<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Register weighs in on our crusade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/</link>
	<description>Investigating naked short selling, economic warfare, and the financial crisis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171403</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171403</guid>
		<description>Where the hell is the SEC&#039;s Lehman Investigation:

From Bloomberg:

&quot;Airport Runway

On Sept. 17, two days after Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the number of failed trades climbed to 49.7 million, 23 percent of overall volume in the stock.

The next day, the SEC announced its ban on shorting financial companies in 2008. The number of protected stocks ultimately grew to about 1,000. On Sept. 19, the commission announced “a sweeping expansion” of its investigation into possible market manipulation.

The ban, which lasted through Oct. 17, didn’t eliminate shorting, according to data from the SEC, the NYSE Arca exchange and Bloomberg. Throughout the period, short sales averaged 24.7 percent of the overall trading in Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. on NYSE Arca. In 2008, short sales averaged 37.5 percent of the overall trading on the exchange in the three companies.

To date, the commission hasn’t announced any findings of its investigation.

Pollack, the former SEC regulator, wonders why.

“This isn’t a trail of breadcrumbs; this audit trail is lit up like an airport runway,” he said. “You can see it a mile off. Subpoena e-mails. Find out who spread false rumors and also shorted the stock and you’ve got your manipulators.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aB1jlqmFOTCA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where the hell is the SEC&#8217;s Lehman Investigation:</p>
<p>From Bloomberg:</p>
<p>&#8220;Airport Runway</p>
<p>On Sept. 17, two days after Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the number of failed trades climbed to 49.7 million, 23 percent of overall volume in the stock.</p>
<p>The next day, the SEC announced its ban on shorting financial companies in 2008. The number of protected stocks ultimately grew to about 1,000. On Sept. 19, the commission announced “a sweeping expansion” of its investigation into possible market manipulation.</p>
<p>The ban, which lasted through Oct. 17, didn’t eliminate shorting, according to data from the SEC, the NYSE Arca exchange and Bloomberg. Throughout the period, short sales averaged 24.7 percent of the overall trading in Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. on NYSE Arca. In 2008, short sales averaged 37.5 percent of the overall trading on the exchange in the three companies.</p>
<p>To date, the commission hasn’t announced any findings of its investigation.</p>
<p>Pollack, the former SEC regulator, wonders why.</p>
<p>“This isn’t a trail of breadcrumbs; this audit trail is lit up like an airport runway,” he said. “You can see it a mile off. Subpoena e-mails. Find out who spread false rumors and also shorted the stock and you’ve got your manipulators.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&#038;sid=aB1jlqmFOTCA" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&#038;sid=aB1jlqmFOTCA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171336</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171336</guid>
		<description>One judge see&#039;s the SEC is a POS and is FOS and is wanting to dig deeper !!!



udge Rejects BofA-SEC Pact, Sets Trial Date

SEPTEMBER 14, 2009, 12:53 P.M. ET
By JESS BRAVIN
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125294493976909051.html

Federal District Judge Jed S. Rakoff rejected a proposed $33 million settlement of allegations by the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bank of America Corp. &quot;materially lied&quot; in shareholder communications about bonuses to employees of Merrill Lynch &amp; Co.

Instead, Judge Rakoff set a Feb. 1 trial date on the allegations in his New York courtroom.

Judge&#039;s Order: BofA-SEC Pact
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/bofaorder914.pdf

The SEC and Bank of America had sought the judge&#039;s approval of a consent decree to resolve charges that the bank concealed an agreement to pay up to $5.8 billion in bonuses to Merrill executives.

In an order issued Monday, Judge Rakoff acknowledged the public interest in settling disputes rather than having them go to trial. Nonetheless, he wrote, &quot;even upon applying the most deferential standard of review,&quot; he was &quot;forced to conclude that the proposed consent judgment is neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate&quot; to protect the public interest.

In effect, Judge Rakoff found, the settlement would force the victims of the alleged misstatements--Bank of America shareholders--to pay an additional $33 million.

&quot;It does not comport with the most elementary notions of justice and morality, in that it proposes that the shareholders who were the victims of the bank&#039;s alleged misconduct now pay the penalty for that misconduct,&quot; the judge wrote.

The judge has noted that SEC policy directs that culpable executives be punished for misleading shareholders, something the commission had not sought in this case.

