Deep Capture Forums

Discussing the crime of naked short selling

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The Deep Capture forums are ready! Feel free to post until your fingers bleed.

#1451 2012-03-27 11:42:01

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



Green Turtle   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:08:07 AM

Re: None

Post # of 197098


Looking forward to seeing my 15mil shares pay off.. Divi on the way!



laodiekanzhang   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:42:17 AM

Re: Green Turtle post# 197079

Post # of 197098


the day is near come.



Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking forward to seeing my 15mil shares pay off.. Divi on the way!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 7:17:00 AM

Re: OldBen post# 197075

Post # of 197098


Gold making a nice rebound. Let's hope for the dividend's concern, it continues to move toward $2000.



AlanC   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 7:23:32 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197022

Post # of 197098


Did you know FFGO management has been fighting the naked shorting of its stock for almost 7 years? Did you know that the stock was billions short back in 2006? Did you know that management tried hard to force those short to cover and regulators failed to enforce existing rules and regulations and allowed the naked shorters to continue to sell more non existant shares into the markets? Did you know management used every method available to them to try and thwart the attacks including multiple dividends and even reverse splitting the stock and still the naked shorters continued to sell non existant shares trying to drive FFGO into bankruptcy? Thanks management for being such warriors! Thanks for developing a plan that will insure that your shareholders are compensated for the suffering endured at the hands of the criminal naked shorters. Thanks for your courage and your caring.
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

Thanks to BullFinch for this DD:

Great West Gold, Inc. Continues
To Monitor Short Selling
NEW YORK, May 8, 2006 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) confirms that BUYINS.NET, www.buyins.net, continues its coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGOE) after releasing the latest short sale data through May 2006. From January 2005 to May 2006 approximately 28.73 billion total aggregate shares of GWGOE have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $22.7 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 2.21 billion shares. The GWGOE SqueezeTrigger price of $0.00079 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze started when shares of GWGOE closed above $0.00079. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://www.buyins.net/.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/080506_GWG_PR_Buyins_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Squeeze Trigger Report
NEW YORK, NY, February 21, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) announced on February 16, that www.buyins.net, is initiating coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGO) after releasing the latest short sale data through February 2006. From January 2005 to February 2006 approximately 20.59 billion total aggregate shares of GWGO have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $12.35 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 1.59 billion shares. The GWGO SqueezeTrigger price of $0.0006 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze is expected to begin when shares of GWGO close above $0.0006. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://buyins.net/squeezetrigger.pdf.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/210206_GWG_PR_Squeeze_Trigger_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. –
Share Price And Trading Activity
NEW YORK, NY, February 17, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) confirms that it has noted that its share price traded at a new low yesterday with in excess of 1 billion shares being traded on that day.
The Company has requested an urgent “Squeeze Trigger” Report from www.buyins.net in respect of the Company’s trading including yesterday and upon receipt of this report, it will be published by the Company.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/170206_GWG_PR_Trading_Activity.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Update On Naked Short Selling
Great West Gold (“GWGO”) Report
NEW YORK, December 27, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com



http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/271205_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – UPDATE ON NAKED SHORT NEW YORK, November 9, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com


http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/091105_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf




AlanC   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 7:24:41 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197021

Post # of 197099


FINRA provides the evidence in black and white. Total volume traded for the day and the percentage of the total volume that were short sales. The numbers are staggering. Over 90% and
FINRA admits there numbers are on the low side. UBSS and Credit Suisse fined by regulators for mismarking short trades and calling them long. It is likely that every single share sold in the past two years did not exist. 100% short sales! Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

FINRA short sale numbers for Novemeber 2010 for FFGO!!!

20101101|FFGO|2849999|3849999|0 74%
20101102|FFGO|1750000|1750000|O 100%
20101103|FFGO|7000000|7107200|O 98%
20101104|FFGO|2000000|2000000|O 100%
20101105|FFGO|7999999|10999999|O 73%
20101108|FFGO|15050000|26500000|O 57%
20101110|FFGO|1000000|2898917|O 34%
20101111|FFGO|2419999|2419999|O 100%
20101112|FFGO|3100000|3200000|O 97%
20101116|FFGO|1000000|1340000|O 75%
20101117|FFGO|6000001|10778584|O 56%
20101118|FFGO|2000000|4014600|O 50%
20101122|FFGO|19845000|19845000|O 100%
20101123|FFGO|500000|1000000|O 50%
20101130|FFGO|20385000|21035000|O 97%
Nov. totals: 79,354,998.00 107,739,299.00 74% sold short

Here are the FINRA short sale numbers for December 2010:

20101202|FFGO|999999|999999|O 100%
20101203|FFGO|615000|4585000|O 13%
20101206|FFGO|1100000|1220000|O 90%
20101207|FFGO|700000|3700000|O 19%
20101208|FFGO|750000|1017259|O 74%
20101209|FFGO|2500000|4500000|O 56%
20101210|FFGO|57089999|74194973|O 77%
20101213|FFGO|6000000|10005000|O 59.7%
20101214|FFGO|28900077|31695902|O 91%
20101215|FFGO|5500000|5704441|O 96%
20101216|FFGO|33250000|54755000|O 61%
20101217|FFGO|8890998|9340998|O 95%
20101220|FFGO|5615800|6660800|O 84%
20101221|FFGO|9600000|11200000|O 86%
20101222|FFGO|24577777|31723803|O 77%
20101227|FFGO|154399995|176901620|O 87%
20101228|FFGO|4999999|4999999|O 100%
20101229|FFGO|9382269|9426819|O 100%
20101230|FFGO|7000000|7010000|O 100%
20101231|FFGO|4081168|8192303|0 50%
Dec. totals: 361,453,081.00 457,833,916.00 79%


2010 short sale totals: 440,808,079. out of a total volume of 565,573,215 or 78% shares sold short. Note well the SEC only started publishing FINRA's daily short sale numbers in Nov. of 2010.


January 2011

20110103|FFGO|20000000|22953402|O 87%
20110104|FFGO|9100000|9400000|O 96.8%
20110105|FFGO|8250000|13250000|O 62.3%
20110106|FFGO|11000000|11220000|O 98%
20110107|FFGO|9999999|9999999|O 100%
20110110|FFGO|400000|900000|O 44%
20110111|FFGO|1500000|2000000|O 75%
20110112|FFGO|1400000|1400000|O 100%
20110113|FFGO|1300000|1800000|O 72%
20110114|FFGO|23859999|38587151|O 61%
20110118|FFGO|3000400|3400400|O 88%
20110120|FFGO|7499999|8099999|O 92.5%
20110124|FFGO|1800000|1800000|O 100%
20110125|FFGO|800000|800000|O 100%
20110126|FFGO|10000000|10000625|O 99.9%
20110131|FFGO|317800|317800|O 100%


February 2011

20110202|FFGO|20700000|36210000|O 57%
20110203|FFGO|13400000|38601000|O 34.7%
20110209|FFGO|200000|365000|O 54.7%
20110210|FFGO|2900000|3700000|O 78.3%
20110211|FFGO|500000|4970000|O 10%
20110214|FFGO|2000000|2006250|O 99.6%
20110216|FFGO|17700000|27770000|O 63%
20110217|FFGO|525499999|528499999|O 99.4% COLD WINTER DAY
20110218|FFGO|7600000|8725000|O 87.1%
20110222|FFGO|10000000|10526708|O 94.9%
20110223|FFGO|2000000|2700000|O 74%
20110225|FFGO|1000000|1455000|O 68.7%

March 2011

20110301|FFGO|1000000|0|1350000|O 74%
20110303|FFGO|1795000|0|3492848|O 51%
20110304|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110307|FFGO|1800000|0|1800000|O 100%
20110311|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110314|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110315|FFGO|3500000|0|4500000|O 77.7%
20110316|FFGO|11500000|0|11500650|O 99.99%
20110317|FFGO|3114000|0|3617357|O 86%
20110318|FFGO|13020000|0|13020000|O 100%
20110324|FFGO|150000|0|701113|O 21%
20110325|FFGO|110000|0|110000|O 100%
20110329|FFGO|1497300|0|1497300|O 100%
20110331|FFGO|1999999|0|3430269|O 58%

April 2011

20110404|FFGO|5891100|0|6651100|O 88.5%
20110405|FFGO|126400|0|126400|O 100%
20110406|FFGO|150000|0|150000|O 100%
20110411|FFGO|456000|0|456000|O 100%
20110413|FFGO|876543|0|876543|O 100%
20110414|FFGO|4100000|0|4741400|O 86.4%
20110415|FFGO|1500000|0|2500000|O 65%
20110420|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110421|FFGO|1560000|0|1560000|O 100%
20110425|FDTC|4000|0|25000|O 16%
20110426|FFGO|1000000|0|1000162|O 99.9%
20110427|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110428|FFGO|8072700|0|8322700|O 96.9%
20110429|FFGO|30210000|0|30210000|O 100%

May 2011

20110502|FFGO|4476700|0|4476700|O 100%
20110503|FFGO|7338600|0|10788600|O 68%
20110504|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110505|FFGO|1620000|0|2140000|O 75.7%
20110506|FFGO|1500000|0|1505583|O 99.6%
20110509|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110511|FFGO|3000000|0|3040000|O 88.2%
20110512|FFGO|7200000|0|8200000|O 87.8%
20110516|FFGO|8200000|0|8300000|O 98.7%
20110517|FFGO|4099900|0|4199900|O 97.6%
20110518|FFGO|585000|0|585000|O 100%
20110520|FFGO|1000777|0|1000777|O 100%
20110523|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110524|FFGO|500000|0|800000|O 62%
20110525|FFGO|18585000|0|18585000|O 100%
20110527|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110531|FFGO|7628700|0|8031462|O 94.9%

June 2011

20110603|FFGO|400000|0|400000|O 100%
20110606|FFGO|2710000|0|2710000|O 100%
20110607|FFGO|24000000|0|24000000|O 100%
20110608|FFGO|173800|0|173800|O 100%
20110609|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110610|FFGO|83100|0|83100|O 100%
20110614|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110615|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110616|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110617|FFGO|1105223|0|1355223|O 81.5%
20110621|FFGO|423000|0|423000|O 100%
20110623|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110624|FFGO|3401333|0|3401333|O 100%
20110629|FFGO|8619200|0|8619200|O 100%
20110630|FFGO|200400|0|200400|O 100%

July 2011

20110701|FFGO|5497995|0|5497995|O 100%
20110706|FFGO|400400|0|700400|O 57%
20110711|FFGO|500000|0|1400000|O 35%
20110714|FFGO|1102699|0|1102699|O 100%
20110715|FFGO|300100|0|400100|O 75%
20110718|FFGO|10850000|0|10850000|O 100%
20110719|FFGO|74000000|0|74000000|O 100%
20110720|FFGO|54100000|0|54100000|O 100%
20110722|FFGO|30000000|0|30000000|O 100%
20110725|FFGO|10346500|0|10346500|O 100%
20110727|FFGO|2400100|0|3400100|O 70.5%

August 2011

20110801|FFGO|8900000|0|8900000|O 100%
20110803|FFGO|5550000|0|5550000|O 100%
20110804|FFGO|7000100|0|10325100|O 67%
20110805|FFGO|5573333|0|5723333|O 100%
20110808|FFGO|405800|0|405800|O 100%
20110809|FFGO|3400000|0|3500000|O 97.1%
20110811|FFGO|3279000|0|3279000|O 100%
20110812|FFGO|100100|0|100100|O 100%
20110815|FFGO|14500000|0|14500000|O 100%
20110816|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110817|FFGO|10490000|0|10490000|O 100%
20110818|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110822|FFGO|467000|0|467000|O 100%
20110823|FFGO|55633600|0|55633600|O 100%
20110824|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110825|FFGO|750000|0|750000|O 100%
20110829|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110831|FFGO|45327062|0|61885560|O 73.2%


September 2011

20110901|FFGO| 777000|0| 832000|O 93.3%
20110902|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110908|FFGO|1920000|0|1920000|O 100%
20110909|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110913|FFGO|5000000|0|5299100|O 94.3%
20110914|FFGO|3000000|0|3000000|O 100%
20110923|FFGO|2000000|0|2320000|O 86.2%
20110928|FFGO|1000600|0|1125600|O 88.8%

Month totals: 20,197,600/20,996,700 96.1%

October 2011

20111003|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20111004|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20111005|FFGO|310000|0|590000|O 52.5%
20111006|FFGO|600000|0|1600000|O 37.5%
20111010|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20111012|FFGO|2010000|0|2390000|O 84.1%
20111013|FFGO|2999999|0|2999999|O 100%
20111014|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20111018|FFGO|8000000|0|11000000|O 72.7%
20111019|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20111026|FFGO|2150000|0|2150000|O 100%


Month totals: 23,659,999/28329,999 83.5%

FFGO YEAR TO DATE

JAN 110,228,197/ 135,899,376
FEB 603,499,999/ 665,528,957
MAR 42,086,299/ 47,619,537
APR 55,046,743/ 57,719,305
MAY 71,734,677/ 77,653,022
JUN 49,116,056/ 49,366,056
JLY 189,497,794/ 191,797,794
AUG 168,375,995/ 188,509,493
SEP 20,197,000/ 20,996,700
OCT 23,659,999/28,329,999
Year to date totals

1,333,442.759/ 1,453,420,239 91.7% SHORT VOLUME for shares sold in 2011

regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20110324.txt
Total short volume since FINRA began publishing records in Nov. 2010:
1,774,250,838 short shares sold out of total volume of 2,018,993,454 or 87.9% of all shares sold were sold short!



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 8:14:36 AM

Re: JammingJAY post# 197087

Post # of 197099


Someone BOUGHT 500MM Shares that day!

NITE went short 500MM plus!

Good Luck!


SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:13:50 AM

Re: alien42 post# 197089

Post # of 197099


besides the fact that FFGO has nothing to do with the price of gold and that the dividend will never happen...

FFGO even stated in their FAQ...

"Does the price of Gold affect the holders of NMGL Preferred Series “A” and Series “B” shares?

In our opinion, it does not." - alien42

First of all, the price of gold, in the OPINION of the company, would not effect the value of the dividend payout to shareholders. OPINION is STRESSED!

Secondly, no where in the FAQ's does it state that the dividend will NEVER happen!

Claims of such, without written proof from the company, is OPINION!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:48:15 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197090

Post # of 197099


well now, since FFGO is gone and NMGL is on the way to the revoking bin

it leaves only the State of WY to pay this fantasy divvy

that's what I read in your speculation/rumor - other wise why bring it up?

please let me know when the state of WY liquidates FFGO and NMGL .. and issues the divvy to FFGO share holders

when do you expect that to happen?

perhaps around

Next week(s)? - puppydotcom

FACT: Wyoming Statutes protect the dividend process. That is all that has consistently bee claimed based upon the FACTS.

Claiming that the SOS of Wyoming will be paying the dividend is not coming from this end of the table. It has never been inferred on my part, or any other shareholders' part.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:05:59 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7306

Post # of 7309


NMGL - Filings around the corner?

Sure seems like it!

Those short appear to be showing signs of despair in OTC stocks.

Should materialize here soon also.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 12:44:21 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197099

Post # of 197114


still waiting for that FFGO filing stating FFGO is still going to pay the fantasy divvy

still waiting for that filing stating
FFGO is not GONE - puppydotcom

Waiting will pay off for shareholders.

Those short, not so much.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:02:33 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197101

Post # of 197114


nope, just like every other typical share printing pump and dump scam like FFGO, shareholders have lost everything. - alien42

NOPE!

Only way shareholders lose everything is if they write off their investment prior to the dividend distribution.

Please provide link or proof source that the dividend was canceled by the company.

Waiting...




Lebron23   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:20:55 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197100

Post # of 197114


No worries here. FFGO/NMGL Dividend was computed; then locked and loaded.
Willing to wait for an incredible return.
IMO, Management has men on first and second....and they are not trying to move the runners over with a bunt. They are looking to drive the first good pitch they see over the Center Field Wall!
Playing for the Big Inning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gooooooooooooooooooooooooo FFGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Lebron23   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 1:37:44 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197108

Post # of 197114


We both know that that game is still being played. And, that's not good for those who are short. They want the game to be over.......................................................
It's not.



mwab52   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 4:35:43 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197115

Post # of 197116


Seems like you forgot.Longs are holding and will continue to hold just like shorty.Is it divvy time yet.Hold onto those shorts.(FFGO)



SevenTenEleven 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 3:14:52 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 7311

Post # of 7313


NMGL - When Company filings to the SEC are received by the SEC, then what?

Tic Toc



Texan77   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:17:37 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197123

Post # of 197124


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=52459311



Vianna 


Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:01:49 PM

Re: None

Post # of 197124


BLM INFO: SEARCHLIGHT EXPLORATION LLC CLAIMANT FOR S COPPERSTONE AND BOUSE...and LITTLE BUTTE

They have many more claims but I thought these would be of interest.

NOTE: I ran these reports from the BLM website today, July 20, 2010.

V

BOUSE


S COPPERSTONE




LITTLE BUTTE



Posted by: mattyhoho Date: Monday, July 19, 2010 11:30:28 AM
In reply to: None Post # of 140806

from searchlightwest@aol.com
to XXXXXX
date Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:31 AM
subject Re: Bouse, South Copperstone Properties
mailed-by aol.com


Mr. XXXXXXX,

Thank you for your inquiry.

Searchlight Exploration, LLC is a private company and does not make filings with the SEC. However, we will respond to your questions.

A number of years ago Bouse Gold Inc. and South Copperstone Inc. acquired the Bouse and South Copperstone gold properties from Searchlight Exploration, LLC pursuant to Project Acquisition Agreements that were filed with the SEC by Fortress Financial Group, Inc. (then named Great West Gold, Inc.). These agreements remain in effect, although Searchlight Exploration, LLC has agreed to amend the agreements to facilitate the sale process for Fortress Financial Group Inc.'s interest in Bouse Gold Inc. and South Copperstone Inc.

We have reviewed the SEC filings made by Fortress Financial Group, Inc. and Sloane Investments, Inc. concerning Sloane Investments, Inc.'s acquisition of Fortress Financial Group Inc. shares of common stock and Loan Notes. These SEC filings correctly report Sloane Investments Inc.'s acquisition of loan notes and Fortress Financial Group, Inc. shares from Searchlight Exploration, LLC and other parties.

We would refer you to Fortress Financial Group, Inc.'s SEC filings, press statements and website for more information on these subjects. We do not believe that we are privy to any information that has not been disclosed by Fortress Financial Group, Inc. through these media.



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-27 21:21:04)

Offline

 

#1452 2012-03-28 15:31:08

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879



poor broke bloke   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:55:41 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149264


CH, I thimnk it was last week that you posted that shareholders should be doing various things, specifically writing to the brokers. Can you please refer me to that post again?

TIA....a PM would work too, but maybe others would like to see it again.


Anyone else with that info can Post/PM it too.

GO BCIT!!!!




freewhilly   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:02:07 PM

Re: poor broke bloke post# 149227

Post # of 149264


Looking for that breach of contract post, as well, to pass along to Scottrade...



poor broke bloke   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:03:41 PM

Re: freewhilly post# 149228

Post # of 149264

need to update them on both of my accounts....eom



op9171787   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:04:29 PM

Re: freewhilly post# 149225

Post # of 149264

bcit's victory is coming as the facts are solid & stark here. the brokers defrauded, covered up, obstructed, etc. With help from the DTC, and of course the
pathetic SEC and the joke org called FINRA. THESE AGENCIES KNOW THE BROKERS have been STEALING and DEFRAUDING thru naked shorting galore FOR YEARS on a massive scale.

BCIT has all the facts that PROVE they were massively wronged, and there should be punishing justice. These brokers are sick frankly. Sickly unAmerican & criminal in their processes of thievery.

on a different side, yes the financial system of the US (Federal reserve system) will collapse - it's fraud and raping of the American people for almost 100 years will not last, can not last. the financial markets have thrived with so much criminal fraud for so long BECAUSE THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM helped enable it, participated in it.



weebie 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:17:33 PM

Re: freewhilly post# 149228

Post # of 149265

Here's the link: Etrade to be in breach of their contract for failing to deliver the BCIT securities which the investor purchased in August 2005.

http://banweb.co.fresno.ca.us/cprodsnp/ck_public_qry_doct.cp_dktrpt_frames?backto=P&case_id=12CESC00171&begin_date=&end_date=




poor broke bloke   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:26:22 PM

Re: weebie post# 149231

Post # of 149266

Thanks weebie, I have that too. Just thought CH may have said something else when writing to the brokers.




freewhilly   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:30:44 AM

Re: weebie post# 149231

Post # of 149266


Matt Drudge, Alex Jones, for starters, may be interested in running with this BCIT story. Thoughts?

TY weebie!



hurley cruppers   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:35:09 AM

Re: mikeymac post# 149218

Post # of 149266

DTCC only possesses 645,000 BCIT shares, all the rest is naked short shares sold

Laws have been broken.




The big time   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:37:57 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149266

Actually in my opinion if the Brokers were smart they would work to get this trading. That way they could trade their way out of this mess and still make some money from it. They certainly would not want to see Bancorp International Group become a viable company building value. That would only add to their pain.



hurley cruppers   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:45:24 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149209

Post # of 149266

A Press release addresses this, per the Etrade lawyers

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2012/2/prweb9193532.htm

Patrick Mokros President of Empire Stock Transfer Inc.,the Transfer Agents for Bancorp International Group Inc., states that DTCC systems show that the correct Cusip number at the time of the Arbitration was not subject to any chills or locks. A letter dated 4th January confirming that Empire Stock have been the transfer agents since 2007 and that Cede & Co have a total of 645,800 Bancorp shares is attached.




The big time   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:51:21 AM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149241

Post # of 149266

  Apparently not enough by a long shot. Silly Market makers...naked short selling is for scam pinksheet companies... not for a company where the CEO fights for years and the shareholders hang around and fight for what is right and then CH comes in and does a complete and thorough investigation to expose all the fraud. BCIT was not the company for them to think they could naked short it with complete impunity. Silly Market Makers go steal some TRIX cereal from some kids. You are toast here.




CarltonH 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:16:59 AM

Re: op9171787 post# 149189

Post # of 149266

Has DTCC on deposit the 200+ million shares from the OK. City case?

They should have


CarltonH 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:19:41 AM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149249

Post # of 149266

  There are additional court cases pending. As I may have said these were moved out of small claims by the brokers when they lawyered up.
Awaiting dates of hearings.




lollybella   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:45:55 AM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149217

Post # of 149266


I'm SAYING that "Empire themselves have NOTIFIED the powers that be that they ARE THE ACTIVE TRANSFER FOR AGENT FOR OUR STOCK, BCIT!"

You figure out the rest.



CarltonH 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:55:32 PM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149258

Post # of 149266

Friday.
It is worth waiting for.




padutch40   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 4:07:41 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149267

Sent a message today to TDAmerifraud again requesting my cert.




mastaflash 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 4:16:13 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 149264

Post # of 149267

Filed another complaint with SEC today, CC to my broker, TDW ombudsman, BCSC, and IRROC. If the recent past is any indicator, no one will respond.



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1453 2012-03-28 15:59:41

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111




Texan77   

Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:35:30 PM

Re: None

Post # of 197168

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingPdf?FilingID=7385235

Exhibit A
Bouse Gold Project
Northern Plomosa Mining District
La Paz County, Arizona
Original Claim Block


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, through their duly authorized representative, have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the day and year first
above written.
SEARCHLIGHT EXPLORATION, LLC,
an Arizona limited liability company
By: /s/ Frederick C. Bauman
Frederick C. Bauman
Manager
SOUTH COPPERSTONE, INC.
A Wyoming corporation
By: /s / Peter Bezzano
Name: Peter J. Bezzano
Title: President




wrenchman 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 5:39:19 AM

Re: Texan77 post# 197129

Post # of 197168

Tex,nice reminders for the the board and we know it all leads back to ST.James!!!GO FFGO!!




AlanC   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:57:55 AM

Re: Texan77 post# 197128

Post # of 197168

Texan77: Thanks for those posts. You just buried about 10,000 negative posts and illustrated once again why the longs bought FFGO to begin with and why we will be receiving our dividends.
Just a matter of time. The time this is taking is driving the shortman nuts as he knows there is no escape unless folks declare their shares as worthless and sell them all back to their broker for a buck. Nobody I know has even considered doing that.
The dividends are worth waiting for:
1 million shares $100.00 Divy $3,449.00
10 " " $1000.00 " $34,449.00
100 " " $10,000 " $344,490.00
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



tatoo1   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:20:20 PM

Re: mwab52 post# 197116

Post # of 197168

Concur. Mwab52. And last time the previous dividends were given. It was around two years after they were announced. So that might put us around August September time frame.




Lebron23   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 12:36:03 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197111

Post # of 197168


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Locked & loaded"? Or just wishful thinking?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Answer: Locked and loaded.



Lebron23   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 1:36:16 PM

Re: ctrumabll post# 197142

Post # of 197168

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
this is all an elaborate trap
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Actually, there is nothing elaborate about it.
It is a totally in-your-face trap!!!!!
And, the great part is, shorties can do nothing about it.
Not anymore.
Sleep well shorties..............lol



Texan77   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:30:12 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197134

Post # of 197168


show 13g filing that would prove that




SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:39:03 PM

Re: layton post# 197112

Post # of 197168


FFGO - Dividend has not been canceled.

Wouldn't want to be an off-shore shorter when the dividend is announced and paid.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:44:44 PM

Re: Texan77 post# 197153

Post # of 197168

FFGO - Sloane buys fir $0.0035 per share and it is suggested that he was selling for $0.0001 per share? LOL!

Sloane didn't become a multimillionaire selling investments at nearly 100% losses.

In fact, same goes for those who write off 100% of FFGO before the dividend is paid. Not wise, IMO!

DIVIDEND NOT CANCELED as CLAIMED!




SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:49:38 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197155

Post # of 197168

lol, you do realize the dividend hasn't even been declared yet right?

the bogus dividend was the final nail in the coffin for the scam fka FFGO. it was never intended to occur in the first place. - alien42

Bogus dividend? lolzzzz

Might want to reference SEC Form 8-K filings regarding dividend.

You know, same filings used to "stress" the out clauses of the dividend deal between FFGO and NMGL.

The same Form 8-K's that have not been followed up with, as of YET!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:51:47 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197156

Post # of 197168

  of course not, he became a millionaire by conning naive and inexperienced investors into such scams as FFGO - alien42

Conning? So he has been accused AND convicted of investor fraud?

Would love to see the proof to back up such claims!

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:54:15 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 197168

We need nothing of the sort. Does not matter who is the President of the USA regarding the fraud being perpetrated in the equity markets. Naked short selling days are numbered.

FFGO will pay the dividend soon enough.

Nice to know there is the little talked about 3% interest clause that is likely coming into play as we wait.

3% on $0.003449 = $0.0001347 annually.

Tic Toc



Texan77   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:45:26 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197156

Post # of 197168





Forbes says differant; Ronald Yadin Lowenthal

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
ASPA Gold Corp
Rancho Mirage , CA
Sector: BASIC MATERIALS / Industrial Metals & Minerals
Officer since November 2010

Mr. Lowenthal is a specialist in Corporate Finance, in the structuring of IPO's and in fund raising for Mining Exploration Companies. From 1999, Mr. Lowenthal was a founding director of Incentive Holdings Ltd. and Incentive Securities Ltd, a South African based Financial Services Group. From 1982 to 1999, Mr. Lowenthal served as a financial consultant and as the compliance officer to family owned, Lowenthal & Co, a South African based Stock Broking, Corporate Finance and Fund Management company specializing in obtaining mining concessions for exploration, and obtaining and assisting a significant number of Mining and other companies with their obtaining quotations on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. In 1971, Mr.Lowenthal earned a Masters of Business Administration degree from the Wharton Graduate Division, University of Pennsylvania, USA and in 1969 earned a Bachelor of Arts (Hons) degree in International Relations from the University of Sussex, England. Mr. Lowenthal is presently an officer or director of Kansala Resources SA, Senegal, Sanko Lowenthal, Mauritanie SARL, Sloane Investments, Inc., Chataprop Holdings 86 (Pty) Limited, IHL Nominees (Pty) Limited, Incentive Securities (Pty) Limited and North American Gold & Minerals Fund. He was previously an officer or director of Faso Mining SA, Consolidated Mining Corporation Limited, West Witwatersrand Gold Holding Limited, Carrig Diamonds Limited, Hanover Capital Group plc, Anglo Dutch Life Limited, Africa Resources Investments Limited, Catwalk Investments 398 (Pty) Limited, Hanover Research (Pty) Limited, Incentive Asset Management (Pty) Limited, Incentive Asset Traders, Incentive Corporate Finance (Pty) Limited, Incentive Holdings Limited, Rhizoid Timeline Formula Limited, Saga Lowenthal Commodities (Pty) Limited, Benoni Gold Holdings Limited, Bonte Koe Mynbou Ondernemings (Pty) Limited, Rex Mining Corporation Limited, Southern Fissures Limited, Wolfberg Mynbou (Pty) Limited, Carbon Leader Limited, Loxton Exploration (Pty) Limited, Dukes Court Shareblock Limited, Edgtech Holdings (Pty) Limited, Master Computer Bureau (Pty)Limited, Moorpark Shareblock Limited, Pick Distribution Company (Pty) Limited, Pick Square (Pty) Limited, Pick Technologies (Pty) Limited and Mesklip Prospecting (Pty) Limited. From 1972 to 1979, Mr. Lowenthal served as an International Merchant Banker with Scandinavian Bank in both London and in Singapore, Amex Bank in both London and in Hong Kong, Rothschild Intercontinental Bank in both London and in Hong Kongand with European and American Bank in New York. From 1979 to 1981, Mr. Lowenthal was involved in Diamond Mining and in Diamond Trading on an International basis. On November 22, 2010, Ronald Yadin Lowenthal was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. On November 26, 2010, the Board of Directors increased its size to 4 (Four) Members and elected Mr. Ronald Yadin Lowenthal, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, to the additional Board seat. As of March 3, 2011, the Company?s Board of Directors consists of Ronald Lowenthal.

http://people.forbes.com/profile/ronald-yadin-lowenthal/141097




SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 4:19:43 PM

Re: varmit post# 187918

Post # of 197168

ubs scam-dal was exposed ,fined ,and busted !!!!!!! nite and sean and others to follow suit shortly !!!!!

ffgo nss will be more than well rewarded - varmit

Looking forward to those naked short selling (i.e. NITE et al.) covering their liability.

