<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shocking insights into the mind of a naked short seller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/</link>
	<description>Investigating naked short selling, economic warfare, and the financial crisis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:02:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-159257</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-159257</guid>
		<description>I do not believe any owner of any stock would agree to have their stock lent out to be used in any method of trading that eventually caused the value of the stock to fall. The small investor that has a 401k to invest in the market is always the loser of these usually very large trades by hedge funds that sell millions of shares at the higher price causing an additional large amount of selling too basically flood the market with shares resulting in  the value (demand) to drop and forcing the price lower. This is simply a method of large traders being able to strip the appreciation of a stock’s growth and take out that value and then returning a borrowed stock back to an unknowing owner of the stock at the now lower value.

I challenge any of you to tell me you would agree to lend your stock to be used in this way. I suspect no one here would agree to having your stock depreciated in this matter. Wall Street knows this and had the power to stop the selling of their stock  short and avoided destroying the value of their shares. 

A small 401k investor does not have the power to protect his stock&#039;s value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not believe any owner of any stock would agree to have their stock lent out to be used in any method of trading that eventually caused the value of the stock to fall. The small investor that has a 401k to invest in the market is always the loser of these usually very large trades by hedge funds that sell millions of shares at the higher price causing an additional large amount of selling too basically flood the market with shares resulting in  the value (demand) to drop and forcing the price lower. This is simply a method of large traders being able to strip the appreciation of a stock’s growth and take out that value and then returning a borrowed stock back to an unknowing owner of the stock at the now lower value.</p>
<p>I challenge any of you to tell me you would agree to lend your stock to be used in this way. I suspect no one here would agree to having your stock depreciated in this matter. Wall Street knows this and had the power to stop the selling of their stock  short and avoided destroying the value of their shares. </p>
<p>A small 401k investor does not have the power to protect his stock&#8217;s value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhelburn</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-156045</link>
		<dc:creator>mhelburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-156045</guid>
		<description>I tried to log in on the right side and got negative messages.  You might want to check that out.  I&#039;m posting here as a check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to log in on the right side and got negative messages.  You might want to check that out.  I&#8217;m posting here as a check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-156033</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-156033</guid>
		<description>Love, love, love the new site!  It&#039;s top notch and new visitors will find their way around much easier.  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love, love, love the new site!  It&#8217;s top notch and new visitors will find their way around much easier.  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlk</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150696</link>
		<dc:creator>carlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150696</guid>
		<description>Without having watched the video yet, I tried to collect something meaningful from the quote derived from this short seller surrounding apparent longs, i.e., institutions who might be loaning their shares to the other side of the table. 

From what I can tell, he seems to be stating that, potential loaners of shares with &quot;inside knowledge&quot; of certain companies, might be setting the shorts up for a beating from time to time.   

I am a large fan of Deep Capture and the coalition&#039;s work, at the same time I am always trying to find objectivity. 

As an investor, I am finding the lack of transparency on the institutional side of the equation, to be just as perplexing and without full disclosure. 

For fun, I&#039;m going to watch the video now. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without having watched the video yet, I tried to collect something meaningful from the quote derived from this short seller surrounding apparent longs, i.e., institutions who might be loaning their shares to the other side of the table. </p>
<p>From what I can tell, he seems to be stating that, potential loaners of shares with &#8220;inside knowledge&#8221; of certain companies, might be setting the shorts up for a beating from time to time.   </p>
<p>I am a large fan of Deep Capture and the coalition&#8217;s work, at the same time I am always trying to find objectivity. </p>
<p>As an investor, I am finding the lack of transparency on the institutional side of the equation, to be just as perplexing and without full disclosure. </p>
<p>For fun, I&#8217;m going to watch the video now. <img src='http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Beyer</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150569</link>
		<dc:creator>William Beyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 13:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150569</guid>
		<description>Lucy Komisar has written about the naked shorting of US Treasuries at her Komisar Scoop website. If true, is it not clear that the entire financial system is owned by organized crime?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucy Komisar has written about the naked shorting of US Treasuries at her Komisar Scoop website. If true, is it not clear that the entire financial system is owned by organized crime?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marv Eatinger</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150395</link>
		<dc:creator>Marv Eatinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150395</guid>
		<description>Government Accountability Office:
 
How in the hell can the regulatory authorities for publicly traded equities look the other way when it concerns &quot;NAKED SHORT SELLING&quot; WITH THE ABILITY TO COVER THOSE NAKED SHORT SHARES THAT WERE SOLD NAKED SHORT THREE YEARS EARLIER, THREE YEARS  LATER BY STAGING ACTUALTRADES AND THEN ADDING TWO EXTERNALLY ADDED ZEROS TO THE VOLUME OF THESE ACTUAL TRADES!!  You therefore have covered 5,000,000 plus &quot;NAKED SHORT SALES&quot; of Daleco Resources Corp three years later,  with 1/100 of the actual volume of shares that were sold &quot;NAKED SHORT&quot; !!  Who will ever pay any capital gains taxes on this transaction,  since the transaction has been able to circumvent any scrutiny by any regulatory authority in the United States? 
 
Marv Eatinger
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: marv eatinger 
To: ENFORCEMENT ; Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov 
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 7:42 PM
Subject: DALECO RESOURCES CORP - WALL STREET EQUITIES, INC. - JB OXFORD &amp; CO - JB OXFORD HOLDINGS - J.B. OXFORD SUBSIDIARY &quot;NATIONAL CLEARING CORP.&quot;


 
Dear Regulatory Authorities For Publicly Traded Equities On United States Markets:
Was Wall Street Equities, Inc. who was one of Daleco Resources Corp Market Makers from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 while Daleco was delisted to the Pink Sheets from the OTCBB market, involved in &quot;Naked Short Selling&quot; of Daleco&#039;s common stock and the fraudulent addition of TWO ZEROS to all of Daleco&#039;s actual trades from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 while Daleco was using two symbols of DLOV &amp; DLVO while listed only the Pink Sheets????
 
Is it like BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER?
 
Sincerely,
 
Marv Eatinger
================================================================
The following hypothesis is presented for evaluation:
 
From approximately December 1, 1996 through January of 1997 Daleco Resources Corp had more than 9,000,000 Regulation &quot;S&quot; shares traded on the NASDAQ Market. WAS WALL STREET EQUITIES, INC. (DISCOUNT BROKER IN NEW YORK) ONE OF DALECO RESOURCES CORP MARKET MAKERS? How was Wall Street Equities, Inc. of Rhode Island connected to Wall Street Equities, Inc. of New York? 
 
On February 24, 1998 (official record) Daleco Resources Corp effected a 1 for 10 reverse split of its common stock. Prior to this February 24, 1998 date Daleco Resources Corp issued a press release stating that the effective date for the 1 for 10 reverse split was February 17, 1998! There is good evidence that Daleco was able to disguise and hide from the SEC in Daleco&#039;s public filings, that this 1 for 10 reverse split ever took place. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT DALECO RESOURCES CORP HAD AN OFFICIAL EFFECTIVE REVERSE SPLIT DATE OF FEBRUARY 24, 1998 (DALECO&#039;S PUBLIC FILINGS WITH THE SEC), BUT ALSO HAD AN EFFECTIVE REVERSE SPLIT DATE OF FEBRUARY 17, 1998 (AS CHANGED WITH ITS CHARTER IN DELAWARE WITH FILING ON FEB. 17, 1998 WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF DELAWARE&#039;S OFFICE) AS PART OF A DUAL AGENDA? INSTEAD OF A 1 FOR 10 REVERSE SPLIT, IT MIGHT BE CONSTRUED AS A 1 FOR 100 REVERSE SPLIT AS PART OF A DUAL AGENDA?
 
