often find themselves forced into a financing &#8220;death spiral&#8221; which often ends in bankruptcy, though it&#8217;s usually a long-ish process (spanning years).</p>
<p>On the other hand, as the examples of Bear and Lehman taught us, when it comes to financial companies a different set of rules apply. That&#8217;s because banks are constantly making short term loans to each other, also using their shares as collateral. Because collateral-to-debt ratios must always meet certain levels, when a share price takes a sudden hit, counterparties demand that the loan balance be immediately paid down to keep the ratios in line. Two days of that and suddenly Bear Stearns and Lehman have no more capital cushion, depositors get nervous, a run ensues, and bankruptcy follows.</p>
<p>Having said all this, I should point out that Bear and Lehman very well might have gone bankrupt over time. They were greedy and deserved as much. But it&#8217;s still murder to kill someone with a terminal illness, and had the process progressed naturally, the consequence would not have been nearly so dire. Given more time, Lehman might have been acquired or bailed out, and the credit crunch made much less severe.</p>
<p>The point of my video is to remind people that there remain murderers walking around out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rken</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-168998</link>
		<dc:creator>rken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-168998</guid>
		<description>I presume this is a daft question, but how does the present market valuation of a company&#039;s outstanding stock determine it&#039;s success or failure?  My logic is that a company relies solely on its own assets and ongoing operation&#039;s cash flows -- matters that are separate from its equity valuation.  Don&#039;t stock fluctuations affect only the shareholder&#039;s equity and not the company&#039;s equity?  How is the company&#039;s ongoing operations affected by whatever arbitrary value their share&#039;s currently trade at?

Thanks in advance for any enlightenment on this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I presume this is a daft question, but how does the present market valuation of a company&#8217;s outstanding stock determine it&#8217;s success or failure?  My logic is that a company relies solely on its own assets and ongoing operation&#8217;s cash flows &#8212; matters that are separate from its equity valuation.  Don&#8217;t stock fluctuations affect only the shareholder&#8217;s equity and not the company&#8217;s equity?  How is the company&#8217;s ongoing operations affected by whatever arbitrary value their share&#8217;s currently trade at?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance for any enlightenment on this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satwaves</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-168939</link>
		<dc:creator>Satwaves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-168939</guid>
		<description>[...] the reality that main street media portrayed, and thus the reality that came to pass. Check out this video (one of many) over at DeepCapture.com to learn more about this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the reality that main street media portrayed, and thus the reality that came to pass. Check out this video (one of many) over at DeepCapture.com to learn more about this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot Client7</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148959</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot Client7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148959</guid>
		<description>FINANCIAL TERRORISTS:

Bush, Paulson &amp; Cox allowed a co-ordinated terrorist strike against our financial system by rich fat cats wielding Blackberries rather than GPS units to bring down major financial institutions, the banking system around the world, and confidence worldwide, and thus place the world in the throes of a Great Depression. no need to take over airliners and crash them into buildings anymore. investment bankers and hedge fund managers do their work for the terorists with impunity and even get rich in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINANCIAL TERRORISTS:</p>
<p>Bush, Paulson &amp; Cox allowed a co-ordinated terrorist strike against our financial system by rich fat cats wielding Blackberries rather than GPS units to bring down major financial institutions, the banking system around the world, and confidence worldwide, and thus place the world in the throes of a Great Depression. no need to take over airliners and crash them into buildings anymore. investment bankers and hedge fund managers do their work for the terorists with impunity and even get rich in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148854</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148854</guid>
		<description>Probably already posted here, but...