$1 per share is a legal exchange and $1 per share should be the penalty for those naked short selling and arguing that they are just doing their jobs.

Looking forward to settlement sooner than later.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:52:55 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7314

Post # of 7317

DIVVY coming!!! - puppydotcom

YEP!

Shorts getting nervous. Risk is high and reward is nonexistent.

Liability on their books about to turn to losses!

Thanks for all of the DD!

Has help investors to remain positive and steadfast.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 2:47:11 PM

Re: layton post# 7310

Post # of 7317

NMGL - Dividend Coming!

Those who own shares of FFGO will be rewarded for their patience!

Those short, not so much!

Anyone check Edgar lately? lolzzzz

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 4:53:47 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197071

Post # of 197171


Market makers offering 1.8B shares at $0.0001. - SevenTenEleven

that is simply not true - alien42


Put a number of buys in at $0.0001 to meet their offer, and NO FILL! - SevenTenEleven

that is because the ask was at .0002 - alien42

Here is a screen shot that confirms that there have been billions of shares being offered by market makers at $0.0001. Very often, they war stalling fills for up to 3 hours.

Mind you, ETrade retail attempting to buy @ $0.0001, with NITE and ETMM offering over 2B at the ask of $0.0001.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=65766874

The size of the offer @ $0.0001 varied from 1.5B shares to 2.5B shares on any given day, from August 2010, until the trading suspension.

Shorts have a HUGE inventory problem!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 4:58:06 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197074

Post # of 197177


So you were trying to buy when FFGO was at No Bid?

If you do have screen shots & electronic records of those orders, then someone has a lot of 'splainin to do. - RoadLessTraveled

Here is a screen shot that confirms that there have been billions of shares being offered by market makers at $0.0001. Very often, they war stalling fills for up to 3 hours.

Mind you, ETrade retail attempting to buy @ $0.0001, with NITE and ETMM offering over 2B at the ask of $0.0001.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=65766874

The size of the offer @ $0.0001 varied from 1.5B shares to 2.5B shares on any given day, from August 2010, until the trading suspension.

Shorts have a HUGE inventory problem!

Electronic records of when my orders were placed and how long they took to fill have also been recorded.

Good Luck!


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-28 16:25:03)

Offline

 

#1454 2012-03-28 22:13:08

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111


SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:24:23 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197174

Post # of 197192


why not pick up the phone, email or write FFGO, Sloane and NMGL and ask where the fantasy divvy is>?

Oh Wait! - puppydotcom

Company made it very clear in their FAQ' and communications with shareholders that they would not be answering shareholder questions or concerns with email's or phone calls until the record date was announced and set. They also made it very very clear that the entire process could take longer than a year.

Oh wait...

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:25:53 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197177

Post # of 197192


Dividend coming!

Shorts going to pay!

Shareholders NOT taking write downs as expected!

Tic Toc



AlanC   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:25:59 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 197192


Dividend coming, shortman going under! Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!




OldBen 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:33:31 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197154

Post # of 197192


How do you think those shares were acquired?? It never says in that filing. It gives the price (.0035) but never gives the terms or conditions of the purchase.

It is important because a person is unlikely to leave tens of million in cash lying around. A person might leave a "free" contract lying around.

At best, we might suppose that Sloan has something to gain if the dividend is paid. It would be a much stronger document if there were a cash commitment that would have people really moving.


SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:36:22 PM

Re: OldBen post# 197181

Post # of 197192


Well the contract does not deny "cash" either.

One also has to assume that a savvy business person would not "overpay" for an asset, and would not then "sell" that asset at a significant loss to boot.

NMGL will file when the principles are good an ready.

When they do, those who are guilty of naked short selling will be footing one heck of a bill.

Tic Toc



OldBen 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 6:59:33 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197182

Post # of 197192


Your screen shots you posted today prove that there should not have been a time lag. There is a big NSS problem there IMO.

Daily 90%+ short, Monthly (missing), unreported numbers, Level II and Authorized Shares availability yet we have time lags and unfilled order to buy and sell for days and weeks and months.

Everything cannot be explained away as much as some try on this board.

Since, all the numbers cannot be explained away, the common thing is to try to say that is all a "scam."

Shorty has a lot of inventory on the books!! Big bill indeed...




SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:24:03 PM

Re: OldBen post# 197183

Post # of 197192


That is just one screen shot for one day of trading. But the pattern of abuse was consistent for months.



Texan77   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:28:33 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197171

Post # of 197192

I guess this says it all



post1,"Sloane sold off as much of the 17 BILLION shares bought by promissory note he could"

post2,"I don't need to prove anything"



yup I win lol




Texan77   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:40:56 PM

Re: None

Post # of 197192


http://www.whoswhosa.co.za/ronald-lowenthal-4018




AlanC   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:52:45 PM

Re: AlanC post# 197084

Post # of 197192


Did you know FFGO management has been fighting the naked shorting of its stock for almost 7 years? Did you know that the stock was billions short back in 2006? Did you know that management tried hard to force those short to cover and regulators failed to enforce existing rules and regulations and allowed the naked shorters to continue to sell more non existant shares into the markets? Did you know management used every method available to them to try and thwart the attacks including multiple dividends and even reverse splitting the stock and still the naked shorters continued to sell non existant shares trying to drive FFGO into bankruptcy? Thanks management for being such warriors! Thanks for developing a plan that will insure that your shareholders are compensated for the suffering endured at the hands of the criminal naked shorters. Thanks for your courage and your caring.
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

Thanks to BullFinch for this DD:

Great West Gold, Inc. Continues
To Monitor Short Selling
NEW YORK, May 8, 2006 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) confirms that BUYINS.NET, www.buyins.net, continues its coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGOE) after releasing the latest short sale data through May 2006. From January 2005 to May 2006 approximately 28.73 billion total aggregate shares of GWGOE have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $22.7 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 2.21 billion shares. The GWGOE SqueezeTrigger price of $0.00079 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze started when shares of GWGOE closed above $0.00079. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://www.buyins.net/.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/080506_GWG_PR_Buyins_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Squeeze Trigger Report
NEW YORK, NY, February 21, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) announced on February 16, that www.buyins.net, is initiating coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGO) after releasing the latest short sale data through February 2006. From January 2005 to February 2006 approximately 20.59 billion total aggregate shares of GWGO have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $12.35 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 1.59 billion shares. The GWGO SqueezeTrigger price of $0.0006 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze is expected to begin when shares of GWGO close above $0.0006. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://buyins.net/squeezetrigger.pdf.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/210206_GWG_PR_Squeeze_Trigger_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. –
Share Price And Trading Activity
NEW YORK, NY, February 17, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) confirms that it has noted that its share price traded at a new low yesterday with in excess of 1 billion shares being traded on that day.
The Company has requested an urgent “Squeeze Trigger” Report from www.buyins.net in respect of the Company’s trading including yesterday and upon receipt of this report, it will be published by the Company.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/170206_GWG_PR_Trading_Activity.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Update On Naked Short Selling
Great West Gold (“GWGO”) Report
NEW YORK, December 27, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com



http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/271205_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – UPDATE ON NAKED SHORT NEW YORK, November 9, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com


http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/091105_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf
 


AlanC   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:53:29 PM

Re: AlanC post# 197085

Post # of 197192


FINRA provides the evidence in black and white. Total volume traded for the day and the percentage of the total volume that were short sales. The numbers are staggering. Over 90% and
FINRA admits there numbers are on the low side. UBSS and Credit Suisse fined by regulators for mismarking short trades and calling them long. It is likely that every single share sold in the past two years did not exist. 100% short sales! Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

FINRA short sale numbers for Novemeber 2010 for FFGO!!!

20101101|FFGO|2849999|3849999|0 74%
20101102|FFGO|1750000|1750000|O 100%
20101103|FFGO|7000000|7107200|O 98%
20101104|FFGO|2000000|2000000|O 100%
20101105|FFGO|7999999|10999999|O 73%
20101108|FFGO|15050000|26500000|O 57%
20101110|FFGO|1000000|2898917|O 34%
20101111|FFGO|2419999|2419999|O 100%
20101112|FFGO|3100000|3200000|O 97%
20101116|FFGO|1000000|1340000|O 75%
20101117|FFGO|6000001|10778584|O 56%
20101118|FFGO|2000000|4014600|O 50%
20101122|FFGO|19845000|19845000|O 100%
20101123|FFGO|500000|1000000|O 50%
20101130|FFGO|20385000|21035000|O 97%
Nov. totals: 79,354,998.00 107,739,299.00 74% sold short

Here are the FINRA short sale numbers for December 2010:

20101202|FFGO|999999|999999|O 100%
20101203|FFGO|615000|4585000|O 13%
20101206|FFGO|1100000|1220000|O 90%
20101207|FFGO|700000|3700000|O 19%
20101208|FFGO|750000|1017259|O 74%
20101209|FFGO|2500000|4500000|O 56%
20101210|FFGO|57089999|74194973|O 77%
20101213|FFGO|6000000|10005000|O 59.7%
20101214|FFGO|28900077|31695902|O 91%
20101215|FFGO|5500000|5704441|O 96%
20101216|FFGO|33250000|54755000|O 61%
20101217|FFGO|8890998|9340998|O 95%
20101220|FFGO|5615800|6660800|O 84%
20101221|FFGO|9600000|11200000|O 86%
20101222|FFGO|24577777|31723803|O 77%
20101227|FFGO|154399995|176901620|O 87%
20101228|FFGO|4999999|4999999|O 100%
20101229|FFGO|9382269|9426819|O 100%
20101230|FFGO|7000000|7010000|O 100%
20101231|FFGO|4081168|8192303|0 50%
Dec. totals: 361,453,081.00 457,833,916.00 79%


2010 short sale totals: 440,808,079. out of a total volume of 565,573,215 or 78% shares sold short. Note well the SEC only started publishing FINRA's daily short sale numbers in Nov. of 2010.


January 2011

20110103|FFGO|20000000|22953402|O 87%
20110104|FFGO|9100000|9400000|O 96.8%
20110105|FFGO|8250000|13250000|O 62.3%
20110106|FFGO|11000000|11220000|O 98%
20110107|FFGO|9999999|9999999|O 100%
20110110|FFGO|400000|900000|O 44%
20110111|FFGO|1500000|2000000|O 75%
20110112|FFGO|1400000|1400000|O 100%
20110113|FFGO|1300000|1800000|O 72%
20110114|FFGO|23859999|38587151|O 61%
20110118|FFGO|3000400|3400400|O 88%
20110120|FFGO|7499999|8099999|O 92.5%
20110124|FFGO|1800000|1800000|O 100%
20110125|FFGO|800000|800000|O 100%
20110126|FFGO|10000000|10000625|O 99.9%
20110131|FFGO|317800|317800|O 100%


February 2011

20110202|FFGO|20700000|36210000|O 57%
20110203|FFGO|13400000|38601000|O 34.7%
20110209|FFGO|200000|365000|O 54.7%
20110210|FFGO|2900000|3700000|O 78.3%
20110211|FFGO|500000|4970000|O 10%
20110214|FFGO|2000000|2006250|O 99.6%
20110216|FFGO|17700000|27770000|O 63%
20110217|FFGO|525499999|528499999|O 99.4% COLD WINTER DAY
20110218|FFGO|7600000|8725000|O 87.1%
20110222|FFGO|10000000|10526708|O 94.9%
20110223|FFGO|2000000|2700000|O 74%
20110225|FFGO|1000000|1455000|O 68.7%

March 2011

20110301|FFGO|1000000|0|1350000|O 74%
20110303|FFGO|1795000|0|3492848|O 51%
20110304|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110307|FFGO|1800000|0|1800000|O 100%
20110311|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110314|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110315|FFGO|3500000|0|4500000|O 77.7%
20110316|FFGO|11500000|0|11500650|O 99.99%
20110317|FFGO|3114000|0|3617357|O 86%
20110318|FFGO|13020000|0|13020000|O 100%
20110324|FFGO|150000|0|701113|O 21%
20110325|FFGO|110000|0|110000|O 100%
20110329|FFGO|1497300|0|1497300|O 100%
20110331|FFGO|1999999|0|3430269|O 58%

April 2011

20110404|FFGO|5891100|0|6651100|O 88.5%
20110405|FFGO|126400|0|126400|O 100%
20110406|FFGO|150000|0|150000|O 100%
20110411|FFGO|456000|0|456000|O 100%
20110413|FFGO|876543|0|876543|O 100%
20110414|FFGO|4100000|0|4741400|O 86.4%
20110415|FFGO|1500000|0|2500000|O 65%
20110420|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110421|FFGO|1560000|0|1560000|O 100%
20110425|FDTC|4000|0|25000|O 16%
20110426|FFGO|1000000|0|1000162|O 99.9%
20110427|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110428|FFGO|8072700|0|8322700|O 96.9%
20110429|FFGO|30210000|0|30210000|O 100%

May 2011

20110502|FFGO|4476700|0|4476700|O 100%
20110503|FFGO|7338600|0|10788600|O 68%
20110504|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110505|FFGO|1620000|0|2140000|O 75.7%
20110506|FFGO|1500000|0|1505583|O 99.6%
20110509|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110511|FFGO|3000000|0|3040000|O 88.2%
20110512|FFGO|7200000|0|8200000|O 87.8%
20110516|FFGO|8200000|0|8300000|O 98.7%
20110517|FFGO|4099900|0|4199900|O 97.6%
20110518|FFGO|585000|0|585000|O 100%
20110520|FFGO|1000777|0|1000777|O 100%
20110523|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110524|FFGO|500000|0|800000|O 62%
20110525|FFGO|18585000|0|18585000|O 100%
20110527|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110531|FFGO|7628700|0|8031462|O 94.9%

June 2011

20110603|FFGO|400000|0|400000|O 100%
20110606|FFGO|2710000|0|2710000|O 100%
20110607|FFGO|24000000|0|24000000|O 100%
20110608|FFGO|173800|0|173800|O 100%
20110609|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110610|FFGO|83100|0|83100|O 100%
20110614|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110615|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110616|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110617|FFGO|1105223|0|1355223|O 81.5%
20110621|FFGO|423000|0|423000|O 100%
20110623|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110624|FFGO|3401333|0|3401333|O 100%
20110629|FFGO|8619200|0|8619200|O 100%
20110630|FFGO|200400|0|200400|O 100%

July 2011

20110701|FFGO|5497995|0|5497995|O 100%
20110706|FFGO|400400|0|700400|O 57%
20110711|FFGO|500000|0|1400000|O 35%
20110714|FFGO|1102699|0|1102699|O 100%
20110715|FFGO|300100|0|400100|O 75%
20110718|FFGO|10850000|0|10850000|O 100%
20110719|FFGO|74000000|0|74000000|O 100%
20110720|FFGO|54100000|0|54100000|O 100%
20110722|FFGO|30000000|0|30000000|O 100%
20110725|FFGO|10346500|0|10346500|O 100%
20110727|FFGO|2400100|0|3400100|O 70.5%

August 2011

20110801|FFGO|8900000|0|8900000|O 100%
20110803|FFGO|5550000|0|5550000|O 100%
20110804|FFGO|7000100|0|10325100|O 67%
20110805|FFGO|5573333|0|5723333|O 100%
20110808|FFGO|405800|0|405800|O 100%
20110809|FFGO|3400000|0|3500000|O 97.1%
20110811|FFGO|3279000|0|3279000|O 100%
20110812|FFGO|100100|0|100100|O 100%
20110815|FFGO|14500000|0|14500000|O 100%
20110816|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110817|FFGO|10490000|0|10490000|O 100%
20110818|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110822|FFGO|467000|0|467000|O 100%
20110823|FFGO|55633600|0|55633600|O 100%
20110824|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110825|FFGO|750000|0|750000|O 100%
20110829|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110831|FFGO|45327062|0|61885560|O 73.2%


September 2011

20110901|FFGO| 777000|0| 832000|O 93.3%
20110902|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110908|FFGO|1920000|0|1920000|O 100%
20110909|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110913|FFGO|5000000|0|5299100|O 94.3%
20110914|FFGO|3000000|0|3000000|O 100%
20110923|FFGO|2000000|0|2320000|O 86.2%
20110928|FFGO|1000600|0|1125600|O 88.8%

Month totals: 20,197,600/20,996,700 96.1%

October 2011

20111003|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20111004|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20111005|FFGO|310000|0|590000|O 52.5%
20111006|FFGO|600000|0|1600000|O 37.5%
20111010|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20111012|FFGO|2010000|0|2390000|O 84.1%
20111013|FFGO|2999999|0|2999999|O 100%
20111014|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20111018|FFGO|8000000|0|11000000|O 72.7%
20111019|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20111026|FFGO|2150000|0|2150000|O 100%


Month totals: 23,659,999/28329,999 83.5%

FFGO YEAR TO DATE

JAN 110,228,197/ 135,899,376
FEB 603,499,999/ 665,528,957
MAR 42,086,299/ 47,619,537
APR 55,046,743/ 57,719,305
MAY 71,734,677/ 77,653,022
JUN 49,116,056/ 49,366,056
JLY 189,497,794/ 191,797,794
AUG 168,375,995/ 188,509,493
SEP 20,197,000/ 20,996,700
OCT 23,659,999/28,329,999
Year to date totals

1,333,442.759/ 1,453,420,239 91.7% SHORT VOLUME for shares sold in 2011

regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20110324.txt
Total short volume since FINRA began publishing records in Nov. 2010:
1,774,250,838 short shares sold out of total volume of 2,018,993,454 or 87.9% of all shares sold were sold short!


Texan77   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:00:10 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197168

Post # of 197192


http://images.forbes.com/fdc/mediakit/MISSION.PDF


ill let forbes answer this note the word people


Forbes doesn't do DD on people they have profiles for.

i hope you realize that every single big corporate white collar criminal has had a Forbes profile.

FFGO executives are scammers, it doesn't matter that they have an online profile.



SevenTenEleven 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:28:50 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7318

Post # of 7319

NMGL - Keep checking. One day, one may be surprised as to what they find posted on Edgar!

Tic Toc

5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1455 2012-03-29 09:57:59

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879


Iluvbbs   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 11:39:08 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149266

Post # of 149318

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filed another complaint with SEC today, CC to my broker, TDW ombudsman, BCSC, and IRROC. If the recent past is any indicator, no one will respond.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You left out the Attorney General and the POTUS...LOL

Best, Steve



Iluvbbs   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:02:39 AM

Re: op9171787 post# 149271

Post # of 149318


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
what is it GONNA TAKE TO GET OUR
205 shares and get the
he** out of the American
markets?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Patience grasshopper, patience....

You have waited 7 years, whats another year or two....LOL

We already made it through the first court case, the spotlight is now on the powers that control our stock account lives, and if god willing, the company decided to put some value into the shell BEFORE many cases are settled, then add to that, CH is in the process of unwinding this very sordid tale to the point, somebody/somewhere is going to see the injustice, reverse the de-listing so as to not be sued for that also??, and the first day of trading whether here or abroad, my guess is all hell will break lose.....

God, I love to dream as if it were even possible.

Even JS has admitted that BCIT is quite the unique case in a world of 1000's of penny stocks. Maybe rules will be enacted, changed, enforced...but because of us and BCIT, maybe for once, to the positive......
who the hell knows what will happen, but as much as I could use my money plus interest plus penalties plus 205 shares or whatever is put on the table, I am sitting back and enjoying the ride because the stress here of wondering what could happen, could give a guy a heart attack.

GO BCIT!!!

Best, Steve



Iluvbbs   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:22:05 AM

Re: mastaflash post# 149294

Post # of 149319


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did I mention Megas knows Richard Branson? They used to be neighbors!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I wonder why JS never mentioned that. Don't you?? She is pretty good at sleuthing things out if it published or printed anywhere and then throwing the subject matter out there to see if anyone bites.

Best, Steve




The big time   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 12:28:30 AM

Re: Iluvbbs post# 149295

Post # of 149319


Most here would be amazed at some of the pretty important people he knows. Of course JS would not want to mention that but let her tell you about the shareholder lawsuit. She loves to spin that thing.



NI43-101 Or Bust   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:35:42 AM

Re: poor broke bloke post# 149285

Post # of 149319


Well legally we should not have to do anything, but I get your drift. I would much rather be fighting the good war than the bad war. Some of these scumbags have to feel guilty.... GUARNTEED!




Chas56789   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:58:41 AM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149308

Post # of 149319


Be sure to email or call your state AG ( attorney General) office as well as the SEC and finra.

Everyone has a local financial talk radio program. You should call in and tell them you have a stock that the brokers refuse to give you your certs. That everyone who owns shares of stock at their brokerage accounts ...should be concerned on whether they have real shares or not.

Also direct them to the documentary movie " The Wall Street Conspiracy" the trailer for the movie is at www.thewallstreetconspiracy.com .

It is time to expose these brokers for the CROOKS that they are !!

Chas56789


The big time   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:26:21 AM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149307

Post # of 149319


This is actually pretty simple. Many shares were sold on the open market. Many here bought shares on the open market and paid money for those shares. The money did not go to the company or any principals of the company. There are very little certificates to back up those shares that were sold. The counterfeit shares Pino and Thompson dumped into the market were taken care of when over 240M shares were issued by the company to cover those counterfeit shares after the OK lawsuit. I guess the Market Makers figured they could just keep selling naked shorted shares with complete impunity.




Joda   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:51:45 AM

Re: The big time post# 149311

Post # of 149319


Pretty much sums it up very well, in my opinion.

It was premeditated theft!

Just because someone didn't think they would get caught, doesn't mean they didn't do it!

Even if they thought it was the norm and they could get away with it, in the cesspool our markets have become, doesn't mean it is not still a crime.

A premeditated one at that. Which all involved should be held accounted to, imo.




THESirCharles   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:55:07 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149319


Does anyone else find it quite fascinating that there's been no post by the BCIT Board Gadfly in over 24 hours ?

Oh, and as of yesterday afternoon, E*Trade was suddenly singing a very different tune. More to come.....



THESirCharles   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:17:37 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149319



Amazing how losing a court case can put a whole new perspective on things. After months.... years.... of nothing but intransigence, obfuscation, prestidigitation, specious rodomontade and pixilated twaddle from E*Trade, yesterday comes this reply to my latest communique to them :

From: (E*Trade customer)
Sent: 03/28/2012 02:19 PM
Subject: Portfolio
Topic: Account Positions
Account: XXXX-xxxx
Reference Number: xxxxxxx

Message:

Dear (E*Trade customer),

Thank you for your message regarding BCIT.

The update will take place automatically once proper arrangements have been finalized between the transfer agent for BCIT and the Depository Trust Company (DTCC).

We are aware of the recent press release and have submitted an inquiry to our custodian for BCIT. Additional information will be provided once available.


Sincerely,

E*TRADE Customer Service

1-800-387-2331

E*TRADE Securities LLC.


From: (E*Trade customer)
Sent: 03/27/2012 12:34 PM
Subject: Portfolio
Topic: Account Positions
Account: XXXX-xxxx
Reference Number: xxxxxxx

Message:

This matter requires your immediate attention and prompt remedial action. Specifically in the referenced account ending in xxxx
there is a position of (share count) shares carried only by its CUSIP number, 05968X106. THIS IS INCORRECT ! The new, correct, accurate, and VALID CUSIP number is 05968X205. This can be VERIFIED by consulting the OFFICIAL custodian and arbiter of CUSIP numbers, Cusip Global Services, a division of Standard & Poors. IN ADDITION, there is a DULY AUTHORISED and ACTIVE Transfer Agent for this stock, Empire Stock Transfer of Henderson NV. As YOUR CUSTOMER, I require that you CONTACT Empire Stock Transfer and CORRECT this anomaly regarding the CUSIP number and the CORRECT representation of these shares in this account. This is NOT a "trading" issue, a "clearing" issue, or a "global lock" issue, so DO NOT cite any of these as excuses for not correcting the accurate reporting of this position in this account.




AlanC   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:37:03 AM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149314

Post # of 149319

Looks like you have their attention. Now the question is will they be buying the shares they are short or will they be going to lots more courts? Thanks for sharing I have forwarded your post to my broker (non Etrade) which will perhaps stimulate the reorg department to buy the shares they are short while they still can. Go BCIT!!!




THESirCharles   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:43:03 AM

Re: AlanC post# 149318

Post # of 149319

I doubt my communique got their attention; rather, I suspect that recent events made them realise they needed to view the BCIT matter in a much more serious light and further realise the jig was up in terms of more stalling and disregard. Thus, their sudden, new-found spirit of understanding and cooperation.



Iluvbbs   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:03:11 AM

Re: Domerfan17 post# 149316

Post # of 149325


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Love that as a template....sent to Scotturd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Domerfan, there YOU are!!! How are you guy?? Hows life in Rochester with all the BAD guys??

AMAZING, the current turn of events here after 7 years, don't you agree??

I also loved "theSirCharles" post as a template and also sent it off to Scottrade before I read your post.

So stick around for the fireworks, I imagine will start to happen fairly quickly now. Can't wait to see tomorrows PR.

From another NY "upstater".

Best to you and your family, Steve



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-29 11:04:23)

Offline

 

#1456 2012-03-29 10:25:01

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

Moderators: jarta, hasher, nufced, janice shell, TSXminer, jimmym4, pantherj

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=1561

tootuc   

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 11:23:07 AM

Re: None

Post # of 333782


March 27, 2012

TO ALL CMKM SHAREHOLDERS:

Greetings to each of you from company headquarters! I hope this update finds each of you and your families in good health and with positive outlooks. This update is being published to summarize the details and activities from my recent trip out West on CMKM business.

Since my last update on February 15, 2012 I have had the privilege to communicate with many shareholders by phone, e-mail, and text. I have enjoyed getting to know each of you, and to exchange information and thoughts about CMKM - it’s past, present, and future. I consider our large and diverse shareholder base to be one of CMKM’s biggest assets.
As a brief introductory statement, let me say that my recent trip was both fascinating and very productive. I made stops in Texas, Las Vegas, and multiple cities in California. I met with numerous people and looked at numerous properties on behalf of CMKM. I truly believe that the things I saw and learned, the people I met, and the seeds of progress that were planted will reap benefits for the company in the days ahead.

MEETING WITH LAW FIRMS WITH REGARD TO POSSIBLE NAKED SHORT ACTION
My first stop was in Houston, Texas where I met with two law firms – one firm that specializes in litigation with regard to naked shorting of specific stocks by brokerage firms. The meeting was attended by Bill Frizzell, who knows as much about the history of CMKM as anyone, and by an attorney from the second firm that specializes in securities law.

It is an understatement to say that the meeting was truly fascinating. The law firm specializing in naked short cases is indeed highly qualified, well financed, and has been successful in obtaining settlements for companies that have suffered from naked shorting of their stocks. Typically, a case of this type costs literally millions of dollars to bring to trial, and is usually worked by multiple law firms on a contingency basis. The case must be very strong in order to entice these high-powered law firms to sign on and expend the funds and effort to bring the case to trial.

There is little doubt that CMKX stock was naked shorted during the time frame the stock was being traded. It has been speculated that anywhere from 800 billion to two trillion phantom shares were sold into the marketplace by brokerage firms without shares in hand to cover the sales. However, we face a major obstacle in pursuing a naked short action due to the fact that the statute of limitations limits litigation of this type after five years, and CMKX stock was delisted over five years ago.

There are other avenues that may allow us to pursue this naked short issue in spite of the statute of limitations problem. The three law firms in attendance are studying how to best tackle this case, and will do everything possible to find a way – most likely beginning with a RICO action in a single state with favorable RICO statutes, and expanding from there if successful.
Although I am not at liberty to name the law firms involved, I am confident that we have some of the best legal minds in America chewing on this matter. I will provide more information to you as decisions are made in this pursuit.

