Deep Capture Forums

Should have read CMKX has NOT traded in 4 or 5 years.  EOM

This post from one of the suspected paid bashers I forgot on the RB CMKI board is funny:

By: greencrow17302
15 Jun 2009, 11:28 AM EDT
Msg. 841916 of 841917
(Reply to 841909 by factanonverba13)
Hilarious read, twarn't it? He has JS and the iHub X board guffawing...


They may be guffawing, but they're surely hesitant to respond in THIS forum, aren't they? LOL!

Current Status:  Over 100 viewings, Raging Bull all abuzz, The Janice Shell crew all supposedly "guffawing" on iHub, yet, NOT ONE of the cowards has the courage to post on Deep Capture!  Very telling!  Dr. Byrne, Mr. Bagley, and Mr. Mitchell, you have truly made your mark in the battle against illegal downward market manipulation with Deep Capture when you have them trembling in such fear!

Normally, they would be swarming on anyone challenging them.  In fact, the hornet's nests at Raging Bull (CMKI board) and iHub are evidence (soon to change, I'm sure, since they control those forums).  Yet, NOT ONE of these proclaiming to be upstanding amateur investigators have the nerve to post one post on this form.  They are THAT afraid of DeepCapture.Com!

As much as I would like for them to find the backbone to post their lame attempts at justifying their full-time venom-spewing her, I am very impressed at the fact that this is a Deep Capture forum has them trembling in such fear as to stay away from it like it were their plague.  In fact, it just might be!

LOL!

BillZ, I would have to agree with that.  But why?  They aren't afraid to do it on Raging Bull.  They aren't afraid to do it on InvestorsHUB (IHUB), so why are they so afraid of the Deep Capture message board and not those other two? 

It must be because Raging Bull and iHub are "captured" IMHO.  I have watched as these guys operate in those milieus with an obvious sense of impunity.  I have watched them make complete posters who have challenged them disappear at will, as well as specific posts of others or even their own that they felt went against their agenda.

They know they'll NEVER be able to control this forum, thus, at least at this time, are intent in avoiding this board all together.  It's a slippery slope that miscreants can ill afford to traverse.  Speaks volumes, doesn't it?  LOL!

Thanks for your comment & good luck to you, sir!

Interesting post today on Raging Bull's CMKI board by a good DD'er named silverbulletny1:

(quote)

By: silverbulletny1
12 Jul 2009, 06:58 PM EDT
Msg. 849223 of 849336

lawsuit janiceshell greedymalone etc........

By: AlanC [obviously from another RB board]
11 Jul 2009, 07:49 AM EDT
Msg. 1183143 of 1183147
(Reply to 1183142 by mquietstorm3)

mq3: These are interesting times to be sure.
Found this interesting even though I do not own the stock nor have I done any DD on it:
http://www.minamargroup.net/duallisting.php
Especially interesting to me is the suit against Investors Hub, Janice Shell, Jim Bishop and others: http://www.minamargroup.com/docs/562912037.pdf

and greedy malone in there too................

(unquote)

This new suit shows Janice Shell and Matthew Brown both defendants.  This is EXTREMELY odd since Janice Shell is the hailed "Queen of Pump & Dump Scambusters" and Matthew Brown was recently indicted for orchestrating not one, but FOUR different pump and dumps.

Plus the infamous Greedy Malone is shown as a defendant.  Of course, that's not his real name.  But he is a notorious and extremely devious basher.  In that vein, this following post on that Raging Bull CMKI board tonight might shed more light in his regard:

(quote)

By: rocky_gibraltar
13 Jul 2009, 12:56 AM EDT
Msg. 849335 of 849335
(Reply to 849332 by reality.bytes)

"I can tell you that laptoptrader and janice shell were part of my group until he left last week, as was ninaturtle. Others who have been part of this include early bashers like hard data and Investorman."

"San Francisco-based press release distributor BusinessWire announced late Monday that it has filed a federal court lawsuit against Jeffrey Mitchell, William Ulrich and Janice Shell after they posted an April Fools press release through its service. The company alleges violations of federal and state trademark laws, fraud, breach of contract, defamation and conspiracy and seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief.