Naked Short Sales Hint Fraud in Bringing Down Lehman 

-By Gary Matsumoto March 19 (Bloomberg) 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aB1jlqmFOTCA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably already posted here, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Naked Short Sales Hint Fraud in Bringing Down Lehman </p>
<p>-By Gary Matsumoto March 19 (Bloomberg) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#038;sid=aB1jlqmFOTCA" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&#038;sid=aB1jlqmFOTCA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: al</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148853</link>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148853</guid>
		<description>Text of Senator Kaufman&#039;s dialogue about abusive naked short selling:

http://techstock2000.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/hooray-for-senator-edward-kaufman-d-de/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Text of Senator Kaufman&#8217;s dialogue about abusive naked short selling:</p>
<p><a href="http://techstock2000.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/hooray-for-senator-edward-kaufman-d-de/" rel="nofollow">http://techstock2000.wordpress.com/2009/03/21/hooray-for-senator-edward-kaufman-d-de/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148852</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148852</guid>
		<description>http://www.marketrap.com/article/view_article/9170/jim-cramer-the-weasel-who-is-now-an-investor-advocate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketrap.com/article/view_article/9170/jim-cramer-the-weasel-who-is-now-an-investor-advocate" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketrap.com/article/view_article/9170/jim-cramer-the-weasel-who-is-now-an-investor-advocate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148851</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148851</guid>
		<description>Myshadow, it would be trivial to track down who did it.

It might track down to an offshore entity in the Cayman&#039;s, but because a crime was committed, the government there would give up the beneficial owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Myshadow, it would be trivial to track down who did it.</p>
<p>It might track down to an offshore entity in the Cayman&#8217;s, but because a crime was committed, the government there would give up the beneficial owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jim DeCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148849</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jim DeCosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148849</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t have much time to devote to the study of naked short selling the gist of it is this:  There is only one party empowered to provide the ONLY cure available when the seller of securities absolutely refuses to deliver that which he sold i.e. execute a buy-in.  The problem is that this party that is intentionally witholding the ONLY cure available (NSCC management) is employed by those refusing to deliver that which they sell.  Now how clever is that.  Over the years you attain 15 of the 16 sources of empowerment to provide the only cure available (a virtual monopoly) and then you withold this ONLY cure at the behest of your bosses that are picking the pockets of naive U.S. citizens unaware that their investment never did have a chance to pay off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t have much time to devote to the study of naked short selling the gist of it is this:  There is only one party empowered to provide the ONLY cure available when the seller of securities absolutely refuses to deliver that which he sold i.e. execute a buy-in.  The problem is that this party that is intentionally witholding the ONLY cure available (NSCC management) is employed by those refusing to deliver that which they sell.  Now how clever is that.  Over the years you attain 15 of the 16 sources of empowerment to provide the only cure available (a virtual monopoly) and then you withold this ONLY cure at the behest of your bosses that are picking the pockets of naive U.S. citizens unaware that their investment never did have a chance to pay off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myshadow</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148848</link>
		<dc:creator>myshadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148848</guid>
		<description>I find it hard to understand why the naked short on bear sterns is anonymous.  There is no way of knowing who did this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to understand why the naked short on bear sterns is anonymous.  There is no way of knowing who did this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sen. Kaufman rocks!</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-2/#comment-148846</link>
		<dc:creator>Sen. Kaufman rocks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148846</guid>
		<description>BEWARE OF ABERRANT STATISTICS

