Thank you for your explanation about voting during a tender offer.

Yes, since the FTDs associated with “Ex-clearing arrangements” are not tallied, we can never know if the vote was rigged, because the SEC does not require these “Ex-clearing arrangements” to be reported.

I am wondering if there is some way I and / or others might be able to bring some attention to this dirty little secret on Wall Street using MEDX as an example.

At some point there is going to be a settlement of the Class Action Law Suit against BMY and MEDX. And those that oppose the MOU between the lawyers could bring this up before the Judge.

http://www.rense.com/general19/enemy.htm

Using various methods to suppress cures for virus-induced diseases, including the bankrupting of the company that produced the microscopes that allowed the viewing of virus life cycle, theft of research, purging of research from records, buying off researchers..etc..

http://www.rense.com/general31/rife.htm

More information about this topic is available here:
http://www.fixit.us/main/forum/blog.php?b=10

My only hope now, as it should have always been, is God will extract justice.

Slime, scumbags, oh ya, they already got away with it once when they created fiat banking. They are hoping to legalize fiat share ownership.

What’s next? Fiat ownership of your house, where 2 or 3 people own the same home?

It’s fraud and because they control the government doesn’t mean it’s not fraud.

They should be arrested. It’s fraud. They mail customers brokerage statements that fraudulently imply (mail fraud) that they actually bought something with that money when their plan was to guarantee you lost it by cheating.

People buy lottery tickets, based on their knowledge they have a 1 in 14 million chance of winning.

People buy penny stocks, based on their knowledge they have a 1 in a zillion chance of winning.

It’s not about how good the chances are in the lottery ticket or penny stock and it doesn’t matter if the penny stock is 99.999% guaranteed to fail. The public has the right to place the bet without the brokerage STEALING the money and issuing FRAUDULENT brokerage statements.

Despite the odds….

Sometimes lottery tickets make people millionaires and sometimes penny stocks make people millionaires.

Can you imagine if your local 7-11 “desked” a lottery ticket to you, taking your $2 and not actually giving you a real ticket? He gives you your numbers on a piece of paper, knowing that you won’t actually get paid if it pays off?

If the stock pays off, the brokerage goes under and looks for a government bail out.

If the ticket pays off, the clerk runs to Mexico with your $2.

For the brokerage industry, this worked like clockwork for ten years (when they were killing companies from 1999-2009), but you can’t kill every company. It’s like evolution, the remaining ones are strong.

In the case of the 7-11 worker, he’d be arrested.

In the case of the Goldman Sachs brokerage, they’d merge with all their competitors, getting the regulators to crack down on the Refco’s and Lehman Brothers, then get the government to give him billions to pay off on his bad bets, but then instead of using those fund to pay off, use those billions to naked short those companies more while giving himself a bonus.

If you aren’t mad, it’s because you don’t understand how they are bending you over.

Don’t feel bad, the ones doing it own the media and that’s why the other sheeple bend over and thank the thieves for the opportunity to be their slaves.

I know regulators, politicians and others that can make a difference read this.

The problem is really simple. Brokerages lie to their customers and tell them that they own something that doesn’t exist. Arrest the compliance officers in the brokerages that allow this lie to exist and all else will fall into place.

The shares are listed on your brokerage statement, but the brokerage doesn’t actually own anything.

They can’t lose by taking your money and not actually buying anything or adding to the demand for the stock. This is what the SEC means when they say shorts add liquidity to a stock. It’s kind of like p_ssing on shareholders to make sure things aren’t too dry.

They couldn’t care less about their fiduciary duty to you to hold your shares in custody, because they have plausible deniability. They can claim they believe your shares are in a clearing house they clear through in some other jurisdiction regulators can’t get to.

If they bet wrong, then the brokerage puts a “chill” on the stock. At first, buy orders start getting filled more and more slowly, where you can hit the ask and wait ten minutes to get filled. Finally, they start forbidding their clients from buying that stock.

If the squeeze gets really bad, the DTC stops trading on the stock and then if that doesn’t work, the SEC (Wallstreet’s hired PR arm, they suckered congress into using to replace the DOJ in 1933) finds some reason to ban trading.

Because the low liquidity stock is likely to also have low resources, this multi pronged approach is likely to kill / bankrupt the company and investors never realize why money was transferred from their wallets to the counterfeiters’, even though the investors were correct in their bet.

Laid off employees are unlikely to know the brokerage they have their money with is directly responsible for killing their employer. It’s plausible deniability.

I did a quick google and know nothing about the next link (it could be a scam), but here’s a perfect example of something that happens all the time.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2498074/

My point is EVEN IF the stock is a scam, it doesn’t give the brokerage the right to take your money, lie to you, avoid driving up demand, while increasing supply and claim they bought the shares, then try to drive those shares down.