From March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 (while Daleco Resources Corp was deleted from the OTCBB and only listed on the Pink Sheets) Daleco Resources Corp had trading volume of 13,451,000 as shown on www.moneycentral.com historical data. WWW.YAHOO.COM finance shows Daleco&#039;s (symbol DLOV.OB) total trading volume for the period starting March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 as 144,500 shares.  So, as associated with some certain area of regulatory control for public equities, Daleco Resources Corp would appear to have traded a total volume of 13,451,000 shares from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000, when in fact Daleco Resources Corp only traded a total volume of 144,500 shares DURING THIS PERIOD OF TIME! 
 
FACT: UNDER ONE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED DUAL AGENDAS DALECO RESOURCES CORP HAD TWO ZEROS ADDED TO THEIR ACTUAL DAILY TRADING VOLUME FROM MARCH 1, 2000 TO AUGUST 1, 2000 WHILE DALECO WAS ONLY LISTED ON THE PINK SHEETS AND USING TWO SYMBOLS OF &quot;DLOV&quot; AND &quot;DLVO&quot; !
 
During the period of time from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 Wall Street Equities, Inc. (discount broker in New York) was one of four market makers for Daleco Resources Corp while trading on the Pink Sheets.
 
IN APRIL OF YEAR 2002 WALL STREET EQUITIES, INC. SOLD ALL OF THEIR ACCOUNTS TO J.B. OXFORD AND WENT OUT OF BUSINESS!!!!! 
[ &quot;J.B. Oxford, which sold off its main operations in 2004 as regulators closed in, did not return calls seeking comment.&quot; ]

 
================================================
 
ARCHIVED RECORD...ID# 89337 
Wall Street Equities, Inc. 
Purpose:  INVESTMSNT MANAGEMENT, ACQUISITIONS, FINANCIAL SERVICES,CAPITAL GROWTH AND ACQUISITION. 
General Information 
Status:  RC
Charter: DBC
Chapter: TITLE: 7-1.1-51
State: RHODE ISLAND
Duration:  PERPETUAL
File Date: 04/29/1996
Effective Date:N/A
Last Report Date: N/A
Archived Date: 09/20/1999
Annual Report Image: Not available
Help On Viewing Annual Reports

Sic Code: 6130--

Authorized Shares: 1,000 SHS NO PAR COMMON 

====================================
 
Publication: Business Wire
Publication Date: 03-APR-02
Format: Online - approximately words
Delivery: Immediate Online Access

Article Excerpt
Business Editors 

LOS ANGELES--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 3, 2002 

With Its Fourth Acquisition, JB Oxford to Gain 3,800 Accounts 

and $140 Million in Customer Assets 

JB Oxford Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq:JBOH), which through its JB Oxford &amp; Company subsidiary is a leading provider of discount brokerage services to clients nationwide, has signed an asset purchase agreement to purchase the customer accounts of Wall Street Equities, Inc., a New York-based discount brokerage firm. Under the terms of the all-stock transaction, JB Oxford &amp; Company... 
 
=================
----- Original Message ----- 
From: &quot;Ron Franz&quot; 
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [CSI Website Query: daily volume figures multiplied by 100 - symbol DLOV]


&gt;I had them remove the extra digits. 
&gt; Yahoo should have it corrected by this afternoon.
&gt; Please let me know if you do not see the corrections.
&gt; Thank You,
&gt; 
&gt; 
&gt; marv@mitec.net wrote:
&gt;&gt; Regarding:
&gt;&gt; Data Error Report
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Message:
&gt;&gt; On March 7, 2000 the following web sites showed volume for the day for DLOV - Daleco Resources CP of 2,300 shares: FinancialWeb.com and Quicken.com.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; On March 8, 2000 the following web sites showed volume for the day for DLOV - Daleco Resources CP of 26,200 shares: FinancialWeb.com, Quicken.com and MSN Money Central.com.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; On March 13, 2000 Barchart.com showed DLOV - Daleco Resources Corp volume for the day as 2,000 shares.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Daleco Resources Corp was deleted from the OTCBB to the Pink Sheets on February 22, 2000 to be effective on February 28, 2000. Yahoo Finance &amp; MoneyCentral web sites are presently the only web sites that I can find that show Historical Volume figures for the time period of March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 when Daleco Resources Corp was listed only on the Pink Sheets.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Yahoo Finance Historical Volume figures for the above mentioned dates is shown as follows:
&gt;&gt;              March 7, 2000--------------------230,000 shares
&gt;&gt;       
&gt;&gt;              March 8, 2000------------------2,620,000 shares
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;              March 13, 2000------------------200,000  shares
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Apparently from the period starting March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000, all trades that took place in Daleco&#039;s stock had two zeros added to the daily trading volume!
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; From:
&gt;&gt; marv@mitec.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government Accountability Office:</p>
<p>How in the hell can the regulatory authorities for publicly traded equities look the other way when it concerns &#8220;NAKED SHORT SELLING&#8221; WITH THE ABILITY TO COVER THOSE NAKED SHORT SHARES THAT WERE SOLD NAKED SHORT THREE YEARS EARLIER, THREE YEARS  LATER BY STAGING ACTUALTRADES AND THEN ADDING TWO EXTERNALLY ADDED ZEROS TO THE VOLUME OF THESE ACTUAL TRADES!!  You therefore have covered 5,000,000 plus &#8220;NAKED SHORT SALES&#8221; of Daleco Resources Corp three years later,  with 1/100 of the actual volume of shares that were sold &#8220;NAKED SHORT&#8221; !!  Who will ever pay any capital gains taxes on this transaction,  since the transaction has been able to circumvent any scrutiny by any regulatory authority in the United States? </p>
<p>Marv Eatinger</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211; Original Message &#8212;&#8211;<br />
From: marv eatinger<br />
To: ENFORCEMENT ; <a href="mailto:Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov">Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov</a><br />
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 7:42 PM<br />
Subject: DALECO RESOURCES CORP &#8211; WALL STREET EQUITIES, INC. &#8211; JB OXFORD &amp; CO &#8211; JB OXFORD HOLDINGS &#8211; J.B. OXFORD SUBSIDIARY &#8220;NATIONAL CLEARING CORP.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear Regulatory Authorities For Publicly Traded Equities On United States Markets:<br />
Was Wall Street Equities, Inc. who was one of Daleco Resources Corp Market Makers from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 while Daleco was delisted to the Pink Sheets from the OTCBB market, involved in &#8220;Naked Short Selling&#8221; of Daleco&#8217;s common stock and the fraudulent addition of TWO ZEROS to all of Daleco&#8217;s actual trades from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 while Daleco was using two symbols of DLOV &amp; DLVO while listed only the Pink Sheets????</p>
<p>Is it like BIRDS OF A FEATHER FLOCK TOGETHER?</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Marv Eatinger<br />
================================================================<br />
The following hypothesis is presented for evaluation:</p>
<p>From approximately December 1, 1996 through January of 1997 Daleco Resources Corp had more than 9,000,000 Regulation &#8220;S&#8221; shares traded on the NASDAQ Market. WAS WALL STREET EQUITIES, INC. (DISCOUNT BROKER IN NEW YORK) ONE OF DALECO RESOURCES CORP MARKET MAKERS? How was Wall Street Equities, Inc. of Rhode Island connected to Wall Street Equities, Inc. of New York? </p>
<p>On February 24, 1998 (official record) Daleco Resources Corp effected a 1 for 10 reverse split of its common stock. Prior to this February 24, 1998 date Daleco Resources Corp issued a press release stating that the effective date for the 1 for 10 reverse split was February 17, 1998! There is good evidence that Daleco was able to disguise and hide from the SEC in Daleco&#8217;s public filings, that this 1 for 10 reverse split ever took place. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT DALECO RESOURCES CORP HAD AN OFFICIAL EFFECTIVE REVERSE SPLIT DATE OF FEBRUARY 24, 1998 (DALECO&#8217;S PUBLIC FILINGS WITH THE SEC), BUT ALSO HAD AN EFFECTIVE REVERSE SPLIT DATE OF FEBRUARY 17, 1998 (AS CHANGED WITH ITS CHARTER IN DELAWARE WITH FILING ON FEB. 17, 1998 WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF DELAWARE&#8217;S OFFICE) AS PART OF A DUAL AGENDA? INSTEAD OF A 1 FOR 10 REVERSE SPLIT, IT MIGHT BE CONSTRUED AS A 1 FOR 100 REVERSE SPLIT AS PART OF A DUAL AGENDA?</p>
<p>From March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 (while Daleco Resources Corp was deleted from the OTCBB and only listed on the Pink Sheets) Daleco Resources Corp had trading volume of 13,451,000 as shown on <a href="http://www.moneycentral.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.moneycentral.com</a> historical data. <a href="http://WWW.YAHOO.COM" rel="nofollow">http://WWW.YAHOO.COM</a> finance shows Daleco&#8217;s (symbol DLOV.OB) total trading volume for the period starting March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 as 144,500 shares.  So, as associated with some certain area of regulatory control for public equities, Daleco Resources Corp would appear to have traded a total volume of 13,451,000 shares from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000, when in fact Daleco Resources Corp only traded a total volume of 144,500 shares DURING THIS PERIOD OF TIME! </p>
<p>FACT: UNDER ONE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED DUAL AGENDAS DALECO RESOURCES CORP HAD TWO ZEROS ADDED TO THEIR ACTUAL DAILY TRADING VOLUME FROM MARCH 1, 2000 TO AUGUST 1, 2000 WHILE DALECO WAS ONLY LISTED ON THE PINK SHEETS AND USING TWO SYMBOLS OF &#8220;DLOV&#8221; AND &#8220;DLVO&#8221; !</p>
<p>During the period of time from March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 Wall Street Equities, Inc. (discount broker in New York) was one of four market makers for Daleco Resources Corp while trading on the Pink Sheets.</p>
<p>IN APRIL OF YEAR 2002 WALL STREET EQUITIES, INC. SOLD ALL OF THEIR ACCOUNTS TO J.B. OXFORD AND WENT OUT OF BUSINESS!!!!!<br />
[ "J.B. Oxford, which sold off its main operations in 2004 as regulators closed in, did not return calls seeking comment." ]</p>
<p>================================================</p>
<p>ARCHIVED RECORD&#8230;ID# 89337<br />
Wall Street Equities, Inc.<br />
Purpose:  INVESTMSNT MANAGEMENT, ACQUISITIONS, FINANCIAL SERVICES,CAPITAL GROWTH AND ACQUISITION.<br />
General Information<br />
Status:  RC<br />
Charter: DBC<br />
Chapter: TITLE: 7-1.1-51<br />
State: RHODE ISLAND<br />
Duration:  PERPETUAL<br />
File Date: 04/29/1996<br />
Effective Date:N/A<br />
Last Report Date: N/A<br />
Archived Date: 09/20/1999<br />
Annual Report Image: Not available<br />
Help On Viewing Annual Reports</p>
<p>Sic Code: 6130&#8211;</p>
<p>Authorized Shares: 1,000 SHS NO PAR COMMON </p>
<p>====================================</p>
<p>Publication: Business Wire<br />
Publication Date: 03-APR-02<br />
Format: Online &#8211; approximately words<br />
Delivery: Immediate Online Access</p>
<p>Article Excerpt<br />
Business Editors </p>
<p>LOS ANGELES&#8211;(BUSINESS WIRE)&#8211;April 3, 2002 </p>
<p>With Its Fourth Acquisition, JB Oxford to Gain 3,800 Accounts </p>
<p>and $140 Million in Customer Assets </p>
<p>JB Oxford Holdings, Inc. (Nasdaq:JBOH), which through its JB Oxford &amp; Company subsidiary is a leading provider of discount brokerage services to clients nationwide, has signed an asset purchase agreement to purchase the customer accounts of Wall Street Equities, Inc., a New York-based discount brokerage firm. Under the terms of the all-stock transaction, JB Oxford &amp; Company&#8230; </p>
<p>=================<br />
&#8212;&#8211; Original Message &#8212;&#8211;<br />
From: &#8220;Ron Franz&#8221;<br />
To:<br />
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:13 AM<br />
Subject: Re: [CSI Website Query: daily volume figures multiplied by 100 - symbol DLOV]</p>
<p>&gt;I had them remove the extra digits.<br />
&gt; Yahoo should have it corrected by this afternoon.<br />
&gt; Please let me know if you do not see the corrections.<br />
&gt; Thank You,<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt;<br />
&gt; <a href="mailto:marv@mitec.net">marv@mitec.net</a> wrote:<br />
&gt;&gt; Regarding:<br />
&gt;&gt; Data Error Report<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Message:<br />
&gt;&gt; On March 7, 2000 the following web sites showed volume for the day for DLOV &#8211; Daleco Resources CP of 2,300 shares: FinancialWeb.com and Quicken.com.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; On March 8, 2000 the following web sites showed volume for the day for DLOV &#8211; Daleco Resources CP of 26,200 shares: FinancialWeb.com, Quicken.com and MSN Money Central.com.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; On March 13, 2000 Barchart.com showed DLOV &#8211; Daleco Resources Corp volume for the day as 2,000 shares.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Daleco Resources Corp was deleted from the OTCBB to the Pink Sheets on February 22, 2000 to be effective on February 28, 2000. Yahoo Finance &amp; MoneyCentral web sites are presently the only web sites that I can find that show Historical Volume figures for the time period of March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000 when Daleco Resources Corp was listed only on the Pink Sheets.<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Yahoo Finance Historical Volume figures for the above mentioned dates is shown as follows:<br />
&gt;&gt;              March 7, 2000&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;230,000 shares<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;              March 8, 2000&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;2,620,000 shares<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;              March 13, 2000&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;200,000  shares<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; Apparently from the period starting March 1, 2000 to August 1, 2000, all trades that took place in Daleco&#8217;s stock had two zeros added to the daily trading volume!<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt;<br />
&gt;&gt; From:<br />
&gt;&gt; <a href="mailto:marv@mitec.net">marv@mitec.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150339</guid>
		<description>Thug Weiss will not give Overstock a break!

http://seekingalpha.com/article/129192-overstock-com-questionable-payment-to-director-consultant?source=yahoo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thug Weiss will not give Overstock a break!</p>
<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/129192-overstock-com-questionable-payment-to-director-consultant?source=yahoo" rel="nofollow">http://seekingalpha.com/article/129192-overstock-com-questionable-payment-to-director-consultant?source=yahoo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150297</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does this Manuel Asensio character look like a bad guy in a batman movie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does this Manuel Asensio character look like a bad guy in a batman movie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NOYBIZNIZ</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150295</link>
		<dc:creator>NOYBIZNIZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150295</guid>
		<description>Regarding this notion of &quot;price discovery&quot;, something occurred to me:

Buyers will always seek the lower price.  Short Sellers have an incentive to drive the price down.  Therefore, as they are selling the shares that they borrow (or don&#039;t), it is very easy for them to say to a potential buyer &quot;Look, XYZ just traded for $100 per share.  I can sell it to you for $97, $96, $95.....

So, if they are providing a share (and that is a big IF) for a lower price, a buyer is always going to take advantage of the opportunity to buy at a lower price.  So, this notion that Short Sellers are helping to &quot;discover the fair price&quot; is absurd because they are incentivized to drive the price down.  When you factor that in with the now widely-held belief that many Short Sellers are not borrowing or delivering the share that they are selling, it is going to do great damage to share prices.

