Deep Capture Forums

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111




C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 4:24:18 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198549

AGAIN AND AGAIN --- IF FFGO IS DEAD --- "WHY" WOULD ANYONE BE HERE ?!?!? :-/ The ONLY explanation is: FFGO IS ALIVE !!!
GOOOOOOOOOOOOO FFGO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:37:31 PM

Re: newtrader2007 post# 198532

Post # of 198549

Dividend Coming! Proof is in the DD provided!

Good Luck!



diamondguru-one   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:55:13 PM

Re: C-D post# 198531

Post # of 198549

"Absolutely"!!!!! correct....

come on SUPER 8k FILING !!!! than 3400% ROI !!!! Bammmmm

payday !!!!



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:17:53 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198550

Vianna ----- Vianna ----- we NEED you INDEED !!!!!!! PLEASE TELL US "WHERE" THE FFGO DIVI PARTY
WILL BE !!!!!!!!!!!!!! *************** YAHOO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:20:35 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 198550

C-D all on has to do is look at the DD! It is clear that the dividend is still in play. I would not want to be short when the day comes and 3449% or more MUST be paid out to shareholders. I would imagine all of the Risk managers at TDA, ET, and ST will have a lot of explaining to do to the capital management folks. Share prices could be significantly effected by millions of dollars in losses due to illegally issuing billions of naked short sales to their clients.



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:25:01 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198550

4 ALL WHO DO THEIR FFGO DD? WILL HOPEFULLY BEGIN TO CC! YESSSSS, BE ALL YOU CAN BB! SO YOU WILL NOT BE >CAUGHT
SAYING: GG --- WHY ME !?!?!?!?



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:31:49 PM

Re: diamondguru-one post# 198535

Post # of 198550

FFGO - Will that 3449% PLUS be CASH? Or another broker issued IOU?

TIC TOC



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:33:36 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198550

'Beware' naked short sellers... VERY cold 4 U at 3449% ROI or moooooooooooooooore !!!
(Salvation Army sells GREAT clothes at a very nice price 2 cover! ) !



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:39:05 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198550

*TIC TOC *TIC TOC --- FFGO DIVI IS A LOCK!



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:52:27 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198551

THRILLED 2 READ ALL THE ENTHUSIASTIC & EXCITING POSTS !!!! *BLESSINGS* !!!!

The ROI of 3449%+++++ will

be soooooo sweeeeeet !!!



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:56:14 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 198543

Post # of 198551

*TIME* will tell --- won't you agree!?!?! I'm THRILLED 2 WAIT & SEE, agree?

An ROI of 3449%+ is good for ME ---

how about THEE ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:10:30 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 198543

Post # of 198551

Such fantasy claims are. It supported by the Wyoming Statutes of Incorporation. Distribution of dividend is protected. Regarding revocation of registration by he SEC. FINRA has made it very clear that the state of incorporation governs what a company can and cannot do at all time. Having said that, it appears that the statutes of Wyoming reins supreme!

Thanks for all of the DD! Know more than ever that the dividend is still in play!

Good Luck!




C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:36:25 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 198546

Post # of 198551

There is really >NOTHING< more that has to be said about this upcoming 3449%+++++ dividend ROI !!!!

The FFGO PAGE REVEALS THE MASTER PLAN,& one can either choose to believe it ~~~~~ or not !!!!

Judging from all these recent * WONDERFUL * and insightful posts ?!? CLEARLY one cannot argue the *MARVELOUS* dividend FFGO has planned for only those wishing to receive this *INCREDIBLE* --- but TRUE 3449%++++++++++++++++++++++ ROI !!!!



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:50:18 PM

Re: TomSawyer post# 198547

Post # of 198552

*HALLELUJAH* to be STUCK with those HAPPY >shareholders
about to receive a 3449%+ ROI !!!



C-D   

Sunday, April 22, 2012 8:05:18 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198552

*WOW* ~~~~ "LOOK" AT ALL THESE SUNDAY POSTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


AlanC

Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:24:51 AM

Re: TomSawyer post# 1156

Post # of 1158

Why do you suppose that is Tom? It has been over 7 years now, the SEC conducted a full investigation on one of the sisters and no doubt they have received hundreds of complaints yet zero, squat, nada! The SEC can't be that incompetent. FINRA refuses to answer questions about the short position and their lack of reporting the SHO numbers since August of 2010 despite posting the daily numbers that day after day after day, month after month after month reflected over 90% of volume was short sales, over 2 billion worth no less.

Heck based on subsequent fines against Credit Suisse and UBSS for mismarking short trades and calling them long it is likely that 100% of all shares sold the past two years were non existant.

Thinking about this logic is telling me that the regulators deemed the 3449% return to investors as being fair but it is they who control when the Super 8K filing is released announcing the record and payment date. GNCP can serve as a lever to insure that the regulators make that release. Interesting days ahead to be sure.
Go GNCP!!!



Rocket Man 

Sunday, April 22, 2012 10:03:48 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198557

Finra states that REG Sho Bi Monthly Reports are effectively a sham.. FFGO has been shorted to the "enth" degree..

http://fortfinancegroup.com/



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-22 22:53:21)

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879




janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:06:54 PM

Re: 80baja post# 151020

Post # of 151055

"They had ample opportunity to make things right and chose not to do so."

In September 2005, the SEC suspended their net capital requirements. They didn't have to do anything. They could simply refer people to the SEC's decision.



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:09:21 PM

Re: Whiplash_Investor post# 151021

Post # of 151055

"If NSS manipulation occurred in the years it was trading, it could be gone now."

It barely traded at all between 2000 and the spring of 2005.



NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:16:30 PM

Re: janice shell post# 150995

Post # of 151056

LOL! You truly are a gem. Thank you for that post.


"Nothing in the law books says anything about intentional or non-intentional..

On the contrary:

Fraud must be proved by showing that the defendant's actions involved five separate elements: (1) a false statement of a material fact,(2) knowledge on the part of the defendant that the statement is untrue, (3) intent on the part of the defendant to deceive the alleged victim, (4) justifiable reliance by the alleged victim on the statement, and (5) injury to the alleged victim as a result.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/fraud"



NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:24:39 PM

Re: allezlOM post# 150998

Post # of 151056

I suspect that Catherine is probably looking at my brokerage statements right now laughing at the dates of my purchases




NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:29:42 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151001

Post # of 151056

For the love of all that is holy. Intent has nothing to do with it. The end result (NSS/Fraud) of what happened is the crux of the situation. Chew on that for a little while! Thanks!



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:30:17 PM

Re: NYSERule282 post# 151031

Post # of 151056

If there was no intent, there was no fraud.



NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:37:30 PM

Re: op9171787 post# 151003

Post # of 151056

Op- The number discrepancy here is so ridiculous that I don't believe it will trade again. The scumbags are going to fight this to the end. With that said, it does not mean that we don't profit from the shares that we bought.

I am curious if Darbie ever delivered the shares to the DTCC. I suspect they did. I am actually impressed with how dirty the DTCC is. Their commitment to financial terrorism is solid!

All in my humble, yet very strong opinion~



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:45:01 PM

Re: NYSERule282 post# 151033

Post # of 151056

"I am curious if Darbie ever delivered the shares to the DTCC. I suspect they did."

I very much doubt that. By the time Darbie and Capital Growth got the stock in question, the global lock had been in place for some time. DTCC wouldn't have accepted certs for deposit.



NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:56:19 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151032

Post # of 151056

LOL! Fraud is fraud. WOW!




janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 1:57:48 PM

Re: NYSERule282 post# 151037

Post # of 151056

If you want to deal with the law, you'd do well to understand it.



NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:01:50 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151038

Post # of 151056

So if I have counterfeit hundred dollar bills unknowingly am I guilty if I use those bills?



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:03:07 PM

Re: NYSERule282 post# 151039

Post # of 151056

If you try to buy something with them, the bills will be confiscated. But unless you were associated with the counterfeiter, nothing will be done to you.



AlanC

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:03:45 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151032

Post # of 151056

My brokerage firm removed my BCIT shares from my account and blamed the DTCC claiming the shares were worthless. Obviously there intent was to try and eliminate the liability that those shares represent. When the shares were sold to me and resulted in a FTD did they try and buy them in or was it their intent to not worry about it? Since my brokerage firm was recently notified that an opportunity to replace the markers that have been sitting in my account for years and for which they were paid was available to them at a very fair price and they chose not to buy them what would have been their intent?
No question in my mind BCIT shareholders have all been and continue to be victims of fraud.
Go BCIT!!!



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:05:13 PM

Re: AlanC post# 151041

Post # of 151057

Brokerages remove worthless stock from accounts periodically. If you don't want that to happen, all you have to do is ask them to put it back.



80baja   

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:25:59 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151026

Post # of 151057

so you are saying they (the Brokers) or (marketmakers)whoever ended up with my money could just keep it and not have to provide what I was purchasing and keep the money? really?



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:27:38 PM

Re: 80baja post# 151045

Post # of 151057

They could say: "It's not up to us." And that's pretty much what they have been saying.



80baja   

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:35:59 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151046

Post # of 151058

Yes pretty much but I doubt you really think that was the right thing to do. They sold me my shares after the DTCC had already sent them notice they was no longer clearing and could have made it right with me a long time ago.



lollybella   

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:36:21 PM

Re: None

Post # of 151058

Folks, just ignore her: SHE ALWAYS FAILS to tell you that our brokerage firms SETTLED OUR TRADES in 2005. Yep, they had 3 days to get our shares. That's the law. We placed orders, they took our money, then settled on the 3rd day just and they MUST get us our certified shares that ARE available, PERIOD!



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 2:36:49 PM

Re: 80baja post# 151048

Post # of 151058

I've said many times what I think they should have done, and should still do.



BigMoneyAtl   

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:01:53 PM

Re: AlanC post# 151041

Post # of 151059

I still have mine at Etrade. Isn't illegal to remove shares w/o account holder's written authorization? Whether the stock is worthless or not, brokers have no business of touching those shares (unless instructed by account holder in writing).



NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:04:52 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151050

Post # of 151059

Janice- I do believe that I have told you numerous times how glad I am that you spend time posting here. It makes me realize that my shares of BCIT may have more value than I can imagine! Thank you for your presence!



80baja   

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:06:01 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151050

Post # of 151059

That would have been fine in 2005. 2012 they can deliver the shares, I guess we will see how it plays out. Just puzzles me why you would think that to be fair after all this time?




NYSERule282   

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:06:20 PM

Re: BigMoneyAtl post# 151051

Post # of 151059

Yes, brokers cannot remove shares from you account without your approval (i.e filling out a worthless securities from). I have already informed Etrad that if they do that without my approval I will sue them. My shares are still there.

I do believe we will all be amazed at how much value our shares are worth one day!



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:13:28 PM

Re: 80baja post# 151054

Post # of 151059

Because I think it might be attainable.


