Comments on: Prepare to be astounded

By: Judd Bagley

Judd Bagley — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:18:27 +0000

Arun,
I’m afraid we’re not going to agree on much where SPNG is concerned.
On Roddy: you have to understand that since his sugar daddy went bk, he’s had to try to make a living as a reporter the old fashioned way. Patch was one of the first to criticize SPNG. He told Kaja Whitehouse about it and Roddy Boyd showed up on his own months later, while scavenging for freelance work. As I understand it, Roddy’s and Patch’s interactions have been limited to a single, short phone call placed by Roddy. You cannot criticize Patch for being on the same side of as issue as Roddy when Patch was there first.
Also, I’m in the process of preparing a post about the similarities uniting SPNG, USXP and CMKM but I don’t think it’s going to be the one you’re hoping for.

By: Arun Someshwar

Arun Someshwar — Sun, 06 Jun 2010 21:18:42 +0000

Judd…how well do you guys really know David Patch ? I ask because Roddy Boyd (I am sure you know who that is) has spent a considerable amount of time and effort bashing Spongetech (SPNG) which in and of itself should raise an alarm in the minds of you investigative types…David Patch has done pretty much the same thing (spent considerable time bashing SPNG) and also openly stated he has spoken to Boyd about the lawsuit against him by SPNG…Patch works in tandem with a number of SPNG bashers on IHUB that serve without doubt as front-men/women for hedge funds and other financial institutions…the crime is so blatant that one can find the same coterie of relentless paid bashers that bashed USXP with screen names like janice shell, puppydotcom, dickandbabs, seabiscuit, overachiever, scion, Mighty_Mezz, etc., etc…with all due respect, you, Mark and Patrick need to be careful about associating with Patch as his game appears to have changed rather markedly to the dark side…

A share count of SPNG has been ordered by the DTCC as of last Friday…this is a story you do not want to miss…IFF the results signify a significant naked short position in SPNG, I hope you guys will shed light on it and at least then come to the rescue of common investors by insisting the DTCC and SEC effect a hard cover…

By: Anarcho-regulation: blogging the naked short sellers away | Deep Capture: exposing the crime of naked short selling

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 01:30:42 +0000

[...] (usually delayed by two to three weeks). We took advantage of this reporting time lag to publicly predict – based on the matched blocks – delivery failures in shares of Sears Holdings (NASDAQ:SHLD) [...]

By: SJJNAMARTIN

SJJNAMARTIN — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:08:56 +0000

wow what will happen to SPNG…???

staying tuned…

Hedged my position from 877K to 400K

so if Mr Patch is right, I wont lose more than I haved to,or hear him and others on ihubs SPNG board say see, we told you so, you lost everything on SPNG penny stock scam…… and if he is wrong… oh boy, get the wheel barrel honey we are heading to the bank!

Either way I feel a winner, because I had planned on buying even more shares, but now believe this is the best plan for me, have enough to get PAID, but dont have too many to lose your shirt!

God Bless everyone !

By: SJJNAMARTIN

SJJNAMARTIN — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:40:19 +0000

I agree, the system is incredibly faulty, and the theives take full advantage of it…It is a sick World ( The Securities Markets)

If the general public only knew what was really going on!

By: buybuybuy

buybuybuy — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:36:05 +0000

Congrats on your accuracy predicting the fails Judd. I`ll call it yeoman`s work using this definition–

3 : one that performs great and loyal service

By: marry

marry — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:21:04 +0000

Judd, This had nothing to do with SPNG! T/Y One less soldier MARRY

By: Judd Bagley

Judd Bagley — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:43:39 +0000

Marry,
You do indeed have the wrong David Patch, and this is not the appropriate venue for this conversation. Please take this over to a message board dedicated to SPNG.

By: marry

marry — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:16:25 +0000

David, I read all and every post,you on the other hand I do not think got to see all of mine.I have read most all of your writings Judds and Patrick’s. If you saw my last post then I don’t think I would have to explain! David, tell me, would you talk this way to your mother? Maybe I have the wrong David Patch? T/Y.

By: Patchie

Patchie — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:53:55 +0000

Marry, apparently you had no issue with Robert and others harassing an innocent person to the point of trying to get him fired for comments he never made.

My name is David Patch. I have spent a decade raising awareness of short sale abuses. Spongetech shareholders are outraged by the fact that I have identified that insiders and not NSS is creating their problems. in response they attack me and attack innocent people because they can’t/won’t open their eyes. it was the same with USXP and with CMKX. It is a hard and true lesson to what is wrong with this market.

You likened me to Gary Weiss. That was amusing as you never questioned the repeated posts of others presented against me on a thread having nothing to do with SPNG. those that attacked me wanted to silence my opinion and you had nothing to say until i protected myself.

I suggest that if you want to enter a conversation, you get the entire story before entering. The timeline clearly shows my patience and clearly shows your capability at pulling such a quick trigger on opinion without the facts.

Anytime you want to stop hiding behind an alias and put your full name up for criticism and personal threat I welcome it. I will let these loons call you at all hours of the night and threaten instead of invading my household.

By: marry

marry — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:19:58 +0000

My Dad told me when I was a little girl, (you can’t be right and wrong at the same time!) Please think about that. Again T/Y for your time.

By: marry

marry — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:10:39 +0000

Thankyou Judd for your answer, it was a kind way to show calling people FOOLS,DIMWITTED,DIPSHIT BASHERS and other names is the same as Gary W.

By: Judd Bagley

Judd Bagley — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:15:55 +0000

Marry,
I removed it because comparing somebody to Gary Weiss is profoundly insulting and you did so not once but twice.

By: marry

marry — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:09:31 +0000

?////// Why was my last post deleted about Patchie/Gary W.? Judd you are bigger than that !

By: Patchie

Patchie — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:00:29 +0000

LMAO. Why don’t you fools give Judd his due deserves and stay on topic?

What transpired here by Judd was monumental. He was able to predict the future without access to the data regulators have access to. That is what this thread is about and the on-topic issue. If I were Judd I would remove all this other garbage as it detracts from his efforts and his success.

Thanks Judd. Your efforts should never go unnoticed.