<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The history of short-side stock manipulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/</link>
	<description>Independent investigations into illegal naked short selling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 08:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tore</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-172242</link>
		<dc:creator>Tore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-172242</guid>
		<description>Look at the Norwegian stock called DNO. They have discovered huge oil reserves in the Kurdish part of Iraq, and are being shorted and manipulated by all means necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the Norwegian stock called DNO. They have discovered huge oil reserves in the Kurdish part of Iraq, and are being shorted and manipulated by all means necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackie</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-172014</link>
		<dc:creator>blackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-172014</guid>
		<description>on Information based, how about this hitman

http://www.asensio.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on Information based, how about this hitman</p>
<p><a href="http://www.asensio.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.asensio.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saint</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171891</link>
		<dc:creator>Saint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171891</guid>
		<description>CMKX - Biggest naked short in the history of stock trading along thievey by the insiders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CMKX &#8211; Biggest naked short in the history of stock trading along thievey by the insiders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarge</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171681</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171681</guid>
		<description>This whole charade is like asking the drug cartels to participate in a discussion on how to better secure our borders.  A ridiculous dog and pony show.  Like Jim said, it is an insult to our intelligence and can not go unanswered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole charade is like asking the drug cartels to participate in a discussion on how to better secure our borders.  A ridiculous dog and pony show.  Like Jim said, it is an insult to our intelligence and can not go unanswered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheWesman</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171678</link>
		<dc:creator>TheWesman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171678</guid>
		<description>This is pre 1930s, but How about when Cornelius Vanderbilt bankrupted New York Law makers when they shorted more shares of his Railroad than existed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pre 1930s, but How about when Cornelius Vanderbilt bankrupted New York Law makers when they shorted more shares of his Railroad than existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171665</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171665</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an insult to our intelligence that must not go unanswered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an insult to our intelligence that must not go unanswered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171656</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171656</guid>
		<description>Jim, Sarge.. how much more obvious can it be?
I took this post from investorsvillage.

How obvious can it be?

 
The SEC holding a roundtable on NSS with the capos of NSS.   
 
From Matt&#039;s column today is this excerpt about Wednesday&#039;s SEC roundtable on NSS, followed by Kaufman&#039;s press release.
 
 
   &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt;

 
 
Kaufman and Isakson Statement on Tomorrow&#039;s SEC Roundtable on Short Selling 
 

September 29, 2009


 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Sens. Ted Kaufman (D-DE) and Johnny Isakson (R-GA) released the following statement in advance of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) roundtable on short selling tomorrow. 
 


“Tomorrow’s SEC roundtable is long awaited, but it is clear that the panel is stacked against the need for restrictions on naked short selling. In the recent financial decline, there was abusive short selling enabled by the repeal of the 70-year-old uptick rule and a lack of so-called pre-borrow or hard locate requirements.
 


The recent bull market, however, has lulled us into a false sense of security. If we do not enact these proposals – the uptick rule and either a pre-borrow or hard locate requirement – the same people who drove down certain stocks in the past will just do it again.
 


We need to focus on giving the SEC’s Enforcement Division the tools to end naked short selling once and for all.”

 