Write to Jess Bravin at jess.bravin@wsj.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125294493976909051.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One judge see&#8217;s the SEC is a POS and is FOS and is wanting to dig deeper !!!</p>
<p>udge Rejects BofA-SEC Pact, Sets Trial Date</p>
<p>SEPTEMBER 14, 2009, 12:53 P.M. ET<br />
By JESS BRAVIN<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125294493976909051.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125294493976909051.html</a></p>
<p>Federal District Judge Jed S. Rakoff rejected a proposed $33 million settlement of allegations by the Securities and Exchange Commission that Bank of America Corp. &#8220;materially lied&#8221; in shareholder communications about bonuses to employees of Merrill Lynch &amp; Co.</p>
<p>Instead, Judge Rakoff set a Feb. 1 trial date on the allegations in his New York courtroom.</p>
<p>Judge&#8217;s Order: BofA-SEC Pact<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/bofaorder914.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/bofaorder914.pdf</a></p>
<p>The SEC and Bank of America had sought the judge&#8217;s approval of a consent decree to resolve charges that the bank concealed an agreement to pay up to $5.8 billion in bonuses to Merrill executives.</p>
<p>In an order issued Monday, Judge Rakoff acknowledged the public interest in settling disputes rather than having them go to trial. Nonetheless, he wrote, &#8220;even upon applying the most deferential standard of review,&#8221; he was &#8220;forced to conclude that the proposed consent judgment is neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate&#8221; to protect the public interest.</p>
<p>In effect, Judge Rakoff found, the settlement would force the victims of the alleged misstatements&#8211;Bank of America shareholders&#8211;to pay an additional $33 million.</p>
<p>&#8220;It does not comport with the most elementary notions of justice and morality, in that it proposes that the shareholders who were the victims of the bank&#8217;s alleged misconduct now pay the penalty for that misconduct,&#8221; the judge wrote.</p>
<p>The judge has noted that SEC policy directs that culpable executives be punished for misleading shareholders, something the commission had not sought in this case.</p>
<p>Write to Jess Bravin at <a href="mailto:jess.bravin@wsj.com">jess.bravin@wsj.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125294493976909051.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125294493976909051.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iStandUp</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171331</link>
		<dc:creator>iStandUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171331</guid>
		<description>Dr. Jim DeCosta,

I like the “phrase of the day” award you gave to Judge Rakoff in the B of A case. 

The “Facade of Enforcement” is, in my opinion, exactly what the SEC has become.  And I think this describes what &quot;REG SHO&quot; was and is today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jim DeCosta,</p>
<p>I like the “phrase of the day” award you gave to Judge Rakoff in the B of A case. </p>
<p>The “Facade of Enforcement” is, in my opinion, exactly what the SEC has become.  And I think this describes what &#8220;REG SHO&#8221; was and is today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Screw the Basterds</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171325</link>
		<dc:creator>Screw the Basterds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171325</guid>
		<description>Will anyone take on the captured Ragingbull website. If you log onto the JAGH board with a new name and appear as a long you will be booted no matter what you say.

We sent in irrefutable posts proving that Ru4real and Jag-this were one and the same basher and they were never taken down for a multi-alias violation. But any poster appearing as a long will be gone almost instantly unless posting over the weekend when RB staff is not present. 

The RB JAGH board is captured lock, stock and barrel. Prove it to yourself by going on the board and create a new profile and post as a long and you will be taken down shortly.