AlanC

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:23:36 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151042

Post # of 151059

The brokerage firm has no right to remove anything from my account without my explicit approval to do so imho. They are supposed to be running a legitimate business operation. The BCIT case has exposed just what kind of operation they are running and the liberties they are taking. They no longer seem to feel that they have a fiduciary responsiblity to anyone but themselves. Is it any wonder they are going to be facing increasing numbers of lawsuits from BCIT shareholders? After seeing the way the Arbitration hearing for the BCIT shareholders was handled they can eat cake. They deserve what they have coming to them and more as we all know BCIT is but one example of the fraud they are helping to perpetrate on investors. Go BCIT!!!



lollybella   

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:26:09 PM

Re: None

Post # of 151059

IMHO, J.S. is trying to brainwash those here who are weary or doubting, into taking back your initial amount of money given to your brokers plus a few bucks interest, when the time (soon, IMHO) comes and the brokers will be begging you to settle.

My shares worth WAY more than I paid in 2005. I will NEVER let my brokers off the hook. They will pay dearly.



AlanC

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:31:49 PM

Re: BigMoneyAtl post# 151051

Post # of 151059

I agree completely! They are trying to eliminate liability but that is not going to happen with me! Go BCIT!!!



Joda   

Monday, April 23, 2012 3:42:07 PM

Re: AlanC post# 151059

Post # of 151060

But wait, aren't some yelling that we will never trade again?

So if BCIT will never trade again, why are they sneaking around so much, trying to remove shares from people's accounts?

Oh, but wait. Wasn't that being said about BCIT some 7 years ago, some 6 years ago, some 5 years ago, some 4 years ago, some 3 years ago, some 2 years ago and last year...

...and now "BCIT will never trade" is being said again...
Yup, okay then...

RRRRRRRRiiiiiiiiiiggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttttttt!!!!!!!

We've heard that story before, shall we say, LOL

Many times, and I have feeling we may hear it again, before we have this resolved, ROFL...

But have no worries, the NSS'ers are going down and they are starting to know it.



Whiplash_Investor   

Monday, April 23, 2012 7:53:09 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151027

Post # of 151072

Odd that every time I say anything to you about NSS existing in the markets, you purposely avoid the question. You left out this part when you quoted me:


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point is NSS happens, not whether in BCIT or not, so claims there is no NSS or illegal short selling is bunk.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You asked for an example of NSS and I gave it to you. Want another - Overstock.com, now O.co. That's proof it exists and where there is smoke, there is usually fire. When the SEC finishes rooting it out in the big stocks, the small ones will be next as the lawyers start jumping on it, citing the successful cases. Once the dike opens, those that manipulate prices using illegal shorting will be prosecuted, including those that help them (MM's, etc.). They can't keep doing it and expect nothing to stick to them. They can only stop and hope statutes of limitations save them.

By the way, the SEC is asking Congress for more power to get investor's money back, not just fines and some disgorgement.




janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 7:56:29 PM

Re: Whiplash_Investor post# 151071

Post # of 151072

That's because I don't agree with you. But we've been through that many times. OSTK was shorted naked by options MMs using what was a legitimate exemption at the time.

When that exemption was removed, the short was covered, and the stock soared. Currently, though, it's lower than it ever was. Why? Because it's an unsuccessful company.



Whiplash_Investor   

Monday, April 23, 2012 8:03:24 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151032

Post # of 151074

See footnote one...there are cases where scienter was not required and some where it is, that negligence is not enough. Point is scienter is not required in some cases:

http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/jcorl11&div=15&id=&page=


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-23 19:06:11)

CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

Moderators:jarta, hasher, nufced, janice shell, TSXminer, jimmym4, pantherj

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=1561


SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 8:37:48 PM

Re: janice shell post# 334360

Post # of 334460

SEC OBTAINS $4.8 MILLION JUDGMENT AGAINST MARCO GLISSON, WHO WAS CHARGED WITH MAKING A MARKET IN DEREGISTERED SECURITIES OF CMKM DIAMONDS, INC.



U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22340 / April 23, 2012

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marco Glisson, Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-00104

SEC OBTAINS $4.8 MILLION JUDGMENT AGAINST MARCO GLISSON, WHO WAS CHARGED WITH MAKING A MARKET IN DEREGISTERED SECURITIES OF CMKM DIAMONDS, INC.

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that a judgment was entered on April 11, 2012 in its civil injunctive action against Marco Glisson, filed in the United States District Court of Nevada. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, Glisson consented to entry of a permanent injunction against violations of the registration provisions of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, and the broker dealer registration provisions of Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Glisson was ordered to pay $2,765,650.65 in disgorgement, which represented profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the complaint, together with prejudgment interest in the amount of $670,574.79. In addition, Glisson was ordered to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $1,400,000, and was permanently barred from participating in the offering of penny stock.

The Commission’s complaint alleged that from December 2005 through April 2007, Glisson acted as an unregistered broker or dealer and illegally sold deregistered securities of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. CMKM's registration with the Commission was revoked and the stock delisted on October 28, 2005. According to the complaint, Glisson, a retired auto worker and part-time restaurant worker who used the name “Deli Dog” or “Deli” in Internet chat rooms, identified potential buyers and sellers by frequenting CMKM related internet chat rooms and through referrals from past buyers and sellers. Glisson then negotiated the terms of the transaction and consummated it by exchanging money for the pertinent CMKM stock certificate. Through these practices, Glisson made a market in deregistered CMKM securities at a time when legitimate broker-dealers refused to execute such purchases or sales because of the Commission's deregistration of CMKM.

See Litigation Release No. 20855/January 15, 2009, for information on the filing of the original action and a link to the Commission’s Complaint.



http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22340.htm



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 8:41:26 PM

Re: janice shell post# 334369

Post # of 334460

The individuals and the entities who were naked short selling and/or selling shares they had no right or privileged of selling will begin to surface and be announced. Not just for CMKX, but for many other OTC stocks.



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 8:43:08 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 334370

Post # of 334460

Giant yawn. Biggest cert pull in history. No naked short.

This story is over, except for perp walks.



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 8:46:58 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 334370

Post # of 334460

You realize, don't you, that Glisson was just one of a great many CMKX shareholders who tried to profit from the genuine victims?



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 8:54:45 PM

Re: janice shell post# 334372

Post # of 334460

And the genuine victims were?



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 8:55:27 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 334373

Post # of 334462

Gullible shareholders.



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:07:01 PM

Re: janice shell post# 334383

Post # of 334463

As pointed out earlier, there are companies in the Fortune 500 that started on the OTC. Some even ranking in the top 5 in market cap.

Many companies have started on the OTC and have been very successful. Raising capital to fund growth and development is how the equity markets are designed to prosper.

The problem with the markets today lies in the short sellers collapsing any opportunity for even legit companies raising capital. It seems that the more legit companies are bigger targets. Better story for the short sellers to tell to short into.

Oh well. Some will never agree to disagree. Just tell their sponsored side of the story.



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:15:38 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 334385

Post # of 334465

LOLOL!! CMKX was conceived as a scam.

The REAL problem is that so many people don't bother to learn how to do DD. It's so much easier to believe in conspiracy theories.



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:16:35 PM

Re: Buttonwood post# 334387

Post # of 334465

This is an honest board. Don't like it, you're free to leave.



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:17:10 PM

Re: Buttonwood post# 334387

Post # of 334465

They are easy to bait.

Personal attacks are the MO when all else fails.

Tic Toc



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:20:26 PM

Re: Buttonwood post# 334392

Post # of 334466

Personally, I feel deprogramming is more suitable for the NSS crowd.



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:21:41 PM

Re: Buttonwood post# 334396

Post # of 334467

Their handlers can't dig them out of every hole they find themselves in. They seem to be creating more work for their handlers than they are helping as of late.



janice shell 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:23:45 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 334399

Post # of 334468

LOLOLOLOLISSIMO!! "Handlers"?? Isn't Generic supposed to be a *Key Handler of Minions*? He was here just a little while ago.



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 9:34:40 PM

Re: Buttonwood post# 334416

Post # of 334468

Don't let the low ranking draw you in to get your posts deleted as TOS. The are no rules on the CMKX board unless the mods want to target your posts for deletions. Just a little advice.



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 10:00:08 PM

Re: Brad S post# 334409

Post # of 334471

Do you ever get tired of being wrong? - Brad S

Only an admin could reverse the deletion of another admin. Makes one wonder who on this board have that privilege and/or power?

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 10:16:17 PM

Re: Brad S post# 334456

Post # of 334475

And you can see this again, since it's now a page back already. Love them green arrows. - Brad S

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74750259

As you are legally aware, a TOS violation on a stock board that is not treated as a TOS violation on all stock boards may leave iHub exposed for legal judgements.

Nice to have friends moderating this board that have the same privileges as admins, huh Brad?

Nothing like a personal attack reversed by one of your friends!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 10:23:17 PM

Re: Brad S post# 334459

Post # of 334475

As long as there are shareholders of CMKX, this is a stock board. Just because you and your crew have turned it into a smash and bash attacking shareholders, and get away with it, doesn't justify your comments and personal attacks.

But hey, coming from a paid hack, who would expect anything less?

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 10:31:40 PM

Re: janice shell post# 334462

Post # of 334475

Nothing like watching the MO when the hacks attack. LOL! Nothing but personal insults. Shows their emotional IQ. Not all that high. Oh well. On gets what they pay for.



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 10:33:36 PM

Re: Brad S post# 334461

Post # of 334475

Paid? Hell, no one has to pay me to mess with delusional Kool-Aid conspiracy freaks. I actually pay I-Hub for the privilege. - Brad S

Oh, so you work for a naked short selling hedge fund or market maker? And you and/or your company pays iHub to assist you in running your scams?

Cool! Good to know!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 10:40:50 PM

Re: Brad S post# 334467

Post # of 334475

Are you really that gullible or do you just like to make sh!t up to argue about? - Brad S

Can't make sh!t up that is a good as the sh!t that you spout.

But hey, nothing wrong with making a living off of the short side of the equation.

How much do the shorters pay for a good distort? $50/day? Or maybe $100/day if you get a high rate of intelligent posters' posts deleted, or better yet get them banned from posting?

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 23, 2012 10:44:52 PM

Re: Brad S post# 334472

Post # of 334475

I say this in all seriousness, you should seek the help of a mental health professional. The level of paranoia that you display can be dangerous to you and those around you. - Brad S

Keep up the personal attacks. Shows your lack of intelligence.

Good Luck!



Bull Finch 

Monday, April 23, 2012 11:10:52 PM

Re: janice shell post# 334483

Post # of 334491

Just like you I'm waiting too!

For something that comes from that RAG you write for that isn't CRIMINAL!



Bull Finch 

Monday, April 23, 2012 11:30:11 PM

Re: janice shell post# 334488

Post # of 334493

I Support Shareholders

that have been wronged by CRIMINALS!

That puts me, and you on different sides of the fence!


"Hey, we all know you support bad companies. Don't you find that embarrassing?"~janice shell



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-23 22:33:05)

DHS Holding Co. (DHSM)

Moderators:Admiral Lagrange, SevenTenEleven, goodolboy, Rich, Trading4cash, rekcusdoo


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=7860



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 2:32:50 PM

Re: None

Post # of 25414

DHSM - Development of Cenote Falls Shopping Center Begins in Belize

Dhs Holding Co. (PN) (USOTC:DHSM)

Today : Tuesday 24 April 2012


DHS Holding Co. (PINKSHEETS: DHSM) recently announced that the company has broken new ground on the development of the Cenote Falls Shopping Center in Belize. It is the intention of DHS Holding Co. to approach and make offers to sign popular retailers to the deal, including McDonald's, Abercrombie and Fitch, Nike and several other top businesses.
The first phase of negotiations is being handled by Scarinci Hollenbeck veteran Jay Surgent, who will be charged with acquiring top-rated retailers to supply their products and services at the new one-of-a-kind shopping center.