WELLS FARGO LAWSUIT
While in Houston, I met with one of two additional law firms we have brought on board to assist with the Wells Fargo lawsuit. These two firms have been successful in previous cases against Wells Fargo Bank, and add much firepower to our case. Due to the fact we have an ongoing case against Wells Fargo, I cannot share more details at this time. However, I am confident that we have excellent representation, and am determined to make sure that our lawyers pursue this case with intensity and vigor to insure CMKM the best chance of recovery in this matter.

MEETING WITH MR. EMERSON KOCH
My next stop was Las Vegas, where I had the pleasure to meet Mr. Emerson Koch in person. He is a fine gentleman, and truly has a heart for the CMKM shareholder base. We are very fortunate to have him as our partner in the 1010 Joint Venture.

Mr. Koch has maintained the 1010 claims in good standing for several years at his expense, and has drilled core samples on the 1010 lands that are stored in his warehouse in Saskatchewan. The 1010 JV agreement calls for CMKM to put up substantial sums of cash at intervals to follow the terms of the agreement. However, CMKM has not had the capital to honor our side of the agreement to date. By rights, Mr. Koch could have walked away from this deal long ago, but has been extremely patient as CMKM management attempts to rebuild the company’s finances.

It is clear that all of us want to know what the core samples consist of – are they filled with diamonds and other valuable minerals, or are they worthless samples? Many shareholders have contacted me with questions as to why we haven’t tested these core samples, and the simple answer is that we have not had the funds to honor the terms of the 1010 agreement, or the funds to test the samples.

The 1010 JV is a critical piece to the puzzle for CMKM’s future. A few shareholders have offered to put up money to help with the cost of testing the samples. Well, the day is fast approaching when the opportunity to invest in the core sample testing will be available.

Mr. Koch and I agreed that he will get quotes immediately and put together a budget for the testing of the core samples, and I will find a way to raise the money to get the testing done. I have several avenues to pursue in an effort to raise the funds needed for testing, with the most logical being the offering of “preferred shares† to individuals willing to invest in this venture. I am investigating the legalities of offering preferred shares, and looking at other funding options, including private venture capital.

I will provide more information on this project during the online company meetings which begin in April. The good news is that we will may soon be testing core samples if the needed funds can be secured!

VISITS TO NUMEROUS PROPERTIES BEING PURSUED FOR RECOVERY
I personally visited and viewed various properties in Nevada and California that CMKM is pursuing through legal actions. These properties were purchased by former CMKM insiders, and the company hopes to secure title and ownership to these properties through the large judgments we hold against these insiders. Once the company gets possession of these properties, I will attempt to sell them to generate operating funds and improve the CMKM balance sheet.

I looked at every property that we know about at this time, but we believe that there are many more properties that we will uncover eventually. There is an ongoing, daily effort to locate these properties, much of which is done by shareholders investing their valuable time for the CMKM cause. I offer a hearty word of “thanks† to these individuals for their great work.

The properties I saw rank from C+ to A- in terms of salability, in spite of the weak real estate market that exists in most of the U.S. These properties are just another piece to the CMKM puzzle – we need the chunks of cash that each parcel could generate to stabilize and strengthen company finances.

I also took a long ride from Los Angeles into the sparsely-populated areas of southern California, and located a large parcel of land that is pledged as collateral against a loan made by a former insider to another company several years ago. Due to judgments against these insiders, CMKM is entitled to the proceeds from the loan repayment, which is currently in excess of $900,000, but is in default. I have instructed our legal team to pursue collection/foreclosure efforts diligently in this matter. Due to the anticipated litigation, I cannot comment further on this matter at this time, but will update you at the appropriate time.

VISIT WITH MR. AL HODGES
My final stop was to meet with Mr. Al Hodges and Mr. Dennis Smith. I felt that meeting with Mr. Hodges was a very important part of my trip, and I was pleased and thankful that both men took time to see me in spite of busy schedules.
Our meeting was very cordial, pleasant, and informative. I came away from the meeting more convinced than ever that Mr. Hodges believes in his cause with all his heart. I truly believe he has invested all of himself, his reputation, and his legal expertise into seeking a return for the plaintiffs, and ultimately all CMKM shareholders.

I informed Mr. Hodges of all the efforts that are ongoing from the company side to rebuild value into CMKM. He assured me that none of our company efforts are or could be a hindrance to his efforts for recovery. I offered my assistance if it is ever needed to help bring closure to his recovery efforts, and he assured me that he would let me know if I could help somehow.

I asked Mr. Hodges what he would want me to share or relay to the shareholders at this time. His response was that he feels very strongly that the long-awaited funds will be released very soon, and that the battle is nearly over. So, I am reporting this to you, the shareholders, per Mr. Hodges’ comments.

Please understand that I have no “inside† information one way or another. However, I truly hope and pray that Mr. Hodges prevails for the benefit of all shareholders.

UPCOMING COMPANY WEBINARS
I am planning a minimum of two (probably more) shareholder meetings in the month of April. I am in the process of getting the necessary training to host these meetings, so I cannot announce firm dates at this time.

The web meeting room will allow up to 1,000 attendees, and will be recorded and archived on the company website for those who are unable to participate in the live event. During these meetings I will provide updates on company activities, and then allow plenty of time for questions.

My hope is to continue increasing company transparency and building shareholder unity and trust through these meetings. I may not have the answer to every question, but will provide honest answers to the ones that I can answer.
Please watch the company website for firm dates and times for these meetings, plus instructions on how to sign up and participate.

SALE OF CLAYTON, GEORGIA PROPERTY
We have a firm contract on the 24 acre tract in Clayton, Georgia. The closing is scheduled for April 11, 2012. I will report more about this sale during the online shareholder meetings.

SUMMARY
My current business plan for CMKM is very simple:
1. Cut overhead to the bone and keep it low.
2. Bring in cash from any and all available sources – recovery and sale of properties, collection of funds owed, and ongoing/future litigation recoveries.
3. Raise funds for the purpose of testing the 1010 core samples.
4. Provide honest, accurate information to shareholders.
5. Build shareholder unity and trust.

Of course, I hope all of these efforts translate to the rebuilding of a viable, profitable CMKM, and a return to trading. I am passionate about providing a return to you, our shareholders.

If you believe in prayer, pray for the company and for me as I endeavor to rebuild CMKM. I look forward to speaking to many of you during the online meetings. Take care, and God bless….

Steve Kirkpatrick



February 15, 2012



jimmym4 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:02:01 PM

Re: goldbarren58 post# 333764

Post # of 333782


There is little doubt that CMKX stock was naked shorted during the time frame the stock was being traded. It has been speculated that anywhere from 800 billion to two trillion phantom shares were sold into the marketplace by brokerage firms without shares in hand to cover the sales.




jimmym4 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:03:34 PM

Re: goldbarren58 post# 333764

Post # of 333782


The three law firms in attendance are studying how to best tackle this case, and will do everything possible to find a way – most likely beginning with a RICO action in a single state with favorable RICO statutes, and expanding from there if successful. Fried Bork anyone?


Ya baby!



janice shell 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 7:41:01 PM

Re: jimmym4 post# 333771

Post # of 333782


Won't happen. Nobody wants to deal with Xers.




janice shell 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:18:11 PM

Re: jimmym4 post# 333776

Post # of 333782


No it doesn't. Nobody who wants to "do it right" would waste time traveling to talk to Krazy Al.




jimmym4 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:20:36 PM

Re: janice shell post# 333777

Post # of 333782

It seems everyone that has met with Al doesn't think he is crazy??



janice shell 

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:21:21 PM

Re: jimmym4 post# 333779

Post # of 333782


Oh, I'm sure plenty of people who've met Al think he's crazy. The loony Iraqi dinar stuff is MORE than enough.

5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1457 2012-03-29 11:00:57

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



GNCC Capital, Inc. (GNCP)

Moderators:SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Bull Finch, vladimirr

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3731



wrenchman 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:48:51 AM

Re: lucvuillermoz post# 197201

Post # of 197228

Go to GNCP board and look at the 10q filing and scroll to pages 103 to 105 and see new appointed advisors,one was a broker for years and another was a market maker then tell us this is over i dont think so they definately know what they are doing over and out!!!



LAMBSHIFT   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:16:43 AM

Re: wrenchman post# 197202

Post # of 197228

yes,and I think a strategy like "take the money and run" is not of any interest for these men. about 90% of the dividends will belong to them. why should they try to defraud people, who possibly don´t possess any share in FFGO?



AlanC   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:40:03 AM

Re: wrenchman post# 197202

Post # of 197228

Our FFGO shares are like forced savings. As I recall we are earning 3% interest and you certainly are unable to earn that in onshore bank accounts. I hope those offshore accounts that the shortman has are earning that because he is going to need every cent he can get to pay our divy.
1 million shares cost $100. and will return $3,449. plus int. No wonder this thread attracts so much attention!
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:11:38 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197204

Post # of 197228

FFGO - NMGL filing today? Haven't checked. But pretty sure we will be updated soon enough.

Those short starting to feel the pinch in the OTC. Pretty soon the brokers' secret settlement system is going to come crashing down.

Tic Toc





Vianna 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:48:20 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197154

Post # of 197228


DIVIDEND NOT CANCELED as CLAIMED!

Exactly, SevenTenEleven! That is the problem for SHORTY, and how incredibly EASY it is for the Company to cancel it with what has been referred to as the "weasel clauses??"

SUPER EASY but yet there has been NO CANCELLATION!!

That FACT and the FACT there is NO LONGER a need to give any warning here because NEWBIES can't buy FFGO continues to give me HOPE.

http://www.fortfinancegroup.com/ ...YEP...website still working. smile

Best to ALL FFGO LONGS!

TIC TOC

V



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:29:42 AM

Re: Vianna post# 197223

Post # of 197228

It is easy to make claims that the dividend has been canceled when the company has stated that they will not comment on ANYTHING until the record date is set. At that point, they will file a Form 8-K with the SEC and they will notify shareholders via email.

A company is an easy target when they have made it clear they will not comment, regardless of what is being claimed about the company and/or its officers and directors.

Looking forward to forthcoming filings.

Naked short sellers know time is running short.

Tic Toc




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:43:51 AM

Re: alien42 post# 197227

Post # of 197228

lol, FFGO was suspended and revoked by the SEC for not filing. everyone knows that FFGO will never file again. - alien42

Not according to the company.

Good Luck!



AlanC   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:29:04 AM

Re: digger1 post# 998

Post # of 1001

This could be dangerous to anyone who finds themselves a tad short! Go GNCP!!!




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:32:26 AM

Re: None

Post # of 31095

HGLC - Still trading! Shorty has been trying to get the SEC to revoke, but no luck.

Oh well...

Must be a reason it still trades.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:31:25 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 3073

Post # of 3074

GULP! - puppydotcom

Good word for Shorty!

He is going to need something to wash down the crow he is about to eat.

Naked short sellers are trapped and will be a bit poorer in the coming months.

Good Luck!




OldBen 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:24:09 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197219

Post # of 197238

Quite literally, you are comparing Apples to oranges. As Apple will be paying an annual dividend (that you appear to speak of) and stock buyback program combining for around 10 billion. Apple, obviously, is an ongoing company that will be around at least for a while LOL. FFGO knew that they were not going to continue as a company. They seem to believe that the best way to close up shop was to pay off all their debts (avoiding bankruptcy) and create goodwill and reputation by paying a large dividend.

I understand that it does sound too good to be true, but, it also makes sense in many respects as I referred to above. These thoughts crossed my mind when I bought FFGO in 2009, but, I thought it had some merit also. I kept the percentage small as it did seem like a long shot even then.





SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:32:31 PM

Re: OldBen post# 197234

Post # of 197238

Settlement coming to close out retail positions that are the result of naked short selling?

24/7 hopes of write downs surely would explain this.

Tic Toc


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-29 13:44:34)

Offline

 

#1458 2012-03-29 16:45:50

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:45:06 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197238

Post # of 197266

Dividend is locked and loaded!!!! NMGL/FFGO.
As far as a settlement is concerned....If one is forthcoming........I'll take that too!




Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:50:57 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197238

Post # of 197266


Yes, possible settlement. Locked and loaded dividend!
It feels very good to have shares in my regular brokerage account and in my ROTH!



Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:52:16 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197240

Post # of 197266


I will clarify: Dividend is computed, locked...and LOADED!
Shareholders at the time of revocation are going to be very happy...it's locked in.




Lebron23 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:03:40 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 197266

lol....I bought FFGO with large NON-TAXED gains....looking forward to the dividend!




Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:05:06 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 197266

Roth is the best vehicle to house explosive gains....Never taxed....
FFGO (and SENY) are going to add to those accumulated gains.
(Just wish I could still contribute to one.....but there are income restrictions...I took advantage some years ago of the liberal conversion rules...ROTH's are great)




wrenchman 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:44:48 PM

Re: medchal post# 197249

Post # of 197266

Just check FINRA website and you will see how much regulation changes are happening now and coming to OTC,I think i am gonna start a new club the 1.01 club and it will go up the longer we wait!!!




wrenchman 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:27:27 PM

Re: JammingJAY post# 197254

Post # of 197266

How bout the 1.01 share list bet your not on it!



Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:38:24 PM

Re: JammingJAY post# 197253

Post # of 197266

Dude, don't worry about me...lol. Have a huge retirement portfolio..............and, like I said, more to come with FFGO!




Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:43:01 PM

Re: JammingJAY post# 197253

Post # of 197266

Not going to divulge my Net Worth on IHUB, but buying millions and millions and millions of FFGO shares at $.0001 was not much of a setback for me.....in fact, it's negligible.......
Having said that...I'm still anticipating and looking forward to NMGL/FFGO Dividend!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



wrenchman 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:49:46 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 197262

Post # of 197266

Lebron,i will say my net worth 32mill at 1.01 share equals 32,320,000 will be my worth nice!!!!



digger1   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:48:02 PM

Re: None

Post # of 1002

Inching up nicely, I like it : )

GNCC Capital, Inc. (GNCP)


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (Today 14:44:34)

Offline

 

#1459 2012-03-29 21:20:58

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

DHS Holding Co. (DHSM)


Moderators:Admiral Lagrange, SevenTenEleven, goodolboy, Trading4cash


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=7860



SevenTenEleven

Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:25:25 PM

WOW! Admitting targeting a company or its management? LOL!


janice shell

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:27:26 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24154

Post # of 24156

Nobody's even bothered to "target" management here. Or the company itself, except for a couple of us on this board.

Their sorry history speaks for itself.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73850632



SevenTenEleven


Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:57:16 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24146

Post # of 24147
And why, exactly, should it "return" to $2? I'd be exaggerating if I said it was worth two cents. - janice shell

Everyone is entitled to their two cents worth.

PPS was manipulated by shorts from above $2, to $0.20. Most sellers willing to part with shares below $1 and $2 are out of the game. The rest are holding for much higher ground.

Those short, legal or illegal, are in it together. They have been warned time and time again not to continue to prey on OTC stocks that have strong upside.

Good Luck!




janice shell 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:16:06 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24118

Post # of 24157

I am very happy with. Like the fact that they have been keeping everything close to their chests.

LOLOL!! Has it occurred to you that they may just not have thought up a new story line yet?



neophyte184 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:18:06 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24137

Post # of 24157


The more the merrier! LOL When this stock runs into multi dollars, you'll see that the number of CEO's isn't a factor. GL!
 


janice shell 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:21:24 PM

Re: Rich post# 24135

Post # of 24157

Looks like they removed the BBB symbol from their website.

Well, that's good. If they want to "create value", as Seven claims, they certainly shouldn't have misleading information on their website.




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:55:59 PM

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 24144

Post # of 24157

DHSM - Those short will not be happy when this returns to $2. Glad to have added at these levels ahead of any forced buyin opportunity.




janice shell 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:01:11 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24145

Post # of 24157


And why, exactly, should it "return" to $2? I'd be exaggerating if I said it was worth two cents.



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:57:16 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24146

Post # of 24157

And why, exactly, should it "return" to $2? I'd be exaggerating if I said it was worth two cents. - janice shell

Everyone is entitled to their two cents worth.

PPS was manipulated by shorts from above $2, to $0.20. Most sellers willing to part with shares below $1 and $2 are out of the game. The rest are holding for much higher ground.

Those short, legal or illegal, are in it together. They have been warned time and time again not to continue to prey on OTC stocks that have strong upside.

Good Luck!



janice shell 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:15:16 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24147

Post # of 24157

And what makes you think it wasn't manipulated UP TO two bucks by insiders?

And what on earth makes you think this has a "strong upside"? It's absolute junk. Run by some very questionable people.




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:12:03 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24148

Post # of 24157

And what makes you think it wasn't manipulated UP TO two bucks by insiders? - janice shell

Much easier to naked short sell to manipulate a stocks PPS down than it is to actually have to come up with cash to buy into the ask to move the stock's PPS up through selling resistance.

Those few short sellers have a chance to cover at these levels. The refuse to. They continue to dig a little deeper.

Legal or illegal, they have been warned.



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:13:38 PM

Re: None

Post # of 24157

DHSM - Short Volume for March 29th - 49%

20120329|DHSM|3700|0|7500|O



janice shell 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:14:31 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24149

Post # of 24157

I could document dozens of cases in which stocks were manipulated up. Why? So somebody could sell.

Anyone who'd shorted this at $2 would have covered by now, and been happy with his trade.



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:19:29 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24151

Post # of 24157


I could document dozens of cases in which stocks were manipulated up. Why? So somebody could sell. - janice shell

Hundreds of cases where stocks were manipulated down! WHY? So somebody could COVER.

Good Luck!



janice shell 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:22:44 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24152

Post # of 24157



I see fewer cases of that, I'd say. Especially when you're talking about really BAD stocks like this one.



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:25:37 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24153

Post # of 24157

I see fewer cases of that, really. Especially when you're talking about really BAD stocks like this one. - janice shell

Shorts love to distort stocks they have targeted and are attempting to manipulate down with additional selling.

Part of the distort is to target the management of a company.

Shorts have been warned that they should consider covering all of the unreported positions they are liable for.



janice shell 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:27:26 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24154

Post # of 24157

Nobody's even bothered to "target" management here. Or the company itself, except for a couple of us on this board.

Their sorry history speaks for itself.



fourkids_9pets 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:47:00 PM

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 24096

Post # of 24157

Detailed Quote:DHSM
DHS HOLDING COMPANY
0.42 0.10 (31.25 %)AS OF 3:20:05PM ET 03/29/2012

Last Trade    0.42  Trade Time    3:20:05pm ET  Last Trade Exchange    Pink Sheets  Today's Change    0.10  Today's % Change    31.25%    Open            0.39  Today's High    0.42  Today's Low    0.39  Previous Close Price  03/28/2012    0.32  52-Week High  05/10/2011    5.00  52-Week Low  05/12/2011    0.05

Volume 7,500
10-Day Average Volume 6,033
90-Day Average Volume 12,630

dollar amount ~ $2,947.00

20120329|DHSM|3700|0|7500|O 49.3%


trades    $0.4200    500       OTO    15:20:05     $0.4000    200       OTO    14:58:26  $0.4000    300       OTO    14:57:40    $0.3900    3,500   OTO    14:55:17     $0.3950    500       OTO    14:41:58    $0.3900    2,000   OTO    12:21:26  $0.3900    500       OTO    09:30:05

===
4kids
all jmo



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:48:36 PM

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 24156

Post # of 24157


DHSM - Will be watching tomorrow while few still are.


SevenTenEleven

Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:57:16 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24146

Post # of 24147

And why, exactly, should it "return" to $2? I'd be exaggerating if I said it was worth two cents. - janice shell

Everyone is entitled to their two cents worth.

PPS was manipulated by shorts from above $2, to $0.20. Most sellers willing to part with shares below $1 and $2 are out of the game. The rest are holding for much higher ground.

Those short, legal or illegal, are in it together. They have been warned time and time again not to continue to prey on OTC stocks that have strong upside.

Good Luck!



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-29 21:21:29)

Offline

 

#1460 2012-03-29 22:01:13

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111


wrenchman 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:49:46 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 197262

Post # of 197283

Lebron,i will say my net worth 32mill at 1.01 share equals 32,320,000 will be my worth nice!!!!



Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:16:31 PM

Re: wrenchman post# 197263

Post # of 197283

wrenchman, Excellent! I view anything beyond the awesome NMGL/FFGO dividend as a major bonus!




Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:17:24 PM

Re: Doubleday post# 197268

Post # of 197283

Doubleday, Extraordinary/Liquidating dividend is coming....E-Mail / Super 8-K to come! Hope you have some "skin" in the "game"!



Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:19:18 PM

Re: Doubleday post# 197266

Post # of 197283

Doubleday, you need to consider Liquidating dividends and Extraordinary dividends.
We have been through this regarding FFGO/NMGL before.



Lebron23   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:20:36 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 197283

Correction: could NOT care less. Locked in NMGL/FFGO dividend is on the way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:12:39 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 197272

Post # of 197283

Dividend is coming. Nothing filed or announced by the company stating otherwise.

Tic Toc



AlanC   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:17:54 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197273

Post # of 197283

National news tonight. With gold at 1600 things are booming in Elko, Nevada at the huge open pit mine. We know gold bars are being shipped by our neighbor. Sweet. Great DD Texan. Go FFGO!!!

Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/307502/20120301/american-bonanza-s-copperstone-gold-mine-ships.htm




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:26:09 PM

Re: AlanC post# 197274

Post # of 197283

FFGO - Dividend COMING! Shorts will be forced to pay up and/or settle!

TIC TOC



OldBen 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:37:51 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197238

Post # of 197283

None of this just goes away. Ultimately, there has to be a settlement(s). Whether it is a NSS settlement. A dividend settlement if FFGO/NMGL are on the level. A fraud settlement against FFGO if they are not.

FINRA holds the truth. The numbers are either totally reconciled and market makers did everything by the book or the daily numbers and unreported data point to problems that could not be reconciled and will result in a settlement.

So, yes, settlements and answers ARE COMING!!!




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 5:54:48 PM

Re: digger1 post# 1002

Post # of 1003


GNCP - Continues to move up.



AlanC   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:48:29 PM

Re: Doubleday post# 7322

Post # of 7323

Trapped? Go NMGL!!!



CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

Moderators:jarta, hasher, nufced, janice shell, TSXminer, jimmym4, pantherj

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=1561



jb1967lbk   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:12:45 PM

Re: jimmym4 post# 333778

Post # of 333787

There's nothing dishonest about naked shorting a "stinky pinky"... or any other security.




Diamondsrus 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:33:05 PM

Re: tootuc post# 333755

Post # of 333787


i have to give it to Kirkpatrick - he at least seems to want to keep shareholders in the loop, in contrast to Tyler/Frizzle, Jim Lowdown and West. Speaking of which, the Vegas jury in the Glenn trial fonnd that Frizzel violated the statute of limitations in that case, and now Kirkpatrick admits that Fizzle did not bring suit for years against shorts, so that now he has let the statute expire for that action. How can someone that owes a quasi-fiduciary duty to shareholders not sue Frizzell for this malpractice?




jonathonanders   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 9:28:57 PM

Re: Diamondsrus post# 333784

Post # of 333787

Well Diamondsrus
I guess he knew that with all the crooks inside dumping reams
of shares on the market with the aid of a sloppy attorney, would
have clouded the case and make it too hard to prove NSS damages.
Ya think that could be it?




5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-29 22:06:10)

Offline

 

#1461 2012-03-30 12:39:58

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:22:49 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149335

Post # of 149452


Those naked short selling have been allowed to do so with reckless abandon. They have illegally stolen billions from retail investors while the SEC and FINRA stood on the sidelines cheering for them.

It is time they are forced to buy into the ask to cover their FTD's. That, or allow them a cheeper way out. $1 per share for each and every sub penny stock they cellar boxed.



mastaflash 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:24:01 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149336


Post # of 149455


It is time they are forced to buy into the ask to cover their FTD's. - How do you do that with no float, only IOUs?



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:25:44 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149338

Post # of 149457

they offer a cash settlement to holders of those IOU's to close out those illegal positions. Refund value not optional IMO. Although the investor advocates will argue that that is what investors should do. That argument is in the best interest of those illegally naked short selling and responsible for the illegal activity in the OTC the past 15 years.



mastaflash 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:26:05 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149336

Post # of 149458


There is only one way for brokers to cover....buy shares from the company.



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:27:54 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149339

Post # of 149458


I agree. SEC keeps the music playing. They keep allowing the NITE's of the world an opportunity to screw investors.

Wonder how many shares NITE has illegally deposited in retail broker accounts, while "justifying" to the SEC that the had to do it! LOL!

NITE seems to be backing away from making a market naked short selling into buying demand for quite a few OTC stocks I follow. Might be a sign of things to come.



mastaflash 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:30:21 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149343

Post # of 149458

NITE seems to be backing away from making a market naked short selling into buying demand for quite a few OTC stocks I follow. Might be a sign of things to come. - True...even my broker told me in no uncertain terms that for them, times have changed...and dealing with penny stocks at all is something they shy away from. My broker even went as far as to say they changed their polices recently BECAUSE of the BCIT screwup.




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:30:43 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149342

Post # of 149458


They could technically "cover" by closing out all of the open positions in retail accounts.

Three ways to do it while revoked:

1) Convince shareholders to write down their investment as worthless. (This has been their 24/7 goal for years).

or

2) Make a cash settlement with IOU holders to agree to close out their open orders.

or

3) Buy certs from the company to cover (not my first choice)




AlanC   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 2:40:29 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149314

Post # of 149458

Just spoke with my broker who I forwarded your post to on the phone. He has forwarded it with a note to the reorg department pointing out the transfer agent info and that there is/was an opportunity to purchase any shares the firm is short. He will get back to me when he knows more. Go BCIT!!!




CarltonH 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 3:59:05 PM

Re: carrot_on_stick post# 149327


Post # of 149459

Last i read the dtcc still doesn't acknowledge bcit has a ta

Dont read much do you, if you did you would know that things have changed on that front.




CarltonH 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:07:44 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149335

Post # of 149459

In 2005, there were 645K genuine shares on deposit at DTCC
That is correct and at that time there was total float of 1 million shares give or take.

In September 2005 a senior compliance manager for one of the USA biggest brokers wrote to a concerned BCIT Investor and said there was no naked short despite the fact that the Brokerage he works for still needs to cover 117 million shares.



Chas56789   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 4:42:44 PM

Re: 2late post# 149355

Post # of 149460

There are 1.2 bil naked shorts in BCIT. That is 1.2 bil shares of BUYING PRESSURE that should have been applied to BCIT PPS !

The brokers better be held accountible to more then just buying shares from the company at a cheap price !

BCIT stock price should reflect the buying pressure from 1.2 bil shares or BCIT shareholders should receive a large dollar(s) per share settlement!!!

Chas56789




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:40:55 PM

Re: lollybella post# 149388

Post # of 149463


# 3 is definitey MY first and only choice! That's what I have been demanding and I will not settle for your first 2 options! - lollybella

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73838577

#2 is My 1st and only option.

1) I would never write down my shares as worthless when there is definite value.

3) The company is the one making all the money and there is no guarantee that I, as a shareholder, would see a dime of their revenue from selling certs to the illegal naked short sellers.

2) is the only option for shareholders. As an IOU holder, I would want a settlement at a premium above what I paid.

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:55:00 PM

Re: lollybella post# 149392

Post # of 149465


I would want the payment for my shares as settlement, not the company selling certs to allow the shorts to cover.

Company gets mine for certs and then money disappears? Resulting in me having worthless shares now backed by certs.

Not the best possible scenario for shareholders.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:15:39 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149390

Post # of 149465


Company sells/issues certs, to naked short sellers to close out markers, game over for shareholders.



hurley cruppers   

Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:53:37 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149387

Post # of 149465


I forgot the group you write for, oh yeah,, the street or something, will you write a positive article there regarding what ch is doing for bcit?




weebie 

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:06:31 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149466


Bancorp International Group Inc (BCIT) Announces The Issuance Of Share Certificates To Five Brokerages
Share Certificates in BCIT have been issued to TD Ameritrade, Etrade, Scottrade, Schwab & TD Waterhouse Canada as a gesture of goodwill by BCIT to help the recipients in their dealings with customers who are BCIT Investors.

Carson City, NV (PRWEB) March 30, 2012

Bancorp International Group Inc (BCIT) is a Nevada registered company.

The company is not now known as Energy Source and has never legally been called Energy Source Inc

Standard & Poors Global Cusip Services state that the correct and active cusip for BCIT is 05968X205.

The Transfer agent since January 2007 has been Empire Stock Transfer Inc of
1859 Whitney Mesa Dr.
Henderson, Nevada 89014

Over the last few years and especially the last few months BCIT Investors have been asking various brokerage firms for certificates for the stock they bought in 2005. There have been some confused messages given to investors both by participants and even the SEC about BCIT company information.

Despite the fact that the correct and active cusip number for BCIT is 05968X205 many firms are using Cusip 05968X106 which Standard & Poors Global Cusip Services confirm has been inactive since January 9, 2006.

As a gesture of goodwill and in order to help various customer service teams communicate accurate and correct information about Bancorp and its stock to investors, the company has issued each of the following brokerages a certificate for 500 shares: TD Ameritrade, Etrade, Charles Schwab, Scottarde and TD Waterhouse (Canada).