What a crock that board is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will anyone take on the captured Ragingbull website. If you log onto the JAGH board with a new name and appear as a long you will be booted no matter what you say.</p>
<p>We sent in irrefutable posts proving that Ru4real and Jag-this were one and the same basher and they were never taken down for a multi-alias violation. But any poster appearing as a long will be gone almost instantly unless posting over the weekend when RB staff is not present. </p>
<p>The RB JAGH board is captured lock, stock and barrel. Prove it to yourself by going on the board and create a new profile and post as a long and you will be taken down shortly.</p>
<p>What a crock that board is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171324</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171324</guid>
		<description>Sorry for should be forget!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for should be forget!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171323</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171323</guid>
		<description>Dr. Decosta don&#039;t for that the &quot;SEC&quot; is still investigating  the trader that placed the 1.7 million dollar put on Bear Stearns that netted 270 mill in one week, to see if someone knew something was going to happen or if they were just lucky. I wonder what happened to the result of that inquiry??LOL!!! INVESTIGATE THE SEC!!! Oh that&#039;s right David Kotz just did that and it did not turn out very well did it?? Mary Shapiro should also be investigated. This latest farce (Bank of America/SEC) was done under her and Khuzamis&#039; watch , no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Decosta don&#8217;t for that the &#8220;SEC&#8221; is still investigating  the trader that placed the 1.7 million dollar put on Bear Stearns that netted 270 mill in one week, to see if someone knew something was going to happen or if they were just lucky. I wonder what happened to the result of that inquiry??LOL!!! INVESTIGATE THE SEC!!! Oh that&#8217;s right David Kotz just did that and it did not turn out very well did it?? Mary Shapiro should also be investigated. This latest farce (Bank of America/SEC) was done under her and Khuzamis&#8217; watch , no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jim DeCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171322</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jim DeCosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171322</guid>
		<description>In 2005 Bernie Madoff tried to provide the &quot;facade of enforcement&quot; to the SEC at a roundtable when he claimed that there was no way that anyone could pull anything off on Wall Street because of the SEC&#039;s heightened diligence.  Fast forward to 2009 when Cramer lost it on TV screaming that &quot;they (the SEC)know nothing, nothing&quot;.  Now the standard line of the proponents of the totally corrupt status quo is that since Reg SHO became effective in Jan. of 2005 there&#039;s no longer any problem in regards to delivery failures.  Fast forward to one year ago yesterday when Lehman Bros. goes down in flames and their FTDs at the DTCC went up 57-fold from their previous all time high levels as the share price fell off of a cliff.  The response of the mainstream media and the SEC was that they found no firm evidence that abusive naked short selling played a role in the near collapse of our entire financial system.  A 57-fold increase in FTDs from the all time high in FTDs is not compelling evidence.  Okeedokee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2005 Bernie Madoff tried to provide the &#8220;facade of enforcement&#8221; to the SEC at a roundtable when he claimed that there was no way that anyone could pull anything off on Wall Street because of the SEC&#8217;s heightened diligence.  Fast forward to 2009 when Cramer lost it on TV screaming that &#8220;they (the SEC)know nothing, nothing&#8221;.  Now the standard line of the proponents of the totally corrupt status quo is that since Reg SHO became effective in Jan. of 2005 there&#8217;s no longer any problem in regards to delivery failures.  Fast forward to one year ago yesterday when Lehman Bros. goes down in flames and their FTDs at the DTCC went up 57-fold from their previous all time high levels as the share price fell off of a cliff.  The response of the mainstream media and the SEC was that they found no firm evidence that abusive naked short selling played a role in the near collapse of our entire financial system.  A 57-fold increase in FTDs from the all time high in FTDs is not compelling evidence.  Okeedokee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jim DeCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171321</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jim DeCosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171321</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the quote from the Judge:

“The parties’ submissions, when carefully read, leave the distinct impression that the proposed consent judgment was a contrivance designed to provide the SEC with the façade of enforcement and the management of the bank with a quick resolution of an embarrassing inquiry,” Rakoff wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the quote from the Judge:</p>
<p>“The parties’ submissions, when carefully read, leave the distinct impression that the proposed consent judgment was a contrivance designed to provide the SEC with the façade of enforcement and the management of the bank with a quick resolution of an embarrassing inquiry,” Rakoff wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171318</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171318</guid>
		<description>Here ,hear both Jims&#039;. This is about to come to a screeching halt..one way or the other it is reaching a point of no return if it has&#039;nt already!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here ,hear both Jims&#8217;. This is about to come to a screeching halt..one way or the other it is reaching a point of no return if it has&#8217;nt already!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171316</guid>
		<description>I think we need the FBI and its forensic accountants to pick up the ball.
The SEC has fumbled enough...Disband it. Along with FINRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need the FBI and its forensic accountants to pick up the ball.<br />
The SEC has fumbled enough&#8230;Disband it. Along with FINRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Jim DeCosta</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171314</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jim DeCosta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171314</guid>
		<description>istandup,