"I would like to go on record that all of us at DHS Holding Co. are honored and thrilled to have Jay V. Surgent, of the law firm Scarinci Hollenbeck, as lead attorney for our interests in Belize," said DHS Holding President Charlie Barrett. "As partner of one of the most prestigious law firms in New York/New Jersey area, Mr. Surgent is a key part of our team and will greatly help us implement and realize our ambitions of a strong and productive presence in Belize with our planned Casino/Hotel and Shopping Center. DHS Holding hopes and believes that this is just the beginning of a long and fruitful relationship with Mr. Surgent."

The shopping center, which will be built on a 40-acre parcel of land, is a welcomed initiative to economic professionals in Belize, who agree the investment will help further the country's economic and social goals.

"As more American companies discover the excellent investment opportunities abroad, Scarinci Hollenbeck, has positioned itself with attorneys who have the capability necessary to take advantage of these international business opportunities," said Scarinci Hollenbeck Managing Partner Donald Scarinci.

DHS CEO Mike Rohling noted that nearly $100 million crosses the border from Belize to Mexico due to a lack of retail center options in Belize. The project is expected to provide more opportunities to the citizens of Belize and fuel the local economy.

About Scarinci Hollenbeck

Scarinci Hollenbeck (www.scarincihollenbeck.com) (@S_H_Law) is a New Jersey/New York Metropolitan area law firm that serves a diverse group of clients in numerous industries. The full service, general practice law firm retains a highly trained legal team with expertise in several areas, including Corporate Transactions and Business Law, Bankruptcy and Creditor's Rights, Environmental and Land Use Law, Litigation, Public Law, Commercial Real Estate, Sports and Entertainment Law, and Tax, Trust and Estate Law. Top-tier personnel, innovative technology and superior client service adds to Scarinci Hollenbeck's reputation as one of the most highly ranked law firms in the New Jersey area.

Contact:

Peter Moeller

Tel: 201-896-4100 x 3324

Email: psmoeller@scarincihollenbeck.com



goodolboy 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 2:32:22 PM

Re: None

Post # of 25414

Jay V. Surgent, Co-Chair of the firm’s Litigation Law Group,has extensive experience in federal, state and administrative courts defending individual and corporate clients who have been investigated or charged with criminal, civil, or administrative and regulatory offenses. Mr. Surgent has successfully defended clients against such allegations as securities fraud, kick-back schemes, political corruption, bribery, organized crime, illegal gambling, consumer fraud, fraudulent healthcare claims, theft, kidnapping, murder, manslaughter, sex offenses, and other crimes of violence, as well as possessory and distribution drug offenses.

Mr. Surgent is well known for his work in the area of white collar criminal defense, and often handles high-profile matters which receive local, state, and national media attention. Over the span of his career, Mr. Surgent has defended individual and corporate clients against criminal investigations and prosecutions by a variety of federal agencies, including the United States Attorney’s Office, the United States Drug Enforcement Administration, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the United States Secret Service, the United States Treasury Department, the United States Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the United States Internal Revenue Service, and various White Collar and Organized Crime units. On the state and local level, Mr. Surgent has successfully defended individual and corporate clients against investigations and prosecutions by various County Prosecutors’ Offices, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office, the Office of the Insurance Fraud Prosecutor, the Bureau of Securities, White Collar and Organized Crime Units, New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners and the New Jersey Board of Dentistry, in matters involving licensing issues and criminal complaints against Physicians and Dentists.

Prior to commencing the practice of law, Mr. Surgent served as a legislative liaison for the United States House of Representatives and as a member of the United States Senate Staff Committee, in Washington, D.C. As a well-regarded attorney in private practice, he was chosen to serve on former Governor James E. McGreevey’s Law and Public Safety and Criminal Justice Transition Team for the State of New Jersey. He was also selected for inclusion in the National Registry of Who’s Who of outstanding professionals in their respective fields, and was designated a New Jersey Super Lawyer in 2006, 2007, and 2008, in the area of Criminal Defense. Mr. Surgent has appeared as a commentator on TruTV formally known as CourtTV, and has appeared on nationally syndicated news programs concerning his work as a criminal defense attorney.



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 3:06:02 PM

Re: goodolboy post# 25390

Post # of 25414

DHSM - Looks like a good fit for a company that White Collar criminals have targeted in their manipulative naked short selling attempts!

Should get interesting!

Wouldn't want to be an illegal naked short holder moving forward.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 3:06:43 PM

Re: neophyte184 post# 25389

Post # of 25414

DHSM - I agree! Hoping to grab a little more before this begins to get away from us.



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 3:18:55 PM

Re: goodolboy post# 25393

Post # of 25414

Using a white collar criminal attorney to as the "lead attorney for our interests in Belize."

Hmmmm, doesn't sound good. - goodolboy

Doesn't sound good for the manipulative short sellers!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 5:21:27 PM

Re: None

Post # of 25414

DHSM - Short Volume for April 24th - 14%

20120424|DHSM|1875|0|13275|O



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:54:23 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25399

Post # of 25414

Wouldn't want to be manipulating the loopholes and not covering the short positions created by short selling. $2 coming sooner than later.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:33:36 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25402

Post # of 25414

I see. They're doing this before they've even designed the complex?

Sheesh. - janice shell

I guess I didn't catch that in the PR's.

Oh yeah, they never mentioned that they were holding off on designing the complex until retailers were committed.

Although, one would assume that the finer design detail would not be finalized until various retailers were committed.

Why would someone build a McDonald's if a McDonald's was not committed?

Same goes for some of the trademark designs for the likes of a NIKE or an A & F.

So if there are specific details the architects are waiting on, then it is smart business to do so.



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:36:56 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25403

Post # of 25414

Did he ever defend Larry Formato? - janice shell

If he did, I am sure the DD by those concerned will reveal such information.

I am NOT concerned with who the law group has defended, as much as those that commit white collar crime against OTC companies should be concerned with the legal representation this company is lining up to protect its interest and to advance its business plans.



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 8:59:47 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25406

Post # of 25414

Have you any idea how much time, and how many tens of millions of dollars, it would take to build this resort? - janice shell

Of course I do. Plenty of friends who are in the real-estate development business to consult. There are various retailers and business who require special considerations.

If a developer was courting such businesses in order to attract additional interested parties to bring "traffic" there would be some negotiation to final layout and final design for the vendors.

It is good that the development is being left to the experts and not the jacks of all trades.



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:24:23 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25408

Post # of 25414

This particular "developer" has no money that we know of. - janice shell

Commitments from retail vendors will change all of that, IMO.



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:53:27 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25410

Post # of 25414

Don't think so. They rent space. That's all. - janice shell

Not true. It is all about traffic and potential revenue for the vendors.

There are some retailers who will be willing to pay more for prime positioning in a development and/or wait until other vendors commit before committing themselves.

It is not as simple as "just renting space".



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 10:17:09 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25412

Post # of 25414

Permits, plat survey, and the basics for pre-construction are more than covered with $250K. Again, it is key who leases space first and where they chose to lease. That will impact not only the value per sq ft, but also whom else will be leasing and who won't.

If they sign a vendor who will bring guaranteed traffic, others will follow and be willing to pay premiums for prime lots/locations.


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



GNCC Capital, Inc. (GNCP)

Moderators:SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, digger1, Bull Finch

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3731



LAMBSHIFT   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:18:22 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198689

Post # of 198705

assuming that "the insiders of NMGL... wind down and legally dissolve ...before the revoking", in my opinion they would be obliged to give back the B.+ S.C. shares to FFGO, because "NMGL is entitled to cancel these transactions..." in exchange for the preferred A and B shares - of course.
we should see a FORM 8-K filing.
now the B.+S.C. shares would be with FFGO/WDM again.
what about Searchlight Explor.? we know that "...Searchlight Explor. would in likelihood exercise its rights". but there is no obligation to exercise its rights. my assumption is: S.E. will not exercise its rights - you have to work with probabilities here.
now FFGO is allowed to sell the B.+S.C.shares and to divide the promised dividend as a liquidation dividend - law of the state of Wyoming.
realization of this scenario could bring a bigger dividend than the promised 0,003449 US-$ per shre FFGO.



LAMBSHIFT   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:23:28 AM

Re: TomSawyer post# 198691

Post # of 198707

liquidation preference A: 16,00 US-$ per share A,
liquidation preference B: 2,20 US-$ per share B
minus 5% to NMGL for handling the sale of the shares.



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:55:28 AM

Re: Rocket Man post# 198684

Post # of 198708

Per my calculations I would agree. Also, it has been pointed out how those that naked short sell can avoid reporting on the daily and the bimonthly short reports.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 8:06:52 AM

Re: TomSawyer post# 198691

Post # of 198709

That is why it is great to ALSO be a NMGL shareholder!

Good Luck!



mwab52   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:58:06 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198697

Post # of 198709

Is it divvy time yet? I'am holding and waiting.Hold onto those shares.(FFGO)



paunch13   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:00:04 AM

Re: mwab52 post# 198698

Post # of 198709

mwab52
Divi time should be happening at any time now
John



AlanC

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:01:05 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 198651

Post # of 198709

SevenTenEleven: Those margin payments have to be a real thorn in the side of those who are short. Here we are well over a year and month after month those payments have to be made. Many Americans have learned that it is no fun having to make mortgage payments on a house where the mortgage is greater than what the house can be sold for in the market. Those margin payments are giving the shortman a taste of his own medicine as the Wall Street criminals also contributed to the fraud in the real estate market which also hurt many honest folks just as naked shorting has. Sadly the regulators knew what was going on in the housing industry and allowed the problem and even encouraged more by creating liar loans which allowed people to purchase homes they could not afford or ever pay for. Very sad indeed. Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:05:28 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198699

Post # of 198709

Have to be a shareholder to benefit from a possible $14B value of the mines!

Glad to have been able to add prior to the registration revocation!

Good Luck!



AlanC

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:05:32 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 198662

Post # of 198709

That would be awesome SevenTenEleven and would certainly explain the activity on this board. Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



AKFish   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:07:52 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198702

Post # of 198711

My E*T account closed at rather high $ amount yesterday before correcting. Much inline with the anticipated divi amount. Perhaps it's the FFGO Divi ghost.


SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:09:57 AM

Re: AlanC post# 198701

Post # of 198712

AlanC, Sure explains why the distort campaign continues to this day. Only way those short could get out from under those margin payments is to see retail shareholders write down their shares as worthless. This way, the brokers can legally remove those shares from their books and legally allow those short to close out their open short interest positions. As long as retail holds onto those markers, the short interest is OPEN!

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:10:47 AM

Re: AKFish post# 198706

Post # of 198712

What was the value it closed at per share? $0.003449 or $0.04829?

Tic Toc



AKFish   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:14:21 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 198709

Post # of 198712

minus my other holdings it would come out to .0061315155



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:14:26 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198707

Post # of 198712

claims of a suspended and revoked scam which last traded at .0001 being worth $14 Billion are clearly a scam. - alien42

Great to be a shareholder!

Imagine if the mines sell for $14B and in order to get those mines, the buyers have to purchase the preferreds WD is holding for shareholders? WOW!