Scams can go up and investors invest in their belief in momentum and supply and demand and brokerages are cooking up their own rules.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/racketeering-101-bailed-out-banks-threaten-systemic-collapse-if-fed-discloses-information

istandup,
There is no way to tell because FTDs associated with “Ex-clearing arrangements” are not tallied. If they were there would be no such thing as abusive naked short selling as it would be obvious to investors that what is often being sold doesn’t exist.

A study quoted by the NYSE showed “overvoting” in 100% of the 431 corporate votes studied. Recall that when an FTD or an NSCC SBP “borrow” occurs a readily sellable share price depressing “security entitlement” is credited to the account of the buying party in the case of an FTD and to the NSCC “C” sub account of the lending party in the case of an SBP “borrow”. UCC Article-8 mandates that the “holders” of “security entitlements” be allowed to exercise all of the rights and property interest of the security involved. One of these rights is the right to vote.

The crooked clearing firms try to hide massive disparities between the # of shares they hold in their “shares account” at the NSCC i.e. the ones that got delivered successfully and the # of votes they permit by allowing their clients to vote a “proportionate interest” in the # of shares they got delivery of. Recall that margin account investors and the b/d that loaned them the money are kind of like “co-owners” of the shares. Since technically “Cede and Co.” is the “legal owner” of all shares held in “street name” and since technically the “registered owner” of shares on a transfer agents record of ownership gets accorded voting rights then huge disparities can be easily buried. For the crooks the key is to hold all shares in an “anonymously pooled” format so that individual parcels of shares not allowed to vote cannot be identified. The foundational corporate concept of “one share, one vote” had to get thrown under the bus in order to allow these crimes to go undetected. If you want to exercise the full voting power of that which you purchased you need to demand the delivery of your shares and become the “legal owner” or “shareholder of record” on the TA’s list. Since 90% of all shares are held in “street name” in an anonymously pooled format an investor can only see that which the NSCC allows them to see which is zero.

I tried to post your link on the Yahoo Message Board and it was NOT POSTED. Hummmm… It is an excellent article:

Wall Street Fox Beds Down in Taxpayer Henhouse…

Wall Street Fox Beds Down in Taxpayer Henhouse: David Reilly

Commentary by David Reilly

Aug. 26 (Bloomberg) — What do you do with someone who played a key role in the deregulatory push that ultimately led to the government’s $700 billion Wall Street bailout? In Washington, the answer is easy: Have him help oversee the rescue.

No wonder life in the U.S. capital can seem like an episode of “The Twilight Zone.”

( http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aP7ePs7AR.SE )

( http://bms.com/news/press_releases/pages/default.aspx?RSSLink=http://www.businesswire.com/news/bms/20090827005479/en&t=633869589811742534 )

Since MEDX is a biotechnology company, we all know that the Hedge Funds as Market Maker Guests have used “Naked Counterfeit Short Selling” against it for many years.

One of the many negative effects of “Naked Counterfeit Short Selling” upon any targeted company is the existence of a larger number of shares for voting purposes than the official outstanding number of shares.

In this MEDX example, the SEC does NOT allow the individual investors (nor the company management) to know how many extra voting shares (FTDs – IOUs – Security Entitlements) are floating in the system.

So the shareholders and company management are NOT allowed to know if the tendered shares of MEDX, which represent 87.7% of the official outstanding shares, are really 87.7% of all the shares floating in the system or not.

Additionally, the SEC rules HIDE the FTDs in the one reported system for up to about 5 months. So if Naked Shares were sold during the tender offer to help push the tendered percent above 50% and above 90%, the SEC rules will NOT allow us to know, since the SEC considers “Naked Counterfeit Short Selling” as a proprietary trading method of the rich and powerful Wall Streeters.
If my calculation is correct, the SEC will not RELEASE the FTD numbers during the tendering process until the beginning of next year.

QUESTION:
Does anyone know of any legal process for finding out if any Counterfeit Shares were sold during the tender offering period?

FYI – BMY as started a new tender offer in an attempt to get 90% of the MEDX shares tendered so it can proceed with a Quick Merger, which requires no shareholder meeting.

I find it interesting that a tender offering essentially ONLY counts the YES votes as tendered shares, and does NOT count the NO votes (the un-tendered shares). It seems to me that this allows Wall Street to more easily HIDE all the extra votes above and beyond the official number of outstanding shares.

FYI2: Goldman Sachs will receive $21 Million Dollars from MEDX if the tender offer is successful.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=aP7ePs7AR.SE

This has to be stopped somehow.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?play=1&video=1225880817

Though I doubt Palm Beach would exactly throw a perty.

“Self-regulation turned out to create, what I consider to be, outside the Depression, the greatest financial crisis in the history of the country,” he added.”

“Self-regulation” in the financial industry is a cruel joke that just about destroyed the world economies.

Does anyone know WHEN “Self-regulation” in the financial industry started?