1)	Over 5,000 complaints regarding abusive naked short selling abuses were filed with the SEC in the 17 month period in between 1/1/07 and 6/1/08.  Not 1 of them resulted in enforcement actions by the SEC.
2)	The “self-regulatory organizations” (“SROs”) whose abusive members benefit from naked short selling frauds filed 900 referrals to the SEC in an 18-month period.  Not 1 of them was related to abusive naked short selling frauds perpetrated by their members .
3)	When the “participants” of the SRO known as the NSCC sell securities and absolutely refuse to deliver that which they sell there is one and ONLY one cure available.  That is referred to as a “buy-in”.  The parties with 15 of the 16 sources of empowerment to execute buy-ins (the DTCC and NSCC management) still plead to be “powerless” to execute buy-ins of their bosses when they refuse to deliver that which they sell.
4)	The research of Evans, Geczy, Musto and Reed (2003) reveals that only one-eighth of 1% of even “mandated” buy-ins ever occur on Wall Street.  When the ONLY cure available is intentionally withheld by the employees (NSCC management) of those selling securities but refusing to deliver that which they sold then of course the statistics are going to appear to be aberrational. 
5)	When the Office of the Inspector General of the SEC finished an exhaustive research project on abusive naked short selling frauds it made 11 separate recommendations to the SEC’s Enforcement Division.  This division reported back to this OIG that only one of the 11 had merit.  They then released this statement:  
“The best sources for information on violations relating to “naked” short selling is the SRO, which has primary responsibility for surveillance of its trading. And we receive a large number of referrals from the SROs, addressing all forms of alleged investment misconduct. It is telling that, of the 900 SRO referrals Enforcement received during the Report’s 18-month survey period, none involved the practice of “naked” short selling. That is to say, the people closest to the trading, with the deepest understanding of and  access to the data, did not see and refer any of the large-scale, damaging “naked” short sale abuse about which the Report hypothesizes”.  
What they “accidentally” forgot to report is that the abusive members of these “SROs” are on the receiving end of the money stolen from U.S. investors in these naked short selling frauds.
6)	When the SROs known as the DTCC and NSCC get sued by the victims of abusive naked short selling frauds the first party to the defense of these SROs is the SEC.  In their amicus curiae brief the SEC will tell the judge that we at the SEC signed off on all of these policies that these investors claim have been corrupted.  They then ask the judge to dismiss the case.
7)	When the SEC gets yelled at by its own Office of Inspector General for not enforcing the laws against abusive naked short selling the SEC cites (above) that the real pros on abusive naked short selling matters are the SROs and they don’t seem to think it’s an issue.  Recall that the abusive members of the SROs are the recipients of the money stolen from investors.
8)	In their defense against the findings of their own OIG the SEC states:  “there is hardly unanimity in the investment community OR THE FINANCIAL MEDIA on either the prevalence, or the dangers, of naked short selling”.
IF ONLY THERE WERE A PATTERN TO THIS ILLICIT BEHAVIOR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BEWARE OF ABERRANT STATISTICS</p>
<p>1)	Over 5,000 complaints regarding abusive naked short selling abuses were filed with the SEC in the 17 month period in between 1/1/07 and 6/1/08.  Not 1 of them resulted in enforcement actions by the SEC.<br />
2)	The “self-regulatory organizations” (“SROs”) whose abusive members benefit from naked short selling frauds filed 900 referrals to the SEC in an 18-month period.  Not 1 of them was related to abusive naked short selling frauds perpetrated by their members .<br />
3)	When the “participants” of the SRO known as the NSCC sell securities and absolutely refuse to deliver that which they sell there is one and ONLY one cure available.  That is referred to as a “buy-in”.  The parties with 15 of the 16 sources of empowerment to execute buy-ins (the DTCC and NSCC management) still plead to be “powerless” to execute buy-ins of their bosses when they refuse to deliver that which they sell.<br />
4)	The research of Evans, Geczy, Musto and Reed (2003) reveals that only one-eighth of 1% of even “mandated” buy-ins ever occur on Wall Street.  When the ONLY cure available is intentionally withheld by the employees (NSCC management) of those selling securities but refusing to deliver that which they sold then of course the statistics are going to appear to be aberrational.<br />
5)	When the Office of the Inspector General of the SEC finished an exhaustive research project on abusive naked short selling frauds it made 11 separate recommendations to the SEC’s Enforcement Division.  This division reported back to this OIG that only one of the 11 had merit.  They then released this statement:<br />
“The best sources for information on violations relating to “naked” short selling is the SRO, which has primary responsibility for surveillance of its trading. And we receive a large number of referrals from the SROs, addressing all forms of alleged investment misconduct. It is telling that, of the 900 SRO referrals Enforcement received during the Report’s 18-month survey period, none involved the practice of “naked” short selling. That is to say, the people closest to the trading, with the deepest understanding of and  access to the data, did not see and refer any of the large-scale, damaging “naked” short sale abuse about which the Report hypothesizes”.<br />
What they “accidentally” forgot to report is that the abusive members of these “SROs” are on the receiving end of the money stolen from U.S. investors in these naked short selling frauds.<br />
6)	When the SROs known as the DTCC and NSCC get sued by the victims of abusive naked short selling frauds the first party to the defense of these SROs is the SEC.  In their amicus curiae brief the SEC will tell the judge that we at the SEC signed off on all of these policies that these investors claim have been corrupted.  They then ask the judge to dismiss the case.<br />
7)	When the SEC gets yelled at by its own Office of Inspector General for not enforcing the laws against abusive naked short selling the SEC cites (above) that the real pros on abusive naked short selling matters are the SROs and they don’t seem to think it’s an issue.  Recall that the abusive members of the SROs are the recipients of the money stolen from investors.<br />
 <img src='http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> In their defense against the findings of their own OIG the SEC states:  “there is hardly unanimity in the investment community OR THE FINANCIAL MEDIA on either the prevalence, or the dangers, of naked short selling”.<br />
IF ONLY THERE WERE A PATTERN TO THIS ILLICIT BEHAVIOR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron doc</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-148844</link>
		<dc:creator>ron doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148844</guid>
		<description>Here is the link for the last one if I can get it to work.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=92393