The company wishes to draw attention to the fact that
1. The name of the issuing company on the certificate is Bancorp International Group Inc NOT Energy Source.
2. The Cusip is 05968X205 NOT 05968X106
3. Paper certificates do still exist and can be obtained for BCIT stock.

The certificates were cut and delivered to the recipients by the company the Transfer Agent, EMPIRE STOCK TRANSFER.

It is sincerely hoped that this course of action will promote a better understanding by participants of BCIT and prevent any further erroneous information being communicated to investors.

This information and action has been communicated out of courtesy to SEC, FINRA & DTCC

Thomas Megas
President & CEO
Bancorp International Group Inc





SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 7:37:00 AM

Re: lollybella post# 149398

Post # of 149466


Boy, you sure flip flop fast! Weren't you just saying this a few days ago?? - lollybella

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73663583

Please read it carefully.

Settlement is for SHAREHOLDERS. That is what I am suggesting! Ideally, it would be a settlement for shareholders and the company.

Not just the company issuing shares to the illegal naked short sellers to allow them to cover.

Do you know what shareholders would get if all of the illegal naked shares (IOU's) were covered with company issued certs throughou their TA?

NOTHING!

No squeeze, no settlement, no ordered buyin.

Advocation for a cert issue is not what shareholders want.

Good Luck!



THESirCharles   

Friday, March 30, 2012 9:17:28 AM

Re: weebie post# 149402

Post # of 149467


A simply brilliant gambit as this chess match goes into the endgame.

The brokers who received these token certs have been led into one of most carefully-planned, assiduously-crafted, and brilliantly sprung traps of all time.

Any of you ever watch an ice jam or a log jam break up ? It's a fascinating thing to watch. Seemingly, nothing happens, and you watch... and watch.... and watch. And come close to giving up all hope it will ever break up. Then, all of a sudden, one small log or ice floe breaks loose; then, another; then, the "key" log or floe, and suddenly what was once an intractable mass of wood or ice becomes a raging torrent, and nothing is going to stop it until it has spent its energy in dissembling itself.

The "key" has come loose for BCIT.

And now let's have a few words from Teddy Roosevelt, himself:

It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly; so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.

@weebie : I am he; thus, the "THE"




AlanC   

Friday, March 30, 2012 9:44:03 AM

Re: Vulcan post# 149417

Post # of 149468


The issuance of shares in certificate form to these brokerage firms should certainly help plaintiffs in upcoming court cases and arbitration hearings. How can the defendants deny what they have in their possession? Progress is our most important product.
Go BCIT!!!
RICO? Anti-trust? Treble damages? Think of the possibilities!



ptcgolf   

Friday, March 30, 2012 9:54:45 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149468


latest from TDA...

Mr. XXXXX,

Your Cusip is correct.

TD Ameritrade is a self-clearing brokerage firm which utilizes Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) as our depository. Our clients¿ securities, specifically BCIT, are held there electronically in street name for the benefit of the rightful owner. TD Ameritrade is in compliance with regulations set forth by the regulatory agencies with respect to clearing trades, custody services, and record keeping.
BCIT is currently designated as globally locked by DTCC. When a security is globally locked by DTCC, the security is not available for delivery, transfer, or withdrawal; effectively all activity in the security ceases at DTCC. Regardless of when an investor purchased the security, the global lock affects all shares of BCIT held at DTCC.
As a result of the current DTCC designation, TD Ameritrade is unable to facilitate client requests for stock certificates of BCIT. Additionally, pursuant to SEC Rule 15c3-3, the circumstances surrounding BCIT have created a scenario that is beyond the scope of what is considered the normal course of business; thus further prohibiting TD Ameritrade from obtaining certificates.
I apologize for any frustration this situation has or may cause you in the future; however, there is nothing further TD Ameritrade can do or say concerning this situation. If you feel you must pursue this matter further, you may do so outside of TD Ameritrade.

Regards,


Apex Safekeeping and Restricted Stock, TDA
Division of TD Ameritrade, Inc.

I'm sure that was their attempt, its funny though i received the following response from my other TDA account:

XXXX,

Thank you for your email. As of right now, we currently do not have any additional information regarding the matter. Currently, our management is working with our depository (DTC) to get the issue resolved. Feel free to periodically check with us on a status. Please send us an email with additional questions or concerns or contact our Corporate Actions and Dividends team at 888-723-8504, option 1.

Sincerely

Apex Corporate Actions and Dividends, TDA
Division of TD Ameritrade, Inc.



Vulcan 

Friday, March 30, 2012 10:38:44 AM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149415

Post # of 149468


In the game of chess this current move by Sir Megas et al was "Check".
The next move will be "Checkmate".

"The brokers who received these token certs have been led into one of most carefully-planned, assiduously-crafted, and brilliantly sprung traps of all time."


mastaflash 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:56:17 AM

Re: ptcgolf post# 149423

Post # of 149468


Doesn't matter what they say, they are not protected:

The court found Etrade to be in breach of their contract for failing to deliver the BCIT securities which the investor purchased in August 2005.

UCC trumps everything. As long as the company is alive...you have a right to have shares delivered as purchased. UCC supersedes every other law they can dredge up, and it is for that reason that the judge found for the plaintiff.

§ 2-508. Cure by Seller of Improper Tender or Delivery; Replacement.

(1) Where any tender or delivery by the seller is rejected because non-conforming and the time for performance has not yet expired, the seller may seasonably notify the buyer of his intention to cure and may then within the contract time make a conforming delivery.

(2) Where the buyer rejects a non-conforming tender which the seller had reasonable grounds to believe would be acceptable with or without money allowance the seller may if he seasonably notifies the buyer have a further reasonable time to substitute a conforming tender.

§ 8-104. ACQUISITION OF SECURITY OR FINANCIAL ASSET OR INTEREST THEREIN.

(a) A person acquires a security or an interest therein, under this Article, if:

(1) the person is a purchaser to whom a security is delivered pursuant to Section 8-301; or

(2) the person acquires a security entitlement to the security pursuant to Section 8-501.

(b) A person acquires a financial asset, other than a security, or an interest therein, under this Article, if the person acquires a security entitlement to the financial asset.

(c) A person who acquires a security entitlement to a security or other financial asset has the rights specified in Part 5, but is a purchaser of any security, security entitlement, or other financial asset held by the securities intermediary only to the extent provided in Section 8-503.

(d) Unless the context shows that a different meaning is intended, a person who is required by other law, regulation, rule, or agreement to transfer, deliver, present, surrender, exchange, or otherwise put in the possession of another person a security or financial asset satisfies that requirement by causing the other person to acquire an interest in the security or financial asset pursuant to subsection (a) or (b).

§ 8-501. SECURITIES ACCOUNT; ACQUISITION OF SECURITY ENTITLEMENT FROM SECURITIES INTERMEDIARY.

(a) "Securities account" means an account to which a financial asset is or may be credited in accordance with an agreement under which the person maintaining the account undertakes to treat the person for whom the account is maintained as entitled to exercise the rights that comprise the financial asset.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (d) and (e), a person acquires a security entitlement if a securities intermediary:

(1) indicates by book entry that a financial asset has been credited to the person's securities account;

(2) receives a financial asset from the person or acquires a financial asset for the person and, in either case, accepts it for credit to the person's securities account; or

(3) becomes obligated under other law, regulation, or rule to credit a financial asset to the person's securities account.

(c) If a condition of subsection (b) has been met, a person has a security entitlement even though the securities intermediary does not itself hold the financial asset.

(d) If a securities intermediary holds a financial asset for another person, and the financial asset is registered in the name of, payable to the order of, or specially indorsed to the other person, and has not been indorsed to the securities intermediary or in blank, the other person is treated as holding the financial asset directly rather than as having a security entitlement with respect to the financial asset.


http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8/article8.htm#s8-104



zxc   

Friday, March 30, 2012 12:03:38 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149469


I wonder which broker is going to cave in first. Congrats to the CH team on their brilliant strategy! Looking forward to their next move: Knight takes CRook.




Iluvbbs   

Friday, March 30, 2012 12:11:49 PM

Re: zxc post# 149441

Post # of 149469


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking forward to their next move: Knight takes CRook.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Maybe it will be that TM has decided to RM something into the shell. Sure SEC may have revoked the privledges to trade but TM still owns the shell and even privately, my guess is that a "clean" shell, alone, is worth, what, 500K these days??

To me THAT would be Check and Mate. JMHO

Best to all, Steve



Iluvbbs   

Friday, March 30, 2012 12:25:26 PM

Re: realwood post# 149445

Post # of 149469

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
or share dividend into non-trading stock? (non-trading so there is only one way to get shares and no excuse)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Wow, finally something we agree on. I would LOVE to see that talk we all had here what, 3-4 years ago about having TM do a dividend of say a 1/10 of a penny. It's not the amount that counts, it that EVERY share in existence will have to be accounted for and the NSS would be exposed right down to the last share.

It is a brilliant idea and there were even articles if I remember right on how to execute the move to be totally decisive for the company who offers the dividend as well as the shareholders.

I hope someone in the corporate offices will read about the divi. idea.

Best, Steve




Joda   

Friday, March 30, 2012 12:57:14 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149451

Post # of 149469


Do you think that might extend to ALL who have aided, abetted and actively promoted and supported their criminal acts here with BCIT?

I do!

BCIT can be used to help clean the markets of some active filth, in my opinion...



The big time   

Friday, March 30, 2012 12:59:21 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149452

Post # of 149469

There is no other way for it to be interpreted. Plus it is my understanding that the Plaintiff claims that is exactly what the Judge said at the hearing. Plaintiff bought shares through their broker. Plaintiff requested Certificates for those shares purchased. Defendant failed to deliver those Certificates. Breach of contract plain and simple although we know there are some here that will spin it any different way they can.



Joda   

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:01:55 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149455

Post # of 149469


Hey masta, the negative view point arguments against BCIT doing well have become pathetic in my view.

It seems the Shorts are becoming more desperate by the day and clutching to whatever straws they can stir up, including events that are over 5 years ago.

But hey, you can only use what you have, and it is becoming ever more obvious that they have very little going for them in this battle of wits and substance, Long and Short BCIT, in my opinion



mastaflash 

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:05:11 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149458

Post # of 149470


I'll take the word of those present at the proceedings as fact...in the same spirit you accepted and presented PTs forged documents as fact... besides, there is no other way to interpret awarding the plaintiff what they asked for.




The big time   

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:08:55 PM

Re: Joda post# 149462

Post # of 149471


The negative spin has been totally pathetic. I am pleased to see some of the previous Doom and Gloom sharesholders are at least coming around and becoming proactive. The fact is though nothing we say or post here is going to change the ultimate outcome here because so much has been set in motion now. The proactive response from many shareholders though is what gave us this momentum. CH involvement by TM getting them involved and TM never quitting or giving up is really what will make any positive outcome possible.



zxc   

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:17:02 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149453

Post # of 149471


What other reason would the judge have to award the shareholder his money back? She couldn't have just awarded the money back without stating a reason. Breach of contract is a logical one. If you have any better ideas, please say so. Don't just say what it may NOT be, and then offer no other options.




janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:18:25 PM

Re: zxc post# 149467

Post # of 149471


Yes, it's logical. I wonder why this docket doesn't give the cause of action; most do.



blind squirrel   

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:25:43 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149456

Post # of 149471


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What makes you think the brokerages will accept those "free certs"?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How would not accepting the "free certs" benefit the brokerages? If the PR establishes as fact that certs are available doesn't not accepting them just further the argument that the brokerages are being obstinate and willfully shirking their legal obligation?




janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:34:15 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149469

Post # of 149471


I think the brokerages wouldn't want to establish any relationship with the company. Accepting the certs might imply some kind of contract.

They'd also be accepting 205 certs, which might make it harder for them to argue that 106 is the "right" number.



weebie 

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:35:10 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149469

Post # of 149471


Kinda like...don't confuse em with the facts,
their minds are made up.

The more they resist, the worse they will look in court.

Truth shall prevail.

The fact that the certs are available from the T/A and Fresno Etrade case found breach of contract...well, there ya go.



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1462 2012-03-30 16:19:01

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



LAMBSHIFT   

Friday, March 30, 2012 5:19:13 AM

Re: alien42 post# 197286

Post # of 197334

What about the following? If NMGL decides to terminate ("weasel clauses") the agreement with FFGO, NMGL has to return the shares (Bouse Inc, S.Copperstone Inc.) to FFGO and Western Div. Mining respectively, i.e. to the shareholders of FFGO. The dissolved FFGO should give rise to sell the properties of Western Div.Mining or to sell the daughter itself and thereafter distribute the money to the shareholders ("liquidation dividend":allowed under the law of Wyoming). And it is the money of the shareholders.
Because FFGO and NMGL have shown a value of 258 mil US-$ for these properties - share of FFGO alone- in the purchase agreement, the debt to Searchlight Inc.( about 5 mil US-$ plus interest) could easily be paid from the sale of these properties.
The dividend of 0,003449 $/share FFGO was calculated with a price of gold of about 1.200 US-$/oz - today it is a little higher - only about 35%....Only a rough idea.



AlanC   

Friday, March 30, 2012 7:59:40 AM

Re: OldBen post# 197280

Post # of 197334

OldBen: I agree. In fact I believe our dividend is in fact a settlement that the regulators agreed was fair to all. If in fact I am correct this would explain why FINRA stopped posting the SHO numbers for FFGO back in August of 2010. The shortman will be paying the bulk of our dividend to shareholders large and small. Those who are so inclined can then take those funds and do what they choose to with them and some, like me, will choose to invest in other related companies which I suspect the shortman having been previously burned will stay far far away from.
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



LAMBSHIFT   

Friday, March 30, 2012 9:59:16 AM

Re: alien42 post# 197290

Post # of 197335

alien42, thank you for the source material,in which I haven´t read for a longer time.
I.e. as long as NMGL doesn´t terminate the purchase agreement with FFGO/WDM Searchlight will not be able to exercise ist rights. Now is the question if NMGL could have any interest in the termination.I don´t see such an interest because of the role of Mr. Lowenthal/Sloan Investment...
There remains the question what will happen, if the now delinquent filer NMGL doesn´t file?




LAMBSHIFT   

Friday, March 30, 2012 10:20:01 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197291

Post # of 197338

I think the registration of the A&B shares is the problem of NMGL - i. e. NMGL defaulted,if anybody.
The question is, if it is admissible to stretch the validity of these "weasel clauses" into the eternity? Every company can go bankrupt at some time in the future. There is no guarantee for eternal life.
The former note holders had agreed to a debt-to-equity swap in 2010.




LAMBSHIFT   

Friday, March 30, 2012 10:40:39 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197291

Post # of 197338

a remark to "...who dump 75 BILLION shares on the market...": I don´t see when and where these 75 bil shares have been traded.
Further: remember the filing with Sloan Investment - do you think Mr. Lowenthal will buy voluntarily one share for 0,0035 US-$ only to sell it for 0,0001 US-$?? A voluntary loss of about61 mil $ ??
you shouldn´t underestimate the intellectual capacity of this man.
Read his curriculum vitae, the same for Dr. Colliston a.s.o.




OldBen 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:35:43 AM

Re: alien42 post# 197281

Post # of 197338

Those "conditions and outs" were released AFTER tons of press releases and AFTER prior knowledge that there was going to be no immediate cash sale and AFTER the actual cashless sale.

There will be a settlement either for a dividend or for fraud. I will give the dividend settlement more time. The more time that goes by, the easier a fraud settlement will be if there is no dividend settlement.

When a settlement is based on 85 billion shares and there are trillions of shares. Shorty will have some "fun" paying that bill.



OldBen 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:38:12 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197288

Post # of 197338

That is a very possible scenario!! When a settlement is based on 85 billion shares and there are trillions. Shorty better open up his wallet very wide!!!

I will taking some of any settlement money and putting into the next NSS settlement companies....





OldBen 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:45:22 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197284

Post # of 197338

On one hand, you credit the company with the ability to stay "untouchable." On the other hand, you say that the company is incapable of delivering a dividend.

If you wise enough to do one, you are wise enough to do the other.

Myself, on the other hand, do not credit FFGO with the ability to stay "untouchable." They broke the law in my opinion. I also believe that they may or may not deliver a dividend. Evidence on both sides of that equation if one takes the blinders off.



Rat Trap   

Friday, March 30, 2012 12:02:36 PM

Re: OldBen post# 197302

Post # of 197338

I will taking some of any settlement money and putting into the next NSS settlement companies....

Same here



Lebron23   

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:10:01 PM

Re: None

Post # of 197338

This is not as complex as everyone makes it out to be.
Dividend has been computed.
Dividend is Locked and Loaded.
Dividend is forthcoming.
Simple.





OldBen 

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:10:14 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197311

Post # of 197346

Really. I count 2 facts and 4 "tall tales and excuses."

You have 2 facts.
FFGO has abandoned communication. FFGO did say that they would. NMGL is an SEC violater. For non-filing, perhaps.

You have 4 tall tales and excuses.

You claim that WY disallows a dividend. WY statutes allow for a dividend. How many times do we have to go over this? These statutes have been posted dozens of times.

No divvy will come from FFGO and NMGL because they will never make a statement. How about a filing or a settlement?

There is not a single person with knowledge of public trading companies, including share holders lawyers, accounts, bankers will tell you any different then I just did .. by all legal and business standards
Not the experience I have had with brokers and lawyers.

No dividend is coming ever. That is a 100% absolute statement. Again, you have no way to know that. There is no public press release or other document that says that no dividend is ever coming.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:05:12 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197334

Post # of 197346

standard FFGO fantasy land answer,

DIVVY COMING!! - puppydotcom

Please provide one written document from the company, State of Wyoming, and/or the SEC that the dividend has been canceled.

Not documentation that "infers" cancelation,[/b] such as revocation notice from SEC or possible exit clauses in the contract, BUT ACTUAL COMMUNICATION OR FILINGS FROM COMPANY STATING THAT THEY HAVE CANCELED THE DIVIDEND!

Oh Yeah, no such documentation exists.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:11:33 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197336

Post # of 197346


you are asking for something that will NEVER exist, just like the dividend. - alien42

The dividend process is confirmed in the 8-K filings with the SEC.

There is nothing to support the claims being made that the dividend process has been canceled.

Until there is proof to back up these fantasy claims of a canceled dividend process, said claims are nothing but FANTASY!

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:46:04 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197339

Post # of 197346

common sense, tells everyone

its over - puppydotcom

Sorry. Common sense is not written documentation to support claims of cancelation.

Until written proof is provided, claims of cancelation are nothing but pure fantasy!

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:48:36 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197340

Post # of 197347

how about a website stating the divvy is still on after the SEC revoking, the corp dissolved and no FFGO management contact for the last 20 months - puppydotcom

Company made it clear that they would not communicate with shareholders until the record date. They would then file with the SEC and send out an email communication.

There is no written proof to support the wild fantasy claims that the dividend process has been cancelled.

Dividend Process cancelation claims are nothing but wild fantasy!

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:59:09 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197343

Post # of 197348

lol, common sense is how people avoided getting stuck in this revoked scam. - alien42

Form 8-K filings with SEC and company communication are what investors should base their decision to remain steadfast on.

Anonymous claims of anything other than what is reported to the SEC by a company, and/or what is reported by the company through investor communications should be treated with caution.

The SEC warns that investors should be careful of claims that are made by anonymous individuals.

the SEC advises shareholders of unknown parties posting emails and
unverifiable opinions - puppydotcom

lol, sorry, No divvy coming .. and six months from now I'll repeat the same fact and 6 months after that and 6 months after that and 6 months after that .. and so on - puppydotcom

Tic Toc




Rat Trap   

Friday, March 30, 2012 5:23:10 PM

Re: None

Post # of 197350

Look at ALL the attention a revoked company is getting... wow!




monte1946   

Friday, March 30, 2012 12:31:27 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 1003

Post # of 1007

Under the Radar Screen. Looking good!!!

GNCC Capital, Inc. (GNCP)




digger1   

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:52:15 PM

Re: monte1946 post# 1004

Post # of 1007

Re: under the radar, not for long,

Not if it keeps trading up the way it has.
IMHO, GNCP has obviously got a plan, that might explain why there not replying to my emails or voice mails while the share price is moving up.
Past experience tells me this every time.
The problem is that their just isn't enough shares to accumulate down here at these levels,
you can get a bit but not a lot,
lets see what next week brings.

GNCC Capital, Inc. (GNCP)



waveegravy   

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:18:55 PM

Re: None

Post # of 1007

6 bid and nice close for the week
I like the trading pattern on this one and glad I added more today
lets go GNCP !

GNCC Capital, Inc. (GNCP)



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 5:03:00 PM

Re: None

Post # of 1007

GNCP - Headed higher!



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-30 17:02:38)

Offline

 

#1463 2012-03-31 10:28:08

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

DHS Holding Co. (DHSM)

Moderators: Admiral Lagrange, SevenTenEleven, goodolboy, Trading4cash

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=7860



SevenTenEleven

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:57:29 AM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24166

Post # of 24186

I am anticipating Pink Current and updated financials in the next week or so. Along with that, hopefully IR steps up an investor awareness campaign. Would be nice to see some liquidity and slight volatility as this moves back up to $2 and beyond. Volatility brings in traders playing the ups and downs. I see slight swings in PPS as healthy for the overall health of a stock. Manipulation, such as the kind we experienced as manipulators drove this from $2 to $0.20, could help drive a strong initial run to multiple dollar levels.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:05:03 PM

Re: bigred1 post# 24169

Post # of 24186

DHSM - Short Volume for March 30th - 100%

20120330|DHSM|500|0|500|O




SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:11:02 PM

Re: rekcusdoo post# 24171

Post # of 24186

Company is about to pull it all together. Shorty about to pull up his... SHORTS!

Tic Toc




janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:55:42 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24167

Post # of 24186

I am anticipating Pink Current and updated financials in the next week or so.

Haven't you been "anticipating" that for months?

Oh, and you want to see it pumped? Gonna step up and volunteer to pay for the wash trading?





janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:57:20 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24172

Post # of 24186

Company is about to pull it all together.

Pull what together?? Sheesh, I really can't think of a much more hopeless stock, with equally hopeless management.




wshaw14 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:17:47 AM

Re: janice shell post# 24173

Post # of 24186


Wow, how impressive?? "I am anticipating Pink Current and updated financials in the next week or so"



AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:00:10 AM

Re: janice shell post# 24173

Post # of 24186


"Oh, and you want to see it pumped? Gonna step up and volunteer to pay for the wash trading?" Janice Shell

Wow! Tell us more.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:17:32 AM

Re: wshaw14 post# 24175

Post # of 24186


DHSM - This stock is so thinly held, that it wouldn't take much to trigger a short squeeze. Those short know it and have been active in trying to prevent it.

I am playing this as a 5 to 10 times mover from where speculators jump in to play it.

Right now, that puts this at $2 to $4. It won't take much to get back o $2. Resistance will move up once it gets moving and it will take much less to get to $3 and beyond.

Doesn't hurt to bid sit for a few more days.




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:19:21 AM

Re: rekcusdoo post# 24171

Post # of 24186

The company has no incentive to be stealthy unless it has bad news. - rekcusdoo

Bad news coming for shorts SOON!

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:37:40 AM

Re: janice shell post# 24173

Post # of 24186

Gonna step up and volunteer to pay for the wash trading? - janice shell

Wonder who stepped up and volunteered to manipulate the PPS down from above $2?

Was it NITE? ETMM? VNDM? VERT? UBSS?

ETrade has a serious inventory problem in a number of OTC stocks. It is VERY likely they have one for DHSM.

They could close out my open orders for $10. And that is going easy on them, IMO.

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:56:24 AM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24180

Post # of 24186

Are shorts getting comfortable and confident in their abusive short selling for DHSM?

Actually, I believe they see the writing on the wall and know that they will have to cover. They know that any "real" buying into the ask will trigger a squeeze and a forced buyin.

This can be a mover from $0.40 to well over $4 based upon the float of 3.3MM and the assumed unreported short position that will need to be covered.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:01:51 AM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24182

Post # of 24186

They will try to hold off as long as possible. They will be forced to buyin, IMO. They refuse to accept the fact that a squeeze trigger is likely and that with 3.3MM float, this could be very explosive and costly for them. How many stocks with a much larger float have run 10 to 20 times from these levels? I could think of one that went from $0.05 to $10. Forced buyins cost a few market makers nearly everything they had.

Looking forward to updates from DHSM management this week.



janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:51:53 PM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24182

Post # of 24192

If the MMs are concerned--which obviously they're not--they'll just stop making a market. Pretty simple, really.



CMKM Diamonds Inc. (fka CMKX)

Moderators:jarta, hasher, nufced, janice shell, TSXminer, jimmym4, pantherj

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=1561


wshaw14 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:30:17 AM

Re: None

Post # of 333847

It is amazing to me that I have traced so may folks back to the CMKX board that speak negatively about other positions. Looks like a little house cleaning may be in order at home. Just made me curious tracing those posts.



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-31 16:00:17)

Offline

 

#1464 2012-03-31 11:22:16

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879


blind squirrel   

Friday, March 30, 2012 2:36:41 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149470

Post # of 149547


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the brokerages wouldn't want to establish any relationship with the company. Accepting the certs might imply some kind of contract.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay, I can understand that logic, but

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They'd also be accepting 205 certs, which might make it harder for them to argue that 106 is the "right" number.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't get this thinking. "make it harder for them to argue" implies the existence of a plausible starting point for the argument. That may have been the case up until the last 6 months or so, but unless the argument is ignorance . . okay, now I get it. However, given the documentation put in place by CH, it seems to me that ignorance has lost or is quickly losing any semblance of plausibility.



janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 2:39:47 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149485

Post # of 149547

If the brokerages have sense, they'll take a consistent stance. I don't know what that'll be, but they need not to change their minds constantly.

Now they've been sent certs for a small amount of stock. The certs are really no good to them. So it would make sense for them to send 'em back.

They're probably thinking Trojan horse.



lollybella   

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:00:19 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149486

Post # of 149547

They can SEND BACK THE CERTS ALL THEY WANT! The fact has been now proven: our REAL CERTS are available! There REALLY IS a tranfer agent. They can NO LONGER CONTINUE TO LIE TO THE HUNDREDS OF US that keep NOTIFIYING them that "damnit, we want our legitimate paper certs that we paid for 7 years ago!" Get it, Shell?



blind squirrel   

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:05:52 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149486

Post # of 149547

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the brokerages have sense, they'll take a consistent stance. I don't know what that'll be, but they need not to change their minds constantly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here again I understand the logic of your thought, but in candor haven't the various brokerage's responses, or at least the stated reasons for their inaction, been noticeably inconsistent? Is the consistency you're suggesting work if it is simply not trying to resolve a problem that shows less and less likelihood of going away?


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now they've been sent certs for a small amount of stock. The certs are really no good to them. So it would make sense for them to send 'em back.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Given today's PR that they (specific brokerages) were issued certificates, doesn't sending an unopened package back to the sender, especially when the return address is the BCIT transfer agent, just set the brokerages up to look bad?


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They're probably thinking Trojan horse.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If that's the case they should start hoping that many many more certs sneak out of the delivery envelope when they aren't looking.




janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:09:45 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149490

Post # of 149547

but in candor haven't the various brokerage's responses, or at least the stated reasons for their inaction been noticeably inconsistent?

lol, they certainly have been. Even single brokerages haven't been consistent. They should consider getting their act together.

No, I don't think sending them back would make them look bad. Surely their attorneys could come up with a plausible reason. In a case like this, I think anyone would wonder whether he was somehow being set up.




janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:10:51 PM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149492

Post # of 149547

The SEC has no authority to prevent the company from making financial reports public. It's free to publish whatever it wants.



mastaflash 

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:13:46 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149493

Post # of 149547

They should consider getting their act together. - That isn't likely to happen. There is probably more incompetance than evil-doing here, but either way, I think we can all agree, that an informed and consistant position is not likely. Also, you are forgetting about the fact they are competitors...why would TDW with only 6m ns shares want to be nice to eTrade with 117M+ ns shares? There will be more than a few buses being thrown under...



janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:15:35 PM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149495

Post # of 149547

I didn't say they could put them on Edgar; but they certainly can publish them if they want. Say, on the company website.



NI43-101 Or Bust   

Friday, March 30, 2012 3:19:44 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149498

Post # of 149547

Yes I am aware of that. I was under the impression that the SEC had them in hand and was withholding them from Edgar.



janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:11:56 PM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149499

Post # of 149547

I don't know whether the SEC has them or not. But I assume they haven't appeared on Edgar because the stock's registration has been revoked.

You don't send filings directly to the SEC, as I understand it; you send them to an Edgarizer who formats them and sends them to Edgar.



blind squirrel   

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:12:40 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149493

Post # of 149547


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I don't think sending them back would make them look bad. Surely their attorneys could come up with a plausible reason. In a case like this, I think anyone would wonder whether he was somehow being set up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So a brokerage returns the certs - either having opened the package and having confirmed that it contained certs or simply unopened. Either way, IMO, they have shot themselves in the foot, so to speak. I can hear it now . . .

Yes your honor, we returned the package unopened. We were concerned that we would not like what it contained, and that its contents might in some way entrap us. If that is the nature of their thinking/strategy it seems to me that we will be hearing the phrase "breach of contract" with increasing regularity.