http://kaufman.senate.gov/press/press_releases/release/?id=aa7bc6d1-f21c-4e8d-b500-7123247c5c9b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, Sarge.. how much more obvious can it be?<br />
I took this post from investorsvillage.</p>
<p>How obvious can it be?</p>
<p>The SEC holding a roundtable on NSS with the capos of NSS.   </p>
<p>From Matt&#8217;s column today is this excerpt about Wednesday&#8217;s SEC roundtable on NSS, followed by Kaufman&#8217;s press release.</p>
<p>   &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Kaufman and Isakson Statement on Tomorrow&#8217;s SEC Roundtable on Short Selling </p>
<p>September 29, 2009</p>
<p>WASHINGTON, D.C. – Sens. Ted Kaufman (D-DE) and Johnny Isakson (R-GA) released the following statement in advance of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) roundtable on short selling tomorrow. </p>
<p>“Tomorrow’s SEC roundtable is long awaited, but it is clear that the panel is stacked against the need for restrictions on naked short selling. In the recent financial decline, there was abusive short selling enabled by the repeal of the 70-year-old uptick rule and a lack of so-called pre-borrow or hard locate requirements.</p>
<p>The recent bull market, however, has lulled us into a false sense of security. If we do not enact these proposals – the uptick rule and either a pre-borrow or hard locate requirement – the same people who drove down certain stocks in the past will just do it again.</p>
<p>We need to focus on giving the SEC’s Enforcement Division the tools to end naked short selling once and for all.”</p>
<p><a href="http://kaufman.senate.gov/press/press_releases/release/?id=aa7bc6d1-f21c-4e8d-b500-7123247c5c9b" rel="nofollow">http://kaufman.senate.gov/press/press_releases/release/?id=aa7bc6d1-f21c-4e8d-b500-7123247c5c9b</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171651</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171651</guid>
		<description>http://www.securitiesindustry.com/news/-24010-1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.securitiesindustry.com/news/-24010-1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.securitiesindustry.com/news/-24010-1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171650</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171650</guid>
		<description>Declassified document.

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/us-government-gold-manipulation.html

Private fed wanted to manipulate gold prices while the government treasury didn&#039;t.  Guess who won out, Wallstreet or democracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Declassified document.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/us-government-gold-manipulation.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/09/us-government-gold-manipulation.html</a></p>
<p>Private fed wanted to manipulate gold prices while the government treasury didn&#8217;t.  Guess who won out, Wallstreet or democracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leopard Dog Bed</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171649</link>
		<dc:creator>Leopard Dog Bed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171649</guid>
		<description>Great info at this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info at this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171648</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171648</guid>
		<description>God help our nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God help our nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171647</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171647</guid>
		<description>Jim, check this out!! This is what we have as a regulator New and Improved!!LOL!!

Inspector general lists post-Madoff changes at SECFont size: A &#124; A &#124; A1:45 PM ET 9/29/09 &#124; Marketwatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission&#039;s inspector general on Tuesday recommended that the agency&#039;s enforcement and inspections divisions make changes to how it handles tips and complaints, after it failed to follow up on detailed information and missed exposing the biggest fraud in the regulator&#039;s history: the $50 billion Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Bernard Madoff. 

The SEC should &quot;require tips and complaints to be reviewed by at least two individuals experienced in the subject matter prior to deciding not to take further action,&quot; according to one of 20 post-Madoff recommendations made by the SEC&#039;s inspector general. 

Tuesday&#039;s report comes after SEC Inspector General David Kotz issued a detailed report on Sept. 2 about how the agency fumbled its various investigations into Madoff&#039;s funds -- in particular, how the agency failed to follow up on three versions of a complaint that well-known investor Harry Markopolos brought against Madoff in 2000, 2001 and 2005. 

Based on that report, Kotz is making a series of recommendations about how the agency&#039;s enforcement division could improve its programs to make sure another massive Ponzi scheme doesn&#039;t happen again. 

In addition to having at least two experienced persons review each tip and complaint, the report also seeks to have the SEC set up a more sophisticated system for handling incoming information. The system would require documentation of why a complaint &quot;was or was not acted upon.&quot; 

Kotz also recommends that the agency establish and annually review guidelines that require all complaints that appear to be credible to be followed up with &quot;in-depth&quot; interviews to assess the validity of the claims. 

Lack of experience

Responding to concerns that SEC investigators of the Madoff scam did not have sufficient experience, Kotz said the agency should put in place procedures to ensure that investigations are assigned to teams, where one individual has &quot;specific&quot; knowledge of the subject matter, such as Ponzi schemes. 