If there is anything to this news story maybe even getting the whole corrupt NSS/FTD manipulation case to the Supreme Court won’t help us.

In which case I would say the USA is done for.

There are so many things you can compare to Rome as is fell apart with what we can see with what is going on in the US Government right now.

Could anything we read in history books about the Roman Empires Senate and leaders be far from the total joke we now see in our Congress, Whitehouse,Law enforcement or regulators we have right now, right here in the US Federal Government?

We have the Goverment we deserve because we have went too far off the path of God rules</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the link for the last one if I can get it to work.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=92393" rel="nofollow">http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&#038;pageId=92393</a></p>
<p>If there is anything to this news story maybe even getting the whole corrupt NSS/FTD manipulation case to the Supreme Court won’t help us.</p>
<p>In which case I would say the USA is done for.</p>
<p>There are so many things you can compare to Rome as is fell apart with what we can see with what is going on in the US Government right now.</p>
<p>Could anything we read in history books about the Roman Empires Senate and leaders be far from the total joke we now see in our Congress, Whitehouse,Law enforcement or regulators we have right now, right here in the US Federal Government?</p>
<p>We have the Goverment we deserve because we have went too far off the path of God rules</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron doc</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-short-heard-round-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-148843</link>
		<dc:creator>ron doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=593#comment-148843</guid>
		<description>If there is anything to this news story maybe even getting the whole corrupt NSS/FTD manipulation case to the Supreme Court won&#039;t help us.

In which case I would say the USA is done for.

There are so many things you can compare to Rome as is fell apart with what we can see with what is going on in the US Government right now.

Could anything we read in history books about the Roman Empires Senate and leaders be far from the total joke we now see in our Congress, Whitehouse,Law enforcement or regulators we have right now, right here in the US Federal Government?

We have the Goverment we deserve because we have went too far off the path of God rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is anything to this news story maybe even getting the whole corrupt NSS/FTD manipulation case to the Supreme Court won&#8217;t help us.</p>
<p>In which case I would say the USA is done for.</p>
<p>There are so many things you can compare to Rome as is fell apart with what we can see with what is going on in the US Government right now.</p>
<p>Could anything we read in history books about the Roman Empires Senate and leaders be far from the total joke we now see in our Congress, Whitehouse,Law enforcement or regulators we have right now, right here in the US Federal Government?</p>
<p>We have the Goverment we deserve because we have went too far off the path of God rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
