<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Capture&#8221; Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/</link>
	<description>Independent investigations into illegal naked short selling.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:50:55 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-171996</link>
		<dc:creator>C Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/#comment-171996</guid>
		<description>Very useful article. Thankyou very much Mr. Byrne. I look forward to seeing the movie Deep Capture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful article. Thankyou very much Mr. Byrne. I look forward to seeing the movie Deep Capture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D McGinness</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-148018</link>
		<dc:creator>D McGinness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/#comment-148018</guid>
		<description>Dr. Byrne,

I have to agree with John Horne above.  Your are sometimes hard to follow and following the information as you have presented it is some disjointed.

The gist of the situation all boils down to that in every aspect of our life, there is in one way or another a &quot;good ole boys club.&quot;  Whether it be in the financial sector, the professions, or the guy whose buddy helped get him a job. 

I&#039;m still reading the material you have presented, so where you are headed to the point I am now in the material, may not be where you end.  

I do readily believe the financial markets have used their extreme power (leverage) to manipulate legislation to the favor.  They sure wouldn&#039;t do it to obtain unfavorable outcomes!

But if you&#039;re headed down the path of Milton Friedman that unfettered markets are the answer, I will vehemently disagree.  Greenspan&#039;s model was &quot;flawed,&quot; because he failed to factor in man&#039;s greed.  A vice for which there is no cure.  

Madison clearly understood that power must be balanced equally and SEPARATED.

Regulation is required - our mistake has been in not separating those who regulate from those require regulation, including the legislatures who enact those laws.  Donations to PACs should be limited to beginning of year contributions and contributions should be made immediately available to the public.  I&#039;d like to see it go a step further and prohibit contributions by those industries to those on committees that serve their interests.  But since our legislators make the laws, that will never happen - be it GOP or Dem.

Eliminating regulation may end &quot;capturing,&quot; but, as we&#039;ve seen as recently as King Peanut Butter, ending regulation is not the answer.  Investors demand profits at all costs and CEO&#039;s have to deliver those profits, even if it means hiring their own inspectors to meet FDA requirements (which, of course, they weren&#039;t).

Until we figure out a way to keep separate these entities, we will always have these problems.

And that, unfortunately, is a dilemma that will probably never be solved, as there no longer seem to be ethical people operating within the ruling class of our society. 

We will soon find ourselves sitting in the ashes, like Rome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Byrne,</p>
<p>I have to agree with John Horne above.  Your are sometimes hard to follow and following the information as you have presented it is some disjointed.</p>
<p>The gist of the situation all boils down to that in every aspect of our life, there is in one way or another a &#8220;good ole boys club.&#8221;  Whether it be in the financial sector, the professions, or the guy whose buddy helped get him a job. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still reading the material you have presented, so where you are headed to the point I am now in the material, may not be where you end.  </p>
<p>I do readily believe the financial markets have used their extreme power (leverage) to manipulate legislation to the favor.  They sure wouldn&#8217;t do it to obtain unfavorable outcomes!</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;re headed down the path of Milton Friedman that unfettered markets are the answer, I will vehemently disagree.  Greenspan&#8217;s model was &#8220;flawed,&#8221; because he failed to factor in man&#8217;s greed.  A vice for which there is no cure.  </p>
<p>Madison clearly understood that power must be balanced equally and SEPARATED.</p>
<p>Regulation is required &#8211; our mistake has been in not separating those who regulate from those require regulation, including the legislatures who enact those laws.  Donations to PACs should be limited to beginning of year contributions and contributions should be made immediately available to the public.  I&#8217;d like to see it go a step further and prohibit contributions by those industries to those on committees that serve their interests.  But since our legislators make the laws, that will never happen &#8211; be it GOP or Dem.</p>
<p>Eliminating regulation may end &#8220;capturing,&#8221; but, as we&#8217;ve seen as recently as King Peanut Butter, ending regulation is not the answer.  Investors demand profits at all costs and CEO&#8217;s have to deliver those profits, even if it means hiring their own inspectors to meet FDA requirements (which, of course, they weren&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Until we figure out a way to keep separate these entities, we will always have these problems.</p>
<p>And that, unfortunately, is a dilemma that will probably never be solved, as there no longer seem to be ethical people operating within the ruling class of our society. </p>
<p>We will soon find ourselves sitting in the ashes, like Rome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mullany</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-144166</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mullany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/#comment-144166</guid>
		<description>The capture issue is totally obvious to any one.  Only Harvard PHD&#039;s  would not see it.!  Or the Chigago crowd, which scares me for the next 4 yrs. The wall street crooks, the press, the &quot;JOURNALISTS&quot;, the GOVERNMENT, the regulators, the SEC, ...we have been brought down by the same thing that has killed the USSR.  OH the irony!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The capture issue is totally obvious to any one.  Only Harvard PHD&#8217;s  would not see it.!  Or the Chigago crowd, which scares me for the next 4 yrs. The wall street crooks, the press, the &#8220;JOURNALISTS&#8221;, the GOVERNMENT, the regulators, the SEC, &#8230;we have been brought down by the same thing that has killed the USSR.  OH the irony!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhelburn</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-140122</link>
		<dc:creator>mhelburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/#comment-140122</guid>
		<description>This was posted on the Georgetown University site. 