"Janice Shell Works for Gerard Mooney (incise,scion) Read What if a Alert was issued like this one: Immediatly copy this post to your hard drive, or floppy, RB will erase it with in 20 minuets due to exposing Janice Shell, and employers! RB protects bashers Janice Shell and Scoin aka incise due to the hits they generate for RB, and RB protecting shorted positions continualy"

http://www.hotstockmarket.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40363

Hmmmm.... Gerard Mooney. Same initials as Greedy Malone

Didn't Greedy say his "farm" was in the Detroit, Michigan, area? Well, lookie here:

Gerard Mooney
[address deleted]
Grosse Pointe, MI 48236
[phone number deleted]

(Grosse Pointe is a suburb of Detroit).

No, I think it might be more rural setting, since he said "farm". But, we know he's not a farmer, so how about an attorney? When I Googled Gerard Mooney, an attorney named John G. Mooney of Mooney & Gilboe, PC, popped up. Where was he located? Northwest of Detroit in a more rural setting. He does estate planning, trusts, etc.

Mooney & Gilboe, PC
[address & phone number deleted]
Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4542
[phone number deleted]

John G Mooney
[address deleted]
Beverly Hills, MI 48025-3947
[phone number deleteed]

Age: 55-59


Hmmmm.......

(unquote)

Regarding Janice Shell, if you've been reading the expose', you're familiar with the convicted Anthony "Nine Fingers" Elgindy.  The more I read of him, the more I get infuriated.  He's of Egyptian origin, from what I understand.  I also understand he dumped most of his stock holdings Sept. 10, 2001 (the day before the terrorist attacks) and was quoted as saying the market would crash tomorrow.  He bribed FBI agents, etc.  In other words, he's as dirty as they come.

Janice Shell promotes herself as an "amateur investigator" and "scambuster".  She claims to be an art historian living in Milan, Italy.  She did write a book or two on art history, but you can bet there were no voluminous sales, and there's no way she's lived off that income, since her last book was 15 years ago or so.  What is she doing now?  She's a board moderator in IHUB (CMKX board & possibly others).  Must pay well.

After it became increasingly evident she wasn't supporting herself with the books, she now tries to pass herself off as a government employee of some sort (LOL!).  Since when does our government pay people to moderate a message board all day long which exclusively bashes stocks (when she's not diverting heat from herself by changing the subject to some stupid pictures of deer when the heat gets too hot, LOL!).  She immediately deletes any posts which sheds light on miscreants and bans posters who don't fit her agenda.  On the CMKX (revoked for 5 years... a long and controversial story) board she moderates for IHUB, she actually has banned most of the shareholders from posting (except for some she feels are good targets for her skills).  She bashes Deep Capture like crazy, of course.

Anway, back to her and Elgindy.  You would think a scambuster would be attacking such an obvious market miscreant tooth and nail, right?  Not Janice!  She ACTUALLY TESTIFIED AT THE ELGINDY SENTENCING IN AN EFFORT TO MITIGATE HIS PUNISHMENT after he had been proven guilty.  Here's the proof:

PAGE 40:
Janice Shell, member of Silicon Investor:  I’ve known Tony (Amr) Elgindy for about eight years . . (through) the Silicon Investor financial message board.  The Tony Elgindy that I know helped expose a great many scams. While his activities in this line may have hurt some individual shareholders, in the long run they were of help to the financial markets and to the investing public in general.

PAGE 48:
(Janice Shell) (“I wasn’t a member of his ‘club’, but I knew many members, and I most certainly did not and do not believe it was the evil cabal that some have described. My impression is that it was a fairly ordinary, if rather pricey, investment club, to which members contributed information, research and stock picks.†)

Here's the link to the document:
http://www.asensioexposed.com/apdefsentencing.pdf

She (and her minions who school around her board like sharks attacking anyone who challenges her) claim that everyone is taking the above evidence all wrong.  She wasn't trying to help Elgindy get his sentencing mitigated.  Then, pray tell, what is the purpose of someone testifying complimentary information at a convicts sentencing if not to mitigate his punishment?  Those crooks are so transparent yet will deny, deny, deny!  Time for cuffs!

When confronted about her income, she now tries to pass herself off as a government employee of some sort (LOL!).  Since when does our government pay people to moderate a message board which exclusively bashes stocks (when she's not diverting heat from herself by changing the subject to some stupid pictures of deer, LOL!).

Her "minions" can't be that blind, so they must be complicit.  Are they just some folks that she has somehow blinded to the above facts, or are they on her payroll.  Most I've read are idiots, but I don't think they are ignorant in that regard, so I vote "complicit" and "compensated" in one form or another.  JMHO

When are they going to give this "books-to-message-board" author the "Silver Bracelets Award" to which I feel she is so entitled? LOL!

Mina Mar Group Wins Slander Lawsuit Against the Investors Hub

TORONTO, Jan. 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ - Mina Mar Group Inc. www.minamargroup.com/ (MMG) and Mina Mar Marketing Group www.minamargroup.net/ (MMMG) inform the public that the courts ruled in the favour of Mina Mar Group in slander lawsuit against Investors Hub.

Mr. Justice Belobaba, Ontario Superior Court Of Justice awarded judgment in favor of Mina Mar Group, and awarded $75,000 in general damages, $10,000 in punitive damages and $20,000 for the trial costs to the company.

This was never about the money but rather principle. These stock bashers should not be allowed to destroy other peoples reputations and businesses with slanderous and malicious posts on the Internet

The court ruling can be seen on this link http://www.minamargroup.com/stock_bashers.php

Mina Mar Group wishes to quote some key declarations of the court:

    "4... THIS COURT ORDERS that all negative, defamatory and libellous
postings, made by Posters and members of Investors Hub.Com Inc web site are
untrue and are and were made without any foundation nor basis for any of their
content

    5... THE COURT ORDERS THAT the Defendants, Robert Zumbrunnen, Matt Brown
and InvestorsHub.com Inc. apologize and publicly retract the libelous
statements made against the Plaintiffs and that they shall send their signed
retraction to the Plaintiffs and publish the same on the web site,
InvestorsHub.com

    6. THIS COURT ORDERS that Robert Zumbrunnen, Matt Brown and
InvestorsHub.com Inc. provide the names and addresses of the following of its
members and posters:
    Stratey, itlogic, Jim Bishop, Janice Shell, Universal Trader, Rtso,
Livingstyle, Soyelpato, AccipiterO, strongtower, snow, peraire, and Fast Flyer
03, Strongtower, 1 summer, AccipiterQ, bob41, Buckley, soyelpato, greedy
malone, rolltide, marine-1, firelane, (and any other poster who makes
negative, libelous or defamatory statements against the Plaintiffs)
anonymously named John Doe (the foregoing collectively known as "The
Posters"). ..."

Mina Mar Group recently introduced the "Get the Facts Right" statement to our clients, which we remind all of our clients' shareholders to review before taking any advice from a stock board chat room. Most advisors have hidden agendas and prey on the unsuspecting.

Get the Facts Right. The issuer works hard to continue to keep our shareholders informed, and news is updated frequently via Press Releases, Pink Sheet http://www.pinksheets.com/ filings, and updates to our websites. Other websites not sponsored, or recognized by the Company may provide misleading or disinformation to investors in order to manipulate trading patterns for a given stock. Always look for original content from trusted sources, rather than relying on 'excerpts' or discussion boards that may not give you the whole story. The Securities and Exchange Commission requires financial institutions or brokerage firms to provide their clients with documentation, describing the risks of investing in penny stocks.

Vigorous enforcement of the court order including motions for contempt of court for any non compliance will commence shortly in Florida.

ABOUT Mina Mar Group:

Mina Mar Group (MMG) is a corporate consultancy firm that specializes in small cap or OTC market business services, including public markets in Frankfurt, Germany, and UK. Our focus is on growth companies or emerging markets such as those in South America, Eastern Europe, and Mainland China. We provide our clients with comprehensive advisory, and consulting services regarding mergers and acquisitions, including reverse mergers of private companies into publicly traded entities, and special purpose companies (SPC) offshore. MMG also offers a full suite of related ancillary services subsequent to the successful completion of a reverse merger, including private placements, PIPE offerings and Pink Sheets Adequate Disclosure documentation, various SEC regulatory filings and a broad range of other corporate governance matters. We license our brand name and back office as a white label solution which allows professionals in the industry to tap into the MMG back office to deliver high quality solutions on a private label basis. We also operate a small shareholders' advocacy division which seeks out publicly traded companies in distress or where the minority shareholders' positions are in peril, and assists as a guardian with interim and or turn-around management. Through its wholly owned subsidiary, Mina Mar marketing Group MMMG (www.minamargroup.net), we offer publicly traded companies services such as investor Relations, and investor awareness.

The information contained herein is based on sources which we believe to be reliable but is not guaranteed by us as being accurate and does not purport to be a complete statement or summary of the available data. The owner, publisher, editor and their associates are not responsible for errors and omissions. They may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. MMG encourages readers and investors to supplement the information in these reports with independent research and other professional advice. All information on featured companies is provided by the companies profiled, or is available from public sources and MMG makes no representations, warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of the disclosure by the profiled companies or the information contained herein. MMG and its affiliates are not registered investment advisors or broker-dealers. MMG has been advised that the investments in companies profiled are considered to be high risk and use of the information provided is at the investor's sole risk. MMG also advises that the purchase of such high risk securities may result in the loss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provided by the profiled companies as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form his or her own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made by the profiled companies are made as of the date stated and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securities is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. It is possible that an investor's entire investment may be lost or impaired due to the speculative nature of the companies profiled. MMG makes no recommendation that the securities of the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies through MMG. MMG owners may or may not hold positions in the companies that are profiled. The information contained herein contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1993 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 including statements regarding expected continual growth of the company and the value of its securities. In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 it is hereby noted that statements contained herein that look forward in time which include everything other than historical information, involve risk and uncertainties that may affect the company's actual results of operation. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include the size and growth of the market for the company's products, the company's ability to fund its capital requirements in the near term and in the long term, pricing pressures, unforeseen and/or unexpected circumstances in happenings, pricing pressures, etc. Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

CONTACT: www.minamargroup.net/helpdesk

SOURCE Mina Mar Group

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases … 23462.html

I've been out of this stuff for years but did pen this essay in 2006. It's important to note that EVERY patriarch in the Elgindy family has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The "unfair trial" Jeffrey Mitchell claims Elgindy rec'd was the result of a US task force investigation (Capital Markets Unit of the Terrorist Financing Task Force in Washington, D.C.) headed by Ken Breen. It's purpose was to investigate whether profiteering occurred in the financial markets in anticipation of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Mitchell is right in the sense that it was an "unfair trial". All Elgindy's ties to terrorists were not allowed to be heard. The facts are that Elgindy used Silicon Investor as a profit center not only to manipulate stocks, but also to procure financing for terrorist fronts like the KLA-operated al Qaeda front, Mother Tereza. I have no desire to get involved with this stuff anymore, but I would catagorize Mitchell as a very dangerous person and suggest all to steer clear of him. Though naked shorting is certainly something that merits investigation, my OPINION is much of the manipulation via the message boards has to do with the dirty money (financing) that is laundered in the form of stock through tightly-held & thinnly traded pink sheet markets. Because of this, the presence of criminality is no surprise. Those involved in trading these issues are not choir boys and some are even protected by regulators and agencies that are supposed to be protecting investors. It should be no surprise that if organized crime launders money via the capital markets that terrorists and clandestine ops do as well. They share the same banking networks. My advice is to steer clear from those who defend the status quo passionately. Losing money is one thing, losing your life is another.

http //onthecanvas com/all_american_boy htm

best to all!

they are very active, very deceptive and will scam personal information from you to mount an concerted offensive against you in a heartbeat.  They are very exposed and easy to spot on the CMKI board because CMKX has traded in 4 or 5 years, so they have

Gonzo,

Thanks for that info, LOL!  I laugh because of her use of the term "unhealthy obsessions".  When it comes to her detractors, Janice and the Elgindy/Antar crime crews use that term as a threat.  In other words, anyone who points out any of the facts about their criminal activity is likely to suffer physically.  It's the most legal way they have found to make death threats against anyone who tries to expose their criminal enterprise.  Of course, they don't frighten me one bit.  Bring on all the ills their "Pandora's Box" can muster.  LOL!

Good luck to you, sir!

Oh BTW, this was released just yesterday. Check out the link for full article.

finance.yahoo.com/news/LIGATT-Security-International-pz-2806570228.html?x=0&.v=1

ATLANTA, July 12, 2010 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- LIGATT Security International (Pink Sheets:LGTT - News), a cyber security company, today announced that the company has filed a civil and criminal complaint against IT consultants Chris Riley and Ben Rothke as well as former Cyber Group Network employees, Randolph Morris, Nisha Kappor and others for alleged stock bashing.



According to LIGATT, the alleged stock bashers do not own any stock within the company and bash LIGATT Security on investor websites in order to manipulate the company's stock for their own personal reasons. One alleged basher has posted over 500 posts within the last 6 months on investor sites such as Investors Hub, Yahoo.com, and many more.


"These bashers think because they use different usernames and setup accounts with false information they can't be tracked, but this is what LIGATT Security does every day," says Gregory Evans, CEO of LIGATT Security International.



Evans explains that he hopes to set a trend by starting these investigations. "Once we begin suing bashers, other OTC companies will follow. 99% of these people who are bashing the company's stock have never ran a business, or know anything about business. They think that they can spread lies about a company with no repercussions, and that will not happen with LIGATT," says Evans.

That excerpt/article (from 1998, I believe) about Janice Shell being being a benevolent cyber-vigilante is laughable.  They make it sound like her routine full days of bashing companies is done out of some philanthropic motivation.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Supposedly, she supports herself as an "art historian" and lives comfortably in Milan, Italy, off the royalties she received from her book written over 15 years ago.  Of course, being an "art history" book, it's safe to assume that it was not on the best seller list.  In fact, I venture to say that few outside of a few friends and herself bought copies.  So, she's not sustaining her global activity from that source of revenue.  Therefore, what source of revenue IS supporting Janice Shell and her minions of "voluntary" cyber-vigilantes?

And, since when do we glorify "vigilantes"?  Aren't vigilantes criminals?  Aren't we taught that, as good law-abiding citizens that we are NOT to take the law into our own hands?  Isn't the proper course to turn over any hard evidence of fraud or criminal activity to the proper authorities?  Why would a responsible financial press encourage others to take the law into their own hands, i.e., find someone you think is guilty then just start inflicting as much damage to them as you can without proper process of law?  This is nuts.

If Janice Shell had any of the "scambusting abilities" attributed to her, then why is it she is SO selective on which "pump and dumps" she attacks?  Her associate, Matthew Brown, who operates the "short and distort" racket-controlled Investors Hub message boards, was operating FOUR different pump and dumps right under her nose, but she conveniently overlooked them.  Where was her devotion to investor protection then?  ROFL!

Antony "Nine Fingers" Elgindy, the Egyptian-born convict who sold considerable long holdings on the day before the World Trade Club attack (9/10/01), is doing an 11-year sentence for market fraud and bribing FBI agents in his "short and distort" criminal activity.  This same Janice Shell, who the above article seems to glorify, voluntarily provided Elgindy's defense team with white-washing testimony trying to make this vile, financial terrorist appear to be a Boy Scout.  Why would a legitimate cyber-vigilante be going to such extremes to MINIMIZE the sentencing of a market felon?  If she were out to PROTECT INVESTORS, why was she trying to AID a CONVICTED market criminal.

That article is trying to "whitewash" Janice Shell's very profitable "short and distort" racket participation, just as she tried for her fellow market criminal, Elgindy.  Shell's minions always point to that 1998 article as vindication for Janice Shell, but it is laughable and fails the test of scrutiny.  Janice Shell is a tool of the short and distort racket and nothing more.  Enforcement should be ashamed to have let her continue her criminal activity is the guise of some government-approved cyber-vigilante with a license to kill whatever company she deems as unworthy.  She's a joke, and enforcement is a joke for allowing her to continue for so long.  JMHO