On the other hand ...

Yes your honor, that's correct, after opening the package and determining that the enclosed cert was too small to be of value we returned it because, . . . well . . . because, by itself, it didn't resolve the problem . I see no wings on that reasoning.

The brokerages may choose to return the "free certs". That is their right, but I don't see how doing so helps their cause. Claiming certs are not available just got a lot harder to do with a straight face.

Kudos to CH for a fascinating, and IMO, brilliant tactical move.




janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:16:34 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149503

Post # of 149547

I don't know that it would help their cause, but it wouldn't hurt it. After all, nobody actually BOUGHT the stock in question, so whose account should it be put into?



NevadaSmith   

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:17:46 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149547

BCIT is not revoked,
some other company was, not this one, so the SEC should post the filings, period.
Nice to see there are 205's available and the Transfer Agent is Empire, fact.
Brokers running out of nonsense excuses.
Brilliant move Megas and CH, well done.



Arkait1   

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:24:51 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149485

Post # of 149547

Indeed,

".... unless the argument is ignorance . . okay, now I get it. However, given the documentation put in place by CH, it seems to me that ignorance has lost or is quickly losing any semblance of plausibility."

That is precisely what I wrote the SEC attn Rosalind Tyson in LosAngeles..."it is beyond innocence
and ignorance"



VABlue76   

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:34:07 PM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149507

Post # of 149547


Something tells me the brokers, SEC, DTCC and other entities involved could care less and see it as another stinky pinky that will just be swept under the rug.




blind squirrel   

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:51:58 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149504

Post # of 149547

Okay I'm the mood to have my grey matter stimulated so lets pursue this discussion a little further. You state:

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't know that it would help their cause, but it wouldn't hurt it. After all, nobody actually BOUGHT the stock in question, so whose account should it be put into?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Once again, I understand and even agree with your statement as literally stated. You're right that the 500 share do not clearly belong to any specific client and therefore how would the brokerage make a fair determination as to who's account should be credited.

BUT, we both know that there is a much bigger message being sent in the same package with the 500 shares. Simply put, if shares are available to be issued in the brokerage's name then is it logical to assume there might be additional shares available as needed to resolve outstanding shortages.

You enjoy pondering the legal twists and turns of the financial world, how successful do you think it will be for the brokerages that have received a recently issued cert to argue in court that they choose not to investigate the viability of acquiring additional certificates to fulfill their client's legitimate request for the same.

I suppose, literally you are correct, returning the 500 share cert doesn't in and of itself cause a brokerage significant harm. The real harm occurred the moment they had to decide what to do about a cert they been trying to insist couldn't be obtained. It seems to me, that that harm can't be put back in the delivery package and returned.



janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 5:02:21 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149511

Post # of 149547

You enjoy pondering the legal twists and turns of the financial world, how successful do you think it will be for the brokerages that have received a recently issued cert to argue in court that they choose not to investigate the viability of acquiring additional certificates to fulfill their client's legitimate request for the same.

I should think they'd simply say the SEC's suspension of their net capital requirements relieved them of any responsibility to buy certs.



mastaflash 

Friday, March 30, 2012 5:24:05 PM

Re: op9171787 post# 149514

Post # of 149547

BCIT made its official name change to Energy Source on the Nevada SOS site - It was changed back to Bancorp after the name change was rejected by FINRA. Revocation was over a year later...they screwed up! In law, that cannot be overlooked.



poor broke bloke   

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:15:41 PM

Re: op9171787 post# 149427

Post # of 149548

Maybe everyone needs to contact their broker and request that they get credit of those shares. Keep the pressure on.
I know I will.



madeindet   

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:42:53 PM

Re: ground_fog post# 149525

Post # of 149548

They sold you shares and took your money and cannot deliver?



poor broke bloke   

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:54:39 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149470

Post # of 149548

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the brokerages wouldn't want to establish any relationship with the company. Accepting the certs might imply some kind of contract.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Accepting certs might imply some kind of contract?

Isn't that what they are supposed to do when I buy the stock of any company.

They kind of agreed to it when I opened my account.

Sorry, I fail to see the relevance.

You always made it appear that you know everything. Stumped?



Chas56789   

Friday, March 30, 2012 8:11:22 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149548

I am just letting everyone know who has their shares held in Ameritrade. That I have already asked Ameritrade for those 500 shares that BCIT just sent them.

So I have first dibbs on those 500 real shares ! I then told them that I wanted the balance of my shares ASAP in April 2012 !!

Chas56789



janice shell 

Friday, March 30, 2012 10:33:21 PM

Re: NevadaSmith post# 149505

Post # of 149548

BCIT is not revoked,
some other company was, not this one, so the SEC should post the filings, period.

Are you aware that BCIT's most recent SEC filings were made under the name "Energy Source"?



madeindet   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:53:42 AM

Re: op9171787 post# 149539

Post # of 149548

Op, can MO get anymore obvious? Writing negative articles after a hedge fund front loads a short position and getting paid to do this, than showing up bashing a target company how convenient and know she's a financial expert. Truth hurts when you expose the ROT. They protect and delete.



AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:34:39 AM

Re: realwood post# 149546

Post # of 149548

There are lots of folks coming to this board that are not shareholders including regulators, reorg folks from various effected brokerage firms and folks who have been victimized by Wall Street criminals. I am hoping we have a few reporters following all that is happening here as well and will be providing coverage as well. This board is getting lots of reads, deservedly so. Go BCIT!!!



fourkids_9pets 

Friday, March 30, 2012 1:24:41 PM

Re: fourkids_9pets post# 9335

Post # of 9341

BCIT >> post of interest

===

mastaflash


Friday, March 30, 2012 11:56:17 AM
Re: ptcgolf post# 149423

Post # of 149468

Doesn't matter what they say, they are not protected:

The court found Etrade to be in breach of their contract for failing to deliver the BCIT securities which the investor purchased in August 2005.

UCC trumps everything. As long as the company is alive...you have a right to have shares delivered as purchased. UCC supersedes every other law they can dredge up, and it is for that reason that the judge found for the plaintiff.

§ 2-508. Cure by Seller of Improper Tender or Delivery; Replacement.

(1) Where any tender or delivery by the seller is rejected because non-conforming and the time for performance has not yet expired, the seller may seasonably notify the buyer of his intention to cure and may then within the contract time make a conforming delivery.

(2) Where the buyer rejects a non-conforming tender which the seller had reasonable grounds to believe would be acceptable with or without money allowance the seller may if he seasonably notifies the buyer have a further reasonable time to substitute a conforming tender.

§ 8-104. ACQUISITION OF SECURITY OR FINANCIAL ASSET OR INTEREST THEREIN.

(a) A person acquires a security or an interest therein, under this Article, if:

(1) the person is a purchaser to whom a security is delivered pursuant to Section 8-301; or

(2) the person acquires a security entitlement to the security pursuant to Section 8-501.

(b) A person acquires a financial asset, other than a security, or an interest therein, under this Article, if the person acquires a security entitlement to the financial asset.

(c) A person who acquires a security entitlement to a security or other financial asset has the rights specified in Part 5, but is a purchaser of any security, security entitlement, or other financial asset held by the securities intermediary only to the extent provided in Section 8-503.

(d) Unless the context shows that a different meaning is intended, a person who is required by other law, regulation, rule, or agreement to transfer, deliver, present, surrender, exchange, or otherwise put in the possession of another person a security or financial asset satisfies that requirement by causing the other person to acquire an interest in the security or financial asset pursuant to subsection (a) or (b).

§ 8-501. SECURITIES ACCOUNT; ACQUISITION OF SECURITY ENTITLEMENT FROM SECURITIES INTERMEDIARY.

(a) "Securities account" means an account to which a financial asset is or may be credited in accordance with an agreement under which the person maintaining the account undertakes to treat the person for whom the account is maintained as entitled to exercise the rights that comprise the financial asset.

(b) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (d) and (e), a person acquires a security entitlement if a securities intermediary:

(1) indicates by book entry that a financial asset has been credited to the person's securities account;

(2) receives a financial asset from the person or acquires a financial asset for the person and, in either case, accepts it for credit to the person's securities account; or

(3) becomes obligated under other law, regulation, or rule to credit a financial asset to the person's securities account.

(c) If a condition of subsection (b) has been met, a person has a security entitlement even though the securities intermediary does not itself hold the financial asset.

(d) If a securities intermediary holds a financial asset for another person, and the financial asset is registered in the name of, payable to the order of, or specially indorsed to the other person, and has not been indorsed to the securities intermediary or in blank, the other person is treated as holding the financial asset directly rather than as having a security entitlement with respect to the financial asset.


http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/8/article8.htm#s8-104




OldBen 

Friday, March 30, 2012 4:23:34 PM

Re: AlanC post# 9307

Post # of 9341

Absolutely, been following this board for a long time. I strongly believe that we will start the NSS train where one suit after another will be settled and the shortman will be paying dearly. I have compiled a list. Who will be first BCIT, OSTK?? One suit helps all suits as case law gets built in and solidified.

Suddenly, I can post here. May end tomorrow LOL.



blind squirrel   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 2:19:04 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149513

Post # of 149553

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I should think they'd simply say the SEC's suspension of their net capital requirements relieved them of any responsibility to buy certs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That approach seems to implicitly acknowledgement that legitimate certs are available and while that doesn't win the war for BCIT it does seem like a battle won.

I'm probably just being naive but, it seems to me that If TM/CH can continue to string smaller victories to together, pretty soon, misusing the misattributed words of Senator Dirksen, you're talking real money. 



janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 3:53:14 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 149555

Truth hurts when you expose the ROT.

Yes indeed. And I've never published anything that wasn't absolutely true.




5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-31 15:58:55)

Offline

 

#1465 2012-03-31 12:30:54

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



Rat Trap   

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:26:52 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197351

Post # of 197389

Lots to see here... i agree.



Lebron23   

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:45:44 PM

Re: JammingJAY post# 197352

Post # of 197391

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
there was no "run" in fka/FFGO after the big 8K "filing"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


You just made the argument for NSS. That's why there was no run.



Lebron23   

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:47:19 PM

Re: ctrumabll post# 197323

Post # of 197391

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dividend is going to be paid
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yes, It is going to be paid. I see you agree.



Lebron23   

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:48:48 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197332

Post # of 197391

Again, sale is the only thing on this list that will take time.
The other items are merely administrative.
Not a complex list that you make it out to be.
Simple.



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 11:12:20 PM

Re: underdog150 post# 197361

Post # of 197391

LOL! Wouldn't want to be short. The liability must be CRUSHING!

And DEMANDING!

Tic Toc



AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:54:51 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197085

Post # of 197391

FINRA provides the evidence in black and white. Total volume traded for the day and the percentage of the total volume that were short sales. The numbers are staggering. Over 90% and
FINRA admits there numbers are on the low side. UBSS and Credit Suisse fined by regulators for mismarking short trades and calling them long. It is likely that every single share sold in the past two years did not exist. 100% short sales! Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

FINRA short sale numbers for Novemeber 2010 for FFGO!!!

20101101|FFGO|2849999|3849999|0 74%
20101102|FFGO|1750000|1750000|O 100%
20101103|FFGO|7000000|7107200|O 98%
20101104|FFGO|2000000|2000000|O 100%
20101105|FFGO|7999999|10999999|O 73%
20101108|FFGO|15050000|26500000|O 57%
20101110|FFGO|1000000|2898917|O 34%
20101111|FFGO|2419999|2419999|O 100%
20101112|FFGO|3100000|3200000|O 97%
20101116|FFGO|1000000|1340000|O 75%
20101117|FFGO|6000001|10778584|O 56%
20101118|FFGO|2000000|4014600|O 50%
20101122|FFGO|19845000|19845000|O 100%
20101123|FFGO|500000|1000000|O 50%
20101130|FFGO|20385000|21035000|O 97%
Nov. totals: 79,354,998.00 107,739,299.00 74% sold short

Here are the FINRA short sale numbers for December 2010:

20101202|FFGO|999999|999999|O 100%
20101203|FFGO|615000|4585000|O 13%
20101206|FFGO|1100000|1220000|O 90%
20101207|FFGO|700000|3700000|O 19%
20101208|FFGO|750000|1017259|O 74%
20101209|FFGO|2500000|4500000|O 56%
20101210|FFGO|57089999|74194973|O 77%
20101213|FFGO|6000000|10005000|O 59.7%
20101214|FFGO|28900077|31695902|O 91%
20101215|FFGO|5500000|5704441|O 96%
20101216|FFGO|33250000|54755000|O 61%
20101217|FFGO|8890998|9340998|O 95%
20101220|FFGO|5615800|6660800|O 84%
20101221|FFGO|9600000|11200000|O 86%
20101222|FFGO|24577777|31723803|O 77%
20101227|FFGO|154399995|176901620|O 87%
20101228|FFGO|4999999|4999999|O 100%
20101229|FFGO|9382269|9426819|O 100%
20101230|FFGO|7000000|7010000|O 100%
20101231|FFGO|4081168|8192303|0 50%
Dec. totals: 361,453,081.00 457,833,916.00 79%


2010 short sale totals: 440,808,079. out of a total volume of 565,573,215 or 78% shares sold short. Note well the SEC only started publishing FINRA's daily short sale numbers in Nov. of 2010.


January 2011

20110103|FFGO|20000000|22953402|O 87%
20110104|FFGO|9100000|9400000|O 96.8%
20110105|FFGO|8250000|13250000|O 62.3%
20110106|FFGO|11000000|11220000|O 98%
20110107|FFGO|9999999|9999999|O 100%
20110110|FFGO|400000|900000|O 44%
20110111|FFGO|1500000|2000000|O 75%
20110112|FFGO|1400000|1400000|O 100%
20110113|FFGO|1300000|1800000|O 72%
20110114|FFGO|23859999|38587151|O 61%
20110118|FFGO|3000400|3400400|O 88%
20110120|FFGO|7499999|8099999|O 92.5%
20110124|FFGO|1800000|1800000|O 100%
20110125|FFGO|800000|800000|O 100%
20110126|FFGO|10000000|10000625|O 99.9%
20110131|FFGO|317800|317800|O 100%


February 2011

20110202|FFGO|20700000|36210000|O 57%
20110203|FFGO|13400000|38601000|O 34.7%
20110209|FFGO|200000|365000|O 54.7%
20110210|FFGO|2900000|3700000|O 78.3%
20110211|FFGO|500000|4970000|O 10%
20110214|FFGO|2000000|2006250|O 99.6%
20110216|FFGO|17700000|27770000|O 63%
20110217|FFGO|525499999|528499999|O 99.4% COLD WINTER DAY
20110218|FFGO|7600000|8725000|O 87.1%
20110222|FFGO|10000000|10526708|O 94.9%
20110223|FFGO|2000000|2700000|O 74%
20110225|FFGO|1000000|1455000|O 68.7%

March 2011

20110301|FFGO|1000000|0|1350000|O 74%
20110303|FFGO|1795000|0|3492848|O 51%
20110304|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110307|FFGO|1800000|0|1800000|O 100%
20110311|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110314|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110315|FFGO|3500000|0|4500000|O 77.7%
20110316|FFGO|11500000|0|11500650|O 99.99%
20110317|FFGO|3114000|0|3617357|O 86%
20110318|FFGO|13020000|0|13020000|O 100%
20110324|FFGO|150000|0|701113|O 21%
20110325|FFGO|110000|0|110000|O 100%
20110329|FFGO|1497300|0|1497300|O 100%
20110331|FFGO|1999999|0|3430269|O 58%

April 2011

20110404|FFGO|5891100|0|6651100|O 88.5%
20110405|FFGO|126400|0|126400|O 100%
20110406|FFGO|150000|0|150000|O 100%
20110411|FFGO|456000|0|456000|O 100%
20110413|FFGO|876543|0|876543|O 100%
20110414|FFGO|4100000|0|4741400|O 86.4%
20110415|FFGO|1500000|0|2500000|O 65%
20110420|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110421|FFGO|1560000|0|1560000|O 100%
20110425|FDTC|4000|0|25000|O 16%
20110426|FFGO|1000000|0|1000162|O 99.9%
20110427|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110428|FFGO|8072700|0|8322700|O 96.9%
20110429|FFGO|30210000|0|30210000|O 100%

May 2011

20110502|FFGO|4476700|0|4476700|O 100%
20110503|FFGO|7338600|0|10788600|O 68%
20110504|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110505|FFGO|1620000|0|2140000|O 75.7%
20110506|FFGO|1500000|0|1505583|O 99.6%
20110509|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110511|FFGO|3000000|0|3040000|O 88.2%
20110512|FFGO|7200000|0|8200000|O 87.8%
20110516|FFGO|8200000|0|8300000|O 98.7%
20110517|FFGO|4099900|0|4199900|O 97.6%
20110518|FFGO|585000|0|585000|O 100%
20110520|FFGO|1000777|0|1000777|O 100%
20110523|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110524|FFGO|500000|0|800000|O 62%
20110525|FFGO|18585000|0|18585000|O 100%
20110527|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110531|FFGO|7628700|0|8031462|O 94.9%

June 2011

20110603|FFGO|400000|0|400000|O 100%
20110606|FFGO|2710000|0|2710000|O 100%
20110607|FFGO|24000000|0|24000000|O 100%
20110608|FFGO|173800|0|173800|O 100%
20110609|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110610|FFGO|83100|0|83100|O 100%
20110614|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110615|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110616|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110617|FFGO|1105223|0|1355223|O 81.5%
20110621|FFGO|423000|0|423000|O 100%
20110623|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110624|FFGO|3401333|0|3401333|O 100%
20110629|FFGO|8619200|0|8619200|O 100%
20110630|FFGO|200400|0|200400|O 100%

July 2011

20110701|FFGO|5497995|0|5497995|O 100%
20110706|FFGO|400400|0|700400|O 57%
20110711|FFGO|500000|0|1400000|O 35%
20110714|FFGO|1102699|0|1102699|O 100%
20110715|FFGO|300100|0|400100|O 75%
20110718|FFGO|10850000|0|10850000|O 100%
20110719|FFGO|74000000|0|74000000|O 100%
20110720|FFGO|54100000|0|54100000|O 100%
20110722|FFGO|30000000|0|30000000|O 100%
20110725|FFGO|10346500|0|10346500|O 100%
20110727|FFGO|2400100|0|3400100|O 70.5%

August 2011

20110801|FFGO|8900000|0|8900000|O 100%
20110803|FFGO|5550000|0|5550000|O 100%
20110804|FFGO|7000100|0|10325100|O 67%
20110805|FFGO|5573333|0|5723333|O 100%
20110808|FFGO|405800|0|405800|O 100%
20110809|FFGO|3400000|0|3500000|O 97.1%
20110811|FFGO|3279000|0|3279000|O 100%
20110812|FFGO|100100|0|100100|O 100%
20110815|FFGO|14500000|0|14500000|O 100%
20110816|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110817|FFGO|10490000|0|10490000|O 100%
20110818|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110822|FFGO|467000|0|467000|O 100%
20110823|FFGO|55633600|0|55633600|O 100%
20110824|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110825|FFGO|750000|0|750000|O 100%
20110829|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110831|FFGO|45327062|0|61885560|O 73.2%


September 2011

20110901|FFGO| 777000|0| 832000|O 93.3%
20110902|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110908|FFGO|1920000|0|1920000|O 100%
20110909|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110913|FFGO|5000000|0|5299100|O 94.3%
20110914|FFGO|3000000|0|3000000|O 100%
20110923|FFGO|2000000|0|2320000|O 86.2%
20110928|FFGO|1000600|0|1125600|O 88.8%

Month totals: 20,197,600/20,996,700 96.1%

October 2011

20111003|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20111004|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20111005|FFGO|310000|0|590000|O 52.5%
20111006|FFGO|600000|0|1600000|O 37.5%
20111010|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20111012|FFGO|2010000|0|2390000|O 84.1%
20111013|FFGO|2999999|0|2999999|O 100%
20111014|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20111018|FFGO|8000000|0|11000000|O 72.7%
20111019|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20111026|FFGO|2150000|0|2150000|O 100%


Month totals: 23,659,999/28329,999 83.5%

FFGO YEAR TO DATE

JAN 110,228,197/ 135,899,376
FEB 603,499,999/ 665,528,957
MAR 42,086,299/ 47,619,537
APR 55,046,743/ 57,719,305
MAY 71,734,677/ 77,653,022
JUN 49,116,056/ 49,366,056
JLY 189,497,794/ 191,797,794
AUG 168,375,995/ 188,509,493
SEP 20,197,000/ 20,996,700
OCT 23,659,999/28,329,999
Year to date totals

1,333,442.759/ 1,453,420,239 91.7% SHORT VOLUME for shares sold in 2011

regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20110324.txt
Total short volume since FINRA began publishing records in Nov. 2010:
1,774,250,838 short shares sold out of total volume of 2,018,993,454 or 87.9% of all shares sold were sold short!
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!




AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:56:39 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197084

Post # of 197391

Did you know FFGO management has been fighting the naked shorting of its stock for almost 7 years? Did you know that the stock was billions short back in 2006? Did you know that management tried hard to force those short to cover and regulators failed to enforce existing rules and regulations and allowed the naked shorters to continue to sell more non existant shares into the markets? Did you know management used every method available to them to try and thwart the attacks including multiple dividends and even reverse splitting the stock and still the naked shorters continued to sell non existant shares trying to drive FFGO into bankruptcy? Thanks management for being such warriors! Thanks for developing a plan that will insure that your shareholders are compensated for the suffering endured at the hands of the criminal naked shorters. Thanks for your courage and your caring.
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

Thanks to BullFinch for this DD:

Great West Gold, Inc. Continues
To Monitor Short Selling
NEW YORK, May 8, 2006 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) confirms that BUYINS.NET, www.buyins.net, continues its coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGOE) after releasing the latest short sale data through May 2006. From January 2005 to May 2006 approximately 28.73 billion total aggregate shares of GWGOE have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $22.7 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 2.21 billion shares. The GWGOE SqueezeTrigger price of $0.00079 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze started when shares of GWGOE closed above $0.00079. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://www.buyins.net/.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/080506_GWG_PR_Buyins_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Squeeze Trigger Report
NEW YORK, NY, February 21, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) announced on February 16, that www.buyins.net, is initiating coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGO) after releasing the latest short sale data through February 2006. From January 2005 to February 2006 approximately 20.59 billion total aggregate shares of GWGO have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $12.35 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 1.59 billion shares. The GWGO SqueezeTrigger price of $0.0006 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze is expected to begin when shares of GWGO close above $0.0006. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://buyins.net/squeezetrigger.pdf.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/210206_GWG_PR_Squeeze_Trigger_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. –
Share Price And Trading Activity
NEW YORK, NY, February 17, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) confirms that it has noted that its share price traded at a new low yesterday with in excess of 1 billion shares being traded on that day.
The Company has requested an urgent “Squeeze Trigger” Report from www.buyins.net in respect of the Company’s trading including yesterday and upon receipt of this report, it will be published by the Company.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/170206_GWG_PR_Trading_Activity.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Update On Naked Short Selling
Great West Gold (“GWGO”) Report
NEW YORK, December 27, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com



http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/271205_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – UPDATE ON NAKED SHORT NEW YORK, November 9, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com


http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/091105_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:20:27 AM

Re: None

Post # of 197391

FFGO - Just checked, no filings or emails supporting claims that the dividend has been canceled. Claims that it has are nothing but fantasy!

Tic Toc



AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:24:20 AM

Re: lucvuillermoz post# 197365

Post # of 197391

It is very possible in fact imho it is probable, in fact, I believe the payment of our dividend was determined to be a just and fair compensation because of the naked shorting of Great West Gold and Fortress Financial stock. I suggest you read SevenTenEleven's posts on the subject. FFGO's dividend will be a liquidating dividend and FFGO filed its intention to pay these dividends with regulators well over a year ago. Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:29:57 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197367

Post # of 197391

FFGO - Imagine if $1 per share was the settlement for each and every OTC stock, Shorty naked short sold down to no bid, forcing companies to reverse split time and time again?

Is Varmit correct in his assumption that a Buck a Share is coming?

Will Sean and NITE be changing thousands of shareholders' fortune soon?

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:49:17 AM

Re: XenaLives post# 195728

Post # of 197391

FFGO - It would be interesting to see the daily short numbers for GNCP and RENS and how they stack up next to the abuses short sellers demonstrated in FFGO while it was trading.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:52:09 AM

Re: AlanC post# 197367

Post # of 197391

Clearly there is a pattern of abuse.

Daily short numbers for FFGO

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73903481



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:05:36 AM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197373

Post # of 197391

SevenTenEleven, could you please point me to where either FFGO or NMGL said that they would file, PR or email any kind of statement should the dividend deal be canceled? I have searched and found nothing to that effect. - RoadLessTraveled

There is no place to find an email or a filing canceling the dividend. Pure fantasy on the part of those making such claims.

The company made it very clear in their investor communications that the deal was done. They stated that the next, and last, communication would be a filing and an email to announce the record date.

Pretty easy to target a company that has made it clear that they would not comment until said time.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:28:27 AM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197375

Post # of 197391

So you are saying that should the dividend process be canceled, maybe because one or more of the conditions could not be achieved, that FFGO will not file that info with the SEC (if revoked companies are even still allowed to make such filings) or even email the news to shareholders?

If I understand you correctly, the only news forthcoming from FFGO, in one form or another, will be the news that the dividend deal is finally done and to announce the record date? - RoadLessTraveled

Not what I am saying. It is what those making fantasy claims about the company canceling the dividend are saying.

Credit where credit is due!

Still waiting on that proof of such claims.

Oh wait...

Good Luck!




Rock Hard   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:31:48 AM

Re: None

Post # of 197391

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/26/business/goldman-sachs-denies-claims-it-led-to-copper-rivers-demise.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

This link spells out where the real battle is being fought.
Follow it, for honesty's sake!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:58:07 AM

Re: diamondguru-one post# 196873

Post # of 197391

Fantasy claims of canceled dividend process continue to be made. Not one shred of proof to support such claims have been provided to date. Yet the fantasy and the illusion continues.

Imagine the legal mess a long would face making claims that couldn't be backed up? The SEC would nab them for a pump and dump.

Strange how a short and distort is not treated the same by the SEC. Wonder why?

Tic Toc



spiritthing   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:04:30 AM

Re: Rock Hard post# 197377

Post # of 197391

Good article. Thanks!



mwab52   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:07:08 AM

Re: Rock Hard post# 197377

Post # of 197392

Nice Read..Rock Hard.....(FFGO)



LAMBSHIFT   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:34:55 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197312

Post # of 197392

"...there are 75 BILLION shares in the O/S..." :
but there are only about 8 BILLION shares in the FLOAT...
i.e. only about 10% of the shares in the O/S are in the float.
in 2010 the company has made several debt-to-equity swaps with its debtholders creating about between 40 and 45 billion shares of FFGO.
at the beginning of 2010 there were about 30 bil shares in the O/S but only about 3..5 bil shares (excuse me, it´s from memory) in the float.
consequence: by far the most of these shares from debt-to-equity swaps have not gone into the float-only a fraction. also consider the number of shares traded in 2010.
concerning mr. Lowenthal: the default of NMGL and RENS with state SOS should be no problem - if the necessary fees are paid, the companies will be reinstated: the same as with Bouse Inc and S.Copp.stone Inc. in 2010.



AlanC   

Friday, March 30, 2012 8:09:34 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 1007

Post # of 1011

FINRA short sales reported today for GNCP:
20120330|GNCP|91000|0|145185|O
62.6% of total volume for GNCP was short sales.
Go GNCP!!!



SevenTenEleven 

Friday, March 30, 2012 8:23:14 PM

Re: AlanC post# 1008

Post # of 1011

GNCP - Shorty digging a hole here!

His arrogance excites me! lolzzz

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:45:52 AM

Re: AlanC post# 1008

Post # of 1011

GNCP - Hopefully we are keeping a running total of the daily short volume. Over the course of a few weeks/months, we will be able to gather enough evidence to demonstrate "serial abuses".



wrj 

Friday, March 30, 2012 6:19:05 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 31096

Post # of 31103

The fact you even post here causes me to rejoice. Rumor has it that someone has made an offer to buy the company. Interesting!!!

Hunt Gold Corporation (HGLC)



kazorchian   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:05:48 AM

Re: wrj post# 31098

Post # of 31103

Rumor? Where did you hear that rumor? Interesting....




AlanC   

Friday, March 30, 2012 8:06:45 PM

Re: zarmat post# 3076

Post # of 3080

FINRA short sales reported today for RENS
20120330|RENS|2500|0|2500|O
100% of volume today was short sales!
Go RENS!!!