Richard Sauer

Adjunct Professor; Partner, Vinson &amp; Elkins LLP
B.A., University of California (Davis); J.D., Loyola of Los Angeles; LL.M., S.J.D., Harvard

Address: 
 600 New Jersey Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20001 
 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biography

B.A., University of California (Davis); J.D., cum laude, Loyola of Los Angeles; LL.M., S.J.D., Harvard. Professor Sauer is a Partner at Vinson &amp; Elkins LLP. Recently, he was the Assistant Director of the Division of Enforcement in the Securities and Exchange Commission. As assistant director, he is involved in the investigation and resolution of major financial fraud, market manipulation, and insider trading cases. He has also served as Branch Chief and Senior Attorney in the Division of Enforcement and as Senior Attorney for the Bureau of Consumer Protection in the Federal Trade Commission. Professor Sauer has also served as as Adjunct Professor for Catholic University. He writes frequently on issues involving financial fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was posted on the Georgetown University site. </p>
<p>Richard Sauer</p>
<p>Adjunct Professor; Partner, Vinson &amp; Elkins LLP<br />
B.A., University of California (Davis); J.D., Loyola of Los Angeles; LL.M., S.J.D., Harvard</p>
<p>Address:<br />
 600 New Jersey Avenue N.W.<br />
Washington, DC 20001 </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Biography</p>
<p>B.A., University of California (Davis); J.D., cum laude, Loyola of Los Angeles; LL.M., S.J.D., Harvard. Professor Sauer is a Partner at Vinson &amp; Elkins LLP. Recently, he was the Assistant Director of the Division of Enforcement in the Securities and Exchange Commission. As assistant director, he is involved in the investigation and resolution of major financial fraud, market manipulation, and insider trading cases. He has also served as Branch Chief and Senior Attorney in the Division of Enforcement and as Senior Attorney for the Bureau of Consumer Protection in the Federal Trade Commission. Professor Sauer has also served as as Adjunct Professor for Catholic University. He writes frequently on issues involving financial fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Horne Arch. Em.</title>
		<link>http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/comment-page-1/#comment-10783</link>
		<dc:creator>John Horne Arch. Em.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepcapture.com/a-general-theory-of-capture/#comment-10783</guid>
		<description>good morning Dr. Byrne
ABSTRACT   Critical realism and integrated insights of social psychology evolve a situational character that is influenced by the irrational actor, the law, and economic movement.  Market actors make this complex as they understand and exploit it to the extent that they deep capture the situational character…..
In my effort to integrate insights of social psychology with the gold standard, I find that, Mr. Byrne, laudatory as you may be, your efforts are middle of the ladder.  Your writing, sometimes hard to read and follow, leaves me feeling a bit empty.  Who is capturing the Captors -- -- -- who are the captured capturing?  Is the American consumer not captured by the stock market?  How does the gold standard capture the United States dollar and other paper currencies?
I think you have a wonderful story and I am still reading on it.   It&#039;s kind  of like the Bible, seems like it has a lot of begats or equal. It is just my very small opinion, but I think you need to work on the beginning and the end.  Perhaps, I have exceeded my boundaries. No offense meant.
Peace
John Horne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good morning Dr. Byrne<br />
ABSTRACT   Critical realism and integrated insights of social psychology evolve a situational character that is influenced by the irrational actor, the law, and economic movement.  Market actors make this complex as they understand and exploit it to the extent that they deep capture the situational character…..<br />
In my effort to integrate insights of social psychology with the gold standard, I find that, Mr. Byrne, laudatory as you may be, your efforts are middle of the ladder.  Your writing, sometimes hard to read and follow, leaves me feeling a bit empty.  Who is capturing the Captors &#8212; &#8211; &#8212; who are the captured capturing?  Is the American consumer not captured by the stock market?  How does the gold standard capture the United States dollar and other paper currencies?<br />
I think you have a wonderful story and I am still reading on it.   It&#8217;s kind  of like the Bible, seems like it has a lot of begats or equal. It is just my very small opinion, but I think you need to work on the beginning and the end.  Perhaps, I have exceeded my boundaries. No offense meant.<br />
Peace<br />
John Horne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