Why is it that the only people who don&#039;t seem to understand this are those who are strongly in favor of (and likely profiting from) Short Selling??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding this notion of &#8220;price discovery&#8221;, something occurred to me:</p>
<p>Buyers will always seek the lower price.  Short Sellers have an incentive to drive the price down.  Therefore, as they are selling the shares that they borrow (or don&#8217;t), it is very easy for them to say to a potential buyer &#8220;Look, XYZ just traded for $100 per share.  I can sell it to you for $97, $96, $95&#8230;..</p>
<p>So, if they are providing a share (and that is a big IF) for a lower price, a buyer is always going to take advantage of the opportunity to buy at a lower price.  So, this notion that Short Sellers are helping to &#8220;discover the fair price&#8221; is absurd because they are incentivized to drive the price down.  When you factor that in with the now widely-held belief that many Short Sellers are not borrowing or delivering the share that they are selling, it is going to do great damage to share prices.</p>
<p>Why is it that the only people who don&#8217;t seem to understand this are those who are strongly in favor of (and likely profiting from) Short Selling??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150286</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150286</guid>
		<description>Oh horrors, the NYT thinks anti-shorts have lost their minds:

http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/nail-the-shorts/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh horrors, the NYT thinks anti-shorts have lost their minds:</p>
<p><a href="http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/nail-the-shorts/" rel="nofollow">http://norris.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/08/nail-the-shorts/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150284</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150284</guid>
		<description>Manuel Ass... doesn&#039;t give a rat&#039;s ass about discovery, price or otherwise. As long as nobody discovers what he&#039;s doing to cripple investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manuel Ass&#8230; doesn&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass about discovery, price or otherwise. As long as nobody discovers what he&#8217;s doing to cripple investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarge</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150262</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150262</guid>
		<description>I keep hearing this argument that short selling helps in price discovery.  Isn&#039;t price set by the rule of supply and demand (a stock is only worth what somebody is willing to pay for it)?  I understand that short selling can help to increase liquidity in the market, but just because short selling increases liquidity does not mean that liquidity helps with price discovery.  More liquidity is just more liquidity.  I&#039;d surely appreciate it if someone would show me the data that shows just what short selling does that is vitally important to the whole price discovery process, but absent proof, I have to admit the whole argument just sounds regurgitated and without merit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing this argument that short selling helps in price discovery.  Isn&#8217;t price set by the rule of supply and demand (a stock is only worth what somebody is willing to pay for it)?  I understand that short selling can help to increase liquidity in the market, but just because short selling increases liquidity does not mean that liquidity helps with price discovery.  More liquidity is just more liquidity.  I&#8217;d surely appreciate it if someone would show me the data that shows just what short selling does that is vitally important to the whole price discovery process, but absent proof, I have to admit the whole argument just sounds regurgitated and without merit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150252</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150252</guid>
		<description>How could one ever trust anyone that looks, sounds and says what this preposterous character Asenio advocates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could one ever trust anyone that looks, sounds and says what this preposterous character Asenio advocates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150239</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150239</guid>
		<description>Yesquire, I couldn&#039;t agree more.

&quot;1. Immediate seizure of the DTCC by the Department of Justice.

2. Followed by full public disclosure of the real securities “float” of all publicly traded U.S. corporations, which would include all “securities entitlements”.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesquire, I couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
<p>&#8220;1. Immediate seizure of the DTCC by the Department of Justice.</p>
<p>2. Followed by full public disclosure of the real securities “float” of all publicly traded U.S. corporations, which would include all “securities entitlements”.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/shocking-insights-into-the-mind-of-a-naked-short-seller/comment-page-1/#comment-150238</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/?p=605#comment-150238</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t believe he was saying &quot;I don&#039;t need to deliver what I sold to you&quot; and the headline above his head said &quot;Chanos is against the uptick rule&quot; or something like that.

It&#039;s too confusing for the layman to realize what&#039;s going on.

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=BCOM&amp;date=20090408&amp;id=9773028</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t believe he was saying &#8220;I don&#8217;t need to deliver what I sold to you&#8221; and the headline above his head said &#8220;Chanos is against the uptick rule&#8221; or something like that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too confusing for the layman to realize what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=BCOM&#038;date=20090408&#038;id=9773028" rel="nofollow">http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=BCOM&#038;date=20090408&#038;id=9773028</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