Lebron23   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:23:09 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 199

Post # of 242

Website Info:
Registrant:
Stephen Lumb domain@ip01.net +44.2078871448 +44.2078871449
St James Capital Inc
c/o St James Resource Management Limited, Second Floor,Berkeley Square House, Berkeley
Square
London,London,GB W1J 6BD


Domain Name:stjcapital.com
Record last updated at 2011-08-24 17:14:28
Record created on 9/1/2004
Record expired on 09/01/2012


Domain servers in listed order:
ns5.ip01-dns.net ns6.ip01-dns.net

Administrator:
678 Wells Rd
Boulder City
NV,
US
89005

name:(Ip01.net Domain Administrator)
mail:(domain@ip01.net) +1.7024410300
+1.7024410300
IVC Internet Services Inc.
Technical Contactor:N/A
Billing Contactor:
678 Wells Rd
Boulder City
NV,
US
89005

name:(Ip01.net Domain Administrator)
mail:(domain@ip01.net) +1.7024410300
+1.7024410300
IVC Internet Services Inc.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:51:07 PM

Re: JammingJAY post# 197393

Post # of 197395

You have a better chance of a dividend payout from HGLC, that still trades on the greys, unlike DTC chilled, SEC suspended then revoked fka/FFGO. - JammingJAY

Good to know that HGLC dividend is still in play. since FFGO revocation and dissolution has no effect on the dividend process.

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 1:53:13 PM

Re: indebt2 post# 197392

Post # of 197395

i'd like to make this easy for them.
just give me money.
how easy is that? - indebted

That is pretty much how the retail brokers have been running things for OTC stocks such as FFGO. "Just give me the money" and there is no way you will get out without writing your shares down for a loss.

Times they are a changing!

Tic Toc



Lebron23   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:11:42 PM

Re: ctrumabll post# 197396

Post # of 197402

Liquidation (liquidating dividend) all part of the plan.
Simple.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 5:19:03 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197398

Post # of 197409

HGLC was closed down by the insiders .. as worthless and a defunct company

please provide a filing stating HGLC divvy is still on and the insiders lied about the statements about HGLC being worthless

by Pete ( CEO of FFGO and owners of HGLC ) FFGO FAQ Updated 9/8/2010- 9:43 AM - puppydotcom

Thanks for referencing the FAQ's. Since the company stated that HGLC was now worthless, and this is being taken as FACT, then the rest of the FACTS in the FAQ's must also be CREDIBLE!

Thanks AGAIN!

Good Luck!




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:10:40 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197405

Post # of 197410

WELL ,
SEEMS THE REVOKING OF THE STOCK
THE DISSOLVING OF THE CORPORATION
FFGO MANAGEMENT TERMINATING ALL LINES OF COMMUNICATION AND
ABANDONING THE COMPANY 20 MONTHS AGO

CHANGED A FEW THINGS

YUP, IT DID .... - puppydotcom

Waiting for that CREDIBLE source supporting claims that the dividend was canceled. Inference isn't confirmation.

Good Luck!



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-03-31 17:32:47)

Offline

 

#1466 2012-03-31 21:43:15

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

DHS Holding Co. (DHSM)

Moderators: Admiral Lagrange, SevenTenEleven, goodolboy, Trading4cash

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=7860



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:13:37 PM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24195

Post # of 24218

DHSM - The unreported short position is very apparent. No need to prove it to those protecting it.

This will be one of the biggest squeezes of 2012. Those short will never admit they were squeezed, either.

ETrade is believed to have a rather large inventory problem. Was it NITE who placed all of those electronic markers in retail accounts?

Tic Toc


SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:16:49 PM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24202

Post # of 24218

DHSM - Shorts have dug in and placed their bets. How many times over have they shorted the float, this time?

Tic Toc




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:17:59 PM

Re: rekcusdoo post# 24201

Post # of 24218

There is no outcome here where the company is sitting on good news and being "stealthy" as you claim. That would just show HORRIBLE business sense to purposely lose valuable capital. - rekcusdoo

Good news coming for shareholders and longs. Not so much for those short and issuing IOU's.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:22:32 PM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24200

Post # of 24218

Was watching the news today. It appears that the IRS is hiring 4000 agents to focus on health care.

This is going to continue to be a hot topic in the news and in the investment community.

DHSM's Data Health Systems subsidiary is positioned to capitalize on the need for billing and reimbursement in the sector.

Those with IP in the sector would hate for a small startup to take their revenue stream. They will do what they can to try to squeeze capital investment in startup companies that threaten their pipeline.

Tic Toc




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:56:54 PM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24207

Post # of 24218

Not to mention the "compliance" communications. LOL!

I have faith in the management of DHSM and the value they are slowly building for investors and shareholders.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:01:46 PM

Re: neophyte184 post# 24209

Post # of 24218

Healthcare spending and reimbursement are the areas of economic influence.

I believe DHSM is poised to take advantage of the opportunity. They had foresight, IMO, long before the topic became hot!




janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:04:02 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24203

Post # of 24218

The unreported short position is very apparent.

Only to the people wearing the funny glasses, I'm afraid.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:05:33 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24212

Post # of 24218

Those claiming that naked short selling did not exist, and then that it never existed in the OTC will need more than glasses when th $h!+ hits the fan.

Tic Toc




janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:05:45 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24210

Post # of 24218

I have faith in the management of DHSM...

Please, please tell me you're joking. How long till the next CEO is named? LOLOL!!



janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:06:32 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24213

Post # of 24218

Sheesh. I've been hearing that for more than ten years now, and somehow it just never happens.




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:06:59 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24214

Post # of 24218

Please, please tell me you're joking. How long till the next CEO is named? LOLOL!! - janice shell

Please Please sell will be the hopes of shorts when this gets to a critical trigger point.

Will be fun to watch and to make a few bucks on along the way.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:08:31 PM

Re: janice shell post# 24215

Post # of 24218

Sheesh. I've been hearing that for more than ten years now, and somehow it just never happens. - janice shell

Isn't it crazy how those who manipulate the market are able to be so successful for 15 years, or more?

More money made on the short side without punishment from the SEC, it appears.



janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:09:11 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 24217

Post # of 24218

Or perhaps it's all in your head. That explanation satisfies me.


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1467 2012-03-31 22:01:36

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879



THESirCharles   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 5:23:07 PM

Re: op9171787 post# 149555

Post # of 149581

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
how do we win.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



How is any victory won ? A: By not stopping until it is achieved.

With that said, let's ponder a thought from Schopenhauer :

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."

The First Stage - ridicule - has now been all but concluded; the Second Stage - violent opposition - is now extant. But it, too, has begun to wither under the Absolute Onslaught that is The Truth. Next will come the Acceptance ... the Inevitable can be forestalled only so long.

With that said, redouble your efforts, of whatever kind and in whatever amount those efforts might be.

"For want of a nail....", as the saying goes.



freewhilly   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:26:34 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149556

Post # of 149581

Beautifully said, Sir, but you need to realize that the "acceptance" part is well underway, as observed in certain responses from select (intelegent) brokers.

The only shoe left to drop is how to worm out of this train wreck without admitting guilt.



AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 7:58:48 PM

Re: freewhilly post# 149562

Post # of 149581

I think the regulators will have to do that in order to save face.
At this point they all look dirty. It will be interesting to see what they come up with. The OIG may prove to be a catalyst. The pressure will increase on all involved as the word spreads and it is spreading fast. A couple more court cases may be enough. Go BCIT!!!



2late   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:08:19 PM

Re: blind squirrel post# 149503

Post # of 149581

I believe you are trying to hard to make this make sense:)

All you need to consider is this.

Every BCIT shareholder who uses the brokers who were issued the legal shares of their valid investment as identified in the company PR are now obligated by CONTRACT to open, authentic, and correct any errors they hide behind that are in conflict with their clients best interest and is the justification for arbitration that they intentionaly burden their clients with.

If said brokers who are obligated to their agreed contracts intentionally violate and breach that contract they nullify their arbitration clause and are legally liable and obligated to pay all costs.

If BCIT certs exist and are obtainable then their argument for refusing to deliver them is mute.

It now becomes an undeniable deliberate act of fraud.


SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:04:26 PM

Re: AlanC post# 149563

Post # of 149581

As long as the company has the best interests of the shareholders in mind, this will play out in the best interest of shareholders.




janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:07:38 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149567

Post # of 149581

As long as the company has the best interests of the shareholders in mind...

Let's not forget that this is the company that sued its shareholders for fraud and stock manipulation.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:09:29 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149568

Post # of 149581

As I have made very clear, if the company is only interested in selling certs to brokers to allow them to cover their short interest, then the shareholders likely lose everything.




SevenTenEleven

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:18:30 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149568

Post # of 149581

How is the company planning on returning the profits from issuing certs to the brokers to shareholders?




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:23:07 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149571

Post # of 149582

I am not a shareholder. I am very bullish in the markets, in general.

But when there is no plan announce to demonstrate how to reward shareholders who have been issued the illegal markers, I begin to question "the plan".

Shareholders should be demanding that the company get registered and trading. And that FINRA force a buyin or an agreed upon settlement.

Yet that does not seem to be the case or the course of action. I am sure I am missing something.



weebie 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:55:54 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149568

Post # of 149582

Let's not forget that this is the company that sued its shareholders for fraud and stock manipulation.

Old news and becoming Off Topic.

Lets deal with the present, unless trying to sidetrack what really matters.....



janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:57:36 PM

Re: weebie post# 149573

Post # of 149582

Nothing about the company is "off topic". Even if it makes the company look bad.




weebie 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:02:01 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149574

Post # of 149582

Stay Focused On The Here & Now

Whilst is good to chew the cud and reminisce about old times, we should not loose site of the fact that the real issues are the ones facing us all NOW.



janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:04:25 PM

Re: weebie post# 149575

Post # of 149582

I'm sure he meant "lose". But frankly, I don't think he was right about that.




weebie 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:11:19 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149576

Post # of 149582

Live in the now Janice, leave the ancient history behind and stick to what is current and relevant



janice shell 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:25:51 PM

Re: weebie post# 149577

Post # of 149583

I have a pretty good idea what's "relevant".



poor broke bloke   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:25:57 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149572

Post # of 149584

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not a shareholder. I am very bullish in the markets, in general.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



And of course you are more interested in a non-trading stock as opposed to AAPL, IBM, MSFT, GM, etc....?

With extremely low to no coverage by the media, you are interested in BCIT. WHY?

Why are all of the non-shareholders intrigued by BCIT?


Interesting.....




Iluvbbs   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:35:23 PM

Re: 2late post# 149564

Post # of 149584

Damn, that was impressive, 2Late.

How many on this board were attorneys in their other lives??? Some of you really post like you were/are...

This just gets more impressive by the hour.

Best, Steve



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:51:48 PM

Re: poor broke bloke post# 149524

Post # of 149584

Maybe everyone needs to contact their broker and request that they get credit of those shares. Keep the pressure on.
I know I will. - poor broke bloke

So the brokers demand that the company issue it certs at a premium, allowing them to cover?

Leaving shareholders with nothing?

Explain how the company is going to take care of shareholders after shareholders take care of the company?

Good Luck!




mikeymac 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:56:09 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149582

Post # of 149584

The company is not giving them anything except maybe a token, which shows that company is viable with Transfer Agent.

I am getting my broker to go after the MM who took the money and didn't go get the certs.

Mike



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:57:18 PM

Re: mikeymac post# 149583

Post # of 149584

I just want a response that makes it simple for me to understand. How is the company going to make sure shareholders are at the very least, made whole?



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1468 2012-03-31 22:09:02

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111

diamondguru-one


Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:19:14 PM Re: ctrumabll post# 197419

Post # of 197420

you mean how FFGO merged with another company ??? Yaaaah that's the TICKET !!!! thanks for the FFGO support..it means a lot to us TRUE SHAREHOLDERS !!! thanks again !!!

SUPER 8K FILING!!!! should explain it to you and other NONE-SHARHOLDERS soon enough...have your depends handy !!


Rat Trap   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:45:00 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197410

Post # of 197422

  Probably trying to figure how the heck they are going to issue a dividend when FFGO was over prescribed many times over...

FINRA figures are crystal clear. This pressure cooker is gonna blow...lol



Lebron23   


Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:45:41 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197410

Post # of 197422

RoadLessTraveled: You make SevenTenEleven's point.
Your whole post is conjecture...speculation.
Let's wait and see what happens in the coming weeks!



diamondguru-one   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:51:04 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197404

Post # of 197422

come on you know they only cherry pick what they need...:>)




AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:07:17 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197415

Post # of 197422

That's easy. Everything was agreed to with the regulators approval back in August 2010 when FINRA stopped posting the SHO short numbers. Locked and loaded just waiting for the go ahead to file the Super 8K making the announcement. I have no problem waiting for it as it will be a huge payday for me, how about you? Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:30:59 PM

Re: diamondguru-one post# 197413

Post # of 197422

FFGO - NMGL will the company get SEC current and fully reporting just prior to the 8-K filing?

Tic Toc



Rocket Man 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:12:45 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 197421

Post # of 197422

FFGO

I'll bet on that.



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1469 2012-04-01 15:03:56

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879


mikeymac 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:04:34 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149584

Post # of 149653

If you can get your cert you get what you paid for. If you don't want your cert and it is made available hopefully you can trade it.

Remember it is the various agencies that are supposed to protect shareholders that doing everything they can to prevent trading.

Trading is the fairest most parties involved.

Those that have to come up with either money or shares make accounts whole will feel the most heat.

Mike


Sprycel   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:15:37 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149653

Here is what I think is going to happen! The DTCC is going to release the stock for trading because the company has been able to prove there is a T/A and then the stock will open for trading! No one will know why except the notification that the company is no longer under a 'temporary' global lock! After that, you will see a huge short squeeze. Right now the heat is getting too hot for the government agencies involved! JMHO!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:38:32 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 149653

WILL BE WAITING FOR THE POA THAT ENABLES SHAREHOLDERS TO SEE ROI.

GOOD LUCK!



The big time   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:58:29 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149568

Post # of 149654

Yes and let us not forget that it was the Regulatory Authorities that directed the Law Firm in OK that the lawsuit was necessary to extinquish any fraudulent shares in the market. How many times do we have to rehash that matter. You always try to bring that up all the time as if TM just woke up one day in Europe and decided just for the fun it to sue all the shareholders. How many posts have been wasted on that same subject but it is probably good you are here. Your negative spin on everything has united many of the shareholders. Management of this company has never given up and a lot of money was spent to rectify this unbelievable situation with the Naked Short selling that was done. But I am sure you will bring it up the shareholder lawsuit over and over again. I said you would and I was correct.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:58:55 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149589

Post # of 149654

1.3B NAKED SHORTS! Shareholders holding the IOU's. Would like to know what the company is doing to make sure they are rewarded for their time and money?




janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:02:32 AM

Re: The big time post# 149590

Post # of 149654

And let us remember that many of us simply don't believe that version of events.



The big time   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:05:00 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149592

Post # of 149655

Yes of course and you are sure the Law Firm lied to the Court and we have been through that so many times. It is really getting sickening.



janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:07:08 AM

Re: The big time post# 149593

Post # of 149655

It was pretty sickening from the get go.



Iluvbbs   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 1:08:58 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149591

Post # of 149655

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would like to know what the company is doing to make sure they are rewarded for their time and money?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



One has to wonder why you would care at all considering you have previously posted that you are NOT a shareholder??

I am being dead serious here and not antagonistic. Don't you think the shareholders have a MUCH greater reason to wonder the same question as well.....but, since after 7 years, it should be very obvious to anyone that we have a lot of patience to let the powers that be, do their work behind the scenes uninterupted.

Speaking for myself, I am going with the idea that "time is the shareholders friend".

Best, Steve



zxc   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:34:33 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149571

Post # of 149655

It's not a good question! Anytime a company collects money from the issuance of shares, it's not called profits. It's called raising capital to make profits. Since in BCIT's case, most of this capital would be coming from brokers and not from shareholders, the company is not obligated to reveal their business plans until the capital is realised.

If anyone feels insecure about their holdings, he can insist they get their money back from the broker. With recent events, getting your money back has now become the worsed case scenario.



zxc   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:55:00 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149592

Post # of 149655

What you like to call "many" is a small minority! Very small!



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 9:10:00 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149656

Very strange that there is no simple answer covering "what is in it for shareholders if the company issues millions upon millions of certs".

Certs that will allow market makers and brokers to cover.

Certs that will stop any possibility of an ordered short cover and buyin.

There is a massive naked short interest position here BCIT'ers! That position should result in a forced cover and/or a forced settlement for shareholders.

Anything less than $1 per share as a settlement is an insult to shareholders!

When the company is done issuing certs, allowing short to cover, what are they going to do with the gross proceeds?

Will they distribute a percentage to shareholders as an extraordinary dividend? Or will the principles keep it and walk away from a revoked stock?

Simple answers appreciated.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 9:10:47 AM

Re: zxc post# 149600

Post # of 149656

Shareholders are taking care of the company by putting pressure on the brokers, exposing their naked short positions.

What is the company doing for shareholders?



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 9:59:09 AM

Re: zxc post# 149597

Post # of 149657

Anytime a company collects money from the issuance of shares, it's not called profits. It's called raising capital to make profits. Since in BCIT's case, most of this capital would be coming from brokers and not from shareholders, the company is not obligated to reveal their business plans until the capital is realized. - zxc

So the company does not need to let shareholders know what they plan on doing with the millions of dollars they are raising by issuing certs to brokers so they could cover the massive naked short positions they dumped on shareholders?

Good Luck!



freewhilly   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 9:59:26 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 149603

Post # of 149657

taking care of the company by putting pressure on the brokers, exposing their naked short positions.

I believe the company has been handy in this as well. Read the press releases.

The biggest thing Megas has done for the shareholders is not walk away. After nearly SEVEN years he remains in our corner fighting for our ability to have the tradeable shares we rightfully own. In addition, it appears he has went to all four corners of the earth trying to add value to the company we all (most of us here, anyway) own a stake in. And furthermore, once this is trading in it's proper capacity, don't be suprised to see him go after these crooks seeking prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.



Chas56789   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:42:05 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149574

Post # of 149657

janice - and you know that lawsuit was to prove that shareholders bought their shares legally through their brokers. As it has turned out.... it proved that the BROKERS are the actual CROOKS !!!!

Chas56789



camper9   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 11:27:35 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149594

Post # of 149657

I agree.

It has been pretty sickening that the brokers sold hundreds of millions of shares that they did not have.

It has been pretty sickening that there has been an apparent attempt to stop BCIT from trading via very questionable (if not outright illegal) regulatory tactics.

It has been pretty sickening that the brokers continue to prevaricate in order to cover up the fraud that it appears they have committed.



Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It was pretty sickening from the get go.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



mikeymac 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 11:46:32 AM

Re: realwood post# 149612

Post # of 149657

Or, it is the duty of the brokers to provide me with my certs if I request those certs. Where they get them is there business, and before all of this no one apparently know where they got them, or didn't get them is the case.

Mike




mikeymac 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:22:55 PM

Re: realwood post# 149621

Post # of 149658

To turn 106's to 205's like they were supposed to is the plan without buying them. After all they all exist according to brokers.

Purchasing certs from the company, no problem, they are available.

Brokers to purchase 1 to 2 billions shares, not going to happen even if that is intent of the company. All the company wants is whatever shares are in the system traded has come from them. Just like any other company.

Mike



mastaflash 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:36:00 PM

Re: carrot_on_stick post# 149617

Post # of 149659

You silly...there is no other reason to go public.



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 1:28:22 PM

Re: carrot_on_stick post# 149626

Post # of 149659

One way the shareholders gain is if the stock becomes free trading again. That assumes that there is still a large naked short position and that the SEC and FINRA trigger a mandated buyin.

Another way they gain is if the company issues shares to brokers at a premium to cover their illegal naked short positions, and the company gives a dividend to the shareholders.

I would like to know what the plan is to take care of shareholders. Not how CH wants shareholders to take care of the company.



mikeymac 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 1:39:19 PM

Re: realwood post# 149628

Post # of 149659

Sure it was. TA through Cusip service changed the authorization
number. 106's are now 205's. Brokers are proactive to make those changes.

Mike



NI43-101 Or Bust   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 1:44:22 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149568

Post # of 149659

janice- you are better than this. that is old news and IMO that OKC lawsuit holds a lot weight.



NI43-101 Or Bust   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 1:50:34 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149579

Post # of 149660

Your consistent posting on this board these days is extremely "relevant" smile I like you Janice!



mikeymac 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:14:00 PM

Re: realwood post# 149639

Post # of 149660

Now is where push comes to shove.

If criticism is extended to the timing of BCIT going to authorities after trying to get restitution for wrong doing. Authorities have had 6 years to right from what seems to be a sweeping under the rug of actual problems or complications they have had hands in.

If they want to back up what they say and all is well, make them 205's as was requested, let this trade, and those really holding the bag pay.

If they don't want to be publicly caught red handed that is the best way.

After all it is not like multiple stocks aren't traded every day that don't have certs to back up the ious put into clients portfolios.

Mike



Joda   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:25:38 PM

Re: carrot_on_stick post# 149534

Post # of 149660

Well if nothing has happened, why do the shorts seemed so worried and concerned that bcit will trade again?

Doesn't jive, sorry, but nice try.



Joda   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:32:42 PM

Re: Bull Finch post# 149549

Post # of 149660

"1,742 times on 171 sites in last 3 months"

For a stock that has not traded in 7 years, and yet the shorts are trying to sell everyone that no one is even interested or concerned in BCIT.

Watch when BCIT trades how much activity will be here. All of OTC land will know of BCIT, and thanks to the insulting shorts all these years, they helped keep the BCIT fires stoked.

Go BCIT...



The big time   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:38:43 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149594

Post # of 149660

The Naked Short selling is the sickening part but that is being addressed.



Joda   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:44:21 PM

Re: The big time post# 149590

Post # of 149660

Yes we owe a BIG THANK YOU to the shorts (naked) that have contributed here in helping to fire up our BCIT resolve in correcting this wrong.

Thank you motivating us in getting BCIT trading again,

I don't think the interest in BCIT would have held up as long with out the constant supporters of this illegal act, my opinion.



janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:08:00 PM

Re: zxc post# 149606

Post # of 149660

The company is only covering the counterfeit shares, which were placed into the market by Pino.

Really? That was supposedly resolved by the lawsuit against Pino and the others.



janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:08:48 PM

Re: Chas56789 post# 149607

Post # of 149660

What I know is that that lawsuit was so ill-conceived that Megas had to dismiss it.



janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:39:12 PM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149633

Post # of 149660

...and IMO that OKC lawsuit holds a lot weight.

It holds none at all. It was dismissed. There was no ruling; no disposition; no settlement.



The big time   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:41:07 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149653

Post # of 149660

Yes and the shareholder lawsuit was by directive of the regulatory agencies. TM dropped it because he saw it was a mess. Not sure how many times we have to go over that issue. The lawsuit against Pino and Thompson resulted in a judgement and the issuance of shares to cover the counterfeit shares that were dumped into the market. Just so happens though that there were a lot more naked shorted shares that Market Makers just felt they were able to dump into the market. This leads us to this huge problem of shares out there with no certificates. Since Bancorp International Group never went away and TM never gave up many are left to deal with this problem. Well at least those that naked shorted the shares anyway.



janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:45:40 PM

Re: NI43-101 Or Bust post# 149646

Post # of 149660

That lawsuit provided a pool of shares to be put in deposit with the DTCC, correct

Yes. But did that ever happen? The judge ordered it. According to CH, though, DTCC doesn't seem to have those shares.

Why not?



The big time   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:48:40 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149657

Post # of 149660

Yes and that is a problem for the Brokers. Even those shares are not enough to cover the naked short position.

January 11, 2006, the Oklahoma County District Court enters an “Order Approving Settlement Agreement”, which settles the claims between the Company, Mario Pino, his associates and affiliated entities, Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. and JH Darbie &Co.

In accordance with the settlement, the Company is owed certain sums in respect of the proceeds received through the sale of invalidly issued shares of common stock, and the Company issues 25,025,000 shares of common stock to JH Darbie &Co. and 219,723,000 shares of common stock to Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. for an aggregate sum of 244,748,000 shares to be deposited with the DTCC in satisfaction of JH Darbie &Co.’s and Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C.’s short positions.



janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:49:42 PM

Re: The big time post# 149658

Post # of 149660

Why on earth is is a problem for DTCC and the brokers? It was the defendants who were ordered to surrender the stock.




janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:53:03 PM

Re: The big time post# 149658

Post # of 149660

Again, I don't see why it's a problem for the brokers. The settlement was supposed to have resulted in the conveyance of 250 million shares to DTCC.

Why didn't that happen?


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

#1470 2012-04-01 17:03:12

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



mattyhoho   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 2:23:04 AM

Re: ctrumabll post# 197424

Post # of 197441

Preferred As
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1393283/000116552710000976/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml

Preferred Bs
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1393283/000116552710000977/xslFormDX01/primary_doc.xml



diamondguru-one   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:00:16 AM

Re: ctrumabll post# 197424

Post # of 197441

where else in this market place would you make "3400%" on your money in a few years ????? Bank ??? Stocks ??? naaaaaah...I'll wait my turn... "SUPER 8k FILING" will explain it to YOU FULLY !!! happy trails....

"3400%" ROI !!!! I can wait......



mwab52   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 11:41:23 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197428

Post # of 197441

You forgot one. Time is on (FFGO) shareholders side. Just ask shorty. (FFGO)



AlanC   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:17:19 PM

Re: AlanC post# 197364

Post # of 197441

Did you know FFGO management has been fighting the naked shorting of its stock for almost 7 years? Did you know that the stock was billions short back in 2006? Did you know that management tried hard to force those short to cover and regulators failed to enforce existing rules and regulations and allowed the naked shorters to continue to sell more non existant shares into the markets? Did you know management used every method available to them to try and thwart the attacks including multiple dividends and even reverse splitting the stock and still the naked shorters continued to sell non existant shares trying to drive FFGO into bankruptcy? Thanks management for being such warriors! Thanks for developing a plan that will insure that your shareholders are compensated for the suffering endured at the hands of the criminal naked shorters. Thanks for your courage and your caring.
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

Thanks to BullFinch for this DD:

Great West Gold, Inc. Continues
To Monitor Short Selling
NEW YORK, May 8, 2006 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) confirms that BUYINS.NET, www.buyins.net, continues its coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGOE) after releasing the latest short sale data through May 2006. From January 2005 to May 2006 approximately 28.73 billion total aggregate shares of GWGOE have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $22.7 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 2.21 billion shares. The GWGOE SqueezeTrigger price of $0.00079 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze started when shares of GWGOE closed above $0.00079. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://www.buyins.net/.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/080506_GWG_PR_Buyins_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Squeeze Trigger Report
NEW YORK, NY, February 21, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) announced on February 16, that www.buyins.net, is initiating coverage of Great West Gold, Inc. (OTCBB: GWGO) after releasing the latest short sale data through February 2006. From January 2005 to February 2006 approximately 20.59 billion total aggregate shares of GWGO have traded for a total dollar value of nearly $12.35 million. The total aggregate number of shares shorted in this time period is approximately 1.59 billion shares. The GWGO SqueezeTrigger price of $0.0006 is the volume weighted average short price of all short selling in GWGO. A short squeeze is expected to begin when shares of GWGO close above $0.0006. To access SqueezeTrigger Prices ahead of potential short squeezes beginning, visit http://buyins.net/squeezetrigger.pdf.
Press Release

Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/210206_GWG_PR_Squeeze_Trigger_Report.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. –
Share Price And Trading Activity
NEW YORK, NY, February 17, 2006, Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB: GWGO) confirms that it has noted that its share price traded at a new low yesterday with in excess of 1 billion shares being traded on that day.
The Company has requested an urgent “Squeeze Trigger” Report from www.buyins.net in respect of the Company’s trading including yesterday and upon receipt of this report, it will be published by the Company.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com

http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/170206_GWG_PR_Trading_Activity.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – Update On Naked Short Selling
Great West Gold (“GWGO”) Report
NEW YORK, December 27, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com



http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/271205_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf


Great West Gold, Inc. – UPDATE ON NAKED SHORT NEW YORK, November 9, 2005 – Great West Gold, Inc. (OTC BB:GWGO) announced on November 8, 2005 that Great West Gold, Inc. has now subscribed to a service that will “expose” all naked short positions in its stock on a monthly basis. The Company undertook to publish this list on its web site and issue a Press Release disclosing full details contained in that monthly report. Great West Gold, Inc. is now determined to attack those who are involved in the illegal naked short selling of its stock.
Press Release
Great West Gold, Inc. Email:investor@greatwestgold.com


http://www.greatwestgold.com/pdfs/091105_GWG_PR_Update_on_Short_Selling.pdf
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



AlanC   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:20:30 PM

Re: AlanC post# 197363

Post # of 197441

FINRA provides the evidence in black and white. Total volume traded for the day and the percentage of the total volume that were short sales. The numbers are staggering. Over 90% and
FINRA admits there numbers are on the low side. UBSS and Credit Suisse fined by regulators for mismarking short trades and calling them long. It is likely that every single share sold in the past two years did not exist. 100% short sales! Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!

FINRA short sale numbers for Novemeber 2010 for FFGO!!!

