Comments on: An Overview of Deep Capture

By: iStandUp

iStandUp — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:42:50 +0000

I used FireFox for years, and have not seen any issues with viewing this website.

What version of FireFox are you using?

By: nobody

nobody — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:15:47 +0000

Might wanna fix yer web site–looks like a pile of steaming crap on Firefox browser.

By: Kris Dannon

Kris Dannon — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:08:42 +0000

Many thanks for the work and talents that you must have spent in assembling this excellent site. It seems the sort of thing many of us would want to do but simply dont know where to start… yet you have made quite an admirable start creating an ethical and intellectual oasis in an era of economic subterfuge where honesty and good will are often passed over for quick profits.

Please know that as long as your site exists it will serve as a light in the darkness for me and most likely many others. I will keep reading.. always inspired and inquisitive. Kris Dannon

By: me

me — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:30:49 +0000

there is another part of this scam. Its the copyright, patent, and state grant of monopoly part.

Without monopoly the global economy cannot exist, because to make it work, the global economy must have a monopoly on its goods and services worldwide.. produce in the cheapist place, the products the world must buy.

The merger of the Banking and Security into one scamming industry could only have happened if the firms had in place the monopolies they needed to fit the need of the market.

By: Stuart M.

Stuart M. — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:17:41 +0000

Dr. Byrne,

Full credit to you for your levels of transparency in the accounting and reporting of your company. I respect the way you have not letting sleeping dogs lie in regards to the naked short selling and front running against overstock.

I understand that your actions will have made you more of a target by some in Wall St. Yet, even with all the teaming up and posturing that some in the finance media and on Wall Street are throwing in your direction, you are coming across as authentic and logical in your arguments, where in contrast some of the pundits put up against you, are coming across as vague and with counter-arguments of zero substance.

As you must know, it is your integrity, backed up by financials that will lead to success for you and your company. As a word of encouragement, from my perspective you interview well as an honest and successful CEO. I believe the vast majority who watched these interviews will have had the same impressions.

I wish you all the best with your company. The model and strategy you are following, focused on the longterm growth of the company, makes a lot of sense to me. It seems that you are now coming from a phase of growth, at the cost of some early profits, to a phase of growth, built on critical mass. Perhaps this is the year where some profits can be afforded at the net basis level to build goodwill with your stockholders.

I believe in your strategy, and more importantly find you believable, and will be backing this up with a buy order of some stock.

Best regards,
Stuart

By: J Cowgill

J Cowgill — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:32:14 +0000

God bless you for the History Is Made/CNBC article. SEC should hire the deaf to watch old MadMoney clips to have them interpret Cramer’s handsignals; e.g., note continuing U-U-P signals pre-US$ bottom. CRAMER A FUCKING CRIMINAL.

By: anthony montez

anthony montez — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:43:03 +0000

great motivation Mr. Byrne

By: anthony montez

anthony montez — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:41:41 +0000

and grab the landstock and water rights if any shares arent yours or you dont influence making profitable 4 vaporshares or shareshame or sociolinguistics 4 that massmatter

By: anthony montez

anthony montez — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 19:34:54 +0000

ive seen corruption to i my apology for your last question today and hope fully there is an ideasoverstock.me beating the odds dot long trip

By: Imaginos1892

Imaginos1892 — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:14:10 +0000

Something you wrote in another article gave me a fiendish idea – a way to bring these shenanigans to a grinding halt – make the broker’s fee contingent on delivery of the stock. As financial practices stand now, brokers willingly give a “wink and a nod” on uncompleted stock transactions because they get their cut up front, and the sale of nonexistent stock increases transaction volume and thus their profits. They should be forced to change their practices and wait until the transaction is completed. The brokers get paid when the stock is delivered.

It’s simple, logical, and it makes stock transactions conform to the same practices as others. Real estate agents get their commissions after the sale is complete, banks get origination fees after the loan funds – there are many other examples. Of course they will kick and scream, but that may be the one place they can be hit.
————————-
I propose calling the undelivered stock “Vaporshares”.