I think our &quot;phrase of the day&quot; award has to go to Judge Rakoff in the B of A case.  He labeled the SEC&#039;s role in accepting the B of A settlement as the SEC providing the &quot;facade of enforcement&quot;.  The role of a truly &quot;captured&quot; regulator is to provide the &quot;facade of enforcement&quot; so that misguided investors under the illusion that the SEC and the SROs are providing effective &quot;investor protection&quot; will gladly place their bets on the table. What you need is the presence of a police-like entity that refuses to act in a policeman-like role.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>istandup,</p>
<p>I think our &#8220;phrase of the day&#8221; award has to go to Judge Rakoff in the B of A case.  He labeled the SEC&#8217;s role in accepting the B of A settlement as the SEC providing the &#8220;facade of enforcement&#8221;.  The role of a truly &#8220;captured&#8221; regulator is to provide the &#8220;facade of enforcement&#8221; so that misguided investors under the illusion that the SEC and the SROs are providing effective &#8220;investor protection&#8221; will gladly place their bets on the table. What you need is the presence of a police-like entity that refuses to act in a policeman-like role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iStandUp</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171313</link>
		<dc:creator>iStandUp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171313</guid>
		<description>Dr. Jim DeCosta,

Thank you again for your &quot;hard hitting&quot; letter to the SEC.

It is now obvious to me that the SEC has no intention of ever eliminating &quot;Naked Counterfeit Short Selling,&quot; because this would prevent Wall Streeters from running their extremely profitable Second Tier Ponzi Scheme.  So we are left with seeing continual announcements from the SEC about how they are proposing another change in REG SHO.

In fact, I suspect the Original Secret Purpose for setting up REG SHO was to institutionalize and to protect this Wall Street Second Tier Ponzi Scheme. 

In thinking about this, I recently make the connection to the fact that most American Workers today have a 401K Retirement Plan instead of a Pension Plan. Instead of professional Wall Streeters overseeing a pension plan, now each individual American worker is a single small fish in the sea with no one looking out for their welfare on Wall Street.

REG SHO, this Wall Street Second Tier Ponzi Scheme, allows corrupt Wall Streeters to steal money from any small fish American Worker&#039;s retirement fund with ease and with protection from the SEC as defense lawyers for their Wall Street fraternity brothers.

Keep up the good fight Doctor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jim DeCosta,</p>
<p>Thank you again for your &#8220;hard hitting&#8221; letter to the SEC.</p>
<p>It is now obvious to me that the SEC has no intention of ever eliminating &#8220;Naked Counterfeit Short Selling,&#8221; because this would prevent Wall Streeters from running their extremely profitable Second Tier Ponzi Scheme.  So we are left with seeing continual announcements from the SEC about how they are proposing another change in REG SHO.</p>
<p>In fact, I suspect the Original Secret Purpose for setting up REG SHO was to institutionalize and to protect this Wall Street Second Tier Ponzi Scheme. </p>
<p>In thinking about this, I recently make the connection to the fact that most American Workers today have a 401K Retirement Plan instead of a Pension Plan. Instead of professional Wall Streeters overseeing a pension plan, now each individual American worker is a single small fish in the sea with no one looking out for their welfare on Wall Street.</p>
<p>REG SHO, this Wall Street Second Tier Ponzi Scheme, allows corrupt Wall Streeters to steal money from any small fish American Worker&#8217;s retirement fund with ease and with protection from the SEC as defense lawyers for their Wall Street fraternity brothers.</p>
<p>Keep up the good fight Doctor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171310</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171310</guid>
		<description>Michael Moore VS Golden Slacks:

http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=111472&amp;videoChannel=3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Moore VS Golden Slacks:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=111472&#038;videoChannel=3" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=111472&#038;videoChannel=3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171308</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171308</guid>
		<description>Schapiro likely to &#039;comment period&#039; and &#039;roundtable&#039; any proposed changes until all interested parties meet their maker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schapiro likely to &#8216;comment period&#8217; and &#8217;roundtable&#8217; any proposed changes until all interested parties meet their maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patchie</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-register-weighs-in-on-our-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-171304</link>
		<dc:creator>Patchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1148#comment-171304</guid>
		<description>fails include both long fails and short fails.  this is a problem with the ftd listings.  When you see these, look into the company and look for 144 stock, etc...they have a delay before sale but when clear to sell, they also have a longer settlement due to the paperwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fails include both long fails and short fails.  this is a problem with the ftd listings.  When you see these, look into the company and look for 144 stock, etc&#8230;they have a delay before sale but when clear to sell, they also have a longer settlement due to the paperwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