This recommendation responds in part to one point discussed in the Sept. 2 report, which revealed that the majority of a 2005 investigation into Madoff was performed by a staff attorney who had recently graduated from law school, and only joined the SEC 19 months before she was assigned the investigation. The attorney had never been the lead staff attorney on any investigation before, the report said.

Inspection failure

Kotz also retained FTI Consulting Inc. to complete a review of the agency&#039;s Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examinations -- known as OCIE, the agency unit responsible for evaluating complaints and for periodically examining the books of institutions registered with the agency. 

In 2003, for example, the unit didn&#039;t &quot;properly evaluate&quot; a complaint from &quot;highly credible sources&quot; about problems with Madoff&#039;s fund, according to the report. Madoff was registered with the agency and his funds were subject to -- and received -- periodic inspections. 

FTI also had 37 recommendations, according to the report, including one that would have the SEC set up a collection system for gathering tips and complaints. The group also recommended that all tips considered by the inspections office are vetted within 30 days of being received, with any examinations of funds that take place because of the tips commencing 60 days after the complaint is received. 

In a recommendation similar to Kotz&#039;s proposal for the enforcement division, FTI also recommends that the inspections team document all interviews they complete and log all examinations into a tracking system. 

The group also sought to establish guidelines for searching and screening news articles and other information from industry sources that may indicate securities-law violations by investors and broker-dealers. 

&quot;The protocol should include flexible searching capability to help identify specific areas of risk or concern and should include access to all relevant industry publications. The protocol should also include adequate screening criteria to eliminate unnecessary results and/or to more narrowly define a search in order to generate sufficient results,&quot; according to the FTI report. &quot;The screening criteria and any changes should be documented and the protocol should be reassessed regularly to determine if any modifications are appropriate.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, check this out!! This is what we have as a regulator New and Improved!!LOL!!</p>
<p>Inspector general lists post-Madoff changes at SECFont size: A | A | A1:45 PM ET 9/29/09 | Marketwatch<br />
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) &#8212; The Securities and Exchange Commission&#8217;s inspector general on Tuesday recommended that the agency&#8217;s enforcement and inspections divisions make changes to how it handles tips and complaints, after it failed to follow up on detailed information and missed exposing the biggest fraud in the regulator&#8217;s history: the $50 billion Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Bernard Madoff. </p>
<p>The SEC should &#8220;require tips and complaints to be reviewed by at least two individuals experienced in the subject matter prior to deciding not to take further action,&#8221; according to one of 20 post-Madoff recommendations made by the SEC&#8217;s inspector general. </p>
<p>Tuesday&#8217;s report comes after SEC Inspector General David Kotz issued a detailed report on Sept. 2 about how the agency fumbled its various investigations into Madoff&#8217;s funds &#8212; in particular, how the agency failed to follow up on three versions of a complaint that well-known investor Harry Markopolos brought against Madoff in 2000, 2001 and 2005. </p>
<p>Based on that report, Kotz is making a series of recommendations about how the agency&#8217;s enforcement division could improve its programs to make sure another massive Ponzi scheme doesn&#8217;t happen again. </p>
<p>In addition to having at least two experienced persons review each tip and complaint, the report also seeks to have the SEC set up a more sophisticated system for handling incoming information. The system would require documentation of why a complaint &#8220;was or was not acted upon.&#8221; </p>
<p>Kotz also recommends that the agency establish and annually review guidelines that require all complaints that appear to be credible to be followed up with &#8220;in-depth&#8221; interviews to assess the validity of the claims. </p>
<p>Lack of experience</p>
<p>Responding to concerns that SEC investigators of the Madoff scam did not have sufficient experience, Kotz said the agency should put in place procedures to ensure that investigations are assigned to teams, where one individual has &#8220;specific&#8221; knowledge of the subject matter, such as Ponzi schemes. </p>
<p>This recommendation responds in part to one point discussed in the Sept. 2 report, which revealed that the majority of a 2005 investigation into Madoff was performed by a staff attorney who had recently graduated from law school, and only joined the SEC 19 months before she was assigned the investigation. The attorney had never been the lead staff attorney on any investigation before, the report said.</p>
<p>Inspection failure</p>
<p>Kotz also retained FTI Consulting Inc. to complete a review of the agency&#8217;s Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examinations &#8212; known as OCIE, the agency unit responsible for evaluating complaints and for periodically examining the books of institutions registered with the agency. </p>
<p>In 2003, for example, the unit didn&#8217;t &#8220;properly evaluate&#8221; a complaint from &#8220;highly credible sources&#8221; about problems with Madoff&#8217;s fund, according to the report. Madoff was registered with the agency and his funds were subject to &#8212; and received &#8212; periodic inspections. </p>
<p>FTI also had 37 recommendations, according to the report, including one that would have the SEC set up a collection system for gathering tips and complaints. The group also recommended that all tips considered by the inspections office are vetted within 30 days of being received, with any examinations of funds that take place because of the tips commencing 60 days after the complaint is received. </p>
<p>In a recommendation similar to Kotz&#8217;s proposal for the enforcement division, FTI also recommends that the inspections team document all interviews they complete and log all examinations into a tracking system. </p>
<p>The group also sought to establish guidelines for searching and screening news articles and other information from industry sources that may indicate securities-law violations by investors and broker-dealers. </p>
<p>&#8220;The protocol should include flexible searching capability to help identify specific areas of risk or concern and should include access to all relevant industry publications. The protocol should also include adequate screening criteria to eliminate unnecessary results and/or to more narrowly define a search in order to generate sufficient results,&#8221; according to the FTI report. &#8220;The screening criteria and any changes should be documented and the protocol should be reassessed regularly to determine if any modifications are appropriate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171645</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171645</guid>
		<description>Looks like high school homework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like high school homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171644</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171644</guid>
		<description>I hope he exposes Einhorn and the others for LEH.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope he exposes Einhorn and the others for LEH.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/the-history-of-short-side-stock-manipulation/comment-page-1/#comment-171643</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=1175#comment-171643</guid>
		<description>Anyone notice how Goldman&#039;s is at the top of the &#039;knights who say nee&#039; roundtable invite list. Hilarious but tragic:

9:40-11 a.m. - Panel 1
Controls on &quot;Naked&quot; Short Selling: Examination of Pre-Borrow and Hard Locate Requirements

William Conley, Goldman Sachs
Peter Driscoll, Security Traders Association
Dr. Frank Hatheway, NASDAQ OMX Group
William Hodash, The Depository Trust &amp; Clearing Corporation
Paul Lynch, State Street Corporation
Michael Mendelson, AQR Capital Management
Dennis Nixon, International Bancshares Corporation
William O&#039;Brien, Direct Edgeks, 
Thomas Perna, Quadriserv, Inc.

Could the SEC be more transparent?

Why don&#039;t they just say, &quot;Brought to you by Golden Slacks&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone notice how Goldman&#8217;s is at the top of the &#8216;knights who say nee&#8217; roundtable invite list. Hilarious but tragic:</p>
<p>9:40-11 a.m. &#8211; Panel 1<br />
Controls on &#8220;Naked&#8221; Short Selling: Examination of Pre-Borrow and Hard Locate Requirements</p>
<p>William Conley, Goldman Sachs<br />
Peter Driscoll, Security Traders Association<br />
Dr. Frank Hatheway, NASDAQ OMX Group<br />
William Hodash, The Depository Trust &amp; Clearing Corporation<br />
Paul Lynch, State Street Corporation<br />
Michael Mendelson, AQR Capital Management<br />
Dennis Nixon, International Bancshares Corporation<br />
William O&#8217;Brien, Direct Edgeks,<br />
Thomas Perna, Quadriserv, Inc.</p>
<p>Could the SEC be more transparent?</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t they just say, &#8220;Brought to you by Golden Slacks&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