20101101|FFGO|2849999|3849999|0 74%
20101102|FFGO|1750000|1750000|O 100%
20101103|FFGO|7000000|7107200|O 98%
20101104|FFGO|2000000|2000000|O 100%
20101105|FFGO|7999999|10999999|O 73%
20101108|FFGO|15050000|26500000|O 57%
20101110|FFGO|1000000|2898917|O 34%
20101111|FFGO|2419999|2419999|O 100%
20101112|FFGO|3100000|3200000|O 97%
20101116|FFGO|1000000|1340000|O 75%
20101117|FFGO|6000001|10778584|O 56%
20101118|FFGO|2000000|4014600|O 50%
20101122|FFGO|19845000|19845000|O 100%
20101123|FFGO|500000|1000000|O 50%
20101130|FFGO|20385000|21035000|O 97%
Nov. totals: 79,354,998.00 107,739,299.00 74% sold short

Here are the FINRA short sale numbers for December 2010:

20101202|FFGO|999999|999999|O 100%
20101203|FFGO|615000|4585000|O 13%
20101206|FFGO|1100000|1220000|O 90%
20101207|FFGO|700000|3700000|O 19%
20101208|FFGO|750000|1017259|O 74%
20101209|FFGO|2500000|4500000|O 56%
20101210|FFGO|57089999|74194973|O 77%
20101213|FFGO|6000000|10005000|O 59.7%
20101214|FFGO|28900077|31695902|O 91%
20101215|FFGO|5500000|5704441|O 96%
20101216|FFGO|33250000|54755000|O 61%
20101217|FFGO|8890998|9340998|O 95%
20101220|FFGO|5615800|6660800|O 84%
20101221|FFGO|9600000|11200000|O 86%
20101222|FFGO|24577777|31723803|O 77%
20101227|FFGO|154399995|176901620|O 87%
20101228|FFGO|4999999|4999999|O 100%
20101229|FFGO|9382269|9426819|O 100%
20101230|FFGO|7000000|7010000|O 100%
20101231|FFGO|4081168|8192303|0 50%
Dec. totals: 361,453,081.00 457,833,916.00 79%


2010 short sale totals: 440,808,079. out of a total volume of 565,573,215 or 78% shares sold short. Note well the SEC only started publishing FINRA's daily short sale numbers in Nov. of 2010.


January 2011

20110103|FFGO|20000000|22953402|O 87%
20110104|FFGO|9100000|9400000|O 96.8%
20110105|FFGO|8250000|13250000|O 62.3%
20110106|FFGO|11000000|11220000|O 98%
20110107|FFGO|9999999|9999999|O 100%
20110110|FFGO|400000|900000|O 44%
20110111|FFGO|1500000|2000000|O 75%
20110112|FFGO|1400000|1400000|O 100%
20110113|FFGO|1300000|1800000|O 72%
20110114|FFGO|23859999|38587151|O 61%
20110118|FFGO|3000400|3400400|O 88%
20110120|FFGO|7499999|8099999|O 92.5%
20110124|FFGO|1800000|1800000|O 100%
20110125|FFGO|800000|800000|O 100%
20110126|FFGO|10000000|10000625|O 99.9%
20110131|FFGO|317800|317800|O 100%


February 2011

20110202|FFGO|20700000|36210000|O 57%
20110203|FFGO|13400000|38601000|O 34.7%
20110209|FFGO|200000|365000|O 54.7%
20110210|FFGO|2900000|3700000|O 78.3%
20110211|FFGO|500000|4970000|O 10%
20110214|FFGO|2000000|2006250|O 99.6%
20110216|FFGO|17700000|27770000|O 63%
20110217|FFGO|525499999|528499999|O 99.4% COLD WINTER DAY
20110218|FFGO|7600000|8725000|O 87.1%
20110222|FFGO|10000000|10526708|O 94.9%
20110223|FFGO|2000000|2700000|O 74%
20110225|FFGO|1000000|1455000|O 68.7%

March 2011

20110301|FFGO|1000000|0|1350000|O 74%
20110303|FFGO|1795000|0|3492848|O 51%
20110304|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110307|FFGO|1800000|0|1800000|O 100%
20110311|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110314|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110315|FFGO|3500000|0|4500000|O 77.7%
20110316|FFGO|11500000|0|11500650|O 99.99%
20110317|FFGO|3114000|0|3617357|O 86%
20110318|FFGO|13020000|0|13020000|O 100%
20110324|FFGO|150000|0|701113|O 21%
20110325|FFGO|110000|0|110000|O 100%
20110329|FFGO|1497300|0|1497300|O 100%
20110331|FFGO|1999999|0|3430269|O 58%

April 2011

20110404|FFGO|5891100|0|6651100|O 88.5%
20110405|FFGO|126400|0|126400|O 100%
20110406|FFGO|150000|0|150000|O 100%
20110411|FFGO|456000|0|456000|O 100%
20110413|FFGO|876543|0|876543|O 100%
20110414|FFGO|4100000|0|4741400|O 86.4%
20110415|FFGO|1500000|0|2500000|O 65%
20110420|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20110421|FFGO|1560000|0|1560000|O 100%
20110425|FDTC|4000|0|25000|O 16%
20110426|FFGO|1000000|0|1000162|O 99.9%
20110427|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110428|FFGO|8072700|0|8322700|O 96.9%
20110429|FFGO|30210000|0|30210000|O 100%

May 2011

20110502|FFGO|4476700|0|4476700|O 100%
20110503|FFGO|7338600|0|10788600|O 68%
20110504|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110505|FFGO|1620000|0|2140000|O 75.7%
20110506|FFGO|1500000|0|1505583|O 99.6%
20110509|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110511|FFGO|3000000|0|3040000|O 88.2%
20110512|FFGO|7200000|0|8200000|O 87.8%
20110516|FFGO|8200000|0|8300000|O 98.7%
20110517|FFGO|4099900|0|4199900|O 97.6%
20110518|FFGO|585000|0|585000|O 100%
20110520|FFGO|1000777|0|1000777|O 100%
20110523|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110524|FFGO|500000|0|800000|O 62%
20110525|FFGO|18585000|0|18585000|O 100%
20110527|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110531|FFGO|7628700|0|8031462|O 94.9%

June 2011

20110603|FFGO|400000|0|400000|O 100%
20110606|FFGO|2710000|0|2710000|O 100%
20110607|FFGO|24000000|0|24000000|O 100%
20110608|FFGO|173800|0|173800|O 100%
20110609|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110610|FFGO|83100|0|83100|O 100%
20110614|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110615|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110616|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20110617|FFGO|1105223|0|1355223|O 81.5%
20110621|FFGO|423000|0|423000|O 100%
20110623|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110624|FFGO|3401333|0|3401333|O 100%
20110629|FFGO|8619200|0|8619200|O 100%
20110630|FFGO|200400|0|200400|O 100%

July 2011

20110701|FFGO|5497995|0|5497995|O 100%
20110706|FFGO|400400|0|700400|O 57%
20110711|FFGO|500000|0|1400000|O 35%
20110714|FFGO|1102699|0|1102699|O 100%
20110715|FFGO|300100|0|400100|O 75%
20110718|FFGO|10850000|0|10850000|O 100%
20110719|FFGO|74000000|0|74000000|O 100%
20110720|FFGO|54100000|0|54100000|O 100%
20110722|FFGO|30000000|0|30000000|O 100%
20110725|FFGO|10346500|0|10346500|O 100%
20110727|FFGO|2400100|0|3400100|O 70.5%

August 2011

20110801|FFGO|8900000|0|8900000|O 100%
20110803|FFGO|5550000|0|5550000|O 100%
20110804|FFGO|7000100|0|10325100|O 67%
20110805|FFGO|5573333|0|5723333|O 100%
20110808|FFGO|405800|0|405800|O 100%
20110809|FFGO|3400000|0|3500000|O 97.1%
20110811|FFGO|3279000|0|3279000|O 100%
20110812|FFGO|100100|0|100100|O 100%
20110815|FFGO|14500000|0|14500000|O 100%
20110816|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20110817|FFGO|10490000|0|10490000|O 100%
20110818|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110822|FFGO|467000|0|467000|O 100%
20110823|FFGO|55633600|0|55633600|O 100%
20110824|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20110825|FFGO|750000|0|750000|O 100%
20110829|FFGO|1500000|0|1500000|O 100%
20110831|FFGO|45327062|0|61885560|O 73.2%


September 2011

20110901|FFGO| 777000|0| 832000|O 93.3%
20110902|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20110908|FFGO|1920000|0|1920000|O 100%
20110909|FFGO|2500000|0|2500000|O 100%
20110913|FFGO|5000000|0|5299100|O 94.3%
20110914|FFGO|3000000|0|3000000|O 100%
20110923|FFGO|2000000|0|2320000|O 86.2%
20110928|FFGO|1000600|0|1125600|O 88.8%

Month totals: 20,197,600/20,996,700 96.1%

October 2011

20111003|FFGO|500000|0|500000|O 100%
20111004|FFGO|2000000|0|2000000|O 100%
20111005|FFGO|310000|0|590000|O 52.5%
20111006|FFGO|600000|0|1600000|O 37.5%
20111010|FFGO|100000|0|100000|O 100%
20111012|FFGO|2010000|0|2390000|O 84.1%
20111013|FFGO|2999999|0|2999999|O 100%
20111014|FFGO|4000000|0|4000000|O 100%
20111018|FFGO|8000000|0|11000000|O 72.7%
20111019|FFGO|1000000|0|1000000|O 100%
20111026|FFGO|2150000|0|2150000|O 100%


Month totals: 23,659,999/28329,999 83.5%

FFGO YEAR TO DATE

JAN 110,228,197/ 135,899,376
FEB 603,499,999/ 665,528,957
MAR 42,086,299/ 47,619,537
APR 55,046,743/ 57,719,305
MAY 71,734,677/ 77,653,022
JUN 49,116,056/ 49,366,056
JLY 189,497,794/ 191,797,794
AUG 168,375,995/ 188,509,493
SEP 20,197,000/ 20,996,700
OCT 23,659,999/28,329,999
Year to date totals

1,333,442.759/ 1,453,420,239 91.7% SHORT VOLUME for shares sold in 2011

regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20110324.txt
Total short volume since FINRA began publishing records in Nov. 2010:
1,774,250,838 short shares sold out of total volume of 2,018,993,454 or 87.9% of all shares sold were sold short!
Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



Rocket Man 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:15:05 PM

Re: lucvuillermoz post# 7327

Post # of 7340

I am still lurking. NMGL, filings in will be key!



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:10:14 PM

Re: Rocket Man post# 7328

Post # of 7340

NMGL - If we get filings, the game will change. Shorts will regroup, and shareholders will prevail!



Rocket Man 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:47:13 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 7329

Post # of 7340

NMGL~ Is the power at the helm..



Rocket Man 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:47:14 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 7329

Post # of 7340

NMGL~ Takes the power at the helm to get things done right..



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:48:20 PM

Re: Rocket Man post# 7330

Post # of 7340

NMGL - I LIKE OUR ODDS.



Rocket Man 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:49:43 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 7332

Post # of 7340

Gold takes time to trend.



SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:55:50 PM

Re: Rocket Man post# 7333

Post # of 7340

NMGL - Should get interesting if they finally FILE!



Rocket Man 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:58:43 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7324

Post # of 7340

RENS trades, and trending lower and lower, go figure.. lol I wonder when PENSON goes belly up, and everyone gets the picture on how to cover their positions if they figure making money on their failure is the way to go... PUT me in that category..



Rocket Man 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:00:19 AM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 7334

Post # of 7340

NMGL~ The Connections are key.. It is unlikely no filings will come.



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:02:32 AM

Re: Rocket Man post# 7336

Post # of 7340

Two negatives are a positive. LOL!

8-K!



Rocket Man 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 10:15:56 PM

Re: None

Post # of 3084

Oatman, in due time.



Rocket Man 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 12:03:10 AM

Re: Anvil post# 3080

Post # of 3084

RENS~ I hear the Same, just I hear that Mr. Wells is a figment of imagination..


SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 9:39:03 AM

Re: Rocket Man post# 3083

Post # of 3084

RENS - More attempts to shake investors out of their shares at a loss.

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:10:52 PM

Re: Maleficio post# 197442

Post # of 197451

Dividend process has not been canceled. Claims of cancelation are nothing more than a fantasy.

Do your DD!

Wyoming laws allow for the dividend process to proceed, and protects the process, regardless of dissolved status. email FINRA, they will tell you that the state of incorporation laws govern what a company can and can't do at all times.

Do not make investment decisions on sarcasm, inference, and/or conjecture.

Based upon my DD I am holding until the dividend is paid out.

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:13:39 PM

Re: Nitwit post# 197446

Post # of 197451

There is no dividend... - Nitwit

Now that is a fantasy!

8-K's filed with SEC state otherwise.

Good Luck!



mwab52   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:17:44 PM

Re: Nitwit post# 197443

Post # of 197451

But yet and still. Here we are. Hold onto those shares. (FFGO)




AlanC   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:26:50 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197439

Post # of 197451

Links to your claims? Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!




AlanC   

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:19:52 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 1010

Post # of 1014

SevenTenEleven: I don't think it will be necessary as I believe the criminals running rampant in our markets are about to be in for a rude awakening. Good always prevails over evil although at times good is frustratingly slow. Go GNCP!!!




SevenTenEleven 

Saturday, March 31, 2012 8:24:07 PM

Re: AlanC post# 1012

Post # of 1014

"bona fide" market makers have been stealing from investors for years. Time for companies and investors to fight back.



AlanC   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:47:25 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 1013

Post # of 1014

The SEC is useless. Time to prosecute some folks there from the top down. With proper leadership most of the fraud could be stopped quickly:

http://satwavespro.com/2011/11/23/the-gaming-of-sirius-xm-siri-through-dark-pools/

Go GNCP!!!



AlanC   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:30:35 PM

Re: overachiever post# 7340

Post # of 7341

Got a newer hit piece? Go NMGL!!!



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-02 09:51:01)

Offline

 

#1471 2012-04-02 09:21:04

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879


The big time   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:48:40 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149657

Post # of 149688

Yes and that is a problem for the Brokers. Even those shares are not enough to cover the naked short position.

January 11, 2006, the Oklahoma County District Court enters an “Order Approving Settlement Agreement”, which settles the claims between the Company, Mario Pino, his associates and affiliated entities, Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. and JH Darbie &Co.

In accordance with the settlement, the Company is owed certain sums in respect of the proceeds received through the sale of invalidly issued shares of common stock, and the Company issues 25,025,000 shares of common stock to JH Darbie &Co. and 219,723,000 shares of common stock to Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. for an aggregate sum of 244,748,000 shares to be deposited with the DTCC in satisfaction of JH Darbie &Co.’s and Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C.’s short positions.



janice shell 

Sunday, April 01, 2012 4:05:27 PM

Re: The big time post# 149658

Post # of 149688

Thanks for digging that up. But I'll ask again: who was supposed to deposit those shares with DTCC, Darbie and Capital Growth, or BCIT?

And why did that apparently not happen?



The big time   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:11:20 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149661

Post # of 149688

It did happen. The Transfer Agent delivered the certificates. Not sure what happened after that but the Market Makers had the Certificated Shares. They have been requested to return them to be replaced with 205 certs.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:12:15 AM

Re: The big time post# 149670

Post # of 149688

Then why does CH say DTCC doesn't have nearly that many shares?



The big time   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:26:24 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149671

Post # of 149688

They don't. The DTCC certainly does not have the certificated shares. I would think they would want to check with Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. and JH Darbie &Co. since the TA issued those certificated Shares. Actually whoever does have certificated shares not ending in 205 they should be returned to the TA so they can be exchanged for the 205 share certificates. I believe that Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. and JH Darbie &Co should return the Certs they have to TA so the new 205 certs could be issued and then those certs should be delivered to the DTCC. Even that will not cover the short position though since other Market Makers decided to naked short BCIT and now they have no certificates to back up those trades. What a tangled web we weave. They did anyway not the company. The company has been working hard to unravel this mess.




janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:29:08 AM

Re: The big time post# 149672

Post # of 149688

The company ISSUED 245 million shares as a result of the settlement of the Darbie suit. So why didn't they go to DTCC, when that was supposed to happen?

I'm not sure you're taking my point.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:40:02 AM

Re: The big time post# 149672

Post # of 149688

I'm sorry. Your explanation makes no sense to me. The certs were supposed to be sent to DTCC. Why didn't that happen?



The big time   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:49:07 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149674

Post # of 149688

How am I supposed to know that? Unfortunately I am NOT paid to post on here 24/7 so if you want to research that I would love to find out what you uncover. The shares have been issued by the TA that has been confirmed although it is my understanding that the TA (which was Pacific at the time) should have issued the 205 certificates but the old inactive Cusip was issued instead. Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. and JH Darbie &Co. have been told and instructed to return them. I am not going to go in circles on this Ms. Shell. This is like discussing the Sharholder lawsuit with you. The fact is pretty clear there is a huge Naked Short position. How big that naked short position is???....no one really knows for sure. CH has been working diligently to uncover that actual number or at least boiling it down as well as we can. In the meantime we push on.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:55:51 AM

Re: The big time post# 149675

Post # of 149688

Capital Growth Financial, L.L.C. and JH Darbie &Co. have been told and instructed to return them.

Rather than send them to DTCC? WOW, that's interesting.




hurley cruppers   

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:46:08 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149659

Post # of 149688

Wow, DTCC has only 645K shares and you ask that js ??? Maybe you mean an April Fools joke by that statement. jmho
I almost want to puke that that statement is so abs...

you said

janice shell


Share

Sunday, April 01, 2012 3:49:42 PM

Re: The big time post# 149658

Post # of 149680

Why on earth is is a problem for DTCC and the brokers? It was the defendants who were ordered to surrender the stock.



allezlOM   

Monday, April 02, 2012 8:17:01 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149688

Recent Court Victory against E*Trade will be followed by others...and that`s fact smile



itsmikie   

Monday, April 02, 2012 8:42:09 AM

Re: allezlOM post# 149682

Post # of 149688

Not only will it be a fact, it will be an instrument in proving fraud in some Major statements in possible Federal courts.





AlanC

Monday, April 02, 2012 8:43:49 AM

Re: allezlOM post# 149682

Post # of 149688

Will BCIT slay the DTCC dragon or is BCIT the dragon?


DTCC annual financial report 2010 cover includes a dragon and the following caption.

About the cover
There Be Dragons (TBD) Medieval mapmakers would often write the initials "TBD" in the corners of maps they drew up for explorers. TBD stood for the expression, "There Be Dragons," which was the mapmakers' way of saying they had no idea what was out there at the edge of the known world, but it was unquestionably dangerous.

Sounds like a threat to anyone that would like to explore their activities.

Here is the cover

Introduction

We are rapidly entering a period of transformational change in financial services, as policymakers and regulators fundamentally rewrite rules governing risk mitigation globally.

There are no clear navigational maps on this journey. Like those before us, we have essentially sailed to the end of the map - of the known world.

DTCC is moving with great focus and speed to reexamine and enhance our own internal risk controls, to work with customers and regulators to help control systemic risks and to see where our centralized infrastructure can provide data to effectively support regulators, while minimizing costs of regulatory compliance to our users.

This year, our Annual features some of the great explorers to remind us that throughout history, we have faced uncertainty. But trusting in our resolve to innovate, willingness to collaborate and our commitment to explore new destinations, we have endured to achieve amazing new discoveries.


About the cover

There Be Dragons (TBD) Medieval mapmakers would often write the initials "TBD" in the corners of maps they drew up for explorers. TBD stood for the expression, "There Be Dragons," which was the mapmakers' way of saying they had no idea what was out there at the edge of the known world, but it was unquestionably dangerous.

http://www.dtcc.com/about/annuals/2010/index.php



allezlOM   

Monday, April 02, 2012 8:44:58 AM

Re: itsmikie post# 149683

Post # of 149688

Seven years later now, master word was NSS now we are in a FRAUD mode...much more incidence against brokers, much value for shareholders.



allezlOM   

Monday, April 02, 2012 9:12:32 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149688

285 Millions shares traded after DTCC Notice August 11, 2005...backed with Certificates as it would be ? Very doubtful for the least !



The big time   

Monday, April 02, 2012 9:39:57 AM

Re: hurley cruppers post# 149681

Post # of 149688

It must have all been an April Fools joke. We all know that CEDE AND COMPANY only have 645,000 shares. Not nearly enough to provide certificates for the shareholders. Not nearly enough by such a very very very very very very large margin.



THESirCharles   

Monday, April 02, 2012 10:04:50 AM

Re: None

Post # of 149688

Here's what needs to happen next :

Five brokerages each got a certificate for 500 Shares of BCIT, duly issued by the valid active Transfer Agent of BCIT and bearing the valid, active recognised CUSIP of 05968X205.

Every account holder with 500 or more BCIT shares in their account at one or more of those brokerages can now make a valid legal claim to ownership of that one single 500-Share Certificate now in possession by that brokerage.

So, for example.... every E*Trade customer with 500 or more BCIT shares in their account - as duly accounted for and recognised by E*Trade - needs to assert in no uncertain terms that - having bought and paid for good BCIT shares - they now make a valid, legal claim upon that one single 500-Share Certificate. And ask E*Trade to REGISTER that 500-Share Certificate in their - the Account Holder's name - and be put in E*Trade's local safekeeping. And then demand that E*Trade secure the remaining balance of BCIT Shares they are owed, as well.

And those with BCIT shares in their accounts at the other four brokerages need to do likewise.

So, let's see..... let's say E*Trade has 1000 customers each holding 500 or more BCIT Shares. ALL 1000 of those customers can now assert a valid, legal claim to that ONE, SINGLE 500-Share Certificate now in E*Trade's possession. Plus the remaining balance of their Shares, of course.

1000 accounts.... all with a valid, legal claim to that one, single, 500-Share Cert.

Yeah, should get real interesting, real fast !



Joda   

Monday, April 02, 2012 10:44:38 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149673

Post # of 149689

Nope, don't think too many investors in BCIT are taking your point(s)

As most either do not agree with you or believe what you are trying to convince us of.

As no one has really taken the advice you have efforted to post here for 7 years.
If we did take your advice from the past, we would not be here still today.

So considering you have been wrong in your assertions for 7 years, please do not be offended when we continue to NOT believe what you post.

If this upsets you then that is not any BCIT investors problem, it is yours.

Sorry, but we owe you no explanations, and our future is not incumbent on your agreement or understanding.

Quite to the contrary as these 7 years have proved.




mezjef   

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:07:27 AM

Re: Joda post# 149689

Post # of 149693

Bravo Joda.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
JS, move to another board - we don't need you, but maybe you need us!!!!!! I hear that people are being paid to try & turn us.
We are breaking down this wall brick by brick & there is nothing you can do about it.
I hope the brokers realise just how determined we all are & how much this is gonna cost them.
All IMHO, of course.



zxc 

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:14:09 AM

Re: realwood post# 149690

Post # of 149693

A reality check is in order for you. The lawsuit was not initiated on her advice. No one is taking her advice for anything!



zxc   
Monday, April 02, 2012 11:20:05 AM

Re: realwood post# 149692

Post # of 149695

So??? You don't think he should get paid for what he is doing? The difference is, he's getting paid to go after the crooks, whereas some get paid to defend the them.


mezjef   

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:20:44 AM

Re: realwood post# 149692

Post # of 149697

CH isn't trying to turn us, he is helping us break down this wall - where have you been !!!!!
Everything we have achieved in the last 6 months has been with CH at the helm. He is the one knocking out those bricks.
Of course he is getting paid - I was under the impression Megas had hired him - surely that means that Megas is paying him !!!! It is his job - he's not going to do this out the kindness of his heart is he!!!! He must have put in lots of hours to get this far, so of course he would be paid for that.
Thanks CH for everything you & your team are doing.



buddyglass_00   

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:22:02 AM

Re: zxc post# 149693

Post # of 149698

WOW. Very innovative.

Now you guys are pretending to argue among yourselves while still advancing a negative outlook on BCIT.

Man, that takes some thinking outside of the box.

Coordination, too.

Reminder: I get one post a day, so can't answer your open-ended replies.

00



Joda   

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:32:33 AM

Re: zxc post# 149694

Post # of 149704

We should try and keep the conversation focused on the points that matter to REAL BCIT investors.

Many keep wanting to bring the focus of conversation into the past, and other non-relevant points. that are contrary to the position BCIT has today.

As with most stocks some investors are short and some are long. So if the topic of conversation is for the benefit of the Longs, why should we let the Shorts dominate or steer the topic of conversation?

Many times this will be done by the Shorts stating some fact that others disagree with. The only purpose is to rile up some, so that they respond and the conversation is then directed toward that topic.
Pretty clever actually.

But being a Long, I am most interested in what is happening for the Longs, not the Shorts...

And that is the conversation we should be having, not the topics the Naked Shorts wish us to discuss...

Don't be fooled!



mezjef   

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:35:48 AM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 149714

Since they are offering both that means they are on both sides of fence, basher(refund)

I havn't seen CH offering a refund !!!!!

If a refund is the best on offer at the end of all this, then I will accept it from my broker (not CH) but I will not be taking that route for some time yet, & if I take a refund that will be my choice not because I have been told it is my only option by JS.

I will be following all advice given by CH. I know early on that they said a refund may well be the best result but things have changed since then & there is more info out there so I am following CH & Megas to the end of this.

Go BCIT



weebie 

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:36:04 AM

Re: Joda post# 149704

Post # of 149714

Also, ever notice how the same people keep asking the same questions to which they already know the answers?

Gotta keep BCIT topics current and moving forward



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:38:28 AM

Re: Joda post# 149689

Post # of 149714

As no one has really taken the advice you have efforted to post here for 7 years.

That's odd. I can't recall ever having given any advice.





janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:40:11 AM

Re: realwood post# 149690

Post # of 149715

The Etrade lawsuit proves that some are taking her advice to seek refund.

I'd say that was really CH's advice. If you go back to his earliest posts, you'll see he suggested people either go to small claims court asking for refunds, or request arbitration.

I did and do feel that a refund with interest would be a realistic and equitable solution.




Joda   

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:41:34 AM

Re: weebie post# 149707

Post # of 149715

Of course, I mean come on...

If people will let others manipulate them, then they have only themselves to blame.

It is clear to all here who is on whose side.

The Naked Illegal Shorts only have damaged arguments left, so they have to keep rehashing and bringing up old news...

IT'S ALL THEY GOT!!!

It is your choice to allow them dominance of the conversation or not,

But if you let them to do this with the conversation, you have only yourself to blame...

Don't let them suck you into useless discussions about bcit, as it helps them to steer the conversation away from the progress being made.

The choice is yours, this is the BCIT board and we are it's Investors.




weebie 

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:43:02 AM

Re: janice shell post# 149709

Post # of 149715

suggestive persuasion...

janice shell
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:11:19 PM
Re: camper9 post# 148136
Post # of 149711
As I've said before, I think a refund with interest would be an equitable solution.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:51:40 AM

Re: weebie post# 149712

Post # of 149715

In what way could that be construed as "advice"? Looks like a simple expression of opinion to me.

This, however, is advice. From CH:

WE said before get certs or your money back.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=67645129


CarltonH 

Monday, October 03, 2011 5:11:39 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 138591

Post # of 149715

WE said before get certs or your money back.
So far nobody has either and judging from the resistance we are encountering there is a bit of a fight left.

Then wait to see what happens after that.


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-02 10:56:56)

Offline

 

#1472 2012-04-02 09:50:11

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111


diamondguru-one   

Sunday, April 01, 2012 10:00:16 AM

Re: ctrumabll post# 197424

Post # of 197466

where else in this market place would you make "3400%" on your money in a few years ????? Bank ??? Stocks ??? naaaaaah...I'll wait my turn... "SUPER 8k FILING" will explain it to YOU FULLY !!! happy trails....

"3400%" ROI !!!! I can wait......



Lebron23   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:13:48 AM

Re: None

Post # of 197466

Dividend Locked and Loaded...A Brilliant Dawn awaits FFGO stockholders!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



kazorchian   

Monday, April 02, 2012 4:54:18 AM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 197456

Post # of 197466

you wanna leave close the door behind you I'm staying behind...see what develops...



AlanC

Monday, April 02, 2012 7:15:42 AM

Re: kazorchian post# 197457

Post # of 197466

Nobody can leave, nobody! Both the longs and the shorts are locked in and their is no escape until the Super 8K is filed. Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



AlanC

Monday, April 02, 2012 9:42:00 AM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197461

Post # of 197466

Gotcha and thanks! Well done not even a minute! lol Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



OldBen 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:17:37 PM

Re: ctrumabll post# 197463

Post # of 197473

There is plenty to work with. Remember those NMGL A&B's that WD has? With FFGO as a static entity, it should be very easy to distribute the NMGL A&B's to all FFGO shareholders.

This simple distribution would expose the huge NSS that exists and would have many many defendants who could claim damages as they did not receive their real actual shares. A settlement would have to occur. As I have said before, this is not over in the slightest. Settlement(s) will occur.

After the NSS settlement, there could still be a cash buyer for the mines. Then, even the dividend could be paid.

As AlanC suggests, the discontinuation of FINRA and REG SHO reporting point to a settlement underway already to settle the NSS and other issues surrounding FFGO.

No one has written off their shares. No one has given up.

Long shareholders can see that there is a lot left to develop...



Lebron23   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:35:12 PM

Re: alien42 post# 197470

Post # of 197473

i suggest dd should be done on liquidating dividend for a revoked stock




5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-02 11:46:48)

Offline

 

#1473 2012-04-02 17:30:31

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879


janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 11:57:50 AM

Re: Joda post# 149704

Post # of 149796

Many times this will be done by the Shorts stating some fact that others disagree with.