That would be over $0.048/share! Now imagine all of the naked short interest shares that would need to be made whole! Will those abusive naked short sellers be on the hook for $10B in payments to retail shareholders refusing to write down their shares ahead of a minimum payment of $0.003449/share?

Thanks for all of the DD!

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:15:17 AM

Re: AKFish post# 198710

Post # of 198713

Which is nearly double what the original value of the preferreds was stated as. Not bad!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:18:14 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198705

Post # of 198714

FFGO - Dividend COMING!

Short sellers will have a HUGE reverse of fortune!

Tic Toc



AlanC

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:18:53 AM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 198687

Post # of 198714

"One might think that if FFGO was massively short that someone would have used that incontrovertible evidence and used it against the NSS-ers by now." Road Less Traveled

I agree with you and they have. That is what the agreed upon dividend is all about. I strongly believe that amount was negotiated and approved by the company and regulators and deemed to be fair in light of the size of the naked short against the company.

Think about it a court case would have taken 5-10 years to resolve on one hand and if the regulators had ordered a buyin as provided for it could have bankrupted many brokerage firms. The dividend solution will punish those guilty and compensate those who were damaged and yet allow for closure in such a way as not to destroy confidence in our markets.
A win win solution especially when it provides for an increase in the return if it is dragged out. Works for me. Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



Lebron23   

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:13:43 PM

Re: None

Post # of 1194

The Unaudited 9/30/11 Financial Statements are very well prepared and the audit should not be difficult to get completed imo.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=GNCP&id=67859



Lebron23   

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:15:56 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 1178

Post # of 1194

NOTE 18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS UNAUDITED
The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after September 30, 2011 up through date the Company issued these financial statements. During this period, the Company had the following material recognizable subsequent events.
On December 1, 2011, certain of the Company’s Stockholders’ entered into Stock Trading & Disposal Restriction Agreements with the Company, accounting for an amount of 145,718,220 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, representing 71.74% of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common Stock; on the following conditions:
- These shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock shall not be available to be assigned, pledged, sold, lent or in any way alienated for a period of 2 (two) years commencing
from the date of their issue. These shares are restricted under Regulation 144 and shall be held “on book” by the Transfer Agent to the Corporation; for an on behalf of the Stockholder. The Stockholder shall not be permitted to request these shares of the
Corporation’s Common Stock, in certificated form, until the expiration of the 2 (two) years from the date of their issue to the Stockholder. Thereafter they are permitted to dispose no more than 5% (Five percent) of their shares of the Company’s Common Stock every 3 (Three) months thereafter.



Lebron23   

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:18:32 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 1176

Post # of 1194

A reading of the 9/30/11 Unaudited Financial Statements indicates that GNCP is a lot more closely held than by just 2 individuals.
I read the entire statement a few days ago. Interesting stuff.



Lebron23   

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:20:35 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 1178

Post # of 1194

The bottom line is that the Financial Statements for 9/30/11 have been prepared. They just need the Audit Opinion letter attached to them!!



Lebron23   

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 6:45:03 PM

Re: moe_the_gyp01 post# 1177

Post # of 1194

It's not the first Penny Stock to lose one-half of its pps in one day....lol.



Lebron23   

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:01:00 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 1184

Post # of 1194

Re-read the Financial Statements. What you posted is incorrect. Hint: Pay special attention to the Subsequent Events footnote.



AlanC

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:24:15 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 1185

Post # of 1194

FINRA short sale report for GNCP

20120424|GNCP|178600|0|887700|O

20.1% of today's volume was reported short sales!
Go GNCP!!!




Lebron23   

Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:56:48 PM

Re: JammingJAY post# 1191

Post # of 1194

The FAQ's at the GNCP Website will answer all the questions you just posed.



AlanC

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:25:38 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 198708

Post # of 198716

I hope all FFGO shareholders are monitoring their accounts to make sure their shares are still there:

Certain types of conduct in the securities industry are prohibited, including the following:

Removing funds or securities from a customer's account without the customer's prior authorization.

http://www.finra.org/Investors/ProtectYourself/BeforeYouInvest/ProhibitedConduct/

Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:36:44 AM

Re: AlanC post# 198716

Post # of 198719

AlanC, I could see the brokers attempting to pull shares out of shareholders' accounts ahead of the dividend payment. Millions of dollars worth of losses would be realized by the brokers if they in fact can't back those IOU's with certs that will be receiving the payment.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:53:51 AM

Re: medchal post# 198720

Post # of 198722

There are no margin requirements, let alone margin "payments", on a revoked stock, because any number multiplied by the share price of $ 0.00000000 is zero. There is no remaining danger that the stock can run, because it can't even trade, and nobody but a few misguided people here pays any attention to that non-dividend. - medchal

Sorry! But anyone and everyone who knows anything about shorting on margin knows that the margin interest is based upon the moneys borrowed to short the initial position. Not the current value of the stock.

If shorted at $0.0001, that is what the shorts are paying interest on.

Interesting that fantasy information is now being claimed regarding how margin interest is calculated.

The fantasies never end!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:12:19 PM

Re: medchal post# 198723

Post # of 198729

Strange that FFGO shares are still reflected in the total value in my account(s).

Dividend Coming!

Good Luck!



mwab52   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:15:02 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198725

Post # of 198729

Thats why we are here because (FFGO) is gone.Right? hahaha! Time to get those divvys.Hold onto those shares.(FFGO)



AlanC

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:35:14 PM

Re: medchal post# 198727

Post # of 198729

FFGO is gone... Guess what ...Wrong! The shares remain in all our accounts and cannot be removed without our permission or it will violate a FINRA regulation which I posted earlier today. As long as the shares are in our accounts the liability remains to anyone who is short. The shorts thought BCIT was gone too and after 7 long years are about to participate in its resurrection. 1.3 billion sold against a float of 1 million and an outstanding of 4 million. Stay tuned as the pendulum is finally swinging back on the shortman! Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 1:39:17 PM

Re: medchal post# 198727

Post # of 198734

Sorry but Shorty's fantasy of tax write off are not coming to close out his open short interest!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 1:42:31 PM

Re: AlanC post# 198729

Post # of 198736

AlanC, fantasy claims of shorts not having to cover for a revoked stock and margin payments ceasing because the quoted value is ZERO are entertaining at best.

Looking forward to Varmit's documentation on the sale of the assets!




Lebron23   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 1:52:18 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 198737

The naivete about the massive short selling situation vis-a-vis FFGO is astounding imo.
Dividend is Locked and Loaded.....we will see what happens with the short sellers of FFGO.
All I know is.....I would not want to be short right now...could be hammer time soon!



paunch13   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 2:01:02 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 198736

Post # of 198738

Lebron23
The way I understand it is that it is now just a mater of time before FFGO pays the divis
John



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-25 13:02:22)

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879



janice shell 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:17:22 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 151225

Post # of 151254

Can't sue Bob Greene.



allezlOM   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:18:54 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151226

Post # of 151254

Everybody can be sued... even here on this board, but one thing at the right time



allezlOM   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:21:11 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151226

Post # of 151254

Time to raise your burqa to face the truth, at least for your moral integrity.



padutch40   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:21:26 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151226

Post # of 151254

Is this like when you told me that there was no such thing as a naked short sale???
Of course he can be sued!



janice shell 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:22:39 PM

Re: allezlOM post# 151227

Post # of 151254

There are rules concerning Federal agencies and their employees. AlanC will bring up the possibility of a Bivens action, but they're very hard to win, and one would be inappropriate in this case.

Poor Bob Greene didn't violate your civil rights.




janice shell 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:27:39 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 151229

Post # of 151255

And when did I tell you that? Never, is my guess.

Bob Greene is an SEC employee who works for the Consumer Education department. He's none nothing to you personally, and has made no decisions of any kind regarding the BCIT matter.

Sheesh.



padutch40   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:27:54 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151230

Post # of 151255

Yep there are rules for everything and I'd say poor Bob broke a few...lol



janice shell 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:29:00 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 151233

Post # of 151255

What, exactly, would you sue him FOR? You do need causes of action, you know.



padutch40   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:29:40 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151232

Post # of 151255

Long time ago...maybe it was a different Janice Shell back then



padutch40   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:31:19 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151234

Post # of 151255

Now now Janice why would I tell you that, for goodness sake girl



janice shell 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:32:21 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 151236

Post # of 151255

Because you, um, can't think of any appropriate causes of action? That'd be my guess.




janice shell 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:44:30 PM

Re: jb1967lbk post# 151242

Post # of 151255

Krazy Al would probably do it on the cheap, but you get what you pay for.

That said, I can think of no way in which Greene could possibly have violated the civil rights of anyone here.



oooooo   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:08:50 PM

Re: janice shell post# 151226

Post # of 151255

Any one can sue a judge for abuse of power but not But not Bob Greene For abuse of power Come on so he is above the law allso.
Just how many are above the law here? If you are talking about it I should be able to talk back and say what I think about it to.



janice shell 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:16:12 PM

Re: oooooo post# 151247

Post # of 151255

What? He doesn't have any power. So how could he possibly abuse it?



ptcgolf   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:20:46 PM

Re: None

Post # of 151255

Hmmm...lots of posts but nothing of substance...par for the course with shell and our newest moron from the cmkx board....experts on everything(well as much as they can google)....back to cleaning out the barn...8 dead rats so far....2 with one shot!



BigMoneyAtl   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:41:12 PM

Re: None

Post # of 151255

There are rules for everyone but it is ok for fed employee to lie in writing. In other words, are they untouchable??? DTC/brokers say "jump", and SEC's answer would be "how high"




AlanC

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:52:43 PM

Re: camper9 post# 151200

Post # of 151255

camper: The brokerage firms don't feel the need to use real shares.
Doing that could be expensive. It is much easier just to sell sell sell markers pocket the money and then just hide the shorts in ex-clearing. I wonder if anyone has ever asked the firms that audit these brokerage firms if they realize the potential liability they are exposing themselves to by not doing a proper audit? I also wonder how the Sarbanes Oxley documents are being filed. Perhaps we as a group could send registered letters to all the Directors of say the largest 5 publicly traded brokerage firms with a summary of our situation and asking if they are aware of this in light of the requirements of Sarbanes Oxley?
I think BCIT has bent over backwards in an attempt to provide an opportunity to remedy this travesty. We now have to take action that will put them on notice that this is not going away and they better solve the problem now. I think putting the Directors of these publicly traded firms on notice might just shake things up a bit. Even though I am sure the Directors are covered by insurance that insurance will not protect them once they have knowledge of criminal acts and fail to address them imho. With documented evidence from shareholders it is time to take off the kid gloves. Go BCIT!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes%E2%80%93Oxley_Act

5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111


Vianna 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:13:32 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198749

Post # of 198764

The future is still unknown and I, not only because I am a shareholder with $17K in this, can only hope and pray for the BEST here.

I would never be fulfilled by anything going wrong or "look forward" to being able to say (if this does not work out that is) "I told you so."

That's just ME...



paunch13   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:55:56 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 198764

I am with you vianna, all the way with FFGO and we will sometime soon get out divis
John



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:46:48 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198749

Post # of 198765

you bet, looking forward to see when people will finally get the picture a fantasy divvy from a revoked, abandoned, dirty, dissolved, defunct company called FFGO ..

No divvy is coming! - puppydotcom

Still waiting for documentation to support fantasy claims of dividend being canceled!

Dividend Coming!

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:00:37 PM

Re: newtrader2007 post# 198753

Post # of 198765

FFGO - Dividend coming!

Naked short sellers will pay their dues!

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:05:12 PM

Re: newtrader2007 post# 198753

Post # of 198765

Shareholders protecting their investment!

Great to see that for FFGO and for other OTC stocks that are targets of manipulative short selling!

Naked short sellers will pay dearly!

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:34:04 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198765

Post # of 198770

FFGO share holders have no investment. - puppydotcom

Sorry! Shares still in my account. Dividend process has not been canceled by the company, by the SEC, or by State of Wyoming.

Please provide a statement from Company, the SEC, or the State of Wyoming specifically stating that the dividend process for FFGO will not proceed.

FINRA has made it clear that the state of incorporation governs what a company can and can't do, AT ALL TIMES! State of Wyoming Statutes protect the dividend process.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:01:22 PM

Re: OldBen post# 198758

Post # of 198770

Agreed!

In the cross-fire are the shareholders whom neither FINRA, the SEC, nor the DOJ seem to care about once they are fleeced by short selling manipulators.

Tic Toc

"It is amazing that we get 60-100+ posts a day here at FFGO. Virtually every poster that has posted here IMO has some financial interest in posting. So, you might say there is a lot of financial interest that still exists at FFGO. Revoked or not, FFGO has a lot of "pent-up" activity that will need to be resolved one way or the other."~OldBen



OldBen   

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 8:20:00 PM

Re: maddog gene post# 1123

Post # of 1201

7 trading days later we are at .02 A long term NSS play is fine if confined to 5-10% of your portfolio for ALL NSS plays. GNCP may have NSS, but, it also has no cash and no near term viable prospects IMO.



AlanC

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:52:58 PM

Re: AlanC post# 1189

Post # of 1201

FINRA short sales reported for GNCP

20120425|GNCP|3800|0|169000|O

.022% of totals volume was short sales
Go GNCP!!!



Bull Finch 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:43:11 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 7423

Post # of 7432

"they have not broken any SEC rules"

"squeaky clean" not like some people we know!

Posted by: tride93 Date: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:15:38 AM
In reply to: Vianna who wrote msg# 157574 Post # of 157583

Vianna,

When I first posted, I took some heat from some posters about having my lawyer do DD. He could not find anything on these guys that indicated they ever have done anything remotely unlawful. I still stand by that (today more than ever). Here's why:

One of the people I know who invested in FFGO is a retired Police Officer. He has more investigative experience than ANYONE I know. On August 26th he did an extensive investigation of Lumb, Lowenthal, Bezzano and the others. He stated on the morning of August 27th, everything he found proved them to be squeaky clean. He, also, has checked them out in Europe and South Africa and they are clean.

NO ONE is liked by everyone. Some people don't like people with money. Some people also make money by making outrageous comments. It seems that the only negative things are of a personal nature and are not illegal or unethical. They have done nothing to be put in jail over or even to be charged with anything. They're only guilty of one thing: Trying to be good businessmen. SO, far, that is not a punishable offense.

I do not fear an SEC inquiry because in my opinion, they have not broken any SEC rules. In the event they have, I do not think it was intentional or of a criminal nature. Although to the laymen, not revealing that Lowenthal was Sloane and NMGL was wrong, it may not have been illegal. In fact, it may have been done that way in order for it to be legal. I am not knowledgeable enough to make that judgement. Ethically speaking, I do not agree with not revealing that info, but I can't put anyone in jail or fine them for doing things I think are unethical.

I do find them guilty of only one count. Not communicating with the shareholders. However, this is not illegal. All this drama could have been avoided if they would have come out on the 17th and said, "Due to the complexity of this transaction and the need to evaluate the final draft of the sales agreement, we request your patience until August 31st to have our final package completed along with any questions you may have. We will answer these questions and reveal the final draft of the sales agreement in an email to our shareholders at that time. In the event additional time is required, we will notify you of the revised date. We appreciate your patience and understanding."

That was easy and would have saved a lot of head aches for everyone.

The negatives on the Forum are a small number in the stockholders (Maybe not even stockholders). We should all step back and take a deep breathe. No one should do anything without taking pause. "We do not need to throw the baby out with the bath water!!!!"


SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:47:38 PM

Re: Bull Finch post# 7427

Post # of 7432

The bankers, the brokers, and the market makers have been busted by the SEC and FINRA time and time again. Yet they continue to do business after admitting no guilt. Interesting system.

It is good to know that there is nothing on any of the principles for FFGO, NMGL, etc.

Looking forward to justice being served in the form of a dividend that will bankrupt many of the manipulative short sellers preying on OTC investors and companies.

Tic Toc




Bull Finch 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:49:12 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 7423

Post # of 7432

"diligence case"

Posted by: can_wait 8/24/10 post # 155904

A little more food for thought - If you read between the lines like a sandwich.

"This is a due diligence case for the record books no doubt. I re-did a bunch of time lines over the weekend trying to see what their end game is. Between the combination of private and public corporations they control and trading and non-trading public corporations and reporting and non-reporting corporations they control and the vast array of assets they control they have a lot of options within their grasp but some formidable enemies also. The fact that the bashers just won't go away tells me that somebody is very concerned about matching this 34-for-1 dividend. I like the 34-for-1 risk/reward ratio a lot but once again this is not for widows and orphans. Due to how the DTCC is "wired" some of the dividend has to be in cash to be effective. There's about 14 mining properties out there that might show up under any company's banner at any time due to the non-reporting status of several of the players."

Posted by: can_wait 8/20/10 post # 155370

Here's an interesting post script.

I talked to the American Bonanza guys a bit. They own the Copperstone Mine to the North and contiguous with FFGO's S. Copperstone property. Their projected mine life as per their recent 43-101 results was only 6.5 years which I found interesting. Their cost per ounce to mine their underground ore is $415 per oz.

Both Arizona and Nevada seem to be gearing up for an explosion in gold mining activities with the price of gold over $1,200. A lot of the owners of the smaller properties are receiving expressions of interest especially from the representatives of European and Asian companies. I forgot to mention in my last post that a 5th party surrendered his shares of NMGL as part of whatever their plan that is obviously afoot. This was David Wolfin a very well-respected senior member of the mining community. His dad Lou started Cannaccord with Peter Brown. Apparently all of these famous and wealthy families have been doing business together in the mining sector in the U.S. for a while. When the 5 biggest shareholders simultaneously "donate" 99% of their shares into the pot for cancellation they're doing it at somebody's request or demand and they're accepting a smaller slice of a much larger pie. With NMGL about to contain 100% of both the Bouse and S. Copperstone properties one can't rule out that the end purchaser of those properties (assuming that NMGL is just playing an intermdiary role as a fully reporting entity) made this demand as part of an overall plan to acquire these and possibly other properties. Notice how NMGL is referred to as a "fund". Once again, be careful!


Posted by: can_wait 8/10/10 post # 155362
Sorry someone else created the post - I'm just the messenger. I'm not smart enough to come up with that.

Posted by: can_wait 10/10/10 post # 150995
Not true back at you.

"In order to be taxed as a qualified dividend, the investor "must have held the stock for more than 60 days during the 121-day period that begins 60 days before the ex-dividend date," as the IRS explains in Publication 550."

Posted by:can_wait 8/05/10 post # 148721
I called NITE corporate office and tried to talk to anyone. No one could take the call. Something about an internal crisis and everyone was at their terminal posting on an internet chat room.


Bull Finch 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 10:54:52 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 7428

Post # of 7432

Funny how the Stone Throwers

are the ones we see on the court papers as John Doe!



Bull Finch 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:20:15 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7431

Post # of 7432

I'm seeing a pattern here!

You must get paid by the post, and not the content!



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-25 22:26:07)

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



North American Gold & Minerals Fund (NMGL)

Moderators:AlanC, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Texan77, Bull Finch

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=16265




PNKBULLSHT 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:07:22 AM

Re: None

Post # of 198800

I guess this is a good thing that FFGO is "suspended" and not deleted?

http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/otc/OTC-237.pdf



PNKBULLSHT 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:08:17 AM

Re: PNKBULLSHT post# 198782

Post # of 198800

And then a reinstatement of FFGO

http://dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/otc/OTC-219.pdf



PNKBULLSHT 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:13:32 AM

Re: PNKBULLSHT post# 198783

Post # of 198800

Name: Fortress Financial Group, Inc

Sub Status: Current

Standing - Tax: Delinquent

Standing - RA: Good

Standing - Other: Good

2012-001304702 System Amendment 02/09/2012

https://wyobiz.wy.gov/Business/FilingDetails.aspx?FilingNum=2003-000459064



PNKBULLSHT 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:18:51 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198785

Post # of 198801

Great West Gold, Inc. - Confirmation of Immediate Name and Trading Symbol Change Company Confirms Its Change of Name and Its New Trading Symbol

NEW YORK, Oct 05, 2007 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Great West Gold, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: GWGD) confirms that its name has now been changed to that of Fortress Financial Group, Inc.
The Company has received its new CUSIP Number and Trading Symbol. The Company will trade under the new Trading Symbol "FFGO" and under the name "Fortress Financial Group, Inc." with effect from the market open on Monday October 8, 2007.

About Great West Gold, Inc.

Great West Gold, Inc., was a gold mining exploration stage company, engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties in the United States. The Company retains these Gold Mining Exploration interests as portfolio assets, it intends to extract value from these assets through a future "spin off" or a sale. Great West Gold, Inc. has now changed its name to that of Fortress Financial Group, Inc. following its entry into the financial services sector. The Company will now be primarily engaged in the issuing and marketing of prepaid debit and credit card and related activities.



PNKBULLSHT 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:19:05 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198785

Post # of 198801

How about that??? lol



PNKBULLSHT 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:46:03 AM

Re: None

Post # of 198801

Let me make sure I don't convine anyone here to invest in a stock you cannot buy or sell. Please do not put your hard earned money in a stock that once again you cannot buy or sell.

YOU GUYS DO NOT NEED TO TELL PEOPLE THIS!!!!

At the same time let me warn everyone about smoking. Shhhhhh don't tell anyone but you can get cancer from smoking!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:26:03 AM

Re: None

Post # of 198801

FFGO - Dividend coming! Those writing down their shares ahead of the record date will lose out on the dividend which has been put in process.

Those short MUST close out their short interest ahead of the record date. Otherwise they are on the hook for making the IOU holders "whole" for the shares issued by short sellers.

There is no way for shareholders to get conned into buying more shares. So the con is aimed at shareholders who still hold their shares.

Not hard to figure out what the fantasy frenzy is targeting.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:41:39 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198797

Post # of 198801

sorry, FFGO is revoked, dissolved and abandoned. Insiders have closed down the empty shell, terminated the phone, email, TA, RA, address and have left town with everyones money 21 months ago

no divvy is coming

no one will ever hear from FFGO again - puppydotcom

Still waiting for proof from company that the dividend process has in FACT been canceled. Also, revocation does not cancel the dividend. State of Wyoming Statues protect the process and will allow the distribution to shareholders proceed.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:56:16 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198799

Post # of 198801

Technology is a wonderful thing because it stops cold anyone from making misleading statements about the filings of companies or the ability to trade or if the companies are revoked, dissolved, delinquent and closed down

for example;

if the SEC were to revoked the stock, DTC delete the stock, the state were to dissolve the corporation, the TA was let go, the RA was let go, no phone, no email, no business license, no current address. It would provide totally indisputable proof the company no longer existed

as I said technology is a wonderful thing

good luck! - puppydotcom

All one needs to do is contact the SEC, FINRA, and the State of Wyoming. Dividend process as stated by the company and as filed with the SEC is protected by the Statutes if Wyoming. According to FINRA, the Laws of the State of Incorporation Govern what a company can or cannot do at all times!

Dissolution of FFGO by the state of Wyoming still allows for the distribution of assets to shareholders. Please reference the Statutes of Wyoming to verify!

Technology IS a wonder thing! Nothing like an electronic footprint tracking the magnitude of misinformation and misdirection.

Good Luck!



AlanC

Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:43:02 AM

Re: Bull Finch post# 7427

Post # of 7438

BullFinch: The simple facts are that the shorts have searched high and low and come up with nothing that can be used against management. You can be sure they have called in every marker they have with the regulators and for 8 years now zilch. The shortman met his match and then some. The 5 trillion authorized trap was baited and the shortman fell for it hook line and sinker. We are on hold waiting for the right moment for the Super 8K and while we wait our ultimate return continues to increase and the shortmans costs continue to escalate. He is screaming now but when will he scream Uncle? We wait! Go NMGL!!!



Bull Finch 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 9:57:55 AM

Re: AlanC post# 7434

Post # of 7438

They will be Scream Uncle, and Paying Uncle!

"He is screaming now but when will he scream Uncle? We wait! Go NMGL!!!"~AlanC




Bull Finch 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:25:26 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7431

Post # of 7438

I notice you are checking for filings Daily!

You have to be patient they will come!

Don't stop checking, after all these years it would be fitting for you to be the first one to find out!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:30:34 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 3119

Post # of 3121

4/26/12 .. NO filings from RENS - puppydotcom

Interesting that on the 25th, one is able to search the SEC database for filings posted on the 26th.

Tic Toc






AlanC

Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:26:22 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 3120

Post # of 3122

Some habits are hard to break! Nice catch! Go RENS!!!



Bull Finch 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:47:07 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7431

Post # of 7438

Good News Today!

Come to find out FFGO was only Suspend not Deleted!

"I guess this is a good thing that FFGO is "suspended" and not deleted?"~PNKBULLSHT


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74865080

http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/otc/OTC-237.pdf


"And then a reinstatement of FFGO"~PNKBULLSHT


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74865144

http://dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/otc/OTC-219.pdf




Bull Finch 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:50:13 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7431

Post # of 7438

Good thing we have Shareholders like PNKBULLSHT

to give us the facts, and truth!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:07:22 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198804

Post # of 198805

yes, why don't you contact the WYO SOS and ask them if they plan on liquidating the FFGO?

lol

here is a shocker for you .. the state has no power over the companies to liquidate anything

liquidating can only be done by the company and/or the courts - puppydotcom

No one is claiming that the State of Wyoming will be liquidating the FFGO assets.

The STATUTES do PROTECT the shareholders and the company's intent to complete the distribution when they so choose.

Strange how this FACT is never acknowledged.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:55:09 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198807

Post # of 198808

who cares about whether or not shares are written down? - alien42

Those who are short pre-revocation care, IMO. The only way for them to close out their risk is for shareholders to write down their shares and have the brokers remove the markers from their brokerage accounts.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:58:24 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198807

Post # of 198810

the con is to convince shareholders that they didn't invest in a scam. - alien42

To convince shareholders, who are awaiting a 3449% ROI that they invested in a scam, is what should be questioned.

No one could buy a revoked stock. So why convince shareholders they invested in a scam (past tense)?

Only thing that could be accomplished is convincing shareholders that they hold worthless shares, and the only logical thing they could do is write them down as a 100% loss.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:01:00 PM

Re: alien42 post# 198807

Post # of 198811

besides the facts that that is completely wrong and the tax deadline has passed - alien42

The tax deadline for the 2011 tax year has passed. Correct!

But not for the 2012, second, third, and forth fiscal quarters, as well as the annual deadline.

Those shares not written down when the dividend is paid will have to be backed by those who are responsible for short selling them to retail investors.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:09:50 PM

Re: alien42 post# 198812

Post # of 198813

wrong, the only thing to be accomplished is to keep the truth and reality public, period.

the lies of the scammers who ran FFGO and who you invested in need to be stopped. thankfully the SEC suspended and revoked FFGO to prevent any further victims. - alien42

Please post a statement provided by the SEC that they revoked FFGO's registration to prevent the company's principles from scamming further shareholders.

Oh wait...

There are no such statements provided by the SEC!

IN FACT, the revocation was due to the company not filing periodic financials, which they made very clear that they had no intention of filing prior to the dividend being distributed! No scamming there! Company has been very very clear on what their intent has been. The risk was all laid out for investors throughout the entire dividend discussion process.

The revocation has no impact on the dividend process. State of Wyoming Statutes govern what FFGO can and can't do moving forward regarding the dividend distribution to shareholders.

Just email FINRA and ask them where the State of Incorporation Statutes come into play.

Looking forward to their reply!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven

Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:16:52 PM

Re: alien42 post# 198814

Post # of 198818

There sure are a lot of "MAY'S" in that document provided. It is clear, from the SEC complaint, that FFGO did not file periodic financials with the SEC. We all know that! Company made it clear that they did not intend on filing financials with the SEC and that it would have no impact on the dividend process.

Not a single piece of proof that has been documented and/or confirmed to accuse the FFGO management of financial fraud or scamming investors.

I will wait patiently for that document that must exist in fantasy land.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SEC may invoke a trading suspension. In some cases, the SEC will suspend trading (or the Nasdaq or NYSE may halt trading) in the stock of an issuer that is a defunct company if, for example, the SEC believes that public information about the issuer is materially false or misleading or the stock price appears to be manipulated. During a trading suspension, no broker-dealer may trade the security. When the trading suspension terminates, a broker-dealer wishing to publish quotations must comply with Rule 15c2-11, which may be impossible to do in the case of a defunct company.

The SEC may revoke the registration of stocks. In some circumstances, the SEC may revoke the registration of a defunct company's stock pursuant to Section 12(j) of the Exchange Act. Under Section 12(j), the SEC is authorized to revoke the registration of a security if it fails to comply with the federal securities laws. No broker-dealer may execute any trades in stocks whose registration has been revoked pursuant to Section 12(j).

A defunct company may not have a transfer agent. In some situations, the defunct company does not have a transfer agent. Although the federal securities laws do not require a company to have a transfer agent, if a company does not have a transfer agent, investors are unable to receive or transfer their stock certificates. Sometimes the SEC has considered a company's lack of a transfer agent as a factor in whether to revoke the registration of stock pursuant to Section 12(j) for the protection of investors.

www.sec.gov/answers/dfnctco.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:23:22 PM

Re: alien42 post# 198816

Post # of 198818

sure, if you completely ignore the years of lies publicly documented by FFGO. - alien42

Please provide a statement or a written complaint filed by the SEC that accuses, or convicts any of the principles, or managers associated with FFGO, regarding financial fraud and/or scamming investors.

Oh wait...

No such documents and/or statements exists coming from the SEC! NOTHING!

Nothing but fantasy claims of such.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:30:12 PM

Re: alien42 post# 198820

Post # of 198822

no such documents exist from 99% of the scams that the SEC puts an end to. i never stated that FFGO committed fraud, just because they scammed investors doesn't mean they broke the law. all one has to do is read the carefully worded dividend 8K which is loaded with weasel clauses. - alien42

Please provide documented proof that these so called weasel have been IN FACT exercised by either party.

Oh wait...

No such documentation has ever been provided to support such claims.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:43:07 PM

Re: alien42 post# 198823

Post # of 198824

it has already been documented repeatedly that the dividend was never even declared due to the clauses. - alien42

Nothing has been proven! There is no such proof documented and/or provided by the company ceasing the dividend process by either party.

Claims of the dividend process being canceled are nothing more than unsubstantiated claims.

Good Luck!




5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-26 11:50:03)

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111


SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:52:36 PM

Re: PNKBULLSHT post# 198782

Post # of 198891

FFGO - How did those doing such detailed DD have missed the FACT that FFGO has been suspended, and not deleted?

If possession is 9/10th of the law, Omission must be 9/10th of the fantasy!

http://www.dtcc.com/downloads/legal/imp_notices/2011/nscc/otc/OTC-237.pdf

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:00:25 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198844

Post # of 198891

willingly and knowingly - FFGO Management (Paraphrased by Puppydotcom

Could Varmit be right?

$0.007 per share Plus a Legal opportunity to get $1 per share due to naked shorts being required to cover by law?

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 7:21:22 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198848

Post # of 198891

sorry, no divvy is coming - puppydotcom

Still waiting on a link or a document to support that claim. Seems like other claims there are links or documents quickly displayed.

Will be waiting on that link or document.

Until then, nothing more than keeping the canceled dividend fantasy alive!

Good Luck!



PNKBULLSHT 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:14:17 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 198843

Post # of 198891

Selective Research



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:53:17 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198852

Post # of 198892

if you choose not to believe FFGO was revoked and the state of WYO dissolved the corporation

the FFGO management terminated all lines of communication with the public and ran away 21 months ago

its ok with me

however, its fact! - puppydotcom

If anyone chooses to ignore the FACT that the Statutes of Wyoming protect the dividend process, regardless of the dissolution status of FFGO, and that the revocation has no effect on the dividend being distributed when the terms are met...

its OK with me!

Tic Toc



Rocket Man 

Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:35:54 PM

Re: None

Post # of 198892

I believe based on facts as I see them FFGO has a massive short position that is locked up.. It may last a long time, it may not.. Depends.. I still believe it is not over until it is over. Way to many wheels still spinning..



AlanC

Friday, April 27, 2012 6:01:28 AM

Re: Rocket Man post# 198854

Post # of 198893

RocketMan: FFGO has the potential to cause the system to implode. FFGO's plan they designed to battle the shortman was brilliant in that there is no escape hatch. The regulators are trapped as well and cannot bail out the shortman with FFGO. We don't have our money yet but the bill continues to tick for the shortman.

The plan can have final implementation executed at any time. Should anyone become frustrated because they have not yet received payment yet all they need do is realize how frustrating this is on the shortman who made a terrible mistake choosing FFGO and yet cannot do a single thing to correct that mistake. The shortman knows that a huge bill will be coming due and that bill is growing each and every day. He hasn't even been able to generate a plug nickel by shorting more since trading was stopped. It is all outgo and no income for the shortman here. Go FFGO!!!

Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



mwab52   

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:10:28 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 198877

Post # of 198895

I think the truth is being shown daily in (FFGO-Land). Seem like someone has a daily problem with a no trading so called worthless stock. I'am waiting on the divvy. Btw! If there is a short problem,Shorty must pay. Right? Hold onto those shorts. (FFGO)


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it's never too late for the truth however.

apparently, some can't handle the truth

No divvy is ever coming!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AKFish   

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:14:20 AM

Re: mwab52 post# 198878

Post # of 198896

Kinda makes you wonder how much someone has to loose should the payout come!!!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:14:57 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198879

Post # of 198896

FFGO - Dividend Coming! Hold onto those IOU's shareholders!

DD provided by the company in the form of FAQ's and Filings with SEC are what should be referenced!

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:17:44 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198882

Post # of 198897

when the SEC revokes a scam like FFGO, it's over. - alien42

Hardly a FACT!

Dividends can still be distributed to shareholders for revoked securities.

This is a FACT!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:19:43 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198885

Post # of 198897

the dividend can't be distributed because it was never even declared.

odd why you never mention that fact 71011. - alien42

Shareholders may want to reference the FAQ's and the Form 8-K filings provided to the SEC to understand where the dividend process lies.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:22:53 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198887

Post # of 198897

of course and the 8K makes it quite clear that the dividend can not even be declared. - alien42

Really? Hardly a FACT!

BTW, please provide proof that any of the exit clauses have been exercised by either party!

Will be waiting...

Good Luck!



mwab52   

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:24:35 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198879

Post # of 198897

Sorry! It makes alot of sense to me. Hold onto those shorts.(FFGO)



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:34:01 AM

Re: alien42 post# 198893

Post # of 198897

Sorry, Nothing in the sticky that confirms the exit classes have been exercised by either party!

Good Luck!




AlanC

Friday, April 27, 2012 8:45:44 AM

Re: lucvuillermoz post# 7439

Post # of 7441

No, the last call I made regarding FFGO was to expose a poster who had made some false claims a few years ago. I am comfortable waiting to be paid my dividends. I think the regulators are fully aware of all that has happened here and given the planned distribution their blessing otherwise they would have laid charges and as we both know in over 7 years not a single charge by any U.S. regulator has been made. Go NMGL!!!

Take a look at the education and resumes of all the players involved, they have impressive credentials.



AlanC

In reply to: puppydotcom who wrote msg# 1210 Date:4/26/2012 7:09:15 PM

Post #1211 of 1214

I'll bet you feel good coming out! Go GNCP!!!


SevenTenEleven

In reply to: puppydotcom who wrote msg# 1212 Date:4/26/2012 7:22:14 PM

Post #1213 of 1214

boy, I wish I could have shorted FFGO, NMGL and RENS .. too bad the share holders have lost everything because of the bad management of the two companies

Oh Wait! - puppydotcom

You Did!

Tic Toc



Rocket Man 

Friday, April 27, 2012 11:16:53 AM

Re: AlanC post# 198869

Post # of 198899

Kinda like having a boot on ones car to keep it from moving, yet the meter still keeps on ticking.. FFGOs meter for shorty tic toc.




AlanC

Friday, April 27, 2012 12:23:31 PM

Re: lucvuillermoz post# 7442

Post # of 7444

The poster was lying in his posts. I proved that for all to see and then put that poster on ignore. That call was made about 3 years ago. As Mr. Bezzano stated most shareholders will be pleased when paid no matter how long it takes. I am one of those shareholders he described. Go NMGL!!!



Lebron23   

Friday, April 27, 2012 12:36:10 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 1210

Post # of 1215

If you short GNCP (not GNCC as some mistakenly call it).....
YOU ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GOOD LUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-27 11:48:19)

DHS Holding Co. (DHSM)

Moderators:Admiral Lagrange, SevenTenEleven, goodolboy, Rich, Trading4cash, rekcusdoo


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=7860




NSS ~ Counterfeiting Stock ~ MM Games Played

Moderator:fourkids_9petsAssistants:XenaLives, camper9, SevenTenEleven, ThePennyGuru, dehydratedman

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=18322



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 5:07:26 PM

Re: Bull Finch post# 9465

Post # of 9559

FYI : http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74948616



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 5:05:55 PM

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 24257

Post # of 25657


DHSM - Company Links being tampered with in iBox

Please click on the following links to visit Company's Websites!

http://www.dhsholding.com/

http://datahealthsystems.com/

http://salesking.com/

Links in iBox are the same as the above, but will take you to error pages.

They were working earlier today when I updated iBox!

Makes you wanna go hmmmmmm?????



Rich 

Friday, April 27, 2012 5:34:23 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 9555

Post # of 9559

Nobody is tampering with the links.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 5:37:49 PM

Re: Rich post# 9556

Post # of 9559

LOL! Yes they are!

I fixed them this morning and they were converted back to back links this afternoon. Someone with tech privileges is tampering with them? But why?

Are the shorts still short 10 times the float?

Tic Toc



Rich 

Friday, April 27, 2012 5:40:05 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 9557

Post # of 9559

Ask Admin. If someone plays with the ibox they know who did it and what time. Ask them.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:16:19 PM

Re: AlanC post# 9552

Post # of 9559

Talking points on the short report distort continues to evolve. It is interesting how much effort is put into protecting the loopholes that are used by the abusive short sellers.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 7:14:27 PM

Re: sx1100 post# 25588

Post # of 25658

DHSM - DHS Holding Company Announces Meetings With Ministers of Government in Belize

Dhs Holding Co. (PL) (USOTC:DHSM)

Today : Friday 27 April 2012


DHS Holding Company (PINKSHEETS: DHSM) is tentatively scheduled to have meetings with Ministers of Government in Belize, as well as the Prime Minister, sometime between May 16 - May 18. The meetings will be attended by Michael Rohling, CEO of DHS Holding Company, and Charles Barrett, President/Director. Also attending the meetings will be the project's Belize architectural firm, iE International, and Daniel Arguelles, a partner in the firm.

At the meetings, DHS Holding Company will present Site Plans for the complete Cenote Falls project that will include the Casino, Hotel and Shopping Center. The plans will also include the project's proximity to the Cenote (lake) that adjoins the site and is the inspiration for the project's name.

In addition to the Site Drawings, there will be a number of Artists' Renditions showing various views of the entire project. Currently, DHS Holding Company has no plans to release any renditions to the public. Rather, we look forward to the Government of Belize having the opportunity to introduce the project more fully to their People.

DHS Holding Company looks forward to discussing with the Government and its Officials, the proper zoning that would be allocated for Cenote Falls Hotel Casino and Shopping Center. This will be a world-class project and one of the largest, most complex for the country of Belize.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 7:27:53 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25611

Post # of 25658

Had to be "fixed" twice today.

My fix didn't "take!

Interesting that Rich was aware that the links weren't working for weeks, yet alerted no one.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 7:31:29 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25613

Post # of 25658

Not really. Most people don't bother reading IBoxes. First thing I do when I go to a board is disable it. - janice shell

Well potential investors may like to click on the links.

Nothing like someone with tech access preventing the links from working. TWICE!

Strange....

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 7:36:50 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25615

Post # of 25658

Maybe...

Not seeing "technical problems" on other company links in iBox's for other stocks.

This "technical problem" appears to have been going on for DHSM for weeks. And then after fixed, today. Going on again until it was made public!

Strange....



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 7:37:26 PM

Re: Rich post# 25068

Post # of 25658

Strange how old posts can be edited?

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 8:00:26 PM

Re: Rich post# 25616

Post # of 25658

Strange that a mod would refuse to fix a problem with company links that had errors?

Errors that would detour investors possibly.

Good Luck!



janice shell 

Friday, April 27, 2012 8:01:14 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 25624

Post # of 25658

Nah. I would have refused. I don't mess with IBoxes.




Rich 

Friday, April 27, 2012 8:09:17 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 25624

Post # of 25658

Last time I played with an iBox, I caught hell from other Mods, I won't do it again. I told you I wasn't going to touch it.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 8:45:51 PM

Re: None

Post # of 25658

DHSM - Short Volume for April 27th - 33%

20120427|DHSM|35184|0|105877|O



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 9:11:54 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25631

Post # of 25659

Strange most of that was not the Ask, in fact it was everything from Bid to Ask and between, what was that strange theory again about shorting into buying volume again? - BigBake1

Do the math! Most of the shorting was buying into the ask. Majority of volume today was at the bid.

Short selling into buying volume” based upon what actual data? Short volume does not tell you what was sold short, it only tells you the volume of shares MARKED as short - BigBake1

So you are now able to tell what was marked short? LMFAO!

Strange...

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 9:56:50 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25633

Post # of 25659


Which is it, one CAN or one CAN'T tell what was sold short?

Incorrect as 20,700 were in fact neither Bid nor Ask, being the majority on it's own,and yes actually it is quite easy to conclude what was MARKED short reading the tape. Not hard to do at all. - BigBake1

Short selling into buying volume” based upon what actual data? Short volume does not tell you what was sold short, it only tells you the volume of shares MARKED as short - BigBake1

Unless the volume is 100% short or 0% short, when there are a number of trades, it is some what difficult to determine which lots were sold short.

Any claims of what is short would be a guess at best.

When NITE and VERT have been the only one on the ask and 100% of the volume was hitting the offers they were sitting on, it was easy to figure out what lots were being shorted, and by whom.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:04:13 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25633

Post # of 25659

Incorrect as 20,700 were in fact neither Bid nor Ask - BigBake1

Interesting. My level 2's show the 20,700 as a sell. I watch it hit the bid. So my eyes would have to agree with my level 2's.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 10:09:39 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25636

Post # of 25659

So what 35184 shares were short sold?

I have made a few assumptions based upon easy math. But without seeing the tape, it is a "best guess".

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 9:35:11 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25638

Post # of 25659

Sorry, but the 20,700 block was marked as a sell on your level 2's as well.

I was watching level 2's as the trades were going off. There was a bid at $0.39 at the time of that trade.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 9:46:38 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25639

Post # of 25659

Marked short because they were sold short. All the fancy claims does not change the fact that the short volume is in FACT short sales.

Twisting the english language to suit one's needs is the work of journalists and politicians.

Here is what FINRA has to say about what is "MARKED" short on the daily report.

Aggregate reported share volume of executed short sale and short sale exempt trades during regular trading hours

There is a separate column for short exempts, which is what your claims would generally fall under. But there are ZERO short exempts being reported on the daily list for DHSM or any other OTC stock.

Let's face it, those short are in a bad way here and it is getting worse with each share retirement announcement.

Wonder if the unreported short interest is still 10 times the float?

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 9:53:56 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25642

Post # of 25659

The bid WAS in FACT $0.39 when the dump into the bid occurred. Sorry to inform you. There was support at $0.39 and $0.38. As soon as the dump hit, the bid at $0.39 was cleared out. I was watching level 2's and know that what you see happen, and what is reported by the market maker filling the trade is not always in sync.

BTW, as plain as day, the 20,700 is reported in the "SELL" column of the screen shot you provided.

Thanks for the DD!

It is reassuring to know that there is a large unreported short interest position being shielded from the public and from investors.

Thanks again for confirming!

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Friday, April 27, 2012 9:56:50 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25633

Post # of 25659

Which is it, one CAN or one CAN'T tell what was sold short?

Incorrect as 20,700 were in fact neither Bid nor Ask, being the majority on it's own,and yes actually it is quite easy to conclude what was MARKED short reading the tape. Not hard to do at all. - BigBake1

Short selling into buying volume” based upon what actual data? Short volume does not tell you what was sold short, it only tells you the volume of shares MARKED as short - BigBake1

Unless the volume is 100% short or 0% short, when there are a number of trades, it is some what difficult to determine which lots were sold short.

Any claims of what is short would be a guess at best.

When NITE and VERT have been the only one on the ask and 100% of the volume was hitting the offers they were sitting on, it was easy to figure out what lots were being shorted, and by whom.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 9:57:39 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25644

Post # of 25659

You have no way of knowing if they were SOLD short, all the Daily Reg SHO reports is what is MARKED short as to the very reason you have no idea as to why they were marked short. SEC Rule 200 and 203 provide a “Risk Exposure” measure to allow certain trades to be MARKED as short when there in fact physical certs backing the trade: - BigBake1

Sorry, it is reported and market as a SHORT SALE, because it IS A SHORT SALE!

In FACT, the same "risk exposure" and hidden legs of the trade could be short sales that AREN'T reported on the daily report OR the monthly report!

FINRA makes that FACT very clear also!

The DD provided is reassuring that their is a rather large unreported short interest being shielded.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 10:02:16 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25646

Post # of 25659

I know what I was watching on level 2's and it has been documented. Thanks again for providing the proof that what actually happened and what was reported is two different things.

The DD provided continues to support the FACT that market makers are gaming the reporting system to satisfy their needs.

The DD provided is also reassuring to shareholders and investors that there is like a large unreported short interest position that is being shielded.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 10:07:18 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25649

Post # of 25659

This is pretty simple, provide the actual evidence that the NBBO was showing a Bid of .39, until then my statement will stand as FACT, that is how it works provide the evidence that shows that my statement is wrong. You have none and therfore my statement stands. - BigBake1

What is reported, is not always FACT. In FACT, what is reported, may not be accurate at all based upon what I was watching while the trades were going off.

UBS and Credit Suisse were guilty of that.

Thanks again for providing proof that market makers do not always report the correct information.

Good Luck!



Rocket Man 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 10:59:18 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25648

Post # of 25659

Lol, might want t re think that about FINRA, FINRA published a paper on some serious topics. Such as under reporting short sales and that in cases the data reported by Reg Sho Bi monthly reports are under inclusive. Thus suggesting the numbers can't be relied on. Let me know if you can't find it. I am sure I can drum a link up!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 11:01:54 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25651

Post # of 25659

Thanks again for the DD and the proof that what was actually showing on Level 2's when the trades were going off is not what was reported.

How many times the float are the shorts short?

Retirement of shares must be very problematic for them that they would expend so much effort to shield the unreported interest in the OTC.

Good Luck!



Rocket Man 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 11:47:59 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25655

Post # of 25659

When I get back to my office, I'll post it, since you can't find it.



SevenTenEleven

Saturday, April 28, 2012 11:50:02 AM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25655

Post # of 25659

What the trade documentation proves is that while watching in realtime, what was reported to the regulatory bodies and the general public does not match. I do recall NITE being on the bid. No surprises regarding NITE.

Good Luck



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 12:06:34 PM

Re: Rocket Man post# 25652

Post # of 25659

Strange that live level 2's were showing a bid at $0.39 for a size of 20,700. A dump hits he bid, and that offer disappears as it was filled. Strange that the bid reported was $0.38 at the time when there was a bid of $0.39 streaming live.




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 1:32:36 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25659

Post # of 25667

Would love to see the public report on internalized trades. Oh yeah, that is something only market makers involved in making those trades would know.

Also, bid was $0.39 when the 20,700 hit the bid. Was accurately recorded as a sell. Whether or not the bid was $0.38 at the time is what is in question. According to my live feed, it was $0.39. Sorry! It has been documented.

Regarding claims of insiders selling shares, which has been claimed a number of times. The facts are the Company has been retiring shares at an alarming rate, while the float remains the same. So there is nothing to support claims of dilution. In fact, quite the opposite.

Claims have also been made accusing a third party of front loading and hen selling into a 24 hour promotion. Still waiting for the report that shows one party loaded and unloaded as claimed.

Thanks again for the DD proving that the market makers have loopholes and resources to effectively game the system and take advantage of shareholders.

How short are he shorts? Still 10 times the float? Maybe more?

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:06:33 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25661

Post # of 25668

Unless you have documented numbers, one can ONLY speculate that someone was selling into the buying. Again only a broker and/or market maker handling trades could comment with certainty.

How short are he shorts? 10 times the float? Maybe more?

Imagine if a third party was buying into the 24 hour promotion and not selling? Did the market makers go shorter to meet demand?

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:11:39 PM

Re: lucvuillermoz post# 25663

Post # of 25669

Creating value for shareholders.

Shorts are officially trapped.

Are they short 10 times the float still? Maybe more?



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:20:43 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25662

Post # of 25669

It is Saturday. I also doubt it will be updated on Sunday! Once he TA officially retires the shares the company will update OTCmarkets.com. Wouldn't want to put the cart before the horse so the shorts have a legal gripe. Shareholders are well aware of the tactics the shorts leverage with FINRA, the DTC, the SEC, and the OTC.

Glad to have white collar crime experts looking after the best interests of the shareholders and the company's ability to preserve its ability to raise capital.

How short are the shorts? Are the still short 10 times the float? More?

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:34:26 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25668

Post # of 25669

$6 per share or more coming on that ordered buyin.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 2:57:13 PM

Re: BigBake1 post# 25670

Post # of 25672

Documented proof of a third party selling into a promotion?

Oh wait....

Just fantasy speciation!

Squeeze coming for those unreported shorts! If they don't exist, then. I need to be concerned. Right?

Oh wait...

They do exist due to ex-clearing and other loopholes the market makers have exploited over the years.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 3:01:32 PM

Re: stocksonfire post# 25671

Post # of 25674

Shorts are trapped with the recent 75MM share retirement(s).

Are they still short 10 times the float?



bigred1 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 3:06:36 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 25672

Post # of 25674

DHSM historic short list for DHSM----- http://otcshortreport.com/DHSM.PK



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:18:21 PM

Re: Bull Finch post# 25678

Post # of 25686

The only folks with access to internalized trades are market makers and brokers.

It has been brought to the attention of shareholders and investors that there are legs of the trade that allow for short volume to be reset and to avoid being included on the bimonthly short reports.

Of course those educating shareholders and investors have given only one possible side of the non-tepe legs of the trade. Where short volume is covered by a non-tape transaction with actual shares.

There is an equal possibility that the non-tape legs allow a short selling market maker to cover his reported daily shorts through a reset. Just the same as real shares being exchanged through a non-tape transaction, the shares being issued to "reset" such tape reported shorts may be short transactions themselves.

If they are indeed non-tape short sale transactions, they are not reported on the daily short volume list, nor are they required to be reported on the bimonthly short interest reports.

FINRA has been very clear about this in their direction, and in what they have made public to investors. In the same public documents, they have made it clear that such practice would leave the daily and/or the bimonthly reports under inclusive and the shorts under reported.

So thanks to the DD that has opened the eyes of investors and shareholders to the possible loopholes being manipulated to avoid reporting short volume and short interest in the OTC.

How short are the shorts in DHSM? Are they still short 10 times the float? Or are they digging even deeper?

75MM shares being retired when shorts were expecting free trading shares hitting the bid. OUCH!

Tic Toc




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:20:16 PM

Re: stocksonfire post# 25680

Post # of 25686

I would expect a squeeze if trigger will come once a trigger point is reached, both on PPS and available shares.

I wish I had the specifics of what will trigger those short to cover. I do believe it is north of $2 for PPS, but not sure what further reductions in the O/S will add to the boiling point.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:22:00 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25681

Post # of 25686

None of this, let me repeat, none of these links have the proof, or lack there of, for the internalized trades for DHSM that we are discussing.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:22:35 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25684

Post # of 25687

No. If they were, the stock would show up on the Reg SHO list. Sorry. - janice shell

Nope! Not necessarily.

Good Luck!




janice shell 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:29:44 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 25685

Post # of 25688

They explain the concept, though I don't expect you to take the trouble to read 'em.

No one will be offering "proof" of internalized trades in DHSM, because no one cares about DHSM.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:32:05 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25688

Post # of 25697

No one will be offering "proof" of internalized trades in DHSM, because no one cares about DHSM. - janice shell

Claims that there were no internalized trades for DHSM yesterday "should" be backed up.

Would also love to see those internalized trades to support claims that non-tape legs of trades reset the shorts for/on the days when they are claimed.

Imagine the credibility such proof would offer!

Good Luck!




Bull Finch 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:43:31 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25688

Post # of 25698

If no one cares about DHSM,

why do you even bother?

"They explain the concept, though I don't expect you to take the trouble to read 'em.

No one will be offering "proof" of internalized trades in DHSM, because no one cares about DHSM."~janice shell



janice shell 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:44:18 PM

Re: Bull Finch post# 25693

Post # of 25698

Some of us just like to argue.



Bull Finch 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:45:13 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 25685

Post # of 25698

Funny how statements can be made

but proof is not required, at least by some!


"Although there were no "internalized" trades yesterday that would be another example of a transaction that is required to be MARKED as short, but sometimes is not, another case of under reporting."~BigBake1

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74961273

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74963864


"They explain the concept, though I don't expect you to take the trouble to read 'em.

No one will be offering "proof" of internalized trades in DHSM, because no one cares about DHSM."~janice shell

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=74964824




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:45:57 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25691

Post # of 25699

LOLOL!! Those stupid promotional sites set "squeeze triggers" all the time. And nothing ever happens, except that the company pays $1000 a month for the promotion. - janice shell

Plenty of buyins have nearly BK'd abusive short selling market makers and broker dealers in the past.

Anticipating a squeeze to be triggered in due time.



janice shell 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:49:09 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 25696

Post # of 25699

Not in the stock of companies who pay sleazy Tom Ronk to put out his silly "reports".

Short squeezes are pretty rare, and they almost never occur in penny stocks.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:49:30 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25692

Post # of 25699

So should your claims of what you saw on the tape.

Perhaps BB will explain in detail why it looks as if there weren't any internalized trades yesterday. He most certainly has knowledge and experience. - janice shell

My proof of what occurred regarding the Level 2's and where the bids were and what the size of the bids were have all be noted and documented. What was provided this morning was documented proof that what happened "live" and what was reported doesn't appear to match. Not surprised. Pretty common with various market makers to have data not "match up".

Thanks to BB for providing another example of what happened and what was reported not matching up. DD such as that is valuable to investors.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 4:52:11 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25697

Post # of 25699

They do occur in penny stocks. When they do, they can be very costly for the abusive short sellers responsible.

Looking forward to further direction from DHSM regarding share structure and the development in Belize.

Strange how shorts could be short 10 times the float and no FTD or RegSHO alerts.

Oh well...

The system's loopholes are many and have been very costly to investors overall.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, April 28, 2012 5:13:40 PM

Re: janice shell post# 25700

Post # of 25701

Not very often. There was a squeeze in LEXG. Some small MMs got painful buyin notices. And then the stock crashed and burned.

That was a year ago; hasn't happened since. - janice shell

Stocks typically collapse after a squeeze is triggered. Key is to get in ahead of the squeeze, and not at the top of it.

None of LEXG's short interest was reported. Why is that? Loopholes in the reporting structure.

It is my belief that DHSM is still multiples of the float short. Those would be unreported shorts as was likely the case with LEXG.

With a float of only 3.3MM a forced buyin would cripple those abusively short.



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-28 16:30:14)