Opinions are open to debate. Facts are facts.

And I really don't think there're any shorts here on this board.



camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:00:03 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149703

Post # of 149796

Who were those shares issued to?

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll ask the question again: By the terms of the settlement agreement between BCIT and Darbie et al., 245 million shares were issued by BCIT for cash, and should have been sent to CEDE. Evidently they were not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



mastaflash 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:00:08 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149716

Post # of 149796

And I really don't think there're any shorts here on this board. - Agree, unlikely. More like some who work on contract to those who are naked short...in particular the brokers.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:01:49 PM

Re: camper9 post# 149717

Post # of 149796

They were issued to Darbie and Capital Growth.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:03:29 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149718

Post # of 149796

More like some who work on contract to those who are naked short...in particular the brokers.

Even more unlikely. If the brokerages want to fight this, they'll use lawyers, not message board posters. Sheesh.



mastaflash 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:09:19 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149721

Post # of 149796

If the brokerages want to fight this, they'll use lawyers, not message board posters. Sheesh. - and that from the person at laughed at the suggestion the brokers read this board ( never mind using it as a source of info ). Actually there is proof of such, and it will come out at the appropriate time...stay tuned. Any ways, it is clear that SOMEONE is paying SOMEONE to paint BCIT, it shareholders, and it principles, in the darkest light possible.

Or are you suggesting it is for 'entertainment' purposes? LOLOLOISIMO!




camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:14:21 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149721

Post # of 149796

There's fighting it legally, and there's fighting popular opinion by trying to spin a perception.

Lawyers are good for the former, message board posting for the latter.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even more unlikely. If the brokerages want to fight this, they'll use lawyers, not message board posters. Sheesh.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:14:23 PM

Re: mastaflash post# 149722

Post # of 149796

Any ways, it is clear that SOMEONE is paying SOMEONE to paint BCIT, it shareholders, and it principles, in the darkest light possible.

No it isn't. Bad stocks and companies get dumped on every day. BCIT, of course, no longer trades, but it's still an interesting story.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:15:59 PM

Re: camper9 post# 149723

Post # of 149796

"Popular opinion" is of no importance. 383 people have this board marked. You think that makes any difference to anything?

In the end, the important decisions will be made by regulators and by judges. They won't be paying attention to anything said here.




camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:20:34 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149725

Post # of 149796

It makes a difference to the 383 people.

Just look at how hard you are trying to get the BCIT longs to settle for a refund.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You think that makes any difference to anything?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



THESirCharles   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:21:54 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 149796

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the brokerages don't care about the those 500 share certs, why would they?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Or so you - or, rather, your CrimNake PuppetMeisters - would have us believe.

Sorry, 'Veggie; the five brokers now have an enormous problem... for them; namely, they are now in possession of something upon which any and all of their customers holding BCIT in their Accounts can make a valid, legal claim.

"Yes, Your Honour, we were given possession of a valid, duly-issued Certificate for 500 Shares of BCIT. Yes, Your Honour, we have (choose any large number here) Accounts holding BCIT Shares they have bought and paid for and we settled in their Accounts on T+3. No, Your Honour, we don't know how we're going to satisfy all their valid, legal claims to this one, single 500-Share Certificate."

At which point His/Her Honour replies: "I'd say you have some serious Breach of Contract problems, brokerage firm. Perhaps even fraud is an appropriate word, but that remains for Another Day"




janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:23:54 PM

Re: camper9 post# 149726

Post # of 149796

What you perceive as my "effort" has been minimal. In the end, that decision is up to individual shareholders. And of course to judges or, alternatively, the brokerages.

Note that the brokerages are apparently unwilling--at least at this point--to offer refunds. So why on earth would they--as some suggest--be paying people to come here and propose that as a good solution?

Doesn't make any sense, does it?



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:27:37 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149727

Post # of 149796

Sorry, 'Veggie; the five brokers now have an enormous problem... for them; namely, they are now in possession of something upon which any and all of their customers holding BCIT in their Accounts can make a valid, legal claim.

Maybe they've already sent those certs back to the TA.



camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:32:51 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149728

Post # of 149796

As the evidence builds against the brokers, they see the refund as the cheapest way out of the fraudulent mess they created.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that the brokerages are apparently unwilling--at least at this point--to offer refunds. So why on earth would they--as some suggest--be paying people to come here and propose that as a good solution?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:34:33 PM

Re: camper9 post# 149731

Post # of 149796

They may or they may not; we don't know yet. I think it would be smart for them to do so, but they could have reasons for resisting.

The "fraudulent mess" you reference was created by a great many people.



camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:37:27 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149732

Post # of 149796

The fraudulent mess I was referring to was created by brokers selling BCIT shares they did not have.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "fraudulent mess" you reference was created by a great many people.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



THESirCharles   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:37:55 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149730

Post # of 149796

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe they've already sent those certs back to the TA.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Refusing to accept property that rightfully belongs to someone else, in this case their Customers, would be legal suicide.


"Yes Your Honour, we received a valid, duly-issued Certificate for 500 Shares of BCIT, but we sent it back because we didn't want to deal with the problem of which of our (same large number as from previous post) Customers it truly belonged to; all of them with 500 or more shares of BCIT in their Accounts, bought and paid for and settled by us on T+3, have a valid, legal claim on that one, single 500-Share Certificate. So, we just sent it back so we could pretend and extend the mess we got ourselves into."

And His/Her Honour replied: "I think I'm going to PUKE!"




janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:43:39 PM

Re: camper9 post# 149733

Post # of 149796

So you prefer to leave out all the others who played a role? Perhaps a judge would want to see the whole picture.




camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:43:41 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149734

Post # of 149796


It is truly interesting the extent to which the brokers are going in order to deny delivering to BCIT shareholders what they purchased.

The brokers have said that the company doesn't exist - yet the brokers turn down stock certificates sent to them by the company.

The brokers have said that the company does not have a transfer agent - yet the brokers receive stock certificates from the very transfer agent they say does not exist.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And His/Her Honour replied: "I think I'm going to PUKE!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:44:45 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149735

Post # of 149796

Of course, I'd include you as well. smile


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So you prefer to leave out all the others who played a role?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:45:27 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149734

Post # of 149796

Refusing to accept property that rightfully belongs to someone else, in this case their Customers, would be legal suicide.

I beg your pardon? The certs were cut with the brokerages' names on them. They were not accompanied by instructions to deposit them to any client's account.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:46:56 PM

Re: camper9 post# 149737

Post # of 149796

You probably would, but I'm afraid that won't get you anywhere. I only began posting here--at Art2Gecko's request--the day before the SEC suspended in 2005.



Iluvbbs   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:48:12 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149734

Post # of 149796

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:Maybe they've already sent those certs back to the TA.

Refusing to accept property that rightfully belongs to someone else, in this case their Customers, would be legal suicide.


"Yes Your Honour, we received a valid, duly-issued Certificate for 500 Shares of BCIT, but we sent it back because we didn't want to deal with the problem of which of our (same large number as from previous post) Customers it truly belonged to; all of them with 500 or more shares of BCIT in their Accounts, bought and paid for and settled by us on T+3, have a valid, legal claim on that one, single 500-Share Certificate. So, we just sent it back so we could pretend and extend the mess we got ourselves into."

And His/Her Honour replied: "I think I'm going to PUKE!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Check.....and MATE!!!!

This entire affair and how the shareholders got it stuck to them by the brokers has become so absurd that you just can not make this stuff up!!!

I want the "rights" to the book that has yet to be written.

Best to all, Steve




janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:50:17 PM

Re: Iluvbbs post# 149740

Post # of 149796

In the real world, any judge who responded in that manner in oral arguments would only be giving the defendants grounds for appeal.



padutch40   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:59:36 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149796

I wonder how many additional lawsuits against the brokers? The test case requested a refund, I doubt there will be any more of those. I would guess the next ones will ask for certs. Yes your Honor I would like certs with the current Cusip #205 thank you.




Iluvbbs   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:59:38 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149739

Post # of 149796



Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
at Art2Gecko's request
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Not true...he invited you here (as he posted to the rest of us somewhere 100 thousand posts ago) for an "opinion" of what you thought MIGHT (at the time) be going on here with the FRAUD of PINO and counterfeit shares in the market place....I feel absolutely certain, that if we could ask him today, that he never expected you to stick around 24/7 for 7 very long years......

NOT all of us were born yesterday,.....and of course, this is just "my opinion"

Best to all, Steve


5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-02 19:14:04)

Offline

 

#1474 2012-04-02 19:44:43

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Bancorp International Group Inc (fka BCIT)

Moderators:weebie, allezlOM, f1fans, camper9, AlexI, CarltonH

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3879


janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:04:53 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 149743

Post # of 149801

Plaintiffs in small claims courts can only seek monetary awards. To wit: a refund.

CH has said that some brokerages are trying to remove small claims suits to other courts. That would result in greater expenses for the plaintiffs, and in far more complex actions.




camper9   

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:05:54 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 149743

Post # of 149801

To my view, the first case against eTrade, and finding eTrade in breach of contract for not delivering the BCIT shares purchased, laid a good foundation for future cases. I agree that those future cases will more than likely be asking for stock certificates.


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The test case requested a refund, I doubt there will be any more of those. I would guess the next ones will ask for certs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:07:16 PM

Re: Iluvbbs post# 149744

Post # of 149801

I feel absolutely certain, that if we could ask him today, that he never expected you to stick around 24/7 for 7 very long years....

I don't think he'd be surprised at all. He knew that Jim and I often stick with stories for years. And he wasn't upset by anything I said. We exchanged a lot of information, publicly and privately.



padutch40   

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:17:20 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149745

Post # of 149801

Who said anything about small claims court?

And gosh, maybe the brokers can pay costs too.....golly...thanks..lol




janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:17:23 PM

Re: carrot_on_stick post# 149748

Post # of 149801

Yep. Though if they were sent to me, I'd consider them a Trojan horse, and they'd go back by return mail and a request to cancel.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:21:17 PM

Re: padutch40 post# 149749

Post # of 149801

The California suit was heard in small claims court. Higher courts, higher costs, and no guarantee that you'll win, either.

In small claims, it's not unusual for a judge to rule that the loser must pay costs, as she did in that case. Unfortunately it's very unusual in higher courts.



YOGI314   

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:28:22 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149739

Post # of 149801

Everyone hear has there reasons for posting about Bancorp BCIT and at times its fun to watch some who try to pretend what their intentions and motives are. Now I will try to ignore those who keep bringing up past as we have turned to a new page I have had enough onward and upward the only way we can move from where we are.
We have both kinds of posters here and after seven years I like the guys who have helped me personally to fight this wrong that has been commited win or lose the right thing to do is fight for what is right. Why some of you are here does not take a genious to figure out.

The planting of a seed in someone's mind does mean that you say something and the thoughts behind those words remain with the person you spoke to.

Is it positive or negative?

That depends. It can be either.

You can say harmful words, either on purpose or innocently, and raise doubt, confusion, fear - lots of negative emotions.

But you can also say something positive to someone and plant a new seed of inspiration and encouragement that gives them the idea to make changes or to do something totally new.

Stay positive there are many things happening and I for one am very appreciative



CarltonH 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:30:57 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149734

Post # of 149801

Maybe they've already sent those certs back
Who cares, the fact is that they were issued and took delivery of them.

Try telling a court that the cusip is 106 or that there are no paper certs or that Bancorp no longer exists.



CarltonH 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:33:42 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149738

Post # of 149801

The certs were cut with the brokerages' names on them. They were not accompanied by instructions to deposit them to any client's account.

Just like the certs in the name of Cede & Co



CarltonH 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:39:49 PM

Re: None

Post # of 149801

By the terms of the settlement agreement between BCIT and Darbie et al., 245 million shares were issued by BCIT for cash, and should have been sent to CEDE. Evidently they were not.

Yeah Janice has got it.
The responsibility to send them to cede & Co rests with Darbie and Co NOT the company.
The issuer has very limited participation with DTCC, in fact hardly any.
The TA is a limited participant so if either of those two sent the shares to DTCC they would be sent straight back.
The shares can only be deposited by the participant (Broker or shareholder)

Not a BCIT problem end of story



CarltonH 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:42:25 PM

Re: weebie post# 149756

Post # of 149801

Darbiie still hold approx 25 million restricted shares which were issued late 2005. These were supposed top have been returned to the TA when the unrestricted shares were ratified by the Ok court.

I am unable to comment further on this matter.



CarltonH 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:44:42 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149739

Post # of 149801

I only began posting here--at Art2Gecko's request--the day before the SEC suspended in 2005.

The secret to all great comedy is timing.



CarltonH 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:46:23 PM

Re: realwood post# 149714

Post # of 149801

Until more PR's are released nobody know the value of BCIT.

It is not PRs that determine value.



YOGI314   

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:47:23 PM

Re: op9171787 post# 149752

Post # of 149801

My broker told me Natinal Finacial Services got my money and electronically sent shares. I know NSF has a cert for 25,000,000 shares I asked my broker to make arrangments for transfering them through T/A as I know that can be done with proper athurization and instructions from each party ( my broker and NFS )to transfer agent this can be done. They tell me that the shares in question belong to other NFS customers. I asked how they new for sure if they did not make a request on my behalf ( no answer )smoke and mirrors. I believe enough of us have daming info from our brokers we need to continue to fight. DON'T GIVE UP



CarltonH

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:48:38 PM

Re: op9171787 post# 149760

Post # of 149801

Who got the money - the BROKERS or the MARKET MAKERS?

Who else could it have gone to?




CarltonH 

Monday, April 02, 2012 1:50:49 PM

Re: realwood post# 149765

Post # of 149801

OK agreed.
I believe that something will be going out in the next few weeks.



op9171787   

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:06:03 PM

Re: CarltonH post# 149764

Post # of 149801

?? i guess perhaps if in the
fresno small claims case, if Etrade HAD NOT received the money for the shares but only made a commission as a go-between, they would have said loud & clear to the judge that they did not get the money for the 'shares' and therefore should not be the party having to refund the money for the shares, but they didn't say that, correct?

i see the brokers as quite sinister in how they have naked shorted over the years...they would like the public to THINK that they are always just the middleman making just a commission, but with the naked shorting racket, they most often (at least) keep ALL THE FUNDS paid for the naked shorted shares.

it's sick, it's fraud, it MUST be punished severely...

BCIT must step up with the bunker busters very, very soon.



THESirCharles   

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:07:11 PM

Re: YOGI314 post# 149763

Post # of 149801

"National Financial Services" is the wholly-owned clearing subsidiary of Fidelity Investments; and, they clear for both Fidelity, itself, and other smaller brokerages.

I think it worth noting that neither Fidelity nor NFS were the recipient of a Certificate; and inquiring minds ought to be asking "Why?"



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:09:41 PM

Re: CarltonH post# 149755

Post # of 149801

Certs deposited with CEDE need to match up to accounts.

And while you're here: why weren't the Darbie and Capital Growth certs deposited with CEDE? Did they just never send them in for deposit? By that time, of course, the stock was no longer trading.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:12:47 PM

Re: CarltonH post# 149757

Post # of 149801

The TA is a limited participant so if either of those two sent the shares to DTCC they would be sent straight back.
The shares can only be deposited by the participant (Broker or shareholder)

Huh? Darbie and Capital Growth were brokerages.



janice shell

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:13:48 PM

Re: CarltonH post# 149759

Post # of 149801

You'd have to ask Art about that. If you can find him. But no doubt I have his original message to me somewhere.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:16:12 PM

Re: zxc post# 149761

Post # of 149801

For a broker to answer the judge's question: "Why did you send them back?", by saying: "I considered them a Trojan horse", would not look so good.

LOL!! I'm sure they'd come up with a better answer.



YOGI314   

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:30:08 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149770

Post # of 149801

I guess someone did not give it to them so who might be responsible for that? I could live with your best guess. My understanding is that NFS is supposed to have a cert for 25,000,000 shares I was even given the cert # I'd have to look through my personal info for that but I am sure there is a cert to them ending in 106.
Thanks



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:43:57 PM

Re: zxc post# 149777

Post # of 149802

"Rage" doesn't come into it. Not for them, and certainly not for their lawyers. They may make arguments none of us has anticipated.



THESirCharles   

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:03:32 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149778

Post # of 149802

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They may make arguments none of us has anticipated.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Yes, Your Honour, our dog ate the Certificate."

And His/Her Honour replied: "Now I KNOW I'm going to PUKE! Counselor? Would you be so kind as to let me use your brand-new $5000 Armani suit? Thanks!"



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:05:11 PM

Re: zxc post# 149779

Post # of 149802

What I'm saying is that attorneys are dispassionate. They don't get angry; they just do their job. Thinking they'll somehow lose it, and therefore lose the case, is an unrealistic expectation.

Never underestimate the opposition.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:07:12 PM

Re: THESirCharles post# 149781

Post # of 149802

Again, that's not how oral arguments work. Of course, oral arguments are on motions, and there may not even be any.



mastaflash 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:20:15 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149782

Post # of 149802

Never underestimate the opposition. - I would say you have done exactly that.



zxc   

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:25:05 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149782

Post # of 149802

I don't know whether English is your mother tongue or not, but it isn't mine. So, I re-read my post, and here is what it says, in part: "Returning the certs might serve the purpose of venting their rage...". The "rage" or "anger" was expressed by the broker's returning the certs, not the lawyers in court. Sorry, that's the best I can do to explain this to you with my limited English.



Iluvbbs   

Monday, April 02, 2012 4:22:03 PM

Re: zxc post# 149790

Post # of 149802

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's come to the point, where it's more than just the money. The wrong-doing of the greedy brokers has to be exposed and punished. If Megas, CH, and we make money on this deal, it's an additional bonus.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I could not have said what you wrote better myself. I am retired on a fixed income. I spent 8 grand back in the day to buy into a business that TM was trying to get off the ground here in the US by backing that business into the BCIT shell.
It has been 7 years now that I could have used that 8 thousand dollars towards a dozen different "other" projects or expenditures but be they the brokers or the MM's, someone else needed to use my money for other things, and I guess felt that they did not owe me an explaination of exactly where or on what, my money was spent.

Like you, I am at the point, I would love to have that 8 grand back at a very minimum, to use, for instance, on my daughters upcoming wedding..... BUT as every year has passed since 2005, this entire issue here with BCIT has become ENTIRELY about defending the principals of "right" vs. "wrong".

The detractors here about everything that BCIT and it's managers are alleged to have done wrong since before 2005, with operating a company improperly, and not reporting to it's shareholders are just that.....,"alledged".

What I try to remember, every day, is that, the CEO of the BCIT shell, Mr. Thomas Megas, after spending hundreds of thousands of dollars of his OWN money, back in the early days, in defense of a company that he did NOT have to defend, (he could have just walked away after the revocation), did NOT, and, in fact, stood his ground, and continued to fight back.

Not only is he fighting back (with MORE of his OWN money, I might add) today, but he hired one of the best "forensic" legal teams money could acquire in the country of England. That's what "forensic" teams do. They find out the TRUTH, without question, of WHY a situation, any situation, happened the way it did.

We have all waited 7 years, and we have all basically written our initial investments off, so now the fight, to me, and in my opinion, is strictly to find out the truth of how obvious improprieties, can actually happen while by still being protected by the rule of United States SEC laws???

Tell me I have drunk the kool-aid, I do not care, I just know within myself, after the kind of determination that TM has shown us all by "hiring" CH in the first place, I am seriously here till the sun sets on the "Saga of BCIT"

Best, Steve

IF anyone here, on this board, even wants to try to compete with THAT (TM)



Arkait1   

Monday, April 02, 2012 4:29:30 PM

Re: zxc post# 149790

Post # of 149802

zxc,Your English is perfectly understandable You must appreciate that Ms. Shell deliberately
tries to find any tiny fault the better to contradict any argument that is against the brokers.
It should not discourage you from posting, please I enjoy your posts



lollybella   

Monday, April 02, 2012 4:32:30 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149730

Post # of 149802

Doesn't matter IF the brokerage firms send back the 'good will' cert that BCIT sent them. It was to prove a point, IMHO. There ARE shares available! They NEED to go to Empire Transfer to reconcile our accounts and now they ALL have had proof IN THEIR HANDS that shares exist. It's time for the brokers to MAKE OUR ACCOUNTS RIGHT! THEY SOLD US SHARES, they SETTLED those shares and NOW I WANT MY LEGITIMATE PAPER CERTIFICATES!



lollybella   

Monday, April 02, 2012 4:34:37 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149739

Post # of 149802

Yes, that's true! And now, IMHO, I think you and Art are buddy buddy in this.



op9171787   

Monday, April 02, 2012 7:31:44 PM

Re: zxc post# 149790

Post # of 149802

we will have to make money if justice occurs, it's a part of what has to happen in the event justice is realized, we will have to make money. these basturds
cant just TAKE MONEY FROM PEOPLE, NOT GIVE THEM WHAT THEY BOUGHT, COVER IT UP, DEFLECT THEM FOR YEARS, and EXPECT TO JUST WALK AWAY, maybe throwing us some refund crumbs.

the brokers, DTCC, SEC, FINRA, have all been part of the problem in ENABLING naked short selling's hugely pervasive, obscene profits over the years.



op9171787   

Monday, April 02, 2012 7:35:44 PM

Re: lollybella post# 149793

Post # of 149803

the arrogance of these brokers is astounding. as if we have to BEG them to follow the LAW? WHERE IS LAW ENFORCEMENT?

skrew these filthy thieving scum - they are punk thieves, enabled & covered up by law enforcement & the idiots at the SEC.



janice shell 

Monday, April 02, 2012 8:11:54 PM

Re: poor broke bloke post# 149800

Post # of 149803

Real companies don't keep business plans Sooper Secrit.


weebie 

Monday, April 02, 2012 8:41:30 PM

Re: janice shell post# 149801

Post # of 149803

Secrets....Like brokerages telling us they sold us certificate-backed, real shares?



weebie 

Monday, April 02, 2012 9:09:39 PM

Re: realwood post# 149802

Post # of 149807

Excerpt from Nov 11, 2011 PR:

The company now intends to reactivate and focus on acquiring, managing, and developing operating rights in the gas, oil, and mineral sectors. To this end, the company is currently exploring the feasibility of a number of projects outside of the United States.



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Last edited by Bull Finch (2012-04-02 21:24:33)

Offline

 

#1475 2012-04-02 21:22:46

Bull Finch
Member
Registered: 2010-08-23
Posts: 1916

Re: Is this the company that will take the Naked Shortman down?

Fortress Financial Group (fka FFGO)

Moderators:underdog150, SevenTenEleven, Rocket Man, Vianna, TomSawyer, Mike2211

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=3111



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 5:15:47 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197477

Post # of 197496

It's clear FFGO has been praying for the revoking for some time.

In fact, I'll bet they were very surprised the SEC took so long to revoke the stock ..

word is ... - puppydotcom

So FFGO management wanted the stock to be revoked by the SEC?

Why would they "intentionally" want such a thing?

To "intentionally" get out of paying shareholders a 3449% dividend?

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 6:22:55 PM

Re: underdog150 post# 197479

Post # of 197496

What shorts are you talking about 7/10/11? I don't see any listed for FFGO. Please explain in detail, if possible. - underdog150

Un-reported and Under-reported shorts are the darndest thing, ain't they?

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 6:52:59 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 197484

Post # of 197496

now everyone can see where the words " fantasy NSS " came from
In the land of fantasy FFGO .. If one can't prove anything .. they simply make it up as a rumor or wild speculation ... to suit whatever needs work for them - puppydotcom

The only fantasy in FFGO-land are the claims that the dividend process has been canceled. Not one single filing or communication from the company since August 2010 to support such claims by those making them.

Good Luck!



mwab52   

Monday, April 02, 2012 6:59:26 PM

Re: ohlaws post# 197476

Post # of 197496

I think he will be laughing all the way to the bank jus like (FFGO) longs will. Btw! Ds'nt Lumb owns 17B (FFGO) shares? Thoughts? Hold onto those shorts. (FFGO)


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Puppy, do you think Lumb reads this board and laughs? He knows that this stock is done and over ... so he watches everyone fight about it the last 20 months? If I were him I'd be laughing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AlanC

Monday, April 02, 2012 7:18:04 PM

Re: mwab52 post# 197488

Post # of 197496

I agree that FFGO connected folks must be enjoying watching those who are a tad short squirm. Makes one wonder if they are holding back that super 8K because with the desperation in the posts of those who owe shares clearly showing, it makes up for some of the abuse they endured. Go FFGO!!!
Dividends of 3400%+ are worth waiting for!



paunch13   

Monday, April 02, 2012 7:27:18 PM

Re: AlanC post# 197489

Post # of 197496

AlanC
I just hope that when it is al over the shorts lose enough so that it takes them about 20 years stealing to get it back and it looks like it might , Maybe about 100 bilion would be a good start
John



mwab52   

Monday, April 02, 2012 8:22:22 PM

Re: A deleted message

Post # of 197496

We all are still waiting just like shorty. Hold onto those shares. (FFGO)



Bull Finch 

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:40:35 PM

Re: digger1 post# 1005

Post # of 1019

You Guys must Control a Big

Portion of the Float by now!

Must Feel Good to get in Heavy, and at the Bottom!


GNCP Security Details
Share Structure
Market Value1 $12,188,008 a/o Mar 30, 2012
Shares Outstanding 203,133,470 a/o Mar 12, 2012
Float 8,159,332 a/o Mar 12, 2012
Authorized Shares 500,000,000 a/o Oct 13, 2011
Par Value 0.00001

Shareholders
Shareholders of Record 68 a/o Feb 22, 2012

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GNCP/company-info

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/Info_Center.asp

http://www.gncc-capital.com/faq.php



digger1   

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:46:35 PM

Re: Bull Finch post# 1015

Post # of 1019

I would prefer to own more under 0.06 but I don't believe
that is going to happen. The word on this one is probably
getting out now so trying to get in " Heavy " as you put it
for a good price may be to late, still I'll sit back on the bid a catch what I can.



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:00:33 PM

Re: digger1 post# 1017

Post # of 1019

GNCP - Those shorting this and other Sloane affiliated plays will be hurting in a bad way soon enough.

Great to be the one holding the GOLD!

Tic Toc



AlanC

Monday, April 02, 2012 5:51:01 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 1018

Post # of 1019

FINRA short sales reported today for GNCP:

20120402|GNCP|63000|0|194845|O

32.3% of total volume today was short sales.
Go GNCP!!!



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:01:17 PM

Re: puppydotcom post# 7345

Post # of 7348

NMGL - When the company starts filing with the SEC, please make sure I am one of the first to know!

Tic Toc



Lebron23   

Monday, April 02, 2012 12:37:29 PM

Re: None

Post # of 3095

Nice volume on RENS....a buy at these prices imo



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:59:27 PM

Re: None

Post # of 3095

RENS - Speculating that NMGL will be getting their filings in order.

Things will be getting very sticky for the shorts sooner than later.



AlanC

Monday, April 02, 2012 5:41:08 PM

Re: SevenTenEleven post# 3088

Post # of 3095

FINRA short sales today for RENS:

20120402|RENS|37600|0|37600|O

100% of the volume today was short sales!
Go RENS!!!



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 6:21:08 PM

Re: AlanC post# 3091

Post # of 3095

Shorty keeps digging like he is looking for gold!

Tic Toc



Lebron23   

Monday, April 02, 2012 7:33:08 PM

Re: AlanC post# 3091

Post # of 3095

AlanC: After years and years, I should not be shocked. But I still am.
Unbelievable.
ps.....RENS could go up pretty fast if it ever got some real volume. It doesn't take much to make this puppy move!




Lebron23   

Monday, April 02, 2012 10:06:36 PM

Re: Fire Lane post# 3094

Post # of 3095

So...somebody bot over 35,000 shares today of a company that's out of business? lol



Lebron23   

Monday, April 02, 2012 2:29:20 PM

Re: Bull Finch post# 243

Post # of 251

Right....stjcapital.com kept alive for????????
Must be a reason to keep a domain name alive for a revoked stock.....at least it USED to be revoked.


SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:04:23 PM

Re: Lebron23 post# 245

Post # of 251

SJCH - I would be concerned if I were short on any and all of the sisters.

Will we see filings for one or more of them triggering increased panic for the shorts?

Tic Toc



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:08:53 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 247

Post # of 251

It appears that SJCH may not even be able to trade unless it regains Active Status with NV SOS...and there has been no rush by ex-management to do so. - RoadLessTraveled

Sorry! But my broker(s) are allowing buying for SJCH!

Good Luck!



SevenTenEleven 

Monday, April 02, 2012 3:31:58 PM

Re: RoadLessTraveled post# 249

Post # of 251

Since the SEC never answered my question about trading status of SJCH (or any other security with its business license revoked), I surmised that perhaps it was the likely explanation for the ongoing lack of SJCH trading. - RoadLessTraveled

Yep! Placed an order to buy 1000 shares at $0.25. Order sat open for a few days before I pulled it.

Good Luck!



5T WD haha

BMFL<OD

next week(s) is here

Who's Next!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuWXRZe9yA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQBLi5mukmI


Shortmans Anthem!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRge7lXu56